Skip to content

[LDAP] Revamp LDAP options with nested options definition #28839

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2018

Conversation

yceruto
Copy link
Member

@yceruto yceruto commented Oct 12, 2018

Q A
Branch? master
Bug fix? no
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets -
License MIT
Doc PR -

Next move after #27291 :)

This will work exactly that before, nothing change regarding behavior, BUT now we've less code and intuitive definition of nested options.

@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Oct 12, 2018

Thank you @yceruto.

@fabpot fabpot merged commit a26c284 into symfony:master Oct 12, 2018
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2018
…n (yceruto)

This PR was merged into the 4.2-dev branch.

Discussion
----------

[LDAP] Revamp LDAP options with nested options definition

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | master
| Bug fix?      | no
| New feature?  | no
| BC breaks?    | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | -

Next move after #27291 :)

This will work exactly that before, nothing change regarding behavior, BUT now we've *less code* and *intuitive definition of nested options*.

Commits
-------

a26c284 Revamp LDAP options with nested definition
@yceruto yceruto deleted the ldap_nested_options branch October 12, 2018 16:04
"ext-ldap": "*"
},
"conflict": {
"symfony/options-resolver": "<4.2"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

adding this is useless, constraint in require section already guarantees it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants