Please keep a respectful tone; "look like a clown" isn't very nice if you don't mind.
That being said, I'd be fine removing minification from the assetmapper doc since compression should already provide most of the benefit.
Would you like to have a look and send a PR?

I am not trying to be disrespectful, but merely remarking upon the silliness of trying to make a (rather controversial, imo) point about not needing to minify (which is an industry standard), then linking to a webpage which says the complete opposite, on a website from a major web company which still recommends minifying.

Personally I'm not convinced that compression is all that is needed. We're working on a huge monolith of a project with megabytes of JS, and I find that minifying still saves us a couple hundred of kbs. That's with compression, as without compression the difference would be many hundreds of KBs, perhaps up to an MB.

And while we're aware that our JS needs to change and are working on it, this does block us from switching to AssetMapper until we've got that somehwat sorted in many months or even years, or maybe even never. And that's kinda frustrating as all docs point towards using AssetMapper and the documentation this issue is about, where it is stated that minifying is obsolete, then linking to docs which state the opposite.

We have a concept of asset compilers, so maybe we could make it easy to plug one? Did anyone write a bundle for this already? Up to have a look?

Well there is https://github.com/WebGardenGroup/minify-bundle which implements https://github.com/tdewolff/minify

But the former doesn't seem to have a stable release yet and no promise nor history of LTS, so it's not something we can probably use at this point (though I am keeping an eye on it).

The latter, however, seems like a great tool to implement in the current AssetMapper as an extra native option or officially supported bundle like the TypeScript bundle.

For now, however, we'll probably switch to webpack-encore or Vite (has our company's preference) instead.

EDIT: Note that this issue isn't to bash AssetMapper and I quite like the concept. It's sincerely to point out an outdated reference in the docs of which I have no idea what to replace it with - otherwise I'd have made a PR.

@cavias you mentioned that your project has several megabytes of JavaScript. From my own experience (which by definition, is limited) that's rare in web applications. Maybe you are working on a videogame or some other kind of app that is very heavy in JavaScript usage?

I any case, e.g. when working with libraries like Bootstrap, the difference between "just compress" and "minify + compress" is almost inexistent (I tested it with brotli and zstd compression).

Also, if you are using e.g. Tailwind CSS, the TailwindBundle (https://symfony.com/bundles/TailwindBundle/current/index.html) provides the --minify option in the tailwind:build command.

@javiereguiluz Our total JS is 3,5mb. This is not all loaded into every pageload, but it does stack quickly. That's what over a decade of development has accumulated. I wish I could change this overnight, but I can't.

In my testing with disabling minifying I noticed a 50kbs difference just in the initial main JS file, and there are many more as some effort has already been put into splitting it up into module specific files. And Lighthouse dropped 15 points instantly.

So I am happy to hear that you do not face this issue, but that doesn't solve my issue yet.

Closing as fixed in #19905, where we removed the mention to this deprecated feature from Cloudflare.