I have no control over the naming conventions of imported types

That's not strictly true - you can alias imported names:

import { ajax as Ajax } from 'jquery';

Please also fill out the template.
We don't have issue templates for fun - they're there so that we can collect as much information up front.

Entering n/a when you're requesting an enhancement makes it hard for us to understand things without asking more information

Duplicate of #2106

That's not what I mean - I mean the ajax function needs me to pass an object to it:

$.ajax({
  type: 'GET',
  url: '/something/something',
  data: {
    something: something
  },
  dataType: 'json',
  success: function() {
    // do something
  }
});

and all of those property names (type, url, data etc.) are all underlined in red because they don't match my naming rule.

But if I change them to match my naming rule the jQuery won't recognize what I sent it.

Going back to my previous point... You included no code samples and described a different scenario.

Again - this is why we have an issue template with required fields - so you can clearly describe the problem with clear examples to remove any misunderstanding and back-and-forth.

Regardless, duplicate of #2244