Skip to content

Actually omit surrogate code points #339

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2023
Merged

Actually omit surrogate code points #339

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2023

Conversation

aphillips
Copy link
Member

DBFF is only the high surrogates...

I probably would have done this rule differently, but I noticed the typo just now and can fast-fix it.

DBFF is only the high surrogates...
@aphillips aphillips added the syntax Issues related with syntax or ABNF label Feb 11, 2023
@aphillips aphillips self-assigned this Feb 11, 2023
@eemeli
Copy link
Collaborator

eemeli commented Feb 12, 2023

@gibson042 Was there any reason why these were left out in #290?

@aphillips
Copy link
Member Author

I'm going to merge this. If there is some other reason to have only the one set of surrogates, we can fix later.

@aphillips aphillips merged commit 11b5ff8 into main Feb 12, 2023
@aphillips aphillips deleted the aphillips-patch-1 branch February 12, 2023 20:14
@gibson042
Copy link
Collaborator

Nope, looks like it was just an oversight. 👍

stasm added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2023
This is a follow up to #339, which made the same change to the BNF.
aphillips pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2023
This is a follow up to #339, which made the same change to the BNF.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
syntax Issues related with syntax or ABNF
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants