From 2b466457f9a70f71420a18eb1cf25dc746599137 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eemeli Aro Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 14:20:18 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Drop data model request for feedback on "name" --- spec/data-model/README.md | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/spec/data-model/README.md b/spec/data-model/README.md index 1548a20d97..bd7028df08 100644 --- a/spec/data-model/README.md +++ b/spec/data-model/README.md @@ -58,10 +58,6 @@ declarations, options, and attributes to be optional rather than required proper > In the MessageFormat 2 [syntax](/spec/syntax.md), the source for these `name` fields > sometimes uses the production `identifier`. > This happens when the named item, such as a _function_, supports namespacing. -> -> In the Tech Preview, feedback on whether to separate the `namespace` from the `name` -> and represent both separately, or just, as here, use an opaque single field `name` -> is desired. ## Messages