Skip to content

Positional arguments redo #70

@tertsdiepraam

Description

@tertsdiepraam

I'm not happy with positional arguments at the moment. They do not fit nicely with the rest of the library and have a weird API. We need to reassess how they should work.

The problems are:

  1. The positional arguments do not really fit in an enum.
  2. The distribution of positional arguments cannot be dependent on options (see for instance what cp requires).
  3. The ranges are unintuitive and have no "obvious" default value.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions