Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Netlify template
Adds to the Managed infrastructure providers section a link to the Netlify template, in line with the others.
I see that all the other templates are hosted under https://github.com/nextjs, which we're totally open to doing if you tell us how. We can just transfer this repo to you or set up a new one according to any guidelines you may have.
More information about providers
Additionally, this page says:
(Emphasis yours.)
You then proceed to listing the community maintained deployment templates and advise people to «refer to each provider's documentation for information on supported Next.js features», with no direct link to any of those documentation materials.
I believe this creates the incorrect perception that Vercel is the only place with full-feature support and zero-configuration, and if people want to deploy elsewhere they need to fend for themselves and find that information on their own.
Would you be willing to give other providers the opportunity to say, right from this page, what features they support and don't support? This could be a basic feature comparison table or any other format that can convey that information.
This is an open-source repo where each provider can PR their own changes, so this would not come with a maintenance burden for you; and it would greatly help the community understand their options right from the official learning materials.
I'm happy to open a separate PR with this, if you're open to it.
Thank you!