Ashley Fulmer
Ashley received her PhD in Organizational Psychology from the University of Maryland, College Park. Her research centers on trust dynamics in organizations, emotions in conflict management and levels of analysis theory and research.
less
Related Authors
InterestsView All (13)
Uploads
Papers by Ashley Fulmer
in the aftermath of violations. In this study, we examine how trustors respond to
trust violations differently, depending on their levels of collectivism and whether
the violation is from an ingroup or outgroup member. We argue that although
highly collectivistic individuals are forgiving after minor ingroup trust violations,
when ingroup violations are severe, they will react negatively – lose trust easily
and restore trust with much difficulty – effectively treating the ingroup member
as an outgroup member. Individuals who are low on collectivism, by contrast,
do not differentiate the severity of violations from ingroup and outgroup
members. Two studies, one online attitudinal study using scenarios and one
laboratory experiment using an iterated trust game, were conducted to test this
hypothesis. Study 1 illustrated these effects, mediated by trustor anger. Study 2
replicated these findings with actual behaviour in a trust game and further
showed that trustor’s group identification exacerbated these effects.
review emergence terminology and theories that address the dynamic process by which a higher-level phenomenon
emerges from lower-level elements. Next, we review the extant theory and research on emergence
and convergence in organization science using an organizing framework that simultaneously considers the
content area of lower-level elements, the emergent factors, and the target of the emergent property. In addition
to organizing and bridging current literature on emergence and convergence, gaps of existing research and
new directions for future research, including compilation and divergence, are identified.
Talks by Ashley Fulmer
in the aftermath of violations. In this study, we examine how trustors respond to
trust violations differently, depending on their levels of collectivism and whether
the violation is from an ingroup or outgroup member. We argue that although
highly collectivistic individuals are forgiving after minor ingroup trust violations,
when ingroup violations are severe, they will react negatively – lose trust easily
and restore trust with much difficulty – effectively treating the ingroup member
as an outgroup member. Individuals who are low on collectivism, by contrast,
do not differentiate the severity of violations from ingroup and outgroup
members. Two studies, one online attitudinal study using scenarios and one
laboratory experiment using an iterated trust game, were conducted to test this
hypothesis. Study 1 illustrated these effects, mediated by trustor anger. Study 2
replicated these findings with actual behaviour in a trust game and further
showed that trustor’s group identification exacerbated these effects.
review emergence terminology and theories that address the dynamic process by which a higher-level phenomenon
emerges from lower-level elements. Next, we review the extant theory and research on emergence
and convergence in organization science using an organizing framework that simultaneously considers the
content area of lower-level elements, the emergent factors, and the target of the emergent property. In addition
to organizing and bridging current literature on emergence and convergence, gaps of existing research and
new directions for future research, including compilation and divergence, are identified.