Marta Giuca
Post-doctoral MSCA Fellow - CY Cergy Paris Université, Department of Law
less
Related Authors
Federico C . La Vattiata
University of Catania
Alice Giannini
Maastricht University
Alberto Cappellini
Università degli Studi di Firenze (University of Florence)
Angelo Giraldi
Università degli studi Roma Tre
Ivan Salvadori
Università di Verona
Silvio Riondato
Università degli Studi di Padova
Debora Provolo
Università degli Studi di Padova
silvio riondato
Università degli Studi di Padova
InterestsView All (6)
Uploads
Papers by Marta Giuca
man standard (case of “generic negligence”). For this purpose, a notion of “artificial diligence” is given since it is argued that the reasonable manufacturer parameter will be modelled on the product that complies with the characteristics specified by law and is safe at the same time. Then, discussing the hypothesis of artificial negligence,
a distinction between cases of errors that are ex ante foreseeable and unforeseeable is offered in order to address the manufacturer’s liability and to define his duty of care. As far as the user is concerned, the duty of information, vigilance and to intervene are investigated, to conclude that compliance with the duty of “human oversight” in the assessment of negligence should be ascertained in concreto, in order to evaluate whether to exclude culpability or even the objective dimension of negligence, according to the reasonable man standard.
laundering. The first part briefly examines the legal framework of cryptocurrencies in the US and in the European
systems. The second part illustrates the Italian legislation on the prevention of money laundering, provides a
comparison with the one of the State of Malta, and examines the conducts punished by D.lgs 231/2007. The
last part highlights some critical aspects concerning the conduct of the subject persons under the anti-money
laundering regulation that ultimately contribute to the crime of art. 648 bis of criminal code through acts of
omission, focusing on the existence of a duty to act and on the principle of ne bis in idem
man standard (case of “generic negligence”). For this purpose, a notion of “artificial diligence” is given since it is argued that the reasonable manufacturer parameter will be modelled on the product that complies with the characteristics specified by law and is safe at the same time. Then, discussing the hypothesis of artificial negligence,
a distinction between cases of errors that are ex ante foreseeable and unforeseeable is offered in order to address the manufacturer’s liability and to define his duty of care. As far as the user is concerned, the duty of information, vigilance and to intervene are investigated, to conclude that compliance with the duty of “human oversight” in the assessment of negligence should be ascertained in concreto, in order to evaluate whether to exclude culpability or even the objective dimension of negligence, according to the reasonable man standard.
laundering. The first part briefly examines the legal framework of cryptocurrencies in the US and in the European
systems. The second part illustrates the Italian legislation on the prevention of money laundering, provides a
comparison with the one of the State of Malta, and examines the conducts punished by D.lgs 231/2007. The
last part highlights some critical aspects concerning the conduct of the subject persons under the anti-money
laundering regulation that ultimately contribute to the crime of art. 648 bis of criminal code through acts of
omission, focusing on the existence of a duty to act and on the principle of ne bis in idem