Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 1995
When a therapist becomes gravely ill, not only is the vital therapeutic frame disrupted, but the ... more When a therapist becomes gravely ill, not only is the vital therapeutic frame disrupted, but the therapist's preoccupation with personal vulnerability-as well as defenses against such feelings-may preclude acting in the best interests of clients. Although theAPA (1992) provides ethical guidelines that apply to therapists in such situations, the clinical literature more tellingly captures the nature and difficulty of the specific dilemmas that arise. Three such dilemmas for therapists involve (a) self-disclosure to clients about the illness, (b) precautions against the abandonment of clients, and (c) decisions concerning return to practice following a period of absence. The explicit focus in the literature has been on clinical, rather than ethical, implications of various approaches to these dilemmas. A goal of this article is not only to review these clinical perspectives, but also to elucidate the particular ethical values that are embedded within them. One conceptualization of psychotherapy is that of a process whereby the therapist lends his/her ego strength to the client while the client tries to develop or internalize such resources (Gold, The author wishes to thank Annette Stanton, Ph.D., for her suggestions regarding preparation of the article.
Uploads
Papers by Tony Bram