Re: Implement C11 annex K?
[Posted September 17, 2014 by corbet]
| From: |
| "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph-AT-codesourcery.com> |
| To: |
| "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler-AT-dwheeler.com> |
| Subject: |
| Re: Implement C11 annex K? |
| Date: |
| Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:55:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID: |
| <Pine.LNX.4.64.1408132054090.16622@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> |
| Cc: |
| dalias <dalias-AT-libc.org>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha-AT-sourceware.org> |
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> So... would a high-quality strlcpy/strlcat patch be (FINALLY!) accepted?
I think it would be reasonable to consider. High-quality of course means
including: copyright assignment; documentation; thorough testcases;
appropriate feature test macro conditionals on the function declarations;
appropriate symbol versions and corresponding updates to the ABI test
baselines.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
