Property talk:P1710
Documentation
GND identifier in a biographical dictionary of people from Saxony
|(1[012]?\d{7}[0-9X]|[47]\d{6}-\d|[1-9]\d{0,7}-[0-9X]|3\d{7}[0-9X])
”: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1710#Item P31, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1710#Item P21, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1710#Type Q5, SPARQL
Basic import
editI just uploaded the property for ~840 items from the official GND mapping http://saebi.isgv.de/gnd.txt (2015-01-26). For 540 more entries from that file I was unable to identify an associated wikidata entry and the probability is high that this is because there is no corresponding article in de:Wikipedia. I have no information about the number of Säbi articles without GND mapping (which cannot be referenced by this property anyway). -- Gymel (talk) 15:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Well, yes: [1] states: 1384 articles (as of 2015-01-29) and the file I processed contained 1383 GND numbers. -- Gymel (talk) 15:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- At https://saebi.isgv.de/gnd.txt it says #TIMESTAMP: 1714434276 and #COUNT: 12494 - could you do a new import? Above it says Main statement 1,754 out of 12,313 (14% complete), so many are missing. Rostworowski (talk) 23:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Rename to Sächsische Biografie (GND) ID
editSee also the discussion at Property talk:P7902#Rename to Deutsche Biographie (GND) ID. The situation for P1710 is a bit different, but as for P7902 if " (GND) " is added to the property label, readers looking at the page of an item where a P1710 value is stored may better see what the value actually is and also can more easily understand why the property is placed in the section of VIAF sources next to the property for the GND ID. Example where all three values exist: Q107164#P227 (English label for DtBio has been changed already). @Kolja21, Epìdosis: shall it be done here too? HumanAFuser (talk) 00:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- I confirm Support. --Epìdosis 07:40, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support as nom. HumanAFuser (talk) 11:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
@Kolja21: Would you agree? HumanAFuser (talk) 11:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Done --Kolja21 (talk) 11:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Stability of value - never changes
editNot true: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q55651486&diff=2140599466&oldid=2094643919 Rostworowski (talk) 23:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)