Marxist Feminist Criticism of the Bible, ed. by Roland Boer and Joprunn Okland, Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2008
Wherever the religious neurosis has appeared on the earth so far, we find it connected with three... more Wherever the religious neurosis has appeared on the earth so far, we find it connected with three dangerous prescriptions as to regimen: solitude, fasting, and sexual abstinence—but without its being possible to determine with certainty which is cause and which is effect or IF any relation at all of cause and effect exists there.—Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil.
Interest in the treatment and role of women within Christianity seems to be increasing exponentially. The scope of that interest is very diverse, ranging from serious analytical studies to those that belong more to the sphere of the popular, artistic and obscure. It is enough just to mention the recent mega-success of the popular crime novel, The Da Vinci Code which, because of its accent on the feminine and the role women might have played in the life of Jesus, stirred up so much dust that even the Vatican found it necessary to comment on it. There is no doubt that this wide interest in the role of women in establishing one of the cornerstones of Western civilization, Christianity, owes its emergence mainly to the development of feminism and feminist thought in the twentieth century. On the other hand, if we take into consideration that feminism made its historical debut as an offshoot of Marxism, it can be stated that in its core feminist discourse revolves around two ideas: one is alienation, the process of objectification of biological sex differences and the ways that objectification reflects on the socio-cultural position of women; another concerns the methods of overcoming the consequences of that objectification. Like The Da Vinci Code, this essay is also built around Jesus, women and sex, but rather than chasing blood lines it attempts to interpret the myth of Jesus from the perspective of sexual and gender emancipation. Like other feminist writings, this essay is also concerned with alienation, but unlike the majority of feminist texts which concentrate on the socioeconomic sphere, its focus is mainly on biological and sexual alienation and the missed/suppressed historical potentiality of the Jesus Christ myth to become—at least in these terms—a truly liberating myth.
Uploads
Papers by Tamara Prosic
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Interest in the treatment and role of women within Christianity seems to be increasing exponentially. The scope of that interest is very diverse, ranging from serious analytical studies to those that belong more to the sphere of the popular, artistic and obscure. It is enough just to mention the recent mega-success of the popular crime novel, The Da Vinci Code which, because of its accent on the feminine and the role women might have played in the life of Jesus, stirred up so much dust that even the Vatican found it necessary to comment on it. There is no doubt that this wide interest in the role of women in establishing one of the cornerstones of Western civilization, Christianity, owes its emergence mainly to the development of feminism and feminist thought in the twentieth century. On the other hand, if we take into consideration that feminism made its historical debut as an offshoot of Marxism, it can be stated that in its core feminist discourse revolves around two ideas: one is alienation, the process of objectification of biological sex differences and the ways that objectification reflects on the socio-cultural position of women; another concerns the methods of overcoming the consequences of that objectification. Like The Da Vinci Code, this essay is also built around Jesus, women and sex, but rather than chasing blood lines it attempts to interpret the myth of Jesus from the perspective of sexual and gender emancipation. Like other feminist writings, this essay is also concerned with alienation, but unlike the majority of feminist texts which concentrate on the socioeconomic sphere, its focus is mainly on biological and sexual alienation and the missed/suppressed historical potentiality of the Jesus Christ myth to become—at least in these terms—a truly liberating myth.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Interest in the treatment and role of women within Christianity seems to be increasing exponentially. The scope of that interest is very diverse, ranging from serious analytical studies to those that belong more to the sphere of the popular, artistic and obscure. It is enough just to mention the recent mega-success of the popular crime novel, The Da Vinci Code which, because of its accent on the feminine and the role women might have played in the life of Jesus, stirred up so much dust that even the Vatican found it necessary to comment on it. There is no doubt that this wide interest in the role of women in establishing one of the cornerstones of Western civilization, Christianity, owes its emergence mainly to the development of feminism and feminist thought in the twentieth century. On the other hand, if we take into consideration that feminism made its historical debut as an offshoot of Marxism, it can be stated that in its core feminist discourse revolves around two ideas: one is alienation, the process of objectification of biological sex differences and the ways that objectification reflects on the socio-cultural position of women; another concerns the methods of overcoming the consequences of that objectification. Like The Da Vinci Code, this essay is also built around Jesus, women and sex, but rather than chasing blood lines it attempts to interpret the myth of Jesus from the perspective of sexual and gender emancipation. Like other feminist writings, this essay is also concerned with alienation, but unlike the majority of feminist texts which concentrate on the socioeconomic sphere, its focus is mainly on biological and sexual alienation and the missed/suppressed historical potentiality of the Jesus Christ myth to become—at least in these terms—a truly liberating myth.