We have been conditioned to think of the world in ways which have been extremely counterproductiv... more We have been conditioned to think of the world in ways which have been extremely counterproductive to scientific advancement. We can achieve so much more if we simply changed the way we thought about existence. What if I told you that the way academia has been conditioned to think is, in fact, half-wrong? When a scientist considers information, they consider many layers of information except the layer of information itself. What they fail to answer is: what is perceiving the information? What is the nature of the information which is being perceived? As such, this book takes scientists down the wormhole that transports us from material thinking to immaterial thinking. Paradoxes are resolved like Zeno's Paradox, as well as paradoxes of causality. The community of academia is bright, but it can shine so much brighter if we opened our minds to a new science: a science of the non-physical...an immaterial physics that I call void mechanics.
A special update/note to readers on Academia.edu: Thank you so far for your kind words and deep conversations. I didn't expect this at all. I want to say that, ultimately, this book is one perspective out of many. Finally, I haven't edited the book yet, and I plan on omitting one chapter and finishing a chapter called Zero (at the very end). Also, I recommend everyone to read progressively without skipping, otherwise you could misaim your understanding in a direction which I did not contemplate.
I am very open to any feedback, and firmly believe that the purpose of any debate is to first gain an understanding of the other person's perspective (and then making a decision on your designated "truth value"). If I am convinced of another's perspective and believe it to be more reasonable/logical, I will change the information in my book and cite him or her. I appreciate any and all feedback.
We have been conditioned to think of the world in ways which have been extremely counterproductiv... more We have been conditioned to think of the world in ways which have been extremely counterproductive to scientific advancement. We can achieve so much more if we simply changed the way we thought about existence. What if I told you that the way academia has been conditioned to think is, in fact, half-wrong? When a scientist considers information, they consider many layers of information except the layer of information itself. What they fail to answer is: what is perceiving the information? What is the nature of the information which is being perceived? As such, this book takes scientists down the wormhole that transports us from material thinking to immaterial thinking. Paradoxes are resolved like Zeno's Paradox, as well as paradoxes of causality. The community of academia is bright, but it can shine so much brighter if we opened our minds to a new science: a science of the non-physical...an immaterial physics that I call void mechanics.
A special update/note to readers on Academia.edu: Thank you so far for your kind words and deep conversations. I didn't expect this at all. I want to say that, ultimately, this book is one perspective out of many. Finally, I haven't edited the book yet, and I plan on omitting one chapter and finishing a chapter called Zero (at the very end). Also, I recommend everyone to read progressively without skipping, otherwise you could misaim your understanding in a direction which I did not contemplate.
I am very open to any feedback, and firmly believe that the purpose of any debate is to first gain an understanding of the other person's perspective (and then making a decision on your designated "truth value"). If I am convinced of another's perspective and believe it to be more reasonable/logical, I will change the information in my book and cite him or her. I appreciate any and all feedback.
Uploads
Books by Thomas Braun
A special update/note to readers on Academia.edu: Thank you so far for your kind words and deep conversations. I didn't expect this at all. I want to say that, ultimately, this book is one perspective out of many. Finally, I haven't edited the book yet, and I plan on omitting one chapter and finishing a chapter called Zero (at the very end). Also, I recommend everyone to read progressively without skipping, otherwise you could misaim your understanding in a direction which I did not contemplate.
I am very open to any feedback, and firmly believe that the purpose of any debate is to first gain an understanding of the other person's perspective (and then making a decision on your designated "truth value"). If I am convinced of another's perspective and believe it to be more reasonable/logical, I will change the information in my book and cite him or her. I appreciate any and all feedback.
Sincerely,
Thomas Braun
A special update/note to readers on Academia.edu: Thank you so far for your kind words and deep conversations. I didn't expect this at all. I want to say that, ultimately, this book is one perspective out of many. Finally, I haven't edited the book yet, and I plan on omitting one chapter and finishing a chapter called Zero (at the very end). Also, I recommend everyone to read progressively without skipping, otherwise you could misaim your understanding in a direction which I did not contemplate.
I am very open to any feedback, and firmly believe that the purpose of any debate is to first gain an understanding of the other person's perspective (and then making a decision on your designated "truth value"). If I am convinced of another's perspective and believe it to be more reasonable/logical, I will change the information in my book and cite him or her. I appreciate any and all feedback.
Sincerely,
Thomas Braun