Papers by Alexander Wendt
Review of International Studies, 2000
Can the study of ideas in international politics be made scientifically respectable? The question... more Can the study of ideas in international politics be made scientifically respectable? The question is central to the Third Debate, yet the dominant voices in the ‘debate’ seem oddly to agree. ‘Positivists’ are sceptical because ideas seem ephemeral, difficult to measure, and generally resistant to hard science. As a result, positivist theories of international politics tend to favour seemingly more objective material factors like military and economic capabilities, and only bring in ideas as a last resort. In this way positivist epistemology shapes international ontology. Against this tendency, ‘post-positivists’ argue that it is simply a mistake to think that ideas can or should be studied in the same way we study physical objects. Ontology should determine epistemology, not vice versa. However, in developing this important insight many post-positivists have gone further, to efface any connection between their subsequent work and science—Understanding versus Explanation. The ironic result is to echo the positivist feeling that the study of ideas cannot be made scientifically respectable.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Lynne Rienner Publishers eBooks, Dec 1, 2000
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Cambridge University Press eBooks, May 2, 1996
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Review of International Studies, Oct 1, 1991
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
International Organization, 2001
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
American Political Science Review, Jun 1, 1994
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Oxford University Press eBooks, May 5, 2022
Undertaking a collaborative inquiry into a convergence of quantum theory, science, and technology... more Undertaking a collaborative inquiry into a convergence of quantum theory, science, and technology, the chapter makes the case for a new human science for International Relations (IR). As new scientific discoveries and technological applications suggest large-scale quantum phenomena, near-simultaneous interconnectivity creates global entanglements, and ubiquitous media produce profound observer effects of uncertainty, IR theory needs to “quantize” if it is to retain relevancy in the twenty-first century. The central concepts of quantum mechanics that inform a quantized IR are introduced, and the heuristic advantages of quantum over traditional approaches are presented.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Cambridge University Press eBooks, Apr 9, 2007
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Lynne Rienner Publishers eBooks, Dec 31, 1992
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Taylor & Francis eBooks, Feb 16, 2010
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks, 1995
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Cambridge University Press eBooks, Aug 19, 1999
In his thought-provoking chapter David Held argues that we need to rethink our traditional, state... more In his thought-provoking chapter David Held argues that we need to rethink our traditional, state-centric understanding of democracy in a more cosmopolitan direction because the forces of globalization are gradually eroding the territorial, Westphalian conceptualization of political community upon which it is based. I agree with Held on both counts. However, I think he does not emphasize sufficiently the role that the institution of sovereignty will play in channeling the impact of globalization, creating path-dependencies which raise both empirical and normative questions about the possibility of cosmopolitan democracy. If a non-territorial democracy does evolve, for the forseeable future it seems much more likely to be a democracy of states than of individuals, an “international” rather than “cosmopolitan” democracy, and this might even be normatively acceptable in a way that an analogous democracy at the domestic level based on groups is not. I have divided my remarks into two parts, focusing first on how we get from the here of a world of sovereign states to the there of a nonterritorial democracy, and then on some normative issues that arise when we get there. From here to there Held's chapter, and the book on which it builds (Held 1995), offers a strong and nuanced account of the many forces in the late twentieth century that are eroding purely territorial conceptions of political community and creating transnational “communities of fate.” However, saying that national conceptions of community are being eroded by globalization is not the same thing as saying that transnational ones are being created.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Politics & Society, Jun 1, 1992
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Review of International Studies, Apr 1, 1992
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Alexander Wendt