@Raymond Given your responsiveness in the past, would it be possible for you to take a look at adding bal-pk, bal-ir, and bal-cyrl?

Note that Gujari is most often written in the Arabic script (گوجری).

Tested and working, thank you

Tested and working, thanks

Tested and working, thanks

In T369293#9975965, @Raymond wrote:

phr or phl? Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palula_language it should be phl

phr is Pahari-Pothohari per https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q115823263

In T369293#9975965, @Raymond wrote:

phr or phl? Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palula_language it should be phl

phr is Pahari-Pothohari per https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q115823263

In T368860#9958978, @Raymond wrote:

"Swahili as used in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (cd)" seems to have an own language code: swc per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congo_Swahili

Can you confirm that "swc" would be a better code than "sw-arab-cd". Or "swc-arab"?

I am unsure and ask @Amire80 for help. I do not want to introduce codes that are wrong or very unsual.

Tested and working, thank you

Tested and working, thank you

Tested and working, thank you

Tested and working, thank you

Tested and working, thank you

Tested and working, much appreciated

Excellent, it works. Much appreciated

Tested and working, thank you

It works and is deployed now

Excellent, thank you. I will test it on Wednesday (I believe that's when the Wikidata updates get deployed)

@Raymond Can you take a look at this please?

Would bal-cyrl be preferable to bal-cyrl-tm to be accepted?

@Raymond Could you take a look at this please?

Thank you, I have updated the description of this task with some information about subtags that would be useful to have with this language code.

It seems like you are exactly right about the 50 entity check limit being related to this issue - this lexeme is just shy of 50 entities total with 6 senses and 38 forms, and still shows constraint violations. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Lexeme:L1092922

For what it is worth, I have definitely noticed there is a limit in lexeme size of some kind where constraint violations no longer appear. I typically do not expect them to appear on Hindustani or Punjabi verbs. On the first sense of a lexeme adding a gloss quote usually results in a constraint violation, but if I add one now to this lexeme with over 50 senses no constraint violation is applied (the lexeme is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Lexeme:L33485 but see the screenshot since I do not want to actually leave this statement unreferenced.)

@Amire80 Makran is a region along the southern coast of Pakistani and Iranian Balochistan, and Makrani is the major dialect associated with that region and with Balochi as spoken across the gulf in Oman. See this source for example: https://dsal.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/collett/frontmatter.html Makrani is definitely a more widely recognized and used name for a variety of Balochi than the current autonym given to bcc.

As far as I can tell this is still not resolved—the language code was not available for monolingual text when I tried.

@Arian_Bozorg I could have made it more clear but this was not just for lexemes. I gave a specific example where it would be used for monolingual text.

Any thoughts on this? @Lydia_Pintscher @jhsoby

I have also updated the autonym since finding some additional information for this.

This can now be closed as the code was made available today via the interface translations.

Dingal is a Rajasthani language which lacks a language code of its own https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5278158

Done

Done

I have added items for a number of scholalry works written in Brahui, such as https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q113302350

Done

Done

Done

In T328890#8664641, @Fjjulien wrote:

I was excited to see this feature request being moved into a "task". However, nothing happened with it for the last three weeks. Is this normal?