Billy Wong
Personal website: http://www.billywong.net/
less
Related Authors
Lucila Carvalho
Massey University
Anh Ngoc Quynh Phan
University of Kent
Nyasha Nyereyemhuka
University of Western Ontario
Reijo Kupiainen
Tampere University
Manfredo Manfredini
The University of Auckland
Carmel Lindkvist
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
InterestsView All (12)
Uploads
Books by Billy Wong
The concept of the ideal student can provide students, especially those less familiar or confident with higher education, with a better and clearer understanding of what is valued, expected and rewarded at university. With increasing student diversity, there is an urgent need for greater openness and awareness of the different expectations and ideals of students. The key questions explored include:
• How is the ideal student imagined and envisioned?
• To what extent are these constructions realistic and achievable?
• Are certain students more likely to aspire, identify or embody these ideal characteristics?
• Are there any features of the ideal student that are widely shared and recognised?
• How do people from different social backgrounds construct their ideal student?
• How can staff support students to develop desirable characteristics for university?
A number of issues are unpacked as the book discusses the nuances of what it means to be a university student. The Ideal Student is written for a general audience and will be of particular interest to those working or studying in higher education, especially staff, students and senior leaders.
Papers by Billy Wong
The concept of the ideal student can provide students, especially those less familiar or confident with higher education, with a better and clearer understanding of what is valued, expected and rewarded at university. With increasing student diversity, there is an urgent need for greater openness and awareness of the different expectations and ideals of students. The key questions explored include:
• How is the ideal student imagined and envisioned?
• To what extent are these constructions realistic and achievable?
• Are certain students more likely to aspire, identify or embody these ideal characteristics?
• Are there any features of the ideal student that are widely shared and recognised?
• How do people from different social backgrounds construct their ideal student?
• How can staff support students to develop desirable characteristics for university?
A number of issues are unpacked as the book discusses the nuances of what it means to be a university student. The Ideal Student is written for a general audience and will be of particular interest to those working or studying in higher education, especially staff, students and senior leaders.
Watch video here: youtu.be/I6leTHjifUs
At GCSE, the typical CS student is academically strong, mathematically able, likely to be taking triple science (despite CS counting as a science for the EBacc), from a relatively affluent family, and overwhelming likely to be male (even if the smaller number of girls taking the subject do better in the exam). Some schools and local authorities are doing well in addressing the gender gap in CS, but there are 382 *mixed* schools where the CS students are all boys.
A level CS remains a niche subject: students typically have good maths grades, but their overall academic performance is not strong. CS is often taken in combination with maths and physics. 90% of entries come from boys, and boys are now outperforming girls at the top grades. In 25 local authorities, all the CS entries come from boys. Again students are likely to come from relatively affluent backgrounds, but rather more of these students will be on the school's SEN register than for most subjects.
GCSE and A level CS are hard! At GCSE, students typically get half a grade lower in CS than in their other subjects; at A level, CS grades are also a little lower (about a sixth of a grade) than those students get for their other subjects. CS and ICT are quite different qualifications, and thus are taken by quite different students: the latter are (on average) from less affluent backgrounds, weaker academically, closer to a typical mix for ethnicity, and more likely to be female: the decision to remove ICT as qualifications at GCSE and A level, seems likely to result in fewer, and rather less diverse, students overall taking qualifications in computing.
qualification at GCSE or A-level and not all students sit qualifications in computing. Even where a qualification is taught by a school, subject requirements might limit the type of student who is able to take the
course. Whilst at A-level computing is a well established subject, it is only offered by a minority of centres, with some areas having no provision. Until recently the number of students taking A-level computing has been in decline (McBride, 2008); JCQ(2014, 2015a, 2016b) figures show that since 2014 numbers have been increasing year on year. A new computing GCSE was introduced by the OCR exam board in 2011 (OCR, 2011) with the first cohort of students sitting exams in 2013. Understandably, not all schools adopted this
qualification immediately, and whilst the number of centres and students have been increasing, the numbers have not yet matched those of ICT (JCQ, 2016c). A similar picture has been observed at A-level with numbers of computing students rising 50% in 5 years but still well below ICT (JCQ, 2011, 2015a). Additionally, with recent school funding changes at A-level, from a per subject to per student system (BBC, 2015; Education Funding Agency, 2016), the computing cohort size of A-level providers now becomes a greater
concern for the ongoing financial viability of the subject. Smaller subject cohorts may make a course too expensive for smaller providers.
This report’s first aim is to understand the A-level and GCSE computing cohorts beyond the widely publicised disparity in gender (JCQ, 2015b). It will look at provider type, provider location, subject mix, the ethnicity and socio-economic status of students. To conduct this research the report uses the DfE National Pupil Database (NPD) (DfE, 2015d) linked to Edubase (DfE, 2016a). The NPD provides individual student examination and characteristic data for GCSE and A-level; Edubase provides profile information on
individual schools.
The GCSE and A-level in ICT are being discontinued in 2017 (DfE, 2015a). This leads to the report’s second aim, which is to contrast the computing and ICT qualifications. The DfE justification for dropping the ICT qualification and keeping computer science is that the subjects occupy the “same [subject] space” (quoted in Vaughan, 2015). It is not within the scope of this report to address the overlap in content between these subjects, instead the aim here is to compare the profiles of schools offering each qualification and the examination cohorts. Can we expect students who would have previously chosen ICT qualifications to now choose computing, or that providers which previously ran ICT courses will now switch to computing?
This report is the first iteration of an annual statistical review of computing in England. As such, we welcome comments and suggestions for improvement, as well as suggestions for areas that we can explore further. An updated version, using data from 2016, will be available next year.
Import, memo and annotations: https://youtu.be/LnavhMQCrRU
Coding & uncoding: https://youtu.be/iH2vQ0hCLgk
Classification & attributes: https://youtu.be/ApJ_-vfx-kw
Word frequency and text search: https://youtu.be/mFzpUfWyNX0
Matrix coding query & crosstabs: https://youtu.be/OCrq3ZVlDq0
Import, memo and annotations: https://youtu.be/LnavhMQCrRU
Coding & uncoding: https://youtu.be/iH2vQ0hCLgk
Classification & attributes: https://youtu.be/ApJ_-vfx-kw
Word frequency and text search: https://youtu.be/mFzpUfWyNX0
Matrix coding query & crosstabs: https://youtu.be/OCrq3ZVlDq0