# .the later seasons so strongly refusing to let bashir and garak have any real interaction really hampers episodes like these.# .because the LACK of bashir having a reaction to any of this is so STARK.# .the same way that garak’s conspicuous absence in bashir’s morally dubious spy arc stands out.# .and it then ties into how bashir and sisko don’t really get a proper relationship arc either.# .even though it’s all set up there.# .but following through on that would practically require having sisko and bashir talk about garak.# .because that’s the thread by which these things all end up linked for them both.# .but instead!!!! no!!! it just gets brushed over.# .i was denied my siskoshir development dangit.# .could have had an ot3 going on with idealogical discussions but nooooooooo. ):
I've been thinking about this commentary for awhile, because I hadn't thought to link the lack of development for Sisko and Bashir's dynamic to the way Garak and Bashir's dynamic gets shortchanged, but it does make a lot of sense. I don't think the unexplored potential with Sisko and Bashir is all to do with Garak - the lack of reaction to the augmentation thing from Sisko is also a big gap, imo - but Garak does feature in a lot of it, especially wrt In the Pale Moonlight and the Section 31 arc.
I think for me Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges is the biggest offender in terms of shortchanging all those relationships. The scene with Garak and Bashir having lunch just pisses me off, to be frank, because it feels like a shout-out to the fans - look, they're still buddies! - but in a way that feels completely divorced from the actual character development both characters have been through. They're just bantering about optimism versus pessimism as if they're back in the early seasons, and it feels completely artificial. (As is probably apparent in the fics I've published, I much prefer late seasons Garashir to be about smoldering resentment than fond witty bantering, and I do think that's justified by what happens individually with both characters!)
And then with Sisko, there's the scene near the beginning of that episode where he's on board with bringing down Section 31 and wants Bashir to pretend to play along with Sloan to further that goal, and then there's never any resolution to that at the end of the episode. Bashir discovers that Ross is in cahoots with Section 31, and then a few episodes later Ross is officiating Sisko's wedding with no indication that Sisko knows or cares about that involvement. (Bashir is also present at the wedding and doesn't seem to harbor any ill feelings towards Ross either, which... the fuck?)
And that's an unfortunate loss on both counts, because there's a lot that could have been explored there re: what Bashir and Garak represent to Sisko, and the different ways they initially respond to Garak.
Sisko sees Garak as a potential valuable ally and someone whose skills and connections are an asset, but he doesn't necessarily like or trust him, and that informs pretty much all of their interactions. Bashir gets to have his earnest burbling over Garak being a spy, and in The Wire, he's shocked when Garak confronts him with the harsh reality of what that occupation actually entailed. But because he's a doctor and driven by compassion and a belief that all life is valuable and no suffering is deserved, he's able to offer Garak forgiveness.
The distinction in how they both respond to Garak is driven not just by a difference in temperament and experience, but in their respective roles. Sisko is tasked with diplomacy and politicking and making difficult tactical decisions, but as a doctor, Bashir is allowed to be "apolitical" in a way that Sisko can't be. And that comes into play in his judgment (or lack thereof) of Garak, they way he gets to tell off both Winn and Dukat, and the way he plays a role in helping the enemy with both the Jem'hadar in Hippocratic Oath and the arc involving the Founders' disease near the end.
And so Bashir's optimism and compassion imo represent the best of the Federation to Sisko, the ideals he's fighting to protect. Because Sisko is very idealistic, but he's forced to engage in realpolitik and compromise those ideals in painful ways (most obviously so in In the Pale Moonlight, but even in smaller ways like encouraging Bajor to sign the non-aggression pact with the Dominion). Bashir, as a doctor, is free of that, and his commitment to his morals reflects Sisko's best self. Garak, on the other hand, represents the parts of Sisko that he doesn't like to confront - again, especially in In the Pale Moonlight, but also with stuff like his abuse of his power over Garak in Second Skin.
But the thing about that is that Bashir's ideals also get challenged over the course of the show, most directly with Section 31. And with the augmentation reveal, we learn that some of that disillusionment is latent. There are plenty of ways that seeing Bashir go through that might compound Sisko's guilt and pessimism. Not to mention the ways that it might affect Garak, as Bashir's moral integrity is also what he finds so alluring and admirable about him. And the show really only scratches the surface of that stuff, sadly.
(A lot of this stuff was percolating around in my head when I wrote Vanishing or Vanished, which I know you've read, but I'm going to plug again here because I'm proud of it.)