Papers by Guilherme Sousa
Rotas a Oriente. Revista de estudos sino-portugueses, 2023
During the seventeenth century, the Chinese Catholic Missions were the stage for a dispute, parti... more During the seventeenth century, the Chinese Catholic Missions were the stage for a dispute, particularly amongst Jesuits and members of the Mendicant Orders, such as Dominicans and Franciscans. The main reason was due to the ceremonies
in honour of Confucius and the Chinese ancestors, while also comprising a semantic
debate. In this study, the so-called “Chinese Rites Controversy” is going to be examined during the period between Matteo Ricci’s directive of 1603, according to which those tributes were to some extent accepted, and the decree of Charles Maigrot, vicar-apostolic of Fujian, from 1693, which, among other aspects, forbade them. To achieve
that goal, the arguments used by the complaining parties and their respective reasoning will be scrutinized and the range of the resulting discussions will be be evaluated. Supported by epistolary sources and coeval treatises, this paper proposes a further dimension to the nature of the dispute, far beyond the purely missionary level, and, in this way, contributes towards a better understanding of the complex dynamics that marked the period.
Book Reviews by Guilherme Sousa
Desde o ano de 2015, a editora Brill tem reservado um espaço anual para a publicação de um conjun... more Desde o ano de 2015, a editora Brill tem reservado um espaço anual para a publicação de um conjunto de investigações acerca do fenómeno da escravatura, pensado na sua dimensão diacrónica e mundial. Intitulada Studies in Global Slavery, essa série de obras monográficas e coletivas procura ser difusora de estimulantes interpretações que permitam aprofundar e reenquadrar o entendimento dessa temática histórica. Um propósito que deriva da relevante projeção que a análise das dinâmicas esclavagistas tem adquirido nestas últimas décadas e do papel preponderante que as perspetivas da história global têm vindo a assumir no seio da historiografia mais atual. Correspondendo ao sétimo volume dessa série, a obra The Portuguese Slave Trade in Early Modern Japan: Merchants, Jesuits and Japanese, Chinese, and Korean Slaves, publicada em 2019, não se afasta dos princípios orientadores da coleção, os quais são coincidentes com as próprias tendências analíticas que caracterizam os trabalhos do seu autor, Lúcio de Sousa. Com efeito, o professor associado da Universidade de Estudos Estrangeiros de Tóquio, habituado a conciliar os âmbitos social, político, económico e religioso nos seus exames da complexa experiência portuguesa no continente asiático, como em The Early European Presence in China,
Uploads
Papers by Guilherme Sousa
in honour of Confucius and the Chinese ancestors, while also comprising a semantic
debate. In this study, the so-called “Chinese Rites Controversy” is going to be examined during the period between Matteo Ricci’s directive of 1603, according to which those tributes were to some extent accepted, and the decree of Charles Maigrot, vicar-apostolic of Fujian, from 1693, which, among other aspects, forbade them. To achieve
that goal, the arguments used by the complaining parties and their respective reasoning will be scrutinized and the range of the resulting discussions will be be evaluated. Supported by epistolary sources and coeval treatises, this paper proposes a further dimension to the nature of the dispute, far beyond the purely missionary level, and, in this way, contributes towards a better understanding of the complex dynamics that marked the period.
Book Reviews by Guilherme Sousa
in honour of Confucius and the Chinese ancestors, while also comprising a semantic
debate. In this study, the so-called “Chinese Rites Controversy” is going to be examined during the period between Matteo Ricci’s directive of 1603, according to which those tributes were to some extent accepted, and the decree of Charles Maigrot, vicar-apostolic of Fujian, from 1693, which, among other aspects, forbade them. To achieve
that goal, the arguments used by the complaining parties and their respective reasoning will be scrutinized and the range of the resulting discussions will be be evaluated. Supported by epistolary sources and coeval treatises, this paper proposes a further dimension to the nature of the dispute, far beyond the purely missionary level, and, in this way, contributes towards a better understanding of the complex dynamics that marked the period.