skip to main content
10.1145/3419249.3420143acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

GreenLife: A Persuasive Social Robot to Enhance the Sustainable Behavior in shared Living Spaces

Published: 26 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

This research aims to gain understanding of interactive technology, which could persuade building users to behave sustainably inside shared living spaces. By utilizing the research through design approach, we conducted a three-phase qualitative study to explore persuasive technologies for sustainability. First, we ran three focus groups (n=14) to explore what form of interactive technology could persuade building users to behave sustainably, and to investigate their related needs. Second, based on the focus group findings, we designed an application concept called GreenLife for the social robot Pepper. Third, we evaluated the GreenLife concept represented by video scenarios using an online survey (n=20). Most participants believed that social robots can persuade building users to behave sustainably by providing social feedback, valuable rewards, and reliable information on sustainability. A list of design implications was formulated to support the future design of social robots as motivators of sustainability in shared living spaces.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (a42-beheshtian-supplement.mp4)

References

[1]
Thomas Ulher and W. Lawson, Sustainable development in construction, in the 14th CIB World Building Congress on Construction and the Environment, Gävle, Sweden, 1998.
[2]
Maria V. Moreno, Miguel A. Zamora and Antonio F. Skarmeta, User-centric smart buildings for energy sustainable smart cities, Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 41-55, 2014.
[3]
Brian Keeble, The Brundtland report: ‘Our common future, Medicine and War, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17-25, 1988.
[4]
Ahmad Tayyab and Muhammad J. Thaheem, Developing a residential building-related social sustainability assessment framework and its implications for BIM, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 28, pp. 1-15, 2017.
[5]
Saffron Woodcraft, Social Sustainability and New Communities: Moving from Concept to Practice in the UK, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 68, pp. 29-42, 2012.DOI :https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.sbspro.2012.12.204.
[6]
Lyn Bartram, Johnny Rodgers, and Rob Woodbury, Smart Homes or Smart Occupants? Supporting Aware Living in the Home, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 52–64, 2011.
[7]
Brian J. Fogg, Computers as persuasive social actors, Persuasive Technology, pp. 89–120, 2003.
[8]
Harri Oinas-Kukkonen and Marja Harjumaa, Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 24, 2009.
[9]
Makuochi Nkwo, Rita Orji, and John Ugah, Mobile persuasion, Proceedings of the Second African Conference for Human Computer Interaction on Thriving Communities - AfriCHI’18, 2018.
[10]
Padmanabhan, Rahuvaran Mobile Persuasive Technology » Promoting pro-environmental behaviour. (2011).
[11]
Cody D. Kidd and Cynthia Breazeal, A robotic weight loss coach, Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 1985–1986, 2007.
[12]
Krestin Dautenhahn, Robots as social actors: Aurora and the case of autism, Proceedings Third Cognitive Technology Conference CT’99, vol. 359, no. 3, pp. 359–374, 1999. 10.1.1.190.1767.
[13]
Cees Midden, Teddy Mccalley, Jaap Ham, and Ruud Zaalberg, Using Persuasive Technology to Encourage Sustainable Behavior, Workshop paper at 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing, no. 1, pp. 83–86, 2008.
[14]
Nasim Beheshtian, Kirsikka Kaipainen, Kalle Kähkönen, and Aino Ahtinen, Color game: A collaborative social robotic game for icebreaking, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Academic Mindtrek, Jan. 2020. 10.1145/3377290.3377292.
[15]
Tom Masseiile, Smart Buildings: The Future of Sustainable Design - DesignIntelligence, 2019. Available: https://www.di.net/articles/smart-buildings-future-sustainable-design.
[16]
Cees Midden and Jaap Ham, Using negative and positive social feedback from a robotic agent to save energy, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology - Persuasive ’09, 2009.
[17]
Isaac. Wiafe, A framework for analyzing, designing and evaluating persuasive technologies, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Reading, Henley Business School, Informatics Research Center. September 2015.
[18]
Harri Oinas-Kukkonen and Marja Harjumaa, Towards Deeper Understanding of Persuasion in Software and Information Systems, First International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction, 2008.
[19]
Jaap Ham and Cees. J. H. Midden, A Persuasive Robot to Stimulate Energy Conservation: The Influence of Positive and Negative Social Feedback and Task Similarity on Energy-Consumption Behavior, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 163–171, Aug. 2013.
[20]
Abdullah Al Mahmud, Pavan Dadlani, Omar Mubin, Suleman Shahid, Cees Midden, and Olivar Moran, iParrot: Towards Designing a Persuasive Agent for Energy Conservation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 64–67, 2007.
[21]
Rahuvaran Pathmanathan, Jon Pearce, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Wally Smith, Using mobile phones for promoting water conservation, Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on - Oz CHI ’11, 2011.
[22]
Jesper Kjeldskov, Mikael B. Skov, Jeni Paay, and Rahuvaran Pathmanathan, Using mobile phones to support sustainability, Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’12, 2012.
[23]
Evgenios Vlachos and Henrik Scharfe, Social Robots as Persuasive Agents, in International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media, 2014, vol. 8531, no. June, pp. 528–537. 10.1007/978-3-319-07632-4.
[24]
Evgenios Vlachos and Henrik Schärfe, The Geminoid Reality, in International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2013, p. 374. 10.1007/978-3-642-22098-2.
[25]
Ryuji Yamazaki, Shuichi Nishio, Kohei Ogawa, and Hiroshi Ishigur, Teleoperated android as an embodied communication medium: A case study with demented elderlies in a care facility, in Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2012, no. April 2014, pp. 1066–1071.
[26]
Joshua Wainer, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Ben Robins, and Farshid Amirabdollahian, Collaborating with Kaspar: Using an autonomous humanoid robot to foster cooperative dyadic play among children with autism, in 2010 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Humanoids 2010, 2010, pp. 631–638.
[27]
J. Ham and A. Spahn, Shall I Show You Some Other Shirts Too? The Psychology and Ethics of Persuasive Robots, Cognitive Technologies, pp. 63–81, 2015.
[28]
Mikey Siegel, Cynthia Breazeal, and Michael I. Norton, Persuasive Robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2009.
[29]
Lykke Broggard Bertel, Peers: Persuasive Educational and Entertainment Robotics: A Design-Based Research Approach to Social Robots in Teaching and Learning, Aalborg Universitetsförlag. PhD. -serien for Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Aalborg Universitet 2016.
[30]
Mojgan Hashemian, Persuasive Social robots using Social Power dynamics: Doctoral consortium, in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS, 2019, vol. 4, no. May, pp. 2408–2410.
[31]
Andreas Spahn, And Lead Us (Not) into Persuasion…? Persuasive Technology and the Ethics of Communication, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 633–650, May 2011.
[32]
Omar Mubin, Luke Vink, Pieter Oosterwijk, Abdullad A. Mahmud, and Suleman Shahid, Floffy: Designing an Outdoor Robot for Children, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 563–570, 2013.
[33]
Swapna Joshi and Selma Sabanovic, A communal perspective on shared robots as social catalysts, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Aug. 2017.
[34]
Vijay Chidambaram, Yueh-H. Chiang, and Bilge Mutlu, Designing persuasive robots, Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI ’12, 2012.
[35]
John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson, Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’07, 2007.
[36]
Roy B. Melton, Carla B. Zoltowski, Monica E. Cardella, and William C. Oakes, Work in progress - Development of a design task to assess students’ understanding of human-centered design, Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, pp. 26–27, 2010.
[37]
Paul Gill, Kate Stewart, Elizabeth Treasure, and Barbara Chadwick, Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups, British Dental Journal, vol. 204, no. 6, pp. 291–295, 2008.
[38]
Satu Elo and Helvi Kyngäs, The qualitative content analysis process, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 107–115, Apr. 2008.
[39]
Monika Lohani, Charlene Stokes, Marissa McCoy, Christopher A. Bailey, and Susan E. Rivers, Social interaction moderates human-robot trust-reliance relationship and improves stress coping, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Mar. 2016. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1109/hri.2016.745181.
[40]
Igor M. Verner, Alex Polishuk, and Niv Krayner, Science Class with Rob Thespian: Using a Robot Teacher to Make Science Fun and Engage Students, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 74–80, Jun. 2016.
[41]
Johan F. Hoorn and Sonja D. Winter, Here Comes the Bad News: Doctor Robot Taking Over, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 519–535, Dec. 2017.DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0455-2.
[42]
Jeff Gothelf, Lean UX: Applying lean principles to improve user experience. 2013.
[43]
Pepper the humanoid robot SoftBank Robotics. https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/pepper?q=emea/en/pepper.
[44]
Kirsikka Kaipainen, Aino Ahtinen, and Aleksi Hiltunen, Nice surprise, more present than a machine, Proceedings of the 22nd International Academic Mindtrek Conference on - Mindtrek ’18, 2018.
[45]
Mojgan Hashemian, Ana Paiva, Samuel Mascarenhas, Pedro A. Santos, and Rui Prada, The Power to Persuade: a study of Social Power in Human-Robot Interaction, 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Oct. 2019.
[46]
Abraham Wandersman and P. Florin, Citizen Participation and Community Organizations, Handbook of Community Psychology, pp. 247–272, 2000.
[47]
Jan W. Bolderdijk, Philip K. Lehman, and Scott E. Geller, Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behaviour with Rewards and Penalties, Environmental Psychology, pp. 273–282, Nov. 2018.
[48]
Brian Fogg, The Behavior Grid, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology - Persuasive ’09, 2009.
[49]
Cosimo Talò, Terri Mannarini, and Alessia Rochira, Sense of Community and Community Participation: A Meta-Analytic Review, Social Indicators Research, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 1–28, May 2013.
[50]
Aino Ahtinen and Kirsikka Kaipainen, Learning and Teaching Experiences with a Persuasive Social Robot in Primary School – Findings and Implications from a 4-Month Field Study, Persuasive Technology. Designing for Future Change, pp. 73–84, 2020.
[51]
Minja Axelsson, Social Robot Co-design Canvases, OSF.2020, March 31. doi.org/ 10.17605/OSF.IO/JG2T8.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Designing Home Automation Routines Using an LLM-Based ChatbotDesigns10.3390/designs80300438:3(43)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Toward the design of persuasive systems for a healthy workplace: a real-time posture detectionFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2024.13599067Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Ommie: The Design and Development of a Social Robot for Anxiety ReductionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/370612214:2(1-34)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
NordiCHI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society
October 2020
1177 pages
ISBN:9781450375795
DOI:10.1145/3419249
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 October 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Environmental sustainability
  2. Interactive technology
  3. Persuasive social robots
  4. Persuasive technology
  5. Social robots
  6. Social sustainability

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

NordiCHI '20
NordiCHI '20: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society
October 25 - 29, 2020
Tallinn, Estonia

Acceptance Rates

NordiCHI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 89 of 399 submissions, 22%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)75
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
Reflects downloads up to 19 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Designing Home Automation Routines Using an LLM-Based ChatbotDesigns10.3390/designs80300438:3(43)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Toward the design of persuasive systems for a healthy workplace: a real-time posture detectionFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2024.13599067Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Ommie: The Design and Development of a Social Robot for Anxiety ReductionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/370612214:2(1-34)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2024
  • (2021)EnviRobots: How Human–Robot Interaction Can Facilitate Sustainable BehaviorSustainability10.3390/su13211228313:21(12283)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Towards Resilient Critical Infrastructures – Motivating Users to Contribute to Smart Grid Resiliencei-com10.1515/icom-2021-002120:2(161-175)Online publication date: 8-Sep-2021
  • (2021)Artificial Intelligence for Humankind: A Panel on How to Create Truly Interactive and Human-Centered AI for the Benefit of Individuals and SocietyHuman-Computer-Interaction – INTERACT 202110.1007/978-3-030-85607-6_32(335-339)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media