Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Living within Our War on Nature

We ask here: Which world do we live in? Do we inhabit the Wholeness and Tripartite Unity (Pneuma/Nous-Spiritus/Intellectus-Heart, psyche-anima-soul, soma-corpus-body) of Nature? Or do we only inhabit physical sub-corporeal worlds, in which only measurements count? Many people believe, in their lives and work, that only economic growth counts. Thus, in legally authorised and socially myopic duties, at local, national, and global scales, their attention is on maximising short-term profits and long-term economic wealth in various heartless operations within Business-As-Usual. Consequently, in various inattentive ways, many marginalise and externalise coldly the health of people and planet (air, waters, soils, plants, and animals) from their immediate concerns and future considerations. Thus, many of us fail to live Heart-Centred lives, failing to truly LOVE familiar and unfamiliar people, and failing to fully engage with the thriving of life on our precious planet. So, ALL OF US are “on a highway to climate hell with our foot on the accelerator” (António Guterres, UN Sec-Gen). Let us go much deeper here in our inquiries: Why are we cascading so madly with various interacting ecological and social crises into TEOTWAWKI (The End of the World as We Know It)?

Living within Our “War on Nature” (António Guterres, UN Sec-Gen), Authorised by Our Current Economy: May All Beings Be Happy with Ecological Integrity in Nature, Social Coherence in Each Society, and Wholeness and Unity in Each Person Skills for “Post Doom, No Gloom” Living: Michael Dowd, Post-Doom OUR PLANET NEEDS ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY, in Tropical, Temperate, and Polar Habitats, Altogether. NOT escalating ecological overshoots of various ecological boundaries within various local, national, and global habitats. OUR SOCIETIES NEED SOCIAL COHERENCE, at Local, National, and Global Scales. NOT social divisions, with inhabitants within a social division refusing to learn to understand any Other. EACH PERSON NEEDS PERSONAL UNITY, within Dependent Child-Student, Independent Adult, and Inter-Independent ElderSage, Living with Others, in Body-Soul-Heart, Altogether. NOT reductive body-based materialisms, nor reductive mind-based idealisms, nor supposed mind-body dualisms. Nate Hagens: The 7 Things That Scare Me Most | Frankly 38 - YouTube Frontiers | Listen to the science! Which science? Regenerative research for times of planetary crises (frontiersin.org). Seers Seeing the Seen: Who Is Seeing? How Is Seeing Being Done? What Is Being Seen? ME US US INTER-INDEPENDENT ALTOGETHER Who Is Seeing within the Seer? Child? Student? Adult? Elder? Sage? EYE OF HEART-SPIRIT - Kosmos-centric Wholeness (Agape), and Unity (Eros), with Agentic and Communal VirtuesVices, in Full Humanity, in tune (or not) with Divine Life, Light, and Love, “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” EYE OF WORLD-SOUL - World-centric “All of Us, working to inter-connect with each other” in the dialogues of civilisations, each of which with their own versions of contents and discontents [personal/collective artsskills, inter-personal relations-moralsethics, and authorised sciences] in matrices-systems-organisations EYE OF RATIONAL MIND Socio-centric INDEPENDENT experts-achievers, “US”, “Our” self-/we-authorised social contracts-disciplines EYE OF IN-FORMATION Ethno-centric/Group-centric DEPENDENT “US” “Our” community’s narratives-rulesroles-norms-heritage-traditions EYE OF CORPOREAL BODY “My” Ego-centric Agency-Communion How Is Seeing Being Done? Within Each of Various Schools in Arts, Morals, and Sciences Within Primal Traditions Oriental Traditions Semitic Traditions Modernity Post-Modernity Meta-Modernity The Less Travelled Spiritual Way from the Sensory Surface Modernity: A mix of Monist Materialists (Mind inside of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings, from Ego-centric Matter in Cartesian space-time [x1, x2, x3, t]), Monist Me, to Ethno-Group-centric US, to Socio-centric US, to Idealists (Matter inside Mind) and Matter-Mind Dualists. World-centric All of Us with Each Other, into Noetic No Vedic Tribhuvana (Svar-Bhuvas-Bhū). Kosmos-centric Heartfulness (One-in All, All-in-One) in No Tripartite Kosmos (Pneuma/Nous-Spiritus/IntellectusTripartite Kosmos, Vedic Tribhuvana, Heart-Soul-Body. Heart, Psyche-Anima-Soul, and Soma-Corpus-Body). Multi-cross-inter-trans-meta-disciplinary engagements Engaging in dialogues on skills in arts, relations-moralsethics, and sciences, in matrices-systems-organisations, in attempts to in terms of living in terms of with people inside and outside of various Primal Traditions co-ordinate systems designs selected from less in Africa, Asia, Europe, Americas, and Oceania; various diverse data sets and/or flat nonto more complex Oriental Traditions in Taoism, Hinduism, Buddhism et al.; in sciences of hierarchical developmental or various Semitic Traditions in Judaism, Christianity, Islam et measurement relations in evolutionary al.; various modern disciplines (sciences of measurement); within and across various critiques criteria, e.g., from various post-modern disciplines (critiques of modern); and various disciplines of modern lifeless egocentric me to various meta-modern disciplines (modern + postmodern). e.g., IPCC & WHO mechanics worldcentric us Experts-Achievers in Skills in Arts, in Morals-Ethics in Relations, and in Disciplines in Sciences in Organisations within Our Primal Our Oriental Our Semitic Our Modern Our Postmodern Our Metamodern Tradition with Tradition with Tradition with Lives with Lives with Lives with open ↔ closed open ↔ closed open ↔ closed open ↔ closed open ↔ closed open ↔ closed body-soul-hearts body-soul-hearts body-soul-hearts body-minds body-minds body-minds Conforming to OUR Authorised Narratives-Norms-Rules-Roles-Rituals-Heritage-Traditions within Our Primal Ways Our Oriental Our Semitic Our Modern Our Postmodern Our Metamodern of Living with Tradition with Tradition with Lives with Lives with Lives with open ↔ closed open ↔ closed open ↔ closed open ↔ closed open ↔ closed open ↔ closed body-soul-hearts body-soul-hearts body-soul-hearts body-minds body-minds body-minds Born into a Born into an Born into a Born into a Born into a Post- Born into a MetaPrimal World Oriental World Semitic World Modern World Modern World Modern World © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu What Is Being Seen? With Love (Philia)? Heart-centred Kosmos with all sorts of Seers, Seeing, and the Seen from the Sensory Surface of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings Our DIALOGUES with various Others within, across, and beyond our current readings of skills in arts, relations-moralsethics, and sciences, in matrices-systemsorganisations, at local, national & global scales Our DEBATES within Our Social Contracts in Arts, Morals-Ethics, Sciences, in Organisations, in Our Eco-Society CONFORMITY-LOYALTY to Our Prescribed Community Narratives and Group Norms My Life in My Body Levels-Stages-Degrees of Duty of Care to Child to Student to Adult to Mature Elder to Sage From Heartless “Us” Versus “Them” Polarisations To Heart-Centred Human Integrity, Within Each Person, Within Various Communities, Living in Tune With Nature, Heart-Soul-Body, Altogether All of Us, Nature and Humanity, Altogether, with Deep Compassion and AllInclusive Wisdom All of Us, InterConnecting with Each Other Us, Our Knowledge in Our Social ContractsDisciplines Us, Our In-Formation in Our Community Me, My Life Oriental Values Meta-Modern Semitic Values (in Confucianism, Values Post-Modern (in various schools Modern Values Taoism, Shintoism, (in trying to hold Values within Judaism, (in Cartesian Hinduism, Jainism, Modern and Post(in various critiques Christianity, Islam Sciences) Buddhism, Sikhism of Modern Values) Modern knowledge et al.) et al.) claims altogether) Non-Modern Triple Worlds: Heart-soul-body, Pneuma/NousModern Cartesian body-mind: a spatio-temporal world psyche-soma (Greek), Spiritus/Intellectus-anima-corpus (Latin), represented mathematically in terms of the Cartesian quadruple Rūḥ/‘Aql-nafs-jism (Arabic), Svar-Bhuvas-Bhū (Tribhuvana) et al. (x1, x2, x3, t) with a linear temporal and three spatial coordinates Wholeness [Agape-Feminine Nature], and Unity [Eros-Masculine Nature], with Agentic [Masculine] Energies and Communal [Feminine] Energies in Virtues-Vices [Qualities Loved, degraded, or denied] within Each Stage-Level-Layer-Degree of DevelopmentInhabitation of a Skill and Each Set of Skills, in Arts, Morals, and Sciences, in Each Person, in Each Community, and in Our Shared Humanity, in tune (or not) with the Wholeness and Unity of Divine Nature, Life, Light, and Love, “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” Primal Values (in First Peoples in Africa, Asia, Europe, Americas, Australia, and Oceania) All of Us working to inter-connect with each other in the dialogues of civilisations, each of which with their own versions of contents and discontents [personal/collective intentions-behaviours-arts-skills, inter-personal relations-morals-ethics-cultures, and authorised sciences, based on given or selected assumptions-methodologies-outcomes] in matrices-systems-organisations “Our” Primal self-/we-authorised social contractsdisciplines “Our” Oriental self-/we-authorised social contractsdisciplines “Our” Semitic self-/we-authorised social contractsdisciplines “Our” Modern self-/we-authorised social contractsdisciplines “Our” Post-Modern self-/we-authorised social contractsdisciplines “Our” Meta-Modern self-/we-authorised social contractsdisciplines “Our” Primal community’s narratives-normsrules-roles-ritualsheritage-traditions Born into a Primal World “Our” Oriental community’s narratives-normsrules-roles-ritualsheritage-traditions Born into an Oriental World “Our” Semitic community’s narratives-normsrules-roles-ritualsheritage-traditions Born into a Semitic World “Our” Modern community’s narratives-normsrules-roles-ritualsheritage-traditions Born into a Modern World “Our” Post-Modern community’s narratives-normsrules-roles-ritualsheritage-traditions Born into a Post-Modern World “Our” Meta-Modern community’s narratives-normsrules-roles-ritualsheritage-traditions Born into a Meta-Modern World © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu. An Intimate Conversation with Leading Climate Scientists To Discuss New Research on Global Warming Source of many memes presented in this paper @CodeRedEarth Sophie Gabrielle An Intimate Conversation with Leading Climate Scientists To Discuss New Research on Global Warming - YouTube Global warming in the pipeline | Oxford Open Climate Change | Oxford Academic (oup.com) New Study Warns of an Imminent Spike of Planetary Warming and Deepens Divides Among Climate Scientists - Inside Climate News 2023 state of the climate report: Entering uncharted territory | BioScience | Oxford Academic (oup.com) COVID Policies in Many Countries Are Being Corrupted by All Sorts of Dodgy Interests in Business-As-Usual. See UK COVID Inquiry. 'Endemic' SARS-CoV-2 and the death of public health John Snow Project Editorial 06 November 2023 'Endemic' SARS-CoV-2 and the death of public health John Snow Project May All Beings Be Happy: From Primarily Maxing My/Our Wealth to Compassion and Wisdom in “I-I” Enlightenment, “IWe-Thou” Relations, and “I-We-Seen” Sciences, Based on Various Skills in Varying Degrees in Various Divine Qualities In my street, in my city, and on our one shared planet, there are people with cultural heritages from Australia, Asia, Africa, Europe, North-Central-South America, and Oceania. Accordingly, in my work, I try to give appropriate attention and due care to the life-affirming values that can be found within Primal (First Peoples), Oriental (Hindu, Taoist, Buddhist et al.), Semitic (Judaic, Christian, Muslim et al.), Modern (Cartesian sciences), Postmodern (various critiques of modern), and Metamodern (modern + postmodern) communities, as independent identities, as inter-independent parties, and as truly appreciated interactive communities on our planet, altogether. Xiye Bastida, a young Otomi-Toltec woman from Mexico, in her life and work, like many people, struggles to hold her non-modern Indigenous values, which are in tune with Mother Nature, with her modern values, which work to devitalise nature, turning living beings into inanimate resources that can be measured, made into various products, and monetised by businesses for their short-term profits and for the ongoing ‘economic growth’ of some privileged corporations and nationstates. Xiye Bastida, nevertheless, gave a courageous heartfelt speech at the United Nations in New York in September 2023. She defended the simple dignities of Mother Nature, celebrating Her precious gifts of clean air, clean waters, and clean lands, International Day of Peace 2023 | YOUTH EVENT PROGRAMME | United Nations & Xiye Bastida (xiyebeara.com). Now, with all that already said, let us look at the Oceania — Connecting Climate Minds proposal. We are looking for case studies from Oceania that will broaden global understanding of the intersection of climate change and mental health. Relevant case studies could discuss: • A problem in a community, e.g. A population living in a coastal community already experiencing sea-level rise, where individuals are anecdotally reporting increasing rates of depression or anxiety. • An intervention in a community or country, e.g. An NGO implementing a community-based intervention to enhance the psychological resilience of climate-affected populations. • A policy, e.g. A country or city passing a national mental health policy that has strong emphasis on addressing the mental health impacts of climate change. • A research project, e.g. investigating the mental health impacts of climate change using participatory methods or combined health and environmental big data. Please correct me if my impressions are inadequate, but this proposal engages with which understandings of climate change? mental health? non-modern? modern? both, united? Non-modern Primal, Oriental, and Semitic communities have witnessed, and continue to lament, the ongoing destruction of Mother Nature over many decades, sorry, centuries. Despite truly heroic efforts, these communities continue to see clean air become dirty air, clean waters become dirty waters, clean lands become dirty lands, as all sorts of modern pollution continue to intensify and interact in air, waters, lands, bodies, and minds, degrading and destroying the habitats of many plants, many animals, and many human beings. In contrast to the Love of Nature that can be found within various non-modern Primal, Oriental, and Semitic communities, many people in various Modern, Postmodern, and Metamodern communities continue to authorise their selected knowledge claims based on what philosopher Alfred North Whitehead called, in the 1920s, Cartesian bifurcation. Cartesian ‘bifurcation’ [...] constitutes a dichotomy which divides the world into two substances, namely Thought (res cogitans) and Extension (res extensa). This gives rise to the belief that the ‘objective’ world can be wholly described in quantitative terms. In light of [Wolfgang] Smith’s ontological distinction, this is tantamount to the reduction of the corporeal to the physical. Therefore, qualitative attributes—such as colour, sound, or taste—are taken, in the Cartesian paradigm, to be mental or subjective. On the other hand, the quantitative attributes—the ‘extended’ (i.e., measurable) aspects—of the world are taken to be the ‘really real’. Quantities are thought to have ontological priority over qualities, insofar as the latter are merely ‘in our heads’ (res cogitantes). What is left in the external world, then, are objects which can be accounted for, without residue, in mathematical terms (res extensae) John Trevor Berger, Philos-Sophia Initiative Foundation » Surveying the Integral Cosmos | Philos-Sophia Initiative [text has been adjusted]. Now, when we investigate modern concepts of mental health, human wellbeing, and climate change, we find that, for modern people, each concept continues to be a Cartesian concept, dependent on the primacy of res extensae (quantities-measurements-data) over res cogitantes (qualities), and thus on sciences of measurements, primarily selected metrics (e.g., Building systemic resilience, productivity and well-being: a Mental Wealth perspective), and secondarily selected case studies. Crucially, according to these modern Cartesian measurement-based accounts, human wellbeing does not require participation in “I-I” enlightenment (the journey from one’s surface self into Heart-Centred Oneness with Nature and Humanity in deep compassion and all-inclusive wisdom), nor participation in various “I-We-Thou” relations, in which the Divine in one person sees and dignifies the Divine in another person (which people in the Vedic East call Namaste, and people in the non-modern West call Love Thy Neighbour), nor participation in non-modern wisdom schools with attention on inhabiting, in varying degrees from shallow to deep, various Divine Qualities, like Beauty, Goodness, Truth, Joy, and Love (Agape-Eros-Agency-Philia), in Nature, Arts, Morals, Sciences, and Organisations. I'm sorry if what I am raising here with you is not familiar knowledge, nor perhaps yet easy to understand. Perhaps this will help. Have you seen the image of three modern frogs in water in a saucepan (p. 34), which is slowly being heated? One frog says, concerned, my calculations show something is wrong here. Another frog says, without any concern, everything is good here. And the third frog, annoyed, abruptly dismisses any concerns with contempt, "alarmist!" Let us ask here: Which frog is being physically healthy? mentally healthy? spiritually healthy? In modern ways? In non-modern ways? In non-modern and modern, altogether ways? Any one of them? I hope you can now see that I am trying to engage with some vital issues here. Will you join us in participating more fully in Whole-Hearted Nature and Humanity? W.E.I.R.D. Is Now Normal David Attenborough: A Life on Our Planet: My Witness Statement and a Vision for the Future El Nino Fizzles. Planet Earth Sizzles. Why? (mailchi.mp) Dr Andrew Forrest - Special Climate Presentation at Oxford University - YouTube 2023 state of the climate report: Entering uncharted territory | BioScience | Oxford Academic (oup.com) Climate Action Australia – Climate Change (wordpress.com) ??? ??? New UN University Report Warns about Risk Tipping Points with Irreversible Impacts on People and Planet | UN University W.E.I.R.D. Is Now Our Normal Global Warming is Accelerating. Why? Will We Fly Blind? Technical dialogue of the first global stocktake. Synthesis report by the co-facilitators of the technical dialogue October 2023 was around 1.7ºC above the preindustrial average!!! Chasm between climate action and scientific reality laid bare in UN stocktake | Climate crisis | The Guardian Apostolic Exhortation Laudate Deum of the Holy Father Francis to all people of good will on the climate crisis (vatican.va) Dr Andrew Forrest at Boao Forum for Asia Perth 2023 | Fortescue "Business will kill your children:" Was Andrew Forrest's climate speech really that "loopy"? | RenewEconomy All planetary boundaries mapped out for the first time, six of nine crossed - Stockholm Resilience Centre Increasing Heat with Intensifying Lethal Humidity Will Kill Millions in Forthcoming Years-Decades!!! Post Doom COVID-19: A NEW DISEASE PARADIGM - John Snow Project Earth ‘well outside safe operating space for humanity’, scientists find | Climate crisis | The Guardian Arctic News: Methane eruptions threaten (arcticnews.blogspot.com) The Great Simplification | Film on Energy, Environment, and Our Future | FULL MOVIE - YouTube Wilful ignorance drives civilisation collapse - Pearls and Irritations (johnmenadue.com) Jem Bendell – essays on collapse risk, readiness & response Climate change undermines nearly all sustainable development goals | World Meteorological Organization United In Science 2023 (wmo.int) Beyond-growth-dialogue-with-the-european-commission (eeb.org) Much Too Often To Love Our Full Humanity and the Wholeness of Nature Altogether Is Considered To Be Not Normal! Ecological Integrity in Nature? Social Coherence in Each Society? Wholeness and Unity in Each Person? Living within Intensifying Ecological Crises Are You Familiar with this Common Reading of Modern Science, As an Independent Magisterium with Limited or No Regard for Humanity’s Wisdom? Arctic News: 2023 (arctic-news.blogspot.com) Excerpt from Edward F. Kelly et al. Beyond Physicalism: The rise of modern science has brought with it increasing acceptance among intellectual elites of a picture of reality that conflicts sharply both with everyday experience and with beliefs widely shared among the world’s great cultural traditions. A particularly stark but influential early statement of the emerging picture came from philosopher Bertrand Russell: Global temperatures set to reach new records in next five years | World Meteorological Organization (wmo.int) 2023! 2023! That Man is the product of causes which had no prevision of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental collocations of atoms; that no fire, no heroism, no intensity of thought and feeling, can preserve an individual life beyond the grave; that all the labour of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and that the whole temple of Man’s achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruins—all of these things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain, that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand. Only within the scaffolding of these truths, only on the firm foundation of unyielding despair, can the soul’s habitation henceforth be safely built. (“The Free Man’s Worship,” 1903) There can be no doubt that this bleak vision continues to dominate mainstream scientific thinking and has contributed to the “disenchantment” of the modern world with its multifarious attendant ills. Prominent recent spokesmen include, for example, Nobel prize winners such as theoretical physicist Steven Weinberg, for whom “the more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it also seems pointless,” and physicist-turned-neurobiologist Francis Crick, whose “astonishing hypothesis” declares that “You, your joys and your sorrows, your memories and your ambitions, your sense of personal identity and free will, are in fact no more than the behaviour of a vast assembly of nerve cells and their associated molecules. As Lewis Carroll’s Alice might have phrased it: ‘YOU’RE NOTHING BUT A PACK OF NEURONS.’” (my highlights). Overt conflict between science and religion has erupted sporadically since the stirrings of science centuries ago, and recent years have witnessed a series of heavily publicised attacks on nearly all things religious by well-meaning defenders of Enlightenmentstyle rationalism. Such persons clearly regard themselves, and current mainstream science itself, as reliably marshalling the intellectual virtues of reason and objectivity against retreating forces of irrational authority and superstition. For them the truth of the picture sketched above has been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt, and to think anything different is necessarily to abandon centuries of scientific progress, release the black tide of occultism, and revert to primitive supernaturalist beliefs characteristic of bygone times. Contributors to the present volume share a very different view. We believe it takes astonishing hubris to dismiss en masse the collective experience and wisdom of a large proportion of our forebearers, including persons widely recognised as pillars of human civilisation, and we are united in believing that the single most important task confronting all of modernity is that of meaningful reconciliation of science and religion. We emphatically reject, moreover, the idea of simply exiling these humanly vital subjects to independent “magisteria” where they can go their separate ways as a means to uneasy truce, as originally decreed by Descartes and recently suggested again by Stephen Jay Gould. Let Us Ask Here: Are There Any Better Readings of Nature, Human Society, and the Human Person? [Russell and Whitehead's] Principia Mathematica, though read by only a stalwart few, has even so had a powerful impact upon Western civilization: in outlawing IW [irreducible wholeness], as it were, it has promoted a leveling down of Occidental culture, a drastic flattening thereof in toto. I surmise that the nihilistic nominalism of the point set paradigm has eventually filtered down to the public at large as the last word of Science, and in so doing has contributed decisively to the “enlightenment” of millions. One might say that it has disenchanted the universe, deprived it, in the eyes of the “enlightened ones,” of the authentic mystery residing in every natural thing – down to the humblest. And so it has in effect dehumanized a significant portion of mankind by rendering it profane. The fact is, nonetheless, that the domain of quantity does not exclude irreducible wholeness; if such were the case, not only could there be no music or traditional arts, but there could be no physics as well. — Excerpt from Wolfgang Smith, Physics: A Science in Quest of an Ontology A Brief Overview of Seer, Seeing, and Seen Dynamics: Who is Seeing? How Is Seeing Being Done? What is Being Seen? Who Is Seeing within the Seer? ALL OF US, ALTOGETHER EYE OF RATIONAL MIND Socio-centric INDEPENDENT experts-achievers, “US”, “Our” self-/we-authorised social contracts-disciplines EYE OF IN-FORMATION Ethno-centric/Group-centric DEPENDENT “US” “Our” community’s narratives-rulesroles-norms-heritage-traditions ME US EYE OF WORLD-SOUL World-centric working to interconnect with each other in the dialogues of civilisations, each of which with their own versions of contents and discontents [personal/collective arts and skills, inter-personal relations-moralsethics, and authorised sciences] in matrices-systems-organisations US EYE OF HEART-SPIRIT Kosmos-centric Wholeness [AgapeFeminine Nature], and Unity [ErosMasculine Nature], with Agentic [Masculine] Energies and Communal [Feminine] Energies in Virtues-Vices [Qualities Loved, degraded, or denied] within Each Stage-LevelLayer-Degree of DevelopmentInhabitation of a Skill and Each Set of Skills, in Each Person, in Each Community, and in Our Shared Humanity, in tune (or not) with Divine Life, Light, and Love, “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” INTER-INDEPENDENT Dependent Child? Student? Independent Adult? Inter-Independent Elder? Sage? EYE OF CORPOREAL BODY Ego-centric Agency-Communion How Is Seeing Being Done within Each of Various Schools in Arts, Morals, and Sciences within Non-Modern Heart-Centred Lifecycles in A Primal An Oriental A Semitic Tradition? Tradition? Tradition? With Love (Agape-Eros-Agency-Philia Post-Modernity? Meta-Modernity? [Communion])? Modernity? Modernity: A mix of mainly Monist Materialists (Mind inside Matter in Cartesian space-time [x1, x2, x3, t]) in a mechanistic universe in which measurements count, some Monist Idealists (Matter inside Mind), and some Matter-Mind Dualists. Huston Smith, Levels of Reality, Levels of Self, Why Religion Matters p.224 What Is Being Seen? Modern Cartesian Linear Time in Post-Modernity: Challenges modern lifeless mechanics and authoritarian knowledge claims. Meta-Modernity: Tries to hold modern and postmodern knowledge claims altogether. Modernity Disqualifies (Flatlands) the Quality (Love) of Qualities (Truth-Goodness-Beauty). No Vedic Tribhuvana. No Tripartite Kosmos (Pneuma/Nous-Psyche-Soma). Heart-centred Kosmos with all sorts of Seers, Seeing, and the Seen from the Sensory Surface of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings Our DIALOGUES with various Others within, across, and beyond our current readings of skills in individual-collective arts, skills in inter-personal relations-morals-ethics, and skills in sciences, in matricessystems-organisations, at local, national & global scales People in Primal-Oriental-Semitic Traditions tend to see losses in Heart-Centredness, with disturbing degradations in air, waters, lands, plants, animals, and humans. People in Modernity-Postmodernity-Metamodernity tend to see “historical progress”, and work for “ongoing progress” according to their chosen set of indicators. Our DEBATES within Our Social Contracts-Disciplines in Arts, Relations-Morals-Ethics, and Sciences, in Organisations in Our Society CONFORMITY-LOYALTY to Our Prescribed Community Narratives-Norms-Rules-RolesRituals-Heritage-Traditions See CACOR: The Big Picture: Beyond Hope and Fear. Skills for “Post Doom, No Gloom” Living: Michael Dowd, Post-Doom. Born into a Primal World Born into an Oriental World Born into a Semitic Born into a Modern Born into a PostWorld World Modern World Born into a MetaModern World © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu My Life in My Body Seer, Seeing, and Seen Dynamics within “I-I” Enlightenment, the Heart of “I-We-Thou” Relations, and in Wisdom Schools Who Is Seeing within the Seer? An Oriental Tradition? A Semitic Tradition? Modernity? Modernity EYE OF HEART-SPIRIT Disqualifies Kosmos-centric Wholeness [Agape(Flatlands) the Feminine Nature], and Unity [ErosQuality (Love) of Masculine Nature], with Agentic Qualities (Truth[Masculine] Energies and Communal Goodness-Beauty). [Feminine] Energies in Virtues-Vices No Vedic [Qualities Loved, degraded, or Tribhuvana. denied] within Each Stage-LevelLayer-Degree of DevelopmentNo Tripartite The Less Travelled Spiritual Way from the Sensory Surface Inhabitation of a Skill and Each Set Kosmos of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings, of Skills, in Each Person, in Each (Pneuma/Nousfrom Ego-centric Me to Ethno-Group-centric US to SocioCommunity, and in Our Shared centric US to World-centric All of Us with Each Other into Spiritus/IntellectusHumanity, in tune (or not) with Heart, psycheKosmos-centric Heartfulness (One-in All, All-in-One) Divine Life, Light, and Love, anima-soul, and in Tripartite Kosmos, Vedic Tribhuvana, Heart-Soul-Body. “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” soma-corpus-body). The Quest For Who We Are - Fons Vitae Publishing EYE OF WORLD-SOUL World-centric working to interconnect with each other in the dialogues of civilisations, each of which with their own versions of contents and discontents [personal/collective arts and skills, inter-personal relations-moralsethics, and authorised sciences] in matrices-systems-organisations ME US US ALL OF US, ALTOGETHER A Primal Tradition? INTER-INDEPENDENT Child? Student? Adult? Mature Elder? Sage? How Is Seeing Being Done within Each of Various Schools in Arts, Morals, and Sciences within Engaging in dialogues (on skills in traditional arts and crafts, “I-I” Enlightenment, “I-We-Thou” Relations, and Divine Qualities) with various people inside and outside of various Primal Traditions in Africa, Asia, Europe, Americas, and Oceania; various Oriental Traditions in Confucianism, Taoism, Jainism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Shintoism, Sikhism et al.; various Semitic Traditions in Judaism, Christianity, Islam et al.; various modern disciplines (sciences of measurement); various post-modern disciplines (critiques of lifeless mechanics and authoritarian knowledge claims); and various meta-modern disciplines (working to hold modern and postmodern knowledge claims altogether). What Is Being Seen? With Love (PhiliaCommunion)? Post-Modernity? Meta-Modernity? Heart-centred Kosmos with all sorts of Seers, Seeing, and the Seen from the Sensory Surface of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings Multi-inter-trans-disciplinary engagements, e.g., r3-0.org Priority is: Economic Growth [Wealth]? Wellbeing: PeoplePlanet-Prosperity? Living Well within Earth’s Systems? Disciplines in Silos Disciplines Inter-Acting Disciplines in Systems Our DIALOGUES with various Others within, across, and beyond our current readings of skills in individual-collective arts, skills in inter-personal relations-morals-ethics, and skills in sciences, in matricessystems-organisations, at local, national & global scales Experts-Achievers in Skills in Modern Arts, Modern Experts-Achievers in Skills in Traditional Arts and Crafts, “I-I” Our DEBATES within Our Social Individualism, Modern Instrumental Relations, and Modern Enlightenment, “I-We-Thou” Relations, and Divine Qualities Contracts-Disciplines in Arts, Sciences and Technologies (including Sciences of (including Beauty, Goodness, Truth, Love (Agape-ErosRelations-Morals-Ethics, and Measurement, Information Technologies, Computers, Agency-Communion), Music, Wisdom, Compassion et al.) in Sciences, in Organisations in Mobile Phones, Social Media, Netflix et al.) in OUR Traditional Sciences in OUR Communities. Our Society Organisations in OUR Communities. EYE OF IN-FORMATION Teachings in Skills in Traditional Arts and Crafts, “I-I” Teachings in Skills in Modern Arts, Modern Individualism, CONFORMITY-LOYALTY to Our Ethno-centric/Group-centric Enlightenment, “I-We-Thou” Relations, and Divine Qualities Modern Instrumental Relations, and Modern Sciences and Prescribed Community DEPENDENT “US” (including Beauty, Goodness, Truth, Love (Agape-ErosTechnologies (including Sciences of Measurement, Narratives-Norms-Rules-Roles“Our” community’s narratives-rules- Agency-Communion), Music, Compassion, Wisdom et al.) in Information Technologies, Social Media et al.) in OUR Rituals-Heritage-Traditions roles-norms-heritage-traditions Traditional Sciences in OUR Communities. Organisations in OUR Communities. EYE OF RATIONAL MIND Socio-centric INDEPENDENT experts-achievers, “US”, “Our” self-/we-authorised social contracts-disciplines EYE OF CORPOREAL BODY Ego-centric Agency-Communion Born into a Primal World Born into an Oriental World Born into a Semitic Born into a Modern Born into a PostWorld World Modern World Born into a MetaModern World © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu My Life in My Body Seer, Seeing, and Seen Dynamics within Alan Urban’s 10 Reasons Our Civilization Will Soon Collapse Who Is Seeing within the Seer? ALL OF US, ALTOGETHER EYE OF HEART-SPIRIT Kosmos-centric Wholeness [AgapeFeminine Nature], and Unity [ErosMasculine Nature], with Agentic [Masculine] Energies and Communal [Feminine] Energies in Virtues-Vices [Qualities Loved, degraded, or denied] within Each Stage-LevelLayer-Degree of DevelopmentInhabitation of a Skill and Each Set of Skills, in Each Person, in Each Community, and in Our Shared Humanity, in tune (or not) with Divine Life, Light, and Love, “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” INTER-INDEPENDENT EYE OF WORLD-SOUL World-centric working to interconnect with each other in the dialogues of civilisations, each of which with their own versions of contents and discontents [personal/collective arts and skills, inter-personal relations-moralsethics, and authorised sciences] in matrices-systems-organisations US EYE OF RATIONAL MIND Socio-centric INDEPENDENT experts-achievers, “US”, “Our” self-/we-authorised social contracts-disciplines US EYE OF IN-FORMATION Ethno-centric/Group-centric DEPENDENT “US” “Our” community’s narratives-rulesroles-norms-heritage-traditions ME Dependent Child? Student? Independent Adult? Inter-Independent Elder? Sage? EYE OF CORPOREAL BODY Ego-centric Agency-Communion How Is Seeing Being Done within Each of Various Schools in Arts, Morals, and Sciences within What Is Being Seen? With Love Non-Modern Heart-Centred Lifecycles in Modern Cartesian Linear Time in (Agape-Eros-Agency-Philia A Primal An Oriental A Semitic Modernity? Post-Modernity? Meta-Modernity? [Communion])? Tradition? Tradition? Tradition? 10 Reasons Our Civilization Will Soon Collapse (okdoomer.io) 3. The Failure of Green Energy: A deep dive into the problems world leaders have let spiral out of control. Pollution, Jevons Paradox, Peak Metals ALAN URBAN 4. Dwindling Resources: Selected sections from original article. Rubber, Sand, Fertilizer That’s right. Our entire global industrial civilization is going to collapse. And 5. Topsoil Erosion soon, which means within the lifetimes of most people alive today. 6. Water Shortages I realize this is quite the claim, and a pretty terrifying one if you’re under 50 7. Climate Change or so. In this article, I will list 10 problems the world is facing, each of which 8. Biodiversity Loss could cause the collapse of civilization all on its own. Which means, if even 9. Migrant Crisis one of these problems isn’t solved, our civilization is doomed. 10. Increasing Conflict Before I continue, let me explain what I mean by “collapse.” First of all, it Conclusion doesn’t necessarily mean that humans will go extinct. While that is certainly a For decades, it’s been obvious that our global industrial civilization has an plausible scenario given the many existential threats we are facing, I still expiration date, but only recently have many scientists come to realize that believe it is unlikely. Small groups of humans survived in very difficult the expiration date could be during their own lifetimes. conditions for tens of thousands of years. Fifty years ago, humans overshot the carrying capacity of the planet. Since By collapse, I mean a breakdown of social institutions like governments and then, we have been exploiting the Earth’s resources faster and faster, stealing economies, followed by a dramatic decline in the human population. I realize from future generations. Our civilization wouldn’t even exist without fossil that’s still kind of vague, so here’s a more specific definition I found in the fuels, but we are rapidly running out of them. And it appears green energy book, How Everything Can Collapse. won’t be able to replace them as there aren’t enough metals in the ground. It says, “A collapse is the process at the end of which basic needs (water, Even if we had unlimited clean energy, we would still run out of crucial food, housing, clothing, energy, etc.) can no longer be provided [at a resources like rubber, sand, groundwater, and the ingredients for fertilizer. As reasonable cost] to a majority of the population by services under legal the world’s topsoil erodes, it will get harder and harder to grow enough food supervision.” for everybody. As society breaks down, life will get simpler and simpler. By the late 21st Eventually, we might not be able to grow food at all. Water shortages are century, people will be living the way they did in the early 19th century. already becoming a major problem, and this is just the beginning. Climate How do I know this? Let’s start with humanity’s biggest problem. No, it’s not change is drying up the rivers, burning down the forests, and causing climate change. It’s something most people have never even heard of. disasters the likes of which we’ve never seen. 1. Overshoot Meanwhile, life of all types—from tiny plants to giant mammals—are going Although I’ve listed overshoot as just one of the many problems humanity is extinct even faster than they did during previous mass extinction events. As facing, I could argue that it’s the only problem we’re facing because every the web of life falls apart, human societies will become impossible to other problem on this list is the result of overshoot. Let me explain… maintain. If you’ve never heard of ecological overshoot, it’s what happens when an All this chaos will lead to the worst migration crisis in the history of the world. organism uses up an ecosystem’s resources faster than they can regenerate. The political tension and fights over resources could very well lead to nuclear This happens all the time in nature. annihilation. But things are so bad that even without nuclear war, we could 2. The End of Cheap Fossil Fuels still see human extinction by the end of this century. Before I explain this, you need to understand how important fossil fuels (coal, Believe it or not, there’s a lot more bad news that I didn’t cover in this post. I oil, and natural gas) are to our civilization. barely touched on climate tipping points, and I could have written about The first and most obvious use for fossil fuels such as oil is to make gasoline our crumbling infrastructure, the millions dying from pollution, the increasing and diesel for our vehicles. Without those, our civilization would completely risk of deadly pandemics, and much more, but this article is already far longer collapse because truckers need diesel to get food and supplies to the stores. than I originally intended. Not to mention the fact that most people in the developed world need It doesn’t please me to share this information. Personally, I am terrified. Not gasoline to get to their jobs. just for myself, but for my two young children who I had before I knew all But gasoline is just one small part of our precarious civilization. As explained this. I apologize if I have frightened you. in the book, How The World Really Works, there are at least four other things Why Climate Change Will Crush Civilization Like a Bug we need: cement, steel, plastic, and ammonia. And they all require fossil (collapsemusings.com) fuels. Born into a Primal World Born into an Oriental World Born into a Semitic Born into a Modern Born into a PostWorld World Modern World Heart-centred Kosmos with all sorts of Seers, Seeing, and the Seen from the Sensory Surface of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings Our DIALOGUES with various Others within, across, and beyond our current readings of skills in individual-collective arts, skills in inter-personal relations-morals-ethics, and skills in sciences, in matricessystems-organisations, at local, national & global scales Our DEBATES within Our Social Contracts-Disciplines in Arts, Relations-Morals-Ethics, and Sciences, in Organisations in Our Society CONFORMITY-LOYALTY to Our Prescribed Community Narratives-Norms-Rules-RolesRituals-Heritage-Traditions Born into a MetaModern World © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu My Life in My Body Seer, Seeing, and Seen Dynamics within Andrew Fanning’s Work on Downscaling Doughnut Economics to Nations Who Is Seeing within the Seer? How Is Seeing Being Done within Each of Various Schools in Arts, Morals, and Sciences within What Is Being Seen? With Love (Agape-Eros-Agency-Philia Post-Modernity? Meta-Modernity? [Communion])? Modern Cartesian Linear Time in ALL OF US, ALTOGETHER EYE OF WORLD-SOUL World-centric working to interconnect with each other in the dialogues of civilisations, each of which with their own versions of contents and discontents [personal/collective arts and skills, inter-personal relations-moralsethics, and authorised sciences] in matrices-systems-organisations Our DIALOGUES with various Others within, across, and beyond our current readings of skills in individual-collective arts, skills in inter-personal relations-morals-ethics, and skills in sciences, in matricessystems-organisations, at local, national & global scales EYE OF RATIONAL MIND Socio-centric INDEPENDENT experts-achievers, “US”, “Our” self-/we-authorised social contracts-disciplines Our DEBATES within Our Social Contracts-Disciplines in Arts, Relations-Morals-Ethics, and Sciences, in Organisations in Our Society EYE OF IN-FORMATION Ethno-centric/Group-centric DEPENDENT “US” “Our” community’s narratives-rulesroles-norms-heritage-traditions CONFORMITY-LOYALTY to Our Prescribed Community Narratives-Norms-Rules-RolesRituals-Heritage-Traditions ME EYE OF HEART-SPIRIT Kosmos-centric Wholeness [AgapeFeminine Nature], and Unity [ErosMasculine Nature], with Agentic [Masculine] Energies and Communal [Feminine] Energies in Virtues-Vices [Qualities Loved, degraded, or denied] within Each Stage-LevelLayer-Degree of DevelopmentInhabitation of a Skill and Each Set of Skills, in Each Person, in Each Community, and in Our Shared Humanity, in tune (or not) with Divine Life, Light, and Love, “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” INTER-INDEPENDENT Modernity? US Non-Modern Heart-Centred Lifecycles in A Primal An Oriental A Semitic Tradition? Tradition? Tradition? US Dependent Child? Student? Independent Adult? Inter-Independent Elder? Sage? EYE OF CORPOREAL BODY Ego-centric Agency-Communion Heart-centred Kosmos with all sorts of Seers, Seeing, and the Seen from the Sensory Surface of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings Presenting Doughnut Economics: videos and slides | DEAL Downscaling the Doughnut to nations Born into a Born into an Born into a Semitic Born into a Modern Born into a Post- Born into a MetaPrimal World Oriental World World World Modern World Modern World © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu My Life in My Body Seer, Seeing, and Seen Dynamics within r3.0’s Passionate Work on Activating Restorative Norms Who Is Seeing within the Seer? How Is Seeing Being Done within Each of Many Schools in Arts, Morals, and Sciences? r3.0 Conference 2023 | Activating Restorative Norms (r3-0.org) Heart-centred Kosmos with all sorts of Seers, Seeing, and the Seen from the Sensory Surface of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings Our DIALOGUES with various Others within, across, and beyond our current readings of skills in arts, morals-ethics, and sciences EYE OF HEARTSPIRIT “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” views of Restorative Norms r3.0 Conf Intro 2023.pptx (r3-0.org) EYE OF WORLD-SOUL INTERINDEPENDENT “All of Us, inter-relating with each other” views of Restorative Norms EYE OF RATIONAL MIND INDEPENDENT “US” views of Restorative Norms Our DEBATES within Our Social ContractsDisciplines EYE OF INFORMATION DEPENDENT “US” views of Restorative Norms EYE OF CORPOREAL BODY What Is Being Seen? CONFORMITYLOYALTY to Our Prescribed Community Norms From incremental to transformative change - YouTube [r3.0 Newsletter] 📽️ Conference Videos | Presentations | Testimonials + 🚀 UNSDPI Training Relaunch (campaign-archive.com) © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu My Life in My Body “ME” Seer, Seeing, and Seen Dynamics within Bill Baue’s The Lost Decade: Sustainability Standards Sabotage Sustainability Who Is Seeing within the Seer? How Is Seeing Being Done within Each of Various Schools in Arts, Morals, and Sciences within Non-Modern Heart-Centred Lifecycles in A Primal An Oriental A Semitic Tradition? Tradition? Tradition? INTER-INDEPENDENT EYE OF WORLD-SOUL World-centric working to interconnect with each other in the dialogues of civilisations, each of which with their own versions of contents and discontents [personal/collective arts and skills, inter-personal relations-moralsethics, and authorised sciences] in matrices-systems-organisations US EYE OF RATIONAL MIND Socio-centric INDEPENDENT experts-achievers, “US”, “Our” self-/we-authorised social contracts-disciplines US EYE OF IN-FORMATION Ethno-centric/Group-centric DEPENDENT “US” “Our” community’s narratives-rulesroles-norms-heritage-traditions EYE OF CORPOREAL BODY Ego-centric Agency-Communion With Love (Agape-Eros-Agency-Philia Post-Modernity? Meta-Modernity? [Communion])? Modernity? 2014 The European Union (EU) enters the sustainability standards space, initiating foundational work on its Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). 2020 When IIRC published its updated International Integrated Reporting Framework, it acknowledged that humanity is approaching “planetary limits,” but nevertheless continued to reject integrating the carrying capacities of the capitals. 2021 GRI releases its revised Universal Standards, eviscerating the “heart of sustainability reporting” of “placing performance information in the broader biophysical, social, and economic context” by eliminating contextualized performance assessment. 2006 In its 3rd Generation of Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (G3), GRI advance a nonsensical definition of sustainability (amounting to definitional introduces the Materiality Principle, inclusive of not only traditional cooptation) and a sociopathic approach to materiality that has been likened reporting’s financial materiality thresholds, but also sustainability thresholds to focusing on gunpowder wounds on the trigger finger. encompassed in Sustainability Context. 2023 I?SB issues its first two Sustainability Disclosure Standards, which fail to 2011 In G3.1, GRI initiates the process of sabotaging sustainability standards integrate sustainability thresholds, and the Basis for Conclusions neglects to by replacing Significance of Economic, Environmental, and Social Impacts on document the public input urging I?SB to integrate sustainability thresholds. the horizontal axis of its Materiality Matrix with Significance to the 2023 The EU releases a revised set of ESRS that expand integration of Organization – shifting the analysis from a systemic to a narcissistic scope. sustainability thresholds into almost all the Environmental Standards, but 2013 In G4, GRI refuses to provide implementation guidance on the Sustainability Context Principle, despite the fact that 66 prominent sustainability experts co-signed a Public Comment Letter urging it to take this baseline step, and providing a general specification as an example of the approach GRI could take. thresholds remain absent from the overarching Standards, as well as from the Social and Governance Standards. Just before the final release of the entire set of Standards, the EU releases a Delegated Act that diluted the Standards from mandatory to voluntary. In the end, the EU adopts the ESRS set with thresholds intact, as well as a performance standard approach, but retains 2013 In its Conceptual Framework, the Sustainability Accounting Standards the voluntary elements. Board (SASB) refuses to integrate the thresholds that define sustainability, The Decade Ahead (2023 →) repudiating the idea that companies should hold themselves accountable for 2023→Scenario One (most likely): sustainability standards continue to respecting such thresholds (in addition to external accountability sabotage sustainability. mechanisms). 2013 In its International Integrated Reporting Framework, the International Scenario Two (possible): sustainability standards make an abrupt about-face to integrate the thresholds that define sustainability and thereby advance Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) integrates the multiple capitals, but refuses to call for respecting the carrying capacities of the capitals (respecting authentic sustainability. Lost Decade: Susty Standards Sabotage Susty (r3-0.org) sustainability thresholds). Born into an Oriental World Heart-centred Kosmos with all sorts of Seers, Seeing, and the Seen from the Sensory Surface of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings 2021 The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation launches an International Sustainability Standards Board (I?SB) that absorbs IIRC and SASB to build on their foundations to create disclosure standards for financially material sustainability-related information. 2022 After shifting framing from NFRD to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) in 2021, the EU develops a set of European 2002 In its 2nd Generation of Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (G2), the Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) Exposure Drafts with sustainability Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) introduces the Sustainability Context thresholds absent from the overarching Standard, but included in one of the Principle, tied to economic, social, and environmental thresholds (“limits and Environment Standards (on Biodiversity). demands”), thereby establishing an authentic approach to sustainability. 2022 I?SB releases Sustainability Disclosure Standard Exposure Drafts that Born into a Primal World What Is Being Seen? Modern Cartesian Linear Time in The Lost Decade: 2013 - 2023 EYE OF HEART-SPIRIT Kosmos-centric Wholeness [AgapeFeminine Nature], and Unity [ErosMasculine Nature], with Agentic [Masculine] Energies and Communal [Feminine] Energies in Virtues-Vices [Qualities Loved, degraded, or denied] within Each Stage-LevelLayer-Degree of DevelopmentInhabitation of a Skill and Each Set of Skills, in Each Person, in Each Community, and in Our Shared Humanity, in tune (or not) with Selected sections from original paper. Divine Life, Light, and Love, Historical Context: 2002 - 2013 “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” ME ALL OF US, ALTOGETHER Dependent Child? Student? Independent Adult? Inter-Independent Elder? Sage? Born into a Semitic Born into a Modern Born into a PostWorld World Modern World Our DIALOGUES with various Others within, across, and beyond our current readings of skills in individual-collective arts, skills in inter-personal relations-morals-ethics, and skills in sciences, in matricessystems-organisations, at local, national & global scales Our DEBATES within Our Social Contracts-Disciplines in Arts, Relations-Morals-Ethics, and Sciences, in Organisations in Our Society CONFORMITY-LOYALTY to Our Prescribed Community Narratives-Norms-Rules-RolesRituals-Heritage-Traditions Born into a MetaModern World © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu My Life in My Body Holds the Transcendent Unity of All Beings Eye of Heart-Spirit in Emptiness Sees and Eye of Contemplative World Soul, Living with Noetic-Yogic Practices of Purifying, Illuminating, and Unifying Bodies, Souls, and Hearts, Engages in Esoteric Depths One-in-Many, Many-in-One, Wholeness and Unity, Wisdom and Compassion for All Beings e.g. from my surface self e.g. Tao to the Heart of All Beings Te Ching e.g. Wise Souls e.g. Wise Seers Inter-Independent Dialogues, Working on Transforming Our Personal Selves, Inter-Personal Relations, and Eco-Social Worlds, in Beauty, Goodness, and Truth Pathways to Wholeness and Unity Are Broken in Modern Times due to Cartesian Bifurcation e.g. Inter-Personal, Inter-Cultural, and Inter-Organisational Relations in Our Local, National, and Global Agreements Our Eye of Rational Mind Sees OUR Independent Experts-Achievers in OUR Disciplines in Arts, Morals, and Sciences within Our Schools of Negotiated Action in Primal Traditions, Religious Traditions, Modernity, Post-Modernity, and Meta-Modernity, respectively. In Modern, Postmodern, and Metamodern Disciplines, Our Eye of Rational Mind Tends to be Trained, Using Empirical Methodologies, to Focus Attention on Measuring Exoteric Surfaces, in Terms of the Familiar Cartesian Coordinates (x1, x2, x3, t). This Restricts Participation in the Universal Qualities of Beauty, Goodness, and Truth. Exoteric Surfaces Our Eye of In-Formation Sees OUR Dependent Conformists-Loyalists Learning and Living with OUR Rules and Roles within Our Schools of Prescribed Action in Primal Traditions, Religious Traditions, Modernity, Post-Modernity, and Meta-Modernity, respectively. My Life in Primal Traditions Oriental Traditions Semitic Traditions Modernity Post-Modernity Meta-Modernity What Is Being Seen within Five Stages-Levels-Layers of Reality Stages-Levels-Layers-Degrees of Participation in Beauty, Goodness, and Truth Who is Seeing: Five Eyes of Potential Knowing within Human Beings Stages-Levels-Layers in Human Development from ME to US to All of Us, Altogether From the Heart of All Beings to the Sensory Surface of Things: From the Sensory Surface of Things to the Heart of All Beings My Eye of Corporeal Body Sees MY Sensory Experiences WHO is Seeing within the Seer x HOW is Seeing being done with selected methodologies x WHAT is being Seen within Five Levels of Reality Knowledge depends on the mode of the knower, for what is known is in the knower according to the measure of their mode of knowing [adjusted] – Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) See Vedic Sanâtana Dharma, Latin Sophia Perennis, Samuel Bendeck Sotillos’ Paths That Lead to the Same Summit, and Ananda K. Coomaraswamy’s Paths That Lead to the Same Summit © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman - Academia.edu. May All Beings Be Happy: Max Wealth for the Few, and Leave All Others with Grim Lives and Futures, or Live Well within Integrative Heart-Centred Thriveability with Wholeness and Tripartite Unity in Nature, Each Community, and Each Person? We ask here: Which world do you live in? Do you inhabit the Wholeness and Tripartite Unity (Pneuma/Nous-Spiritus/Intellectus-Heart, psyche-anima-soul, somacorpus-body) of Nature? Or do you only inhabit physical sub-corporeal worlds, in which only measurements count? Many people believe, in their lives and work, that only economic growth counts. Thus, in legally authorised and socially myopic duties, at local, national, and global scales, their attention is on maximising short-term profits and long-term economic wealth in various heartless operations within Business-As-Usual. Consequently, in various inattentive ways, many marginalise and externalise coldly the health of people and planet (air, waters, soils, plants, and animals) from their immediate concerns and future considerations. Thus, many of us fail to live Heart-Centred lives, failing to truly LOVE familiar and unfamiliar people, and failing to fully engage with the thriving of life on our precious planet. So, ALL OF US are “on a highway to climate hell with our foot on the accelerator” (António Guterres, UN Sec-Gen). Let us go much deeper here in our inquiries: Why are we cascading so madly with various interacting ecological and social crises into TEOTWAWKI (The End of the World as We Know It)? From Living Worlds Woven Delightfully with Qualities, like Colours, Many people, in Primal (First Nations), Oriental, and Many people, in modern, postmodern, and to Modern Worlds Reduced to Our Selected Sets of Measurements. Semitic communities, inhabit in various ways in metamodern communities, learn to inhabit in varying degrees Qualities – like Colours, Love in various ways in varying degrees physical subAgape-Eros-Agency-Communion, Beauty in “I-I” corporeal worlds, represented mathematically in Skills in Arts, Goodness in “I-We-Thou” Heart-toterms of the familiar spatio-temporal Cartesian Heart Relations, and Truth in Vision (Who Is Seeing coordinates (x1, x2, x3, t). So, in inhabiting their in the Seer? dependent child-student? independent selected “I-it” indicators, many people tend to adult? inter-independent elder?), in Methods (How Is disregard “I-I” and “I-We-Thou” Body-Soul-Heart Seeing Being Done in arts-narratives-stories-myths? Qualities that are present in our living worlds, as in inter-personal relations-morals-ethics? and in monooften in their work they claim authoritatively that /multi-/inter-/trans-/meta-disciplinary sciences?), and ONLY THEIR MEASUREMENTS COUNT. in Outcomes (What Is Being Seen within a given skillConsequently, reality is quantified-flatlanded, context-discipline-field?) within the Wholeness and nature denatured (with air, waters, soils, plants, Tripartite Unity of Nature (Pneuma/Nous-Rūḥ/‘Aqlanimals, and humans heartlessly exploited for Source of Image: Wolfgang Smith, Spiritus/Intellectus-Heart, psyche-nafs-anima-soul, short-term profits), qualities (like life, body, mind, Philos-Sophia Initiative Foundation » To Be or Not To Be an Apple and soma-jism-corpus-body in non-modern Greeksoul, spirit, arts, morals, sciences, love, feminine, Plato’s Allegory of the Cave: Sun (Heart-Spiritus/IntellectusArabic-Latin-West, or Vedic Tribhuvana in the Oriental Pneuma/Nous) masculine, beauty, goodness, truth, justice, music, outside the cave of space and time seeing all things, East) – which are more valuable in many situations colours) disqualified, human beings dehumanised, with various limited ways of seeing apparent things inside the cave than acquired modern habits of only recognising and all of them “unfriended”, as increasingly W.E.I.R.D. of space and time, e.g., Universal Principles and Action Steps from The Convergence Magazine by Light on Light - Issuu. privileging selected sets of reductive measurements. “Ghosts in the Machine.” Obvious or not, our current cold heartlessness cannot continue. We must change or perish. As UN Secretary-General António Guterres thunders repeatedly: “Humanity has a choice: Cooperate or perish. It is either a Climate Solidarity Pact – or a Collective Suicide Pact.” So, here we must stand, altogether! We – members of our various Primal, Oriental, Semitic, Modern, Postmodern, and Metamodern communities – must work with each other to inhabit Integrative Heart-Centred Thriveability in which we are enabled to transform our current lives from my ego-centric “me” isolations, and our various ethnosocio-centric “us versus them” alienations, towards world-centric “all of us, altogether” cooperative harmonies to live well with each other, with intra-generational and inter-generational equity, within our planet’s ecological matrices-thresholds, and with fair social distributions of our planet's limited living capabilities-capacities, within everybody with everybody, and with all of this in tune with the Wholeness and Tripartite Unity of Nature. Please see: Hottest July ever signals ‘era of global boiling has arrived’ says UN chief | UN News, "Unlearning Economics": Jon Erickson, Josh Farley, Steve Keen, and Kate Raworth | The Great Simplification, Al Gore: What the fossil fuel industry doesn't want you to know | TED Talk, Job One for Humanity, Climate Emergency Forum - YouTube, ClimateSafe Villages - YouTube. © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu Surveying the Integral Cosmos: A Review of ‘Physics & Vertical Causation’ 29 August 2023 Book Review, Philosophy of Physics, Wolfgang Smith John Trevor Berger Philos-Sophia Initiative Foundation » Surveying the Integral Cosmos | Philos-Sophia Initiative According to the experts of standard cosmology, we live in a universe which is uniformly egalitarian, a homogeneous mass of subatomic particles. And this purported ‘cosmological principle’, we are told, holds from the furthest observable (and unobservable) reaches of the universe, to the ordinary moment of lived experience. The problem is that this world-picture completely contradicts what seems to be manifest to us, self-evidently, by our five senses as well as our shared, ‘common’ sense of things. If what the experts are telling us is true, then we really are living in an illusion—and many of them have no qualms about telling us just that. For the better part of four decades, Wolfgang Smith has been gradually chipping away at this impasse, and his project breaks new ground in Physics and Vertical Causation: The End of Quantum Reality. First published by Angelico Press in 2019—and now available exclusively from the Philos-Sophia Initiative—the book is an indispensable companion to the Initiative’s feature documentary on the life and work of Prof. Smith, released in 2020, The End of Quantum Reality. It is also the true sequel to his paradigm-shifting 1995 monograph, The Quantum Enigma: Finding the Hidden Key—now also available from the PhilosSophia Initiative. Physics and Vertical Causation (PVC) picks up just where The Quantum Enigma (TQE) left off: namely, the discovery of ‘vertical causality’ (VC). Yet while TQE was primarily restricted to VC’s relevance to the resolution of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, PVC probes widely and deeply into the presence of VC throughout the cosmos en masse— not to mention the ‘microcosm’, man himself. Indeed, while it may not be readily apparent by the book’s title, the work is, fundamentally, a study in cosmology; the title simply indicates whence cosmology must, in our time, take its point of departure. For if, as Smith maintains, physics is the foundational science—and quantum mechanics “physics come into its own”—then our entire view of the cosmos is necessarily affected by how we interpret quantum theory. One should take special note, incidentally, that the author’s decadeslong project reaches its summit in his last work, Physics: A Science in Quest of an Ontology (soon to be re-released in a second, Revised and Expanded edition). And these three books—The Quantum Enigma, Physics and Vertical Causation, and Physics: A Science in Quest of an Ontology, in this order—form a kind of ‘trilogy’, each one building upon the breakthroughs of the previous: a journey from the bare bones of quantum physics to a full-fledged renascence of Neoplatonist cosmology, wherein one finally sees how physics generally, and quantum mechanics specifically, fits into an ordered cosmological hierarchy.1 * * * Devoted readers of Wolfgang Smith know only too well the great care he takes—in the formulation of his position on a given issue—to articulate his ontological distinction between the ‘physical’ and the ‘corporeal’: to the world “as conceived by the physicist,” versus the world as originarily manifest to sensory perception. In PVC, he takes a great stride forward by the introduction of his etiological distinction between ‘horizontal’ and ‘vertical’ causation. But since the etiological distinction hinges upon the ontological, let’s first take a look at the latter. Owing in large part to his tremendous philosophical prowess—a rarity among contemporary scientists—when first confronted with the quantum reality problem, Smith saw something to which other theoretical physicists seem to be completely myopic: the conundrums and ‘paradoxes’ of quantum theory never stemmed from the side of physics in the first place. Rather, the origin lay in a deeply sedimented philosophical presupposition—one postulated by the likes of Galileo Galilei and John Locke, but most closely associated with René Descartes. Cartesian ‘bifurcation’—a term coined by Alfred North Whitehead, which Wolfgang Smith has put to good use throughout his authorial career—constitutes a dichotomy which divides the world into two substances, namely Thought (res cogitans) and Extension (res extensa). This gives rise to the belief that the ‘objective’ world can be wholly described in quantitative terms. In light of Smith’s ontological distinction, this is tantamount to the reduction of the corporeal to the physical. Therefore, qualitative attributes—such as colour, sound, or taste—are taken, in the Cartesian paradigm, to be mental or subjective. On the other hand, the quantitative attributes—the ‘extended’ (i.e., measurable) aspects—of the world are taken to be the ‘really real’. Quantities are thought to have ontological priority over qualities, insofar as the latter are merely ‘in our heads’ (res cogitantes). What is left in the external world, then, are objects which can be accounted for, without residue, in mathematical terms (res extensae). Smith’s philosophy of physics rests squarely upon the rejection of bifurcation, and indeed he has demonstrated that quantum paradox is itself a byproduct of the Cartesian partition. It is this unexamined assumption which underlies and, in a way, defines what is commonly reckoned as the ‘scientific outlook’, and it is precisely this—not, that is to say, some remaining ‘incompleteness’ in quantum mechanics—that renders the quandaries of quantum theory insoluble from a technical standpoint. Remove this epistemological fallacy, however, and foundational physics starts to make sense. Nor is anything scientific sacrificed in so doing: what is rejected, rather, is a false philosophical dichotomy. The physicist, then, is not, in the strict sense, dealing with the corporeal world—that world in which we find ourselves via cognitive sense perception—but with a subcorporeal domain: one which has been discovered, and to a certain degree ‘constructed’, by the interventions of the physical scientist. And these procedures are what brings into the sphere of observation what the author identifies as the physical universe—the world, once again, “as conceived by the physicist.” Now the ontological distinction, as mentioned above, necessarily entails a complementary etiological distinction. For if there are these ‘strata’ in the order of being—these two different ‘worlds’ so to speak, the corporeal and the physical—then there must be some mode of causation which is capable of traversing between the two, on pain of not being able to conduct the business of physics to begin with. And this defines a causality which is unknown to modern physics: a causal mode that is not field-based, but acts instantaneously—‘above time’ as it were. Hence we have a distinction between horizontal and vertical causation. Horizontal causation may be generally thought of as ‘physical’—the well known relation of ‘cause-&-effect’ operating in space and time—whereas vertical causation is supra-spatiotemporal. The author has thus identified a causal mode whose field of action vastly exceeds that of physical causation. And the central objective of PVC is to bring out the immense scientific, cosmological, and philosophical implications of this discovery. * * * Although first recognized within the context of resolving the quantum measurement problem, Smith found that VC is ubiquitous; its effects come into view on all sides, even from the strictly operational viewpoint of the physicist. It makes sense of the fact, for instance, that corporeal objects do not ‘multilocate’; or that cats cannot be, at once, dead and alive. The intelligibility and stability of form that we find in the corporeal world owes precisely to VC. Smith also shows how VC demystifies J. S. Bell’s celebrated interconnectedness theorem: the phenomena of ‘nonlocal’ interactions become perfectly intelligible once we see that there can in fact be cause-to-effect relations which do not involve a transfer of energy through space. It is worth pointing out, in this connection, that the ‘instantaneity’ of VC is truly atemporal—not just ‘super-fast’. PVC argues as well for the crucial role that VC plays in biology, which for nearly two centuries has been basically reduced to physics, for no better reason than that the Cartesian axiom necessitates such a reduction; res extensae are, after all, governed by horizontal causation alone. Smith demonstrates the invalidity of said reduction, specifically, in arguing that a physicalist biology—by virtue of its inability to recognize vertical effects—is, in principle, incapable of comprehending the physiology of a living organism. In other words, a physiology based upon the contemporary paradigm is able to comprehend an organism only to the extent that it is inorganic! Finally, as he ascends to the anthropic level, the author explains how VC accounts for man’s ability to produce ‘complex specified information’ (CSI). Indeed, it follows upon the strength of William Dembski’s 1998 theorem that CSI cannot be produced by means of horizontal causality: our very ability to generate CSI—or, if you prefer, intelligible forms—necessitates the existence of VC. * * * What is perhaps the most astonishing about PVC—especially to those unfamiliar with premodern thought—is Wolfgang Smith’s analysis and appropriation of what he terms the ‘tripartite cosmos’, manifested, in its respective ways, in both the macrocosm (the world) and the microcosm (the human person). His analysis of the ‘cosmic icon’ the human person is one, integral being. Neither macrocosm nor microcosm is ‘three beings’, but rather one being with three ‘levels’. The cosmic icon, in any case, depicts human nature as well as the cosmos at large. * * * 2 gives us a concise symbolic depiction which effectively encapsulates the cosmic tripartition. The book’s magisterial final chapter, “Pondering the Cosmic Icon,” brings into full view this fecund symbol—to which the author has referred in previous works as a kind of primordial archetype whose presence reverberates throughout traditional cultures—and we find in following Smith’s decoding of the icon the rediscovery of an integral cosmos. But the author really breathes new life into the cosmic icon, and what it depicts, insofar as his reflections on the import of modern physics play an important role in his definitions. First basing himself upon traditional sources, Smith posits that the cosmos consists of three tiers or domains: the corporeal, the intermediary, and the spiritual.3 What makes Smith’s account of the cosmic tripartition unique is that he differentiates these three domains vis-à-vis their spatio-temporal ‘bounds’. That is to say, whereas the corporeal world is bound by the conditions of space and time, the intermediary is bound by time alone, while the spiritual is bound by neither space nor time. One should note well here that the corporeal domain—the sensorily perceived world in its entirety—is actually the lowest stratum of the cosmic hierarchy. From the latter it follows that the physical, or ‘subcorporeal’, is technically ‘below the bottom’ of cosmic reality; hence the author’s characterization of physical objects as ‘sub-existential’. The architecture of this trichotomy, then, is accompanied by the realization that our vaunted differential equations simply do not apply above the corporeal plane, for the simple reason that said equations presuppose the bounds of space and time. Whereas VC acts from the highest reaches of the ontological hierarchy, physics—by virtue of its modus operandi—is restricted, once again, to the ‘lower third’ of the tripartite cosmos. As for man himself: the microcosm is constituted by the tripartition of body (corpus or soma), soul (anima or psyche), and spirit (spiritus or pneuma). Inasmuch as the human person is a true ‘cosmos in miniature’, whatever can be said of the macrocosm is echoed in the microcosm. For instance, while the body is bound by space and time, the soul is bound by time alone, and the spirit by neither space nor time. But it’s crucial to remember that, just as the macrocosm is one, integral being—whose tiers are distinguishable, but not separated, by particular bounds—so What is also new in PVC—and which will no doubt come to the surprise (and consternation) of many—is Prof. Smith’s final and decisive break with the physics of Albert Einstein.4 While in previous decades Smith suggested that while the theory of relativity may well pertain to the physical universe, it does not, strictly speaking, pertain to the corporeal world. PVC, however, tells a new tale. Smith now lays it down categorically that, even on purely physical grounds, Einsteinian relativity is a no-go. And it turns out that relativity falls on shockingly simple theoretical grounds. The author also provides a brief exposé on several little-publicized falsifications of relativity on empirical grounds. Upon analysis of the basic premises of Einstein’s original 1905 paper on special relativity, Smith finds that Einstein’s Principle of Relativity is based upon little more than the fact that it offers a reason why the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887 failed to detect any orbital velocity of Earth. That the principle of relativity preserves the Copernican cosmological principle may explain why—even in spite of adverse empirical findings from Einstein’s time to the present day—the theory remains sacrosanct by the physics establishment. Intriguingly, we also learn that the renowned formula E = mc²—perhaps the most celebrated ‘proof’ of Einstein’s theory—is derivable from classical electrodynamics. Smith contends that, in the final count, Einsteinian relativity is founded on ideological grounds, not empirical ones. Of the many areas of inquiry wherein ideological scientism has instigated what the author characterizes as a “war on design,” two in particular stand out: (1) Darwinism, which denies design in the origin of biological species; and (2) relativistic physics, which negates design on a cosmic scale. Apropos the latter, Smith’s argument is that the equations of classical physics, in conjunction with Mach’s principle, actually imply a geocentric cosmos—and this is surely the epitome of design ‘on a cosmic scale’. The possibility of Einsteinian space-time is, furthermore, ruled out on rigorous metaphysical grounds, in light of the author’s reflections on the tripartition of the integral cosmos. For if the bounds of space and time are ontologically incommensurable, there simply cannot be—as a matter of principle—any such intelligibly combined phenomenon of ‘spacetime’. Moreover, Smith demonstrates that an ‘absolute simultaneity’, a universal Now—categorically absent from the notion of Einsteinian space-time—is globally defined throughout the corporeal cosmos. * * * A final note: The epithet “the end of quantum reality”—the subtitle of the book and title of the documentary film—has been met with some unwarranted prima facie skepticism. Is Wolfgang Smith suggesting we abandon quantum physics, after all the technological wonders it has wrought for instance? Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, Prof. Smith is among quantum mechanics’ strongest defenders. What, then, does this ‘end’ refer to? It refers to the end of a spurious cosmography which would reduce the corporeal world to the physical universe: the popular notion that all those corporeal entities with which we are in continuous contact are no more than ‘aggregates of subatomic particles’—to wit, the idea that reality is fundamentally a quantum reality. But quantum physics is one thing, while ‘quantum reality’ is something else entirely. There is thus no ‘pseudoscientific obscurantism’ here. Quite to the contrary: we are here presented a cosmological vision which renders pseudoscientific—or at any rate untenable—the pop-cosmology peddled for decades by the likes of Stephen Hawking, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Lawrence Krauss, et al. It is this false picture which comes to an ‘end’. After absorbing Smith’s insights one realizes just to what extent authentic science has been contaminated by fallacious philosophical presuppositions which have no place in scientific inquiry. By drawing a clear distinction between physics and philosophy, the author brings the true nature of physics into optimal clarity. On seeing this, we find that the genuine, ‘operational’ findings of quantum physics fit like a glove into the ontological hierarchy and the perennial wisdom of mankind. What emerges from the considerations of Physics and Vertical Causation is an incomparably enlarged worldview: a cosmos vast enough to encompass all of modern science—from the distant stars to subatomic particles—as well as the quintessential patrimony of antiquity. The discovery of vertical causality has reopened the door to truths higher than those discoverable by empiriological means. Wolfgang Smith has shown that a radical expansion of our worldview is both scientifically admissible and absolutely necessary for a proper understanding of physics, not to mention our own human nature. References: 1. Recall that, in the original Greek, the word for cosmos is the antithesis of chaos. If the universe really were just a homogenous amalgam of ‘quantum stuff’, no model of it could meaningfully lay claim to being a bona fide ‘cosmology’. 2. Impressively featured in The End of Quantum Reality—but not fully explained! Again, the book and the film are complementary. 3. Readers familiar with his more recent work will note that the ‘spiritual’ (or ‘celestial’) is now customarily designated by the term ‘aeviternal’. For all intents and purposes one may take ‘spiritual’, ‘celestial’, and ‘aeviternal’ as interchangeable. 4. More accurately: with how Einstein is conceived in the popular imagination, viz. in association with his theory of relativity. Einstein in fact made two major discoveries having nothing to do with relativity, one on the photoelectric effect (for which he duly received the Nobel), the other on Brownian motion. That these are bona fide contributions to the field is beyond dispute. John Trevor Berger is Editor of PSI Publishing. A writer and musician from Atlanta, he is a graduate of Georgia State University, where he studied Philosophy, English Literature, and Art History. The Fundamental Crisis in Our W.E.I.R.D. Modern World’s “War on Nature” The integral kosmos and integral human being are ontologically tripartite, composed of the Tribhuvana or “triple world” in the Vedic East, Pneuma/Nous-Rūḥ/‘Aql-Spiritus/IntellectusHeart, psyche-nafs-anima-soul, and soma-jism-corpus-body in Greek-Arabic-Latin-English. In ordinary corporeal worlds, various QUALITIES, like COLOURS, are more valuable in many situations than reductive measurements. In the modern cosmos, human beings learn to inhabit a spatio-temporal world represented mathematically in terms of three spatial coordinates and a linear temporal coordinate: the familiar Cartesian quadruple (x1, x2, x3, t). In modern physical sub-corporeal worlds, regardless of various body-soul-heart qualities that are present in a living context, only MEASUREMENTS count. Source: Wolfgang Smith, To Be Or Not To Be An Apple, Philos-Sophia Initiative. In corporeal worlds, QUALITIES – like colours, love, and other virtues that In modern physical sub-corporeal spatio-temporal worlds, represented presence beauty, goodness, and truth in various ways – have more value in mathematically in terms of the familiar Cartesian coordinates (x1, x2, x3, t), many situations than QUANTITIES-measurements-data. Moreover, qualities QUANTITIES-measurements-data have primacy in many situations. Thus, participate in the Wholeness of Nature (spiritus-heart, anima-soul, and Nature tends to be denatured, human beings dehumanised, qualities (like corpus-body) in principial equilibrium, uniting various complementaries and life, love, mind, soul, spirit, beauty, goodness, truth, feminine, masculine, et oppositions (silence-sound, essence-substance, masculine-feminine, yang- al.) disqualified, “unfriended” as “ghosts in the machine.” This is said to be yin, good-evil, et al.) at the Heart of All Beings. What is GOOD for planetary good? for economic growth, opening pathways for technological innovations, health and human happiness is human beings becoming fully alive, living with attention on making evermore profits, mandated by law, with limited or creatively in tune with Universal Spirit (Seer) and Sacred Nature (Seen). no responsibility for spiritual transformation from ego- to Heart-Centredness. Inhabitants: People living in tune with Universal Spirit and Mother Nature (Sat-Chit-Ananda) include Inhabitants: People operating with Cartesian principles (res extensae [extended things in space-time], and Heart-Centred philosophers, metaphysicians, mythologists, and storytellers in our Primal Traditions (in res cogitantes [“things of the mind”]) include modernists, who hold that “physics is the basis of reality and Africa, Asia, Europe, Americas, Oceania, et al.) and in our World Religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, that science and rationality set people free,” postmodernists, who hold “a critical stance towards Christianity, Islam, Taoism et al.) that say: 1) beyond the worlds of things, lives, minds, and souls is Divine knowledge and science, and power structures, unconscious drives, cognitive biases, and arbitrary social Presence, 2) in living beings, there is a natural capacity for, a relative similarity to, and a deep longing constructions that enthral human minds,” and metamodernists, who hold “a worldview which combines for Divine Presence, and 3) the true goal of existence is conscious participation in Divine Presence. the modern faith in progress with the postmodern critique” (Source: Metamoderna). “According to the traditional wisdom of humankind, the anthropos constitutes actually a microcosm: a Susanne Cook-Greuter, Vertical Development Academy, in Paul van Schaik’s Urban Hub 23: Integral Africa, “cosmos in miniature,” a fact which entails that even as a human being is tripartite – consisting of corpus p. 116, refers to our W.E.I.R.D. English mediated version of reality, and “how the world is being colonized (body), anima (soul), and spiritus (heart) in the Latin West, the tribhuvana or “triple world” in the Vedic and influenced by Western ideas of what it means to be a developing human being.” W.E.I.R.D. (original East – so too is the cosmos at large tripartite (corporeal, intermediary, and spiritual). It is thus the artist, version found in behavioral sciences) – Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, Democratic. W.E.I.R.D. and above all the saint – the “pure in heart” – who know how to perceive” (adjusted), Wolfgang Smith, (Susanne Cook-Greuter’s version) – White, Educated, Integrally-informed, (post)-Rational, Developmental. The End of Quantum Reality, Physics and Vertical Causation, The Vertical Ascent, The Quantum Enigma, W.E.I.R.D. (my version) – Western, Educated in modern Cartesian principles (res extensae [extended things Ancient Wisdom and Modern Misconceptions, Science & Myth, Cosmos & Transcendence, and his essays, in space-time], and res cogitantes [“things of the mind”]), Industrialised in mechanistic information Vertical Causation and Wholeness, The Tripartite Wholeness, Cosmic versus Measurable Time et al., Philos- systems, Rich in exploiting Nature’s limited resources beyond our only planet’s natural carrying capacities, Sophia Initiative; Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Who Is Man? (Studies in Comparative Religion, Vol.2, No.1); Ananda Democratic in reducing the quality of human maturity to a single vote in regular or occasional political K. Coomaraswamy, The Christian and Oriental, or True, Philosophy of Art; Whitall N. Perry, The Spiritual elections. Moreover, much of this also tends to be V.U.C.A.: Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, Ambiguous. Ascent (previously A Treasury of Traditional Wisdom); Titus Burckhardt, Sacred Art in East and West, The A Key Question for All of Us in the 2020s: Are there healthy ways to integrate the limited worthwhile Universality of Sacred Art, The Seven Liberal Arts (Studies in Comparative Religion, Vol.16, No.1&2, discoveries that have been made and continue to be made within our modern physical spatio-temporal www.studiesincomparativereligion.com); Henri Bortoft, The Wholeness of Nature; Cynthia Bourgeault, Eye worlds into a living harmony within corpus-anima-spiritus, within Universal Spirit and Mother Nature, on of the Heart; Richard Rohr, The Universal Christ; Center for Action and Contemplation (cac.org); Karen our planet? Footnotes2Plato | Philos-Sophia Initiative Foundation, Wolfgang Smith & John Vervaeke: a Armstrong, Sacred Nature; Samuel Bendeck Sotillos, The Transfiguration of the Human Being et al. Dialogos on Turning Toward a Science Grounded in Platonism & Levels of Intelligibility – John Vervaeke. © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman - Academia.edu Secretary-General's opening remarks at press conference on climate | United Nations Secretary-General, 27 July 2023. A very good morning. Humanity is in the hotseat. Today, the World Meteorological Organization and the European Commission’s Copernicus Climate Change Service are releasing official data that confirms that July 2023 is set to be the hottest month ever recorded in human history. We don’t have to wait for the end of the month to know this. Short of a mini-Ice Age over the next days, July 2023 will shatter records across the board. According to the data released today, July has already seen the hottest three-week period ever recorded; the three hottest days on record; and the highest-ever ocean temperatures for this time of year. The consequences are clear and they are tragic: children swept away by monsoon rains; families running from the flames; workers collapsing in scorching heat. For vast parts of North America, Asia, Africa and Europe – it is a cruel summer. For the entire planet, it is a disaster. And for scientists, it is unequivocal – humans are to blame. All this is entirely consistent with predictions and repeated warnings. The only surprise is the speed of the change. Climate change is here. It is terrifying. And it is just the beginning. The era of global warming has ended; the era of global boiling has arrived. The air is unbreathable. The heat is unbearable. And the level of fossil fuel profits and climate inaction is unacceptable. Leaders must lead. No more hesitancy. No more excuses. No more waiting for others to move first. There is simply no more time for that. It is still possible to limit global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius and avoid the very worst of climate change. But only with dramatic, immediate climate action. We have seen some progress. A robust rollout of renewables. Some positive steps from sectors such as shipping. But none of this is going far enough or fast enough. Accelerating temperatures demand accelerated action. We have several critical opportunities ahead. The Africa Climate Summit. The G20 Summit. The UN Climate Ambition Summit. COP28. But leaders – and particularly G20 countries responsible for 80% of global emissions – must step up for climate action and climate justice. What does that mean in practice? First, emissions. We need ambitious new national emissions reduction targets from G20 members. And we need all countries to take action in line with my Climate Solidarity Pact and Acceleration Agenda: Hitting fast forward so that developed countries commit to reach net zero emissions as close as possible to 2040, and emerging economies as close as possible to 2050, with support from developed countries to do so. And all actors must come together to accelerate a just and equitable transition from fossil fuels to renewables -- as we stop oil and gas expansion, and funding and licensing for new coal, oil and gas. Credible plans must also be presented to exit coal by 2030 for OECD countries and 2040 for the rest of the world. Ambitious renewable energy goals must be in line with the 1.5 degree limit. And we must reach net zero electricity by 2035 in developed countries and 2040 elsewhere, as we work to bring affordable electricity to everyone on earth. We also need action from leaders beyond governments. I urge companies as well as cities, regions, and financial institutions to come to the Climate Ambition Summit with credible transition plans that are fully aligned with the United Nations’ net zero standard, presented by our High-Level Expert Group. Financial institutions must end their fossil fuel lending, underwriting and investments and shift to renewables instead. And fossil fuel companies must chart their move towards clean energy, with detailed transition plans across the entire value chain: No more greenwashing. No more deception. And no more abusive distortion of anti-trust laws to sabotage net zero alliances. Second, adaptation. Extreme weather is becoming the new normal. All countries must respond and protect their people from the searing heat, fatal floods, storms, droughts, and raging fires that result. Those countries on the frontlines -- who have done the least to cause the crisis and have the least resources to deal with it -must have the support they need to do so. It is time for a global surge in adaptation investment to save millions of lives from climate [carnage.] That requires unprecedented coordination around the priorities and plans of vulnerable developing countries. Developed countries must present a clear and credible roadmap to double adaptation finance by 2025 as a first step towards devoting at least half of all climate finance to adaptation. Every person on earth must be covered by an early warning system by 2027 – by implementing the Action Plan we launched last year. And countries should consider a set of global goals to mobilize international action and support on adaptation. That leads to the third area for accelerated action – finance. Promises made on international climate finance must be promises kept. Developed countries must honour their commitments to provide $100 billion a year to developing countries for climate support and fully replenish the Green Climate Fund. I am concerned that only two G7 countries – Canada and Germany – have made until now replenishment pledges. Countries must also operationalize the loss and damage fund at COP28 this year. No more delays; no more excuses. More broadly, many banks, investors and other financial actors continue to reward polluters and incentivize wrecking the planet. We need a course correction in the global financial system so that it supports accelerated climate action. That includes putting a price on carbon and pushing the multilateral development banks to overhaul their business models and approaches to risk. We need the multilateral development banks leveraging their funds to mobilize much more private finance at reasonable cost to developing countries -- and scaling up their funding to renewables, adaptation and loss and damage. In all these areas, we need governments, civil society, business and others working in partnership to deliver. I look forward to welcoming first-movers and doers on the Acceleration Agenda to New York for the Climate Ambition Summit in September. And to hearing how leaders will respond to the facts before us. This is the price of entry. The evidence is everywhere: humanity has unleashed destruction. This must not inspire despair, but action. We can still stop the worst. But to do so we must turn a year of burning heat into a year of burning ambition. And accelerate climate action – now. Three Concise Views of Human Development: From “ME” to “US” to “All of Us, Humanity and Nature, Altogether” Feminine Presence of Wholeness 3. Worldcentric “All of Us”, with Each Other, Altogether + Ethno-Socio-centric “US” Our Community + Egocentric “ME” My Body Nondual: Emptiness is Form; Form is Emptiness The Dream Metaphor of Mary & Jane (Rupert Spira Summary) | Sloww Source of Image: Ken Wilber, The Integral Vision, Welcome to Integral Life – Integral Life Plato’s Allegory of the Cave: Sun (Heart-Intellect-Pneuma), outside the cave of space and time, seeing all things, with various limited ways of seeing apparent things inside the cave of space and time. 18. Pneuma/Nous-Spiritus/Intellectus-Heart (Causal Formless) 17. Pneuma/Nous-Spiritus/Intellectus-Heart (Subtle Archetypal) 16. Pneuma/Nous-Spiritus/Intellectus-Heart (Integrative Visioning) 15. Vision-logic (late, ~28 years onward): Cross-paradigmatic engagements, dialectical developmentalism with seer [who is seeing] x seeing [how is seeing being done in arts-morals-sciences] x seen [what is being seen in a skill-context-field] x why [purpose, good or ill] dynamics as World Process-Soul 14. Vision-logic (middle): Inter-connects various contexts-histories 13. Vision-logic (early, ~21 years onward): Initial inclusivist-pluralist skills-stories-contexts-contracts-disciplines-matrices-systems, diverse dynamic multi-cross-inter-trans-meta-disciplinary contexts-histories 5. All of Us, Humanity and Nature (Heart-Soul-Body), Altogether 4. All of Us, Interconnecting with Each Other, Inter-Independent Inclusivists 3. Us, Our Social Contracts Centred, Independent Disciplinary Experts-Achievers 2. Us, Our Community Centred, Dependent Rules-Roles Conformists 1. Me, My Body Centred 2. Ethnocentric “US” Our Community + Egocentric “ME” My Body 1. Egocentric “ME” My Body Masculine Quest for Unity 12. Formal rational mind (late formal operations, self-/we-authorised expert-achiever disciplinary esteem): Multiple static formal rational readings of skills-stories-contexts-contracts-disciplines-systems 11. Formal rational mind (early formal operations, ~11-21 years): thinking-feeling about thinking-feeling, questioning literal exclusive readings of skills-narratives-stories-myths-concepts-symbols-imagesemotions-impulses, formalising rationality, static universal formalism 10. Rules-roles mind (late concrete operations): OUR literal one-rightway myths, OUR rationalisations of OUR exclusive mythic structures 9. Rules-roles mind (early concrete operations, belonging, ~7-11 years): Concrete-literal readings of narratives, stories, myths, images, symbols, concepts, emotions, and impulses; learning OUR skills in reason, will, sentiments, imagination, and memory; locus of mythic power is in OUR deified mythic socio-political Order (family, tribe, community, or nation) 8. Concept (representational mind) (~2-4 years): Ego omnipotence transferred to local Power-Gods 7. Endocept: Ego omnipotence challenged 6. Symbol (~2 years): Locus of magic power = ego 5. Image: Word magic, phantasmic-emotional, narcissistic 4. Impulse (~9 months): Subject-object fusions “selfobject” 3. Exocept “hatching” (~5-9 months): Hallucinatory wish fulfillment 2. Perception: Self-enclosed, uroboric, sensory-corporeal body 1. Sensation: Self-enclosed, uroboric, sensory-corporeal body (sight, smell, sound, taste, and touch) Matter (sub-atomic, atomic, molecular, polymer, cellular): Undifferentiated, pleromatic body Adapted from: Ken Wilber, The Atman Project, Transformations of Consciousness, Integral Psychology, Integral Spirituality. Notwithstanding the reductionist claims of many modern scientists, such as “You’re nothing but a pack of neurons”. © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu Approximate Correspondences of Stages-Levels-Layers in Human Development Across Selected Models Kosmoscentric Ways of Living Worldcentric Ethnocentric Sociocentric Egocentric ME (in Dependence) US (in Independence) All of Us, Altogether (in Inter-Independencies) Who is Seeing in the Seer? Abraham Maslow Hierarchy of Needs Jane Loevinger WUSCT, Ego Development Robert Kegan Orders of Consciousness Jennifer Garvey Berger Susanne Cook-Greuter MAP VeDA’s LMF William R. Torbert GLP ActionLogics Edward J. Kelly ActionLogics Kurt Fischer Skill Assessment, Theo Dawson LAS, Lectica Clare W. Graves, Spiral Dynamics Non-modern, modern, post-modern, and meta-modern worlds tend to inhabit different understandings of human development. Non-modern worlds value the spiritual “I-I” journey from my self to True Self, Divine Qualities, and Oneness with the Wholeness of Nature. Modern worlds, informed by Cartesian bifurcation, value things that can be measured, primarily measurements of res extensae in modern physical and life sciences, and secondarily measurements of res cogitantes, often reduced to modern psychometrics and/or sociometrics. Post-modern worlds tend to critique modern lifeless mechanics with living systems designs, often in terms of non-hierarchical relations. Meta-modern worlds tend to value from less to more complex, developmental, or evolutionary understandings, with some choosing to use models of adult development, like the models presented here [also see the charts in Ken Wilber’s Integral Psychology (pp. 197-217)]. Integrative Heart-Centred Thriveability involves inter-relating non-modern, modern, post-modern, and meta-modern values at child “ME”, adult “US”, and sage “All of Us, Altogether” stages-levels-layers of development within the Wholeness (Spiritus-Anima-Corpus) of Nature. Unitive Ironist SelfTranscendence SelfActualisation Integrated e9 Autonomous e8 Aesthetic Individualistic e7 Cognitive Conscientious e6 Self-Esteem Self-Aware e5 Belonging Conformist e4 Delta e3 Socialized/ Interpersonal (Third Order) GroupCentred Diplomat Diplomat Safety Self-Protective e3 Instrumental/ Imperial (Second Order) Self-Centred Opportunist Opportunist SelfTransforming/ Inter-Individual (Fifth Order) Self-Authoring/ Institutional (Fourth Order) Construct Aware SelfActualising AlchemistMagician Alchemical Strategist Transforming SelfQuestioning Individualist Redefining Abstract Systems (Ab3) SelfDetermining Achiever Achiever Abstract Mappings (Ab2) Skill-Centred Expert Technician Expert (Ab1/Rp4) Single Abstractions Impulsive e2 Survival Pre-Social e1 Impulsive (First Order) Principled Systems (P3) Principled Mappings (P2) Single Principles/ Axioms (P1/Ab4) Impulsive Impulsive Representational Systems (Rp3) Representational Mappings (Rp2) (Rp1/A4) Single Representations Action Sensorimotor (A1, A2, A3) Turquoise Global View Yellow Flex Flow Green Human Bond John Kesler Integral Polarity Practice Worlds Aware Kosmic Aware Pattern Aware Construct Aware Systems Aware Context Aware Achievement Orange Strive Drive Blue Truth Force Red Power Gods Expertise Meaning Discerning Awareness Power Relations Purple Kin Spirits Seeking Beige Survival Sense Life Ken Wilber Integral AQAL Theory Terri O’Fallon STAGES Pacific Integral Nondual Unity (Clear Light White, Ultraviolet, Violet) Unified Tier (7.0 – 8.5 pp) (Indigo) Graded Wholeness (Turquoise) Holistic (Teal) Pluralist Harmony (Green) Rational Achievement (Orange) Mythic Love (Amber) Magic Power Vitality (Red) Magic Sex (Magenta) ArchaicHunger (CrimsonInfrared) Illumined (6.5 pp) Universal (6.0 pp) Transpersonal (5.5 pp) Construct Aware (5.0 pp) Strategist (4.5 pp) Pluralist (4.0 pp) Achiever (3.5 pp) Expert (3.0 pp) Conformist (2.5 pp) Rule Oriented (2.0 pp) Egocentric (1.5 pp) Impulsive (1.0 pp) (pp = person perspective) Proposed correspondences of stages-levels-layers across these selected models of human development are approximate. Keep in mind each model privileges its own selected sets of variables, such as linear time within Cartesian coordinates. Adapted from: Tom Murray, Sentence Completion Assessments for Ego Development, Meaning-Making, and Wisdom Maturity, Including STAGES, Integral Leadership Review, Aug.-Nov.2017. © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu Three, Five, or Eighteen Stages-Levels-Layers-Degrees of Skilfulness within Various Values within Each Person, within Inter-Personal Relations within Communities, and within Sciences within Our Organisations All of Us US In Our Love: in creative plays of Agape-Eros-Agency-Philia In My Love: in AgapeEros-Agency-Philia ME In Divine Love: in creative plays of Agape-Eros-Agency-Philia Varying Capabilities in Various Skills in Arts, in Morals-Ethics in Inter-Personal Relations, and in Various Sciences, in each Person, in each Community, and in each Organisation, in our Eco-Society 18. Pneuma/Nous-Spiritus-Heart (Causal Formless) 17. Pneuma/Nous-Spiritus-Heart (Subtle Archetypal) 16. Pneuma-Spiritus-Heart (Integrative Heartful Visioning) 15. Vision-logic (late, ~28 years onward): Cross-paradigmatic engagements, dialectical developmentalism with seer [who is seeing] x seeing [how is seeing being done in arts-moralssciences] x seen [what is being seen in a skill-context] x why [purpose, good or ill] dynamics as World Process-Soul 14. Vision-logic (middle): Inter-relates contexts-histories 13. Vision-logic (early, ~21 years onward): Inclusivistpluralist-dynamic skills-contexts-contracts-disciplinesfields-histories-matrices-systems 12. Formal rational mind (late formal operations, self-/we-authorised expert-achiever disciplinary esteem): Multiple static formal rational contracts-disciplines-systems 11. Formal rational mind (early formal operations, ~11-21 years): thinking-feeling about thinking-feeling, questioning literal exclusive readings of symbols-myths-concepts, formalising rationality, static universal formalism 10. Rules-roles mind (late concrete operations): OUR literal one-right-way myths, OUR rationalisations of OUR exclusive socio-political mythic structures-functions 9. Rules-roles mind (early concrete operations, belonging, ~7-11 years): Concrete-literal readings of myths, concepts, symbols, images, and impulses; learning OUR skills in reason, will, sentiments, imagination, and memory; locus of mythic power is in OUR deified mythic socio-political Order 8. Concept (representational mind) (~2-4 years): Ego omnipotence transferred to local Power-Gods 7. Endocept: Ego omnipotence challenged 6. Symbol (~2 years): Locus of magic power = ego 5. Image: Word magic, phantasmic-emotional, narcissistic 4. Impulse (~9 months): Subject-object fusions “selfobject” 3. Exocept “hatching” (~5-9 months): Hallucinatory wish fulfillment Primal Values Oriental Values Semitic Values Modern Values Postmodern Values Metamodern Values Heart-Centred Arts, Morals, and Sciences, One-in-All, All-in-One, Humanity and Nature, Altogether No Tripartite Kosmos (Pneuma/Nous-Spiritus/Intellectus-Heart, Psyche-Anima-Soul, and Soma-Corpus-Body), nor Vedic Tribhuvana (Svar-Bhuvas-Bhū), within Modern, Postmodern, or Metamodern Sets of Values. Inter-Independent “I-I” skills in individual and collective arts, “I-We-Thou” skills in inter-personal relations-moralsethics-cultures, and “I-Org” skills in sciences, interconnecting with each other, within, across, and beyond various schools within a Primal Tradition (various schools within First Peoples in Africa, Asia, Europe, North-Central-South America, Australia, and Oceania), various Schools within an Oriental Tradition (various schools within Taoism, Confucianism, Shintoism, Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, Sikhism et al.), and various Schools within a Semitic Tradition (various schools within Judaism, Christianity, Islam et al.), and within, across, and beyond various schools with Modern (sciences of measurement) sets of values, various schools with Postmodern (critiques of lifeless mechanics and authoritarian knowledge claims) sets of values, and various schools with Metamodern (working to hold modern and postmodern knowledge claims altogether) sets of values, within, across, and beyond various places in Europe, North-Central-South America, Asia, Africa, Australia, and Oceania. Independent Independent Independent Independent Independent Independent expertsexpertsexpertsexpertsexpertsexpertsachievers in one achievers in one achievers in one achievers in one achievers in one achievers in one or more Arts, or more Arts, or more Arts, or more Arts, or more Arts, or more Arts, Morals, or Morals, or Morals, or Morals, or Morals, or Morals, or Sciences in one Sciences in one Sciences in one Sciences in one Sciences in one Sciences in one or more Schools or more Schools or more Schools or more Schools or more Schools or more Schools in our Primal in our Oriental in our Semitic with our Modern with our Postwith our MetaTradition Tradition Tradition Values modern Values modern Values Dependent students in skills in one or more Arts, Morals, or Sciences in one or more Schools in our Primal Tradition Dependent students in skills in one or more Arts, Morals, or Sciences in one or more Schools in our Oriental Tradition Dependent students in skills in one or more Arts, Morals, or Sciences in one or more Schools in our Semitic Tradition Dependent students in skills in one or more Arts, Morals, or Sciences in one or more Schools with our Modern Values Born into a Born into a Born into a Born into a Community in a Community in Community in a Community with Primal Tradition an Oriental Semitic Tradition Modern Values in Africa, Asia, Tradition (Judaism, in Europe, Asia, Europe, (Hinduism, Christianity, Africa, Americas Americas et al. Buddhism et al.) Islam et al.) and other places 2. Perception: Self-enclosed, uroboric, sensory-corporeal body (sight, smell, sound, taste, and touch) 1. Sensation: Self-enclosed, uroboric, sensory-corporeal body (sight, smell, sound, taste, and touch) Matter (sub-atomic, atomic, molecular, polymer, cellular): Undifferentiated, pleromatic body Nondual: Emptiness is Form; Form is Emptiness Dependent students in skills in one or more Arts, Morals, or Sciences in one or more Schools with our Postmodern Values Dependent students in skills in one or more Arts, Morals, or Sciences in one or more Schools with our Metamodern Values Born into a Community with Postmodern Values in Europe, Africa, Asia, Americas Born into a Community with Metamodern Values in Europe, Africa, Asia, Americas Adapted from: Ken Wilber, The Atman Project, Transformations of Consciousness, Integral Psychology, Integral Spirituality. Notwithstanding the reductionist claims of many modern scientists, such as “You’re nothing but a pack of neurons”. © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman - Academia.edu Looking into the Philosophical Roots of Current Obsessions with Limitless Economic Growth on Our Limited Planet On Cartesian Bifurcation in the 1920s Whitehead spoke of the “bifurcation of nature into two systems of reality” (1920 [1986: 30]) to denote the strategy—originating with Galileo, Descartes, Boyle and Locke—of bifurcating nature into the essential reality of primary qualities and the non-essential reality of “psychic additions” or secondary qualities, ultimately to be explained away in terms of primary qualities. Whitehead sided with Berkeley in arguing that the primary/secondary distinction is not tenable (1920 [1986: 43–44]), that all qualities are “in the same boat, to sink or swim together” (1920 [1986: 148]), and that, for example, “The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.” Alfred North Whitehead Vedic Tradition Process and Reality pt. 2, ch. 1 (1929) Excerpt from Alfred North Whitehead (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Modern West the red glow of the sunset should be as much part of nature as are the molecules and electric waves by which men of science would explain the phenomenon. (1920 [1986: 29]) Whitehead described the philosophical outcome of the bifurcation of nature as follows: The primary qualities are the essential qualities of substances whose spatiotemporal relationships constitute nature. … The occurrences of nature are in some way apprehended by minds … But the mind in apprehending also experiences sensations which, properly speaking, are qualities of the mind alone. These sensations are projected by the mind so as to clothe appropriate bodies in external nature. Thus the bodies are perceived as with qualities which in reality do not belong to them, qualities which in fact are purely the offspring of the mind. Thus nature gets credit which should in truth be reserved for ourselves: the rose for its scent: the nightingale for his song: and the sun for his radiance. The poets are entirely mistaken. They should address their lyrics to themselves, and should turn them into odes of self-congratulation on the excellency of the human mind. Nature is a dull affair, soundless, scentless, colorless; merely the hurrying of material, endlessly, meaninglessly. (1925 [1967: 54]) “The enormous success of the scientific abstractions”, Whitehead wrote, “has foisted onto philosophy the task of accepting them as the most concrete rendering of fact” and, he added: Thereby, modern philosophy has been ruined. It has oscillated in a complex manner between three extremes. There are the dualists, who accept matter and mind as on an equal basis, and the two varieties of monists, those who put mind inside matter, and those who put matter inside mind. But this juggling with abstractions can never overcome the inherent confusion introduced by the ascription of misplaced concreteness to the scientific scheme. (1925 [1967: 55]) On Cartesian Bifurcation in 2023: An Excerpt from Wolfgang Smith’s Physics: A Science in Quest of an Ontology To the extent that modern physics possesses an ontology at all, it has tended to be the Cartesian doctrine of "bifurcation." Not only, however, does this thesis prove to be untenable, but since the advent of quantum theory it has rendered physics de facto incomprehensible. This book introduces an astoundingly uncomplicated and inherently Platonist ontology in which the quantum theoretic stratum assumes its rightful place within the hierarchy of being. An ontological distinction is thus to be made between the spatio-temporal world as perceptible, and that world as conceived by the physicist: the two are by no means the same. No wonder that—from the physicist’s point of view—the measurement problem could not be solved: what else can you expect, given that the act of measurement—inasmuch as the result must be perceptible—transcends “the world of physics” categorically! What strikes me as perhaps the most amazing fact concerning the quantum measurement quandary is that it has apparently failed to rouse the physics community at large from their “Cartesian slumber.” What is called for is an ontological distinction between the spatio-temporal world as perceptible and the world as conceived by the physicist: the corporeal and the physical, we shall say. It appears that Eddington was right: there are in truth “two Here is An excerpt from 'Physics: A Science in Quest of an Ontology' tables.” There is namely the one I can see and touch, and the one made of “atoms and the void” which I cannot. - SAND (scienceandnonduality.com) The first step towards an ontological comprehension of physics consists in the rediscovery of what we term the corporeal domain, which is basically the perceptible, beginning with the visual. It is neither necessary nor feasible—initially, at least—to speculate about the other four senses, nor to worry about “border cases” and the like. To regain a grasp of “the corporeal” it is needful to substantiate that the grass is indeed “green”: and this should suffice to break the Cartesian [1] spell. There is thus a categorical distinction to be made between the world as conceived by the physicist—which we refer to as the physical—and the perceptible world in which we “live and have our being,” which we distinguish ontologically from the physical as the corporeal. What renders a corporeal entity thus irreducible is the ontological fact that, in its essence, it is not subject to the bounds of space and time. And this notion of irreducible wholeness leads quite naturally to the Platonist ontology represented by the tripartite cosmos, as we have come to conceive of it. In this ontology the integral cosmos divides hierarchically into three domains, ranging from the corporeal—subject to the bounds of both space and time—to what may traditionally be termed the aeviternal, which is subject to neither and must consequently be the ontological stratum from which both VC and IW are ultimately derived. Dante refers to it poetically as “the pivot around which the primordial wheel revolves,” a metaphor in which that “primordial wheel” refers evidently to time, which proves in fact to be definitive of an ontological stratum referred to traditionally as the intermediary domain, of which the corporeal is the termination. The integral cosmos may therefore be represented in iconographic mode as a circle in which the center represents the aeviternal realm, the interior the intermediary, and the circumference the corporeal domain. Having rejected Cartesian bifurcation, we reflect upon what this entails in regard to the measurement problem of quantum theory. And the fact is that, having restored ontological rectitude, the resolution of this conundrum [1] René Descartes (1596–1650) posited a division of reality into two substances: res cogitantes (things of literally “stares us in the face”! This is what we wish now to explain. thought) and res extensae (things extended in space). A. N. Whitehead named this partition “bifurcation.” In place of the Cartesian dichotomy of so-called res extensae versus res cogitantes—which has proved to be spurious—another ontological dichotomy has now taken its place: one needs namely to distinguish ontologically between the entities of physics and the entities comprising this ordinary perceptible world. What invalidates the Democritean [2] premise is the fact that qualities—beginning, yes, with color—have once again been recognized as bona fide components of the “external” world. And this has drastic implications for physics, given that—by its very modus operandi—it has no eye for qualities! A worldview based upon physics is bound, therefore, to exclude the “qualitative dimension” of the cosmos— not because it is not there—but because this science is categorically incapable of grasping that dimension, that aspect of the world. The interest of modern physics is with res extensae, which are purely quantitative and conceived of as wholly “objective”; res cogitantes are, in this paradigm, merely subjective constructs “in the mind” and include qualitative attributes, such as color. —Ed. [2] Democritus of Abdera (5th century BC) declared: “According to vulgar belief, there is color, the sweet and the bitter; but in reality, only atoms and the void.” Cf. Hermann Diels, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (Dublin: Weidmann, 1969), vol II, p. 168. —Ed. Wolfgang Smith graduated from Cornell at age eighteen with majors in physics, mathematics, and philosophy. He subsequently contributed a theoretical solution to the re-entry problem for space flight. After taking his doctorate in mathematics at Columbia, he served for thirty years as professor of mathematics at M.I.T., U.C.L.A., and Oregon State University. Smith then devoted himself to correcting the fallacies of scientistic belief, focusing on foundational problems pertaining to quantum theory and visual perception by way of the traditional tripartite cosmology. The Philos-Sophia Initiative Foundation’s documentary on his life and work, "The End of Quantum Reality", is now available on disc and digital platforms worldwide. Visit Philos-Sophia Initiative Foundation » to go much deeper into the philosophical roots of our current problems. Our Fundamental Crisis in Our W.E.I.R.D. Modern World: Why Are We Overshooting Many Ecological Thresholds, and Failing to Care for the Basic Needs of Many Living Creatures on Our One Shared Planet? WHOLENESS (SPIRITUS-ANIMA-CORPUS) OF NATURE Modern Physical Sub-Corporeal Worlds In ordinary corporeal worlds, the QUALITY of QUALITIES, like COLOURS, LOVE, BEAUTY in Skills, GOODNESS in Relations, and TRUTH in Vision (Who Is the Seer?) in Methods (How Is Seeing Being Done?) and in Outcomes (What Is Being Seen?), are often more valuable in many situations than limited reductive measurements. A Critique of Cartesian Principles In modern physical sub-corporeal worlds, represented mathematically in terms of the familiar three spatial and one linear temporal Cartesian coordinates (x1, x2, x3, t), regardless of various body-mind-soul-heart qualities that are present in various individual and collective living worlds, ONLY MEASUREMENTS COUNT. Source of Images: Wolfgang Smith, Philos-Sophia Initiative Foundation » To Be or Not To Be an Apple. In corporeal worlds, QUALITIES, like Colours, LOVE (Agape-Eros-Agency-Philia), Beauty, Goodness, and Truth, in all sorts of ways, have more value in many situations than QUANTITIES-measurements-data. Moreover, QUALITIES participate in the Wholeness of Nature (pneuma-spiritus-heart, psyche-anima-soul, and soma-corpus-body) in principial equilibrium, uniting various complementaries and oppositions (silence-sound, darkness-light, essence-substance, virtues-vices, masculinefeminine, yang-yin, et al.) at the Heart of All Beings. What is GOOD for planetary health and human happiness involves human beings becoming fully alive; growing up as artists; developing stages-layers of skills in LOVE, Beauty, Goodness, and Truth in each person, in inter-personal relations, and in ecosocial organisations; learning to live creatively in tune with Universal Spirit (Seer) and Sacred Nature (Seen); waking up to be Wise Sages. Inhabitants: People living in tune with Universal Spirit and Sacred Nature (SatChit-Ananda [Being-Consciousness-Bliss]) include Heart-Centred storytellers, mythologists, philosophers & metaphysicians in our Primal Traditions (Africa, Asia, Europe, Americas, Australia, Oceania) and in our World Religions (Taoism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam et al.) who say: 1) beyond the worlds of things, lives, minds, and souls is Divine Presence, 2) in living beings, there is a natural capacity for, a relative similarity to, and a deep longing for Divine Presence, and 3) the true goal of existence is evermore conscious participation in the True, the Good, and the Beautiful in timeless Divine Presence. In modern physical sub-corporeal worlds, represented mathematically in terms of (three spatial and one linear temporal) Cartesian coordinates (x1, x2, x3, t), QUANTITIES-measurements-data are the primary or much too often the only concern in many situations. Consequently, Nature tends to be denatured; human beings dehumanised; qualities (like life, love, body, mind, soul, spirit, beauty, goodness, truth, feminine, masculine, justice et al.) disqualified; “unfriended” as “Ghosts in the Machine.” This is said in business-as-usual to be good? for economic growth (GDP)?, with attention focused on technological innovations, production and consumption of goods, and evermore profits, mandated into law to authorise ongoing abuses of people and planet, but with limited or no responsibility for supporting human development from “ME”-, and/or “US”-centredness into “ALL of US”, ALL of LIFE, Altogether, HEART-CENTREDNESS in each person, in our inter-personal relations, and in our eco-social organisations, at local to global scales. W.E.I.R.D. (Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, Democratic) Inhabitants: People operating with Cartesian bifurcation (res extensae [extended things in Cartesian space-time], and res cogitantes [“things of the mind”]) include: Modernists, who tend to hold that modern “physics is the basis of reality and that science and rationality set people free.” Post-Modernists, who tend to hold “a critical stance towards knowledge and science, and power structures, unconscious drives, cognitive biases, and arbitrary social constructions that enthral human minds.” Meta-Modernists, who tend to hold “a worldview which combines the modern faith in progress with the postmodern critique.” (Source: Metamoderna) © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu f Philos-Sophia Initiative / Twitter Exposing Hidden Issues within the UN Framework: Valuing What Counts António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations Published Jun 6, 2023 Gross domestic product (GDP) is the most widely used benchmark to measure a country’s economic progress and the value of the goods and services it produces. GDP also reflects a harmful anachronism at the heart of global policymaking: our economic models and measurements overlook many aspects that sustain life and contribute to human well-being, while perversely placing disproportionate value on activities that deplete the planet. Within this context, I have introduced a series of proposals, not to replace gross domestic product, but to outline a path to develop complementary metrics that more fully recognize what matters to people, the planet and our future. Due to inherent limitations, GDP is failing to sufficiently address the environmental and social concerns of our world. For example, GDP does not account for air pollution, natural resource depletion, environmental degradation, and biodiversity loss. It also fails to capture the full extent of the informal economy, such as unpaid care work in households, or the social value of activities like health care. GDP also continues to be used – or misused – as the benchmark for important national and international policy settings, particularly in development financing. By using GDP as a proxy for development, we fail to recognize that sustainable development is affected by multiple factors, such as access to resources, inequalities, and the significant vulnerabilities that may exist in countries with high levels of GDP. Moving beyond GDP is fundamental to building an economic system that gives value to what counts – human well-being – now and in the future, and for everyone. Effectively measuring what counts can have a transformative impact and help lead the world toward a more just, inclusive, and sustainable development path. To that end, today I present three proposals to help develop a universal and comprehensive measurement of progress and sustainable development to complement GDP. A) A renewed political commitment from UN member countries to create a conceptual framework that can accurately “value what counts” for people, the planet, and the future, anchored in the 2030 Agenda. B) The elaboration of a robust technical and scientific process, informed by sound and disaggregated data, resulting in a UN value dashboard featuring a limited number of key indicators that go beyond GDP. C) A major capacity-building and resourcing initiative to enable countries to use the new framework effectively. We need a paradigm shift in what we measure as progress, so that we can capture data on the activities and outcomes that societies truly value, and then use the data to better inform our policy and financial decisions. By moving beyond GDP, we can measure what we truly value, reconsider what we mean by progress and, on that basis, re-evaluate how we distribute resources and commit to real change. Valuing What Counts: Framework to Progress Beyond Gross Domestic Product (linkedin.com) Beyond-growth-dialogue-with-the-european-commission (eeb.org) Seer, Seeing, and Seen Dynamics within Intersecting Economic Standards at Local, National, and Global Scales (1) Who Is Seeing within the Seer? How Is Seeing Being Done within Each of Various Schools in Arts, Morals, and Sciences within Non-Modern Heart-Centred Lifecycles in A Primal An Oriental A Semitic Tradition? Tradition? Tradition? What Is Being Seen? With Love (Agape-Eros-Agency-Philia Post-Modernity? Meta-Modernity? [Communion])? Modern Cartesian Linear Time in Modernity? ALL OF US, ALTOGETHER EYE OF WORLD-SOUL World-centric working to interconnect with each other in the dialogues of civilisations, each of which with their own versions of contents and discontents [personal/collective arts and skills, inter-personal relations-moralsethics, and authorised sciences] in matrices-systems-organisations Post-Modernity: Challenges modern lifeless mechanics and authoritarian knowledge claims. Meta-Modernity: Tries to co-ordinate modern and postmodern knowledge claims. Modernity Disqualifies (Flatlands) the Quality (Love) of Qualities (Truth-Goodness-Beauty). No Vedic Tribhuvana. No Tripartite Kosmos (Pneuma/Nous-Psyche-Soma). Intersecting Economic Standards at Local, National, and Global Scales TRUE VALUES PEOPLE LIVING WELL WITH EACH OTHER IN LOVING LIFE WITHIN TRIPARTITE NATURE (Pneuma/NousOur DIALOGUES with various (HeartPsyche-Soma) IN HEART-CENTRED COMMUNITIES [within Primal (First Peoples), Oriental (Taoist, Hindu, Others within, across, and SoulBuddhist et al.), Semitic (Judaic, Christian, Islamic et al.), and some people within Modern-Postmodern- beyond our current readings of Body) Metamodern Communities, in Africa, Asia, Europe, North-Central-South America, Australia & Oceania]. skills in individual-collective arts, skills in inter-personal Post-Growth Standards Modern relations-morals-ethics, and Esoteric (Mind-Body) Degrowth Standards skills in sciences, in matricesFluid Ideal systems-organisations, at local, Contextual UN SDPI Standards System national & global scales Identities Values Doughnut Economics EYE OF RATIONAL MIND Socio-centric INDEPENDENT experts-achievers, “US”, “Our” self-/we-authorised social contracts-disciplines Modern (Body-Mind) Shared Material Values ME US INTER-INDEPENDENT Modernity: A mix of mainly Monist Materialists (Mind inside Matter in Cartesian space-time [x1, x2, x3, t]) in a mechanistic universe in which measurements count, some Monist Idealists (Matter inside Mind), and some Matter-Mind Dualists. EYE OF HEART-SPIRIT Kosmos-centric Wholeness [AgapeFeminine Nature], and Unity [ErosHuston Masculine Nature], with Agentic Smith, [Masculine] Energies and Communal Levels of [Feminine] Energies in Virtues-Vices Reality, [Qualities Loved, degraded, or Levels of denied] within Each Stage-LevelSelf, Layer-Degree of DevelopmentWhy Inhabitation of a Skill and Each Set Religion of Skills, in Each Person, in Each Matters Community, and in Our Shared p.224 Humanity, in tune (or not) with Divine Life, Light, and Love, “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” US Dependent Child? Student? Independent Adult? Inter-Independent Elder? Sage? EYE OF IN-FORMATION Ethno-centric/Group-centric DEPENDENT “US” “Our” community’s narratives-rulesroles-norms-heritage-traditions EYE OF CORPOREAL BODY Ego-centric Agency-Communion Valuing What Counts UN SDG Standards ESG Standards Exoteric Fixed Contractual and/or Prescribed Identities Heart-centred Kosmos with all sorts of Seers, Seeing, and the Seen from the Sensory Surface of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings Our DEBATES within Our Social Contracts-Disciplines in Arts, Relations-Morals-Ethics, and Sciences, in Organisations in Our Society CSR Standards Modern Integrating Doughnut Econ into business education | DEAL CONFORMITY-LOYALTY to Our (Body-Mind) Prescribed Community Compete to Maximise Private Profits and Economic Growth (GDP) with no deep regard for personal Shareholder Narratives-Norms-Rules-Rolesintegrity, social coherence, and living within ecological boundaries, ending with intensifying personal and Material Rituals-Heritage-Traditions social crises interacting within ecological overshoots of our planet’s limited carrying capacities. Values Born into a Born into an Born into a Semitic Born into a Modern Born into a Post- Born into a MetaMy Life in My Body Primal World Oriental World World World Modern World Modern World © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu Seer, Seeing, and Seen Dynamics within Intersecting Economic Standards at Local, National, and Global Scales (2) Who Is Seeing within the Seer? How Is Seeing Being Done within Each of Various Schools in Arts, Morals, and Sciences within EYE OF WORLD-SOUL World-centric working to interconnect with each other in the dialogues of civilisations, each of which with their own versions of contents and discontents [personal/collective arts and skills, inter-personal relations-moralsethics, and authorised sciences] in matrices-systems-organisations EYE OF RATIONAL MIND Socio-centric INDEPENDENT experts-achievers, “US”, “Our” self-/we-authorised social contracts-disciplines ME US ALL OF US, ALTOGETHER Modernity? EYE OF HEART-SPIRIT Modernity Kosmos-centric Wholeness [AgapeDisqualifies Feminine Nature], and Unity [Eros(Flatlands) the Masculine Nature], with Agentic Quality (Love) of [Masculine] Energies and Communal Qualities (Truth[Feminine] Energies in Virtues-Vices Goodness-Beauty). [Qualities Loved, degraded, or No Vedic denied] within Each Stage-LevelTribhuvana. No Tripartite Layer-Degree of DevelopmentThe Less Travelled Spiritual Way from the Sensory Surface Kosmos Inhabitation of a Skill and Each Set of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings, of Skills, in Each Person, in Each (Pneuma/Nousfrom Ego-centric Me to Ethno-Group-centric US to SocioCommunity, and in Our Shared centric US to World-centric All of Us with Each Other into Spiritus/IntellectusHumanity, in tune (or not) with Heart, psycheKosmos-centric Heartfulness (One-in All, All-in-One) Divine Life, Light, and Love, anima-soul, and in Tripartite Kosmos, Vedic Tribhuvana, Heart-Soul-Body. “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” soma-corpus-body). The Quest For Who We Are - Fons Vitae Publishing EYE OF IN-FORMATION Ethno-centric/Group-centric DEPENDENT “US” “Our” community’s narratives-rulesroles-norms-heritage-traditions EYE OF CORPOREAL BODY Ego-centric Agency-Communion What Is Being Seen? With Love (Agape-Eros-Agency-Philia Post-Modernity? Meta-Modernity? [Communion])? Modern Cartesian Linear Time in INTER-INDEPENDENT Non-Modern Heart-Centred Lifecycles in A Primal An Oriental A Semitic Tradition? Tradition? Tradition? US Dependent Child? Student? Independent Adult? Inter-Independent Elder? Sage? Heart-centred Kosmos with all sorts of Seers, Seeing, and the Seen from the Sensory Surface of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings Intersecting Economic Standards at Local, National, and Global Scales PEOPLE LIVING WELL WITH EACH OTHER IN LOVING LIFE WITHIN TRIPARTITE NATURE (Pneuma/NousOur DIALOGUES with various Psyche-Soma) IN HEART-CENTRED COMMUNITIES [within Primal (First Peoples), Oriental (Taoist, Hindu, Others within, across, and Buddhist et al.), Semitic (Judaic, Christian, Islamic et al.), and some people within Modern-Postmodern- beyond our current readings of Metamodern Communities, in Africa, Asia, Europe, North-Central-South America, Australia & Oceania]. skills in individual-collective arts, skills in inter-personal Transforming economies to foster genuine and inclusive wellbeing through Post-Growth Standards Modern relations-morals-ethics, and ecologically sustainable and equitable post-growth societies (Source: EEForAll) (Mind-Body) skills in sciences, in matrices1. Abandon GDP 2. Universal Basic Services 3. Focus on SUFFICIENCY Degrowth Standards Ideal systems-organisations, at local, 4. Reduce Inequality 5. Just Transition (Source: Degrowth Vienna) System national & global scales UN SDPI Standards “Authentic Sustainability” for Prosperity-People-Planet (r3.0 - Ralph Thurm) Values DEAL (doughnuteconomics.org), Beyond Growth 2023, and Beyond-GDP Doughnut Economics Maintain Economic Growth within Prescribed Care for Environments and People Modern Our DEBATES within Our Social Valuing What Counts GDP plus People plus Planet (Valuing What Counts) (Body-Mind) Contracts-Disciplines in Arts, UN SDG Standards Maintain Economic Growth within Our Prescribed 17 Goals for People-Planet Shared Relations-Morals-Ethics, and Maximise OUR Corporate Profits with OUR Prescribed Governance for Selected Sciences, in Organisations in Material ESG Standards Environments and Selected People (e.g., GRI, ISSB, EFRAG, or ESRS Standards) Values Our Society CSR Standards Maximise OUR Corporate Profits with OUR Prescribed Care for Selected People Modern CONFORMITY-LOYALTY to Our (Body-Mind) Compete to Maximise Private Profits and Economic Growth (GDP) with no deep regard for personal Prescribed Community Shareholder integrity, social coherence, and living within ecological boundaries, ending with intensifying personal and Narratives-Norms-Rules-RolesMaterial social crises interacting within ecological overshoots of our planet’s limited carrying capacities. Rituals-Heritage-Traditions Values Born into a Born into an Born into a Semitic Born into a Modern Born into a Post- Born into a MetaMy Life in My Body Primal World Oriental World World World Modern World Modern World TRUE VALUES (HeartSoulBody) © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu Seer, Seeing, and Seen Dynamics within “I-I” Enlightenment, the Heart of “I-We-Thou” Relations & Wisdom Schools Who Is Seeing within the Seer? EYE OF HEARTSPIRIT “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” views of “I-I” Enlightenment, and “I-WeThou” Relations EYE OF WORLD-SOUL INTERINDEPENDENT “All of Us, inter-relating with each other” views of “I-I” Waking & “I-We-Thou” Relations EYE OF RATIONAL MIND “US” INDEPENDENT views of “I-I” Waking & “I-We-Thou” Relations EYE OF INFORMATION DEPENDENT “US” views of “I-I” Waking & “I-We-Thou” Relations EYE OF CORPOREAL BODY How Is Seeing Being Done within Each of Various Schools in Arts, Morals, and Sciences? Ken Wilber’s Pointing Out Instructions (Witness Exercise) A Non-Modern Understanding of Transformation: METANOIA Notice first of all the broad, distinguishing features of the transcendent self [Eye of Heart-Spirit]: it is a center and expanse of awareness which is creatively detached from one’s personal mind, body, emotions, thoughts, and feelings. So if you would like to begin to work at intuiting this transcendent self within you that goes beyond you, the you that is not you, then proceed as follows: Slowly begin to recite the following to yourself, trying to realize as vividly as possible the import of each statement: I have a body, but I am not my body. I can see and feel my body, and what I can see and feel is not the true Seer. My body may be tired or excited, sick or healthy, heavy or light, but that has nothing to do with my inward I, the Witness. I have a body, but I am not my body. I have desires, but I am not my desires. I can know my desires, and what can be known is not the true Knower. Desires come and go, floating through my awareness, but they do not affect my inward I, the Witness. I have desires but I am not my desires. I have emotions, but I am not my emotions. I can feel and sense my emotions, and what can be felt and sensed is not the true Feeler. Emotions pass through me, but they do not affect my inward I, the Witness. I have emotions but I am not my emotions. I have thoughts, but I am not my thoughts. I can know and intuit my thoughts, and what can be known is not the true Knower. Thoughts come to me and thoughts leave me, but they do not affect my inward I, the Witness. I have thoughts but I am not my thoughts. This done – perhaps several times – then affirm as concretely as you can: I am what remains, a pure center of awareness, an unmoved Witness of all these thoughts, emotions, feelings, and sensations. Sources: Ken Wilber, No Boundary: Eastern and Western Approaches to Personal Growth, pp.128-9; Grace and Grit: A Spiritual Journey Through Life, Loss & Beyond, p.126; and Welcome to Integral Life – Integral Life. Treya Killam Wilber: So what exactly are some of the essentials of the perennial philosophy? KW: One, Spirit exists, and Two, Spirit is found within. Three, most of us don’t realize this Spirit within, however, because we are living in a world of sin, separation, and duality—that is, we are living in a fallen or illusory state. Four, there is a way out of this fallen state of sin and illusion, there is a Path to our liberation. Five, if we follow this Path to its conclusion, the result is a Rebirth or Enlightenment, a direct experience of Spirit within, a Supreme Liberation, which—Six—marks the end of sin and suffering, and which—Seven—issues in social action of mercy and compassion on behalf of all sentient beings. Sources: Ken Wilber, Grace and Grit, p.81; Grace and Grit - The Movie. We are told that “The heart is deep” (Psalm 64:6) or, as St. Makarios states, “the heart is an immeasurable abyss.” The heart is, as St. Philotheos of Sinai (9th or 10th century) states, the “place of God” which, when the Divine dwells within it, becomes “the heaven of the heart.” In the Jewish tradition, the Divine Intellect will then dwell in its proper abode, within the spiritual heart of the human being, where it becomes the “eye of the heart” (‘ein ha-lev): “In the hearts of all that are wise-hearted, I have put wisdom” (Exodus 31:6). The Gospel refers to this “heart-intellect” here: “Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God” (Matthew 5:8). The Lakota holy man Hehaka Sapa, more commonly known as Black Elk (1863– 1950), provides a stunning passage outlining the “eye of the heart”: I am blind and do not see the things of this world; but when the Light comes from Above, it enlightens my heart and I can see, for the Eye of my heart (Chante Ista) sees everything. The heart is a sanctuary at the center of which there is a little space, wherein the Great Spirit dwells, and this is the Eye (Ista). This is the Eye of the Great Spirit by which He sees all things and through which we see Him. If the heart is not pure, the Great Spirit cannot be seen, and if you should die in this ignorance, your soul cannot return immediately to the Great Spirit, but it must be purified by wandering about in the world. In order to know the center of the heart where the Great Spirit dwells you must be pure and good, and live in the manner that the Great Spirit has taught us. The man who is thus pure contains the Universe in the pocket of his heart (Chante Ognaka). Black Elk, quoted in Frithjof Schuon, The Feathered Sun: Plains Indians in Art and Philosophy (Bloomington, IN: World Wisdom Books, 1990), p. 51. Source: The Quest For Who We Are - Fons Vitae Publishing John Denver (The WILDLIFE Concert): “Music does bring people together; it allows us to experience the same emotions. People everywhere are the same in heart and spirit. No matter what language we speak, what colour we are, the form of our politics or the expression of our love and faith, music proves we are the same.” © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu What Is Being Seen? Heart-centred Kosmos with all sorts of Seers, Seeing, and the Seen from the Sensory Surface of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings Our DIALOGUES with various Others within, across, and beyond our current readings of skills in arts, morals-ethics, and sciences Our DEBATES within Our Social ContractsDisciplines CONFORMITYLOYALTY to Our Prescribed Community Norms My Life in My Body Light One Candle Peter, Paul, & Mary - Light One Candle (PBS Holiday Concert) YouTube Light one candle for the Maccabee children Give thanks that their light didn't die Light one candle for the pain they endured When their right to exist was denied Light one candle for the terrible sacrifice Justice and freedom demand And light one candle for the wisdom to know When the peacemaker's time is at hand Don't let the light go out! It's lasted for so many years Don't let the light go out! Let it shine through our love and our tears Light one candle for the strength that we need To never become our own foe And light one candle for those who are suff'ring Pain we learned so long ago Light one candle for all we believe in Let anger not tear us apart! Light one candle to bind us together With peace as the song in our heart Don't let the light go out! It's lasted for so many years! (lasted for so many years!) Don't let the light go out! Let it shine through our love and our tears Don't let the light go out! It's lasted for so many years Don't let the light go out! Let it shine through our love and our tears What is the memory that's valued so highly That we keep it alive in that flame? What's the commitment to those who have died When we cry out they've not died in vain We have come this far, always believing That justice will somehow prevail This is the burning, this is the promise And this is why we will not fail Don't let the light go out! (don't let the light go out!) It's lasted for so many years Don't let the light go out! Let it shine through our love and our tears Don't let the light go out! It's lasted for so many years Don't let the light go out! Let it shine through our love and our tears Don't let the light go out! Don't let the light go out! Don't let the light go out! Songwriter: Peter Yarrow Peter, Paul and Mary - Light One Candle - YouTube ONE LIGHT, MANY CANDLES NOW AVAILABLE - YouTube Noel Paul Stookey ©2008 Neworld Media Publishing One light; many candles One sky; many stars One sea; many rivers One Love; many hearts One light; many candles One sky; many stars One sea; many rivers One Love; many hearts One life; many dreamers One death; many tears One word; many meanings One hope; many years One world; many mountains One hill; many trees One tree; many branches One branch; many leaves One light; many candles One sky; many stars One sea; many rivers One Love; many hearts One And Many One Light Many Candles – A Multifaith Program in word and song presented by Reverend Betty Stookey and Noel Paul Stookey Bodhisattva Thich Nhat Hanh Ten Love Letters to the Earth – Thich Nhat Hanh (emergencemagazine.org) Seer, Seeing, and Seen Dynamics within Chosen Values for Awakening Heart in Nature and Humanity (1) Who Is Seeing within the Seer? A Primal Tradition? First Nations in Africa, Asia, Europe, Americas, and Oceania An Oriental Tradition? Taoism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, Shintoism et al. A Semitic Tradition? Judaism, Christianity, Islam et al. ALL OF US, ALTOGETHER Child? Student? Adult? Mature Elder? Sage? EYE OF HEART-SPIRIT Kosmos-centric Wholeness [Agape-Feminine Nature], and Unity [Eros-Masculine Nature], with Agentic [Masculine] Energies and Communal [Feminine] Energies in Virtues-Vices [Qualities Loved, degraded, or denied] within Each Stage-LevelLayer-Degree of DevelopmentInhabitation of a Skill and Each Set of Skills, in Each Person, in Each Community, and in Our Shared Humanity, in tune (or not) with Divine Life, Light, and Love, “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” EYE OF WORLD-SOUL World-centric working to interconnect with each other in the dialogues of civilisations, each of which with their own versions of contents and discontents [personal/collective arts and skills, inter-personal relationsmorals-ethics, and authorised sciences] in matrices-systemsorganisations EYE OF RATIONAL MIND Socio-centric INDEPENDENT experts-achievers, “US”, “Our” self-/we-authorised social contracts-disciplines EYE OF IN-FORMATION Ethno-centric/Group-centric DEPENDENT “US” “Our” community’s narrativesrules-roles-norms-heritagetraditions EYE OF CORPOREAL BODY Ego-centric Agency-Communion How Is Seeing Being Done within Each of Various Schools in Arts, Morals, and Sciences within With Love (PhiliaCommunion)? Heart-centred Kosmos with all sorts of Seers, Seeing, and the Seen from the Sensory Surface of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings US INTER-INDEPENDENT Our DIALOGUES with various Others within, across, and beyond our current readings of skills in arts, skills in interpersonal relations-moralsethics, and skills in sciences, in matricessystems-organisations at local, national & global scales Our DEBATES within Our Social Contracts in Arts, Morals-Ethics, and Sciences, in Organisations in Our Eco-Society CONFORMITY-LOYALTY to Our Prescribed Community NarrativesNorms-Rules-RolesRituals-HeritageTraditions US ME What Is Being Seen? Huston Smith, Levels of Reality, Levels of Self, Why Religion Matters, p.224 News - The Matheson Trust Born into a Primal World Born into an Oriental World Born into a Semitic World Born into a Modern World Born into a PostModern World Born into a MetaModern World My Life in My Body “ME” © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu Seer, Seeing, and Seen Dynamics within Chosen Values for Awakening Heart in Nature and Humanity (2) Who Is Seeing within the Seer? Non-Modern Heart-Centred Lifecycles in A Primal An Oriental A Semitic Tradition? Tradition? Tradition? Huston Smith, Levels of Reality, Levels of Self, Why Religion Matters p.224 Modern Cartesian Linear Time in PostMetaModernity? Modernity? Modernity? Modernity: A mix of mainly Monist Materialists (Mind inside Matter in Cartesian space-time [x1, x2, x3, t]) in a mechanistic universe in which measurements count, some Monist Idealists (Matter inside Mind), and some Matter-Mind Dualists Post-Modernity: Challenges modern lifeless mechanics and authoritarian knowledge claims. Meta-Modernity: Tries to hold modern and postmodern knowledge claims altogether. Modernity Disqualifies (Flatlands) the Quality (Love) of Qualities (Truth-Goodness-Beauty). No Vedic Tribhuvana. No Tripartite Kosmos (Pneuma/Nous-Psyche-Soma). This reform agenda – for conversions from modern reductionisms to Tripartite Nature and Humanity – is Heart-Centred within Nature, and Heart-Centred within various communities, and within various selves. ME US US INTER-INDEPENDENT ALL OF US, ALTOGETHER Child? Student? Adult? Mature Elder? Sage? EYE OF HEART-SPIRIT Kosmos-centric Wholeness [Agape-Feminine Nature], and Unity [Eros-Masculine Nature], with Agentic [Masculine] Energies and Communal [Feminine] Energies in Virtues-Vices [Qualities Loved, degraded, or denied] within Each Stage-LevelLayer-Degree of DevelopmentInhabitation of a Skill and Each Set of Skills, in Each Person, in Each Community, and in Our Shared Humanity, in tune (or not) with Divine Life, Light, and Love, “All of Us, All of Life, Altogether” EYE OF WORLD-SOUL World-centric working to interconnect with each other in the dialogues of civilisations, each of which with their own versions of contents and discontents [personal/collective arts and skills, inter-personal relationsmorals-ethics, and authorised sciences] in matrices-systemsorganisations EYE OF RATIONAL MIND Socio-centric INDEPENDENT experts-achievers, “US”, “Our” self-/we-authorised social contracts-disciplines EYE OF IN-FORMATION Ethno-centric/Group-centric DEPENDENT “US” “Our” community’s narrativesrules-roles-norms-heritagetraditions EYE OF CORPOREAL BODY Ego-centric Agency-Communion How Is Seeing Being Done within Each of Various Schools in Arts, Morals, and Sciences within The "Four Forces" of Modern Psychology and the Primordial Tradition: Interview with Huston Smith | Samuel Bendeck Sotillos - Academia.edu Born into a Primal World Born into an Oriental World Born into a Semitic World Born into a Modern World Born into a PostModern World Born into a MetaModern World What Is Being Seen? With Love (AgapeEros-Agency-Philia [Communion])? Heart-centred Kosmos with all sorts of Seers, Seeing, and the Seen from the Sensory Surface of Beings to the very Heart of All Beings Our DIALOGUES with various Others within, across, and beyond our current readings of skills in arts, skills in interpersonal relations-moralsethics, and skills in sciences, in matricessystems-organisations at local, national & global scales Our DEBATES within Our Social Contracts in Arts, Morals-Ethics, and Sciences, in Organisations in Our Eco-Society CONFORMITY-LOYALTY to Our Prescribed Community NarrativesNorms-Rules-RolesRituals-HeritageTraditions My Life in My Body “ME” © Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative, Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody and with Everybody, Curator of Integrative Currencies, Gerard Bruitzman – Academia.edu We Need to Work with Each Other to Live Well with Each Other, in Intra- and Inter-Generational Equity, within Our Planet’s Ecological Matrices-Thresholds, with Fair Heart-Centred Social Allocations (in Both Nurturing and Guiding Our Varying Capabilities and Capacities to be Loving [Agape (Feminine), Eros (Masculine), Agency (Masculine), and Communion-Philia (Feminine)] in Child, Student, Adult, Elder, and Sage. Thus, Each Person, with their Chosen Creative “I-I” Skills, with their Inter-Personal “I-We-Thou” Relations in their GroupsCommunities, and with their Organisations, in Health, Education, Economics, and Politics, in their EcoSocieties, lives with Everybody, within the Wholeness of Nature (the Tribhuvana [The Triple World: Svar (Heaven), Bhuvas (Air), Bhū (Earth)] in the Vedic East, and Pneuma/Nous-Spiritus/Intellectus-Rūḥ/‘AqlHeart, psyche-anima-nafs-soul, and soma-corpus-jism-body in non-modern Greek-Latin-Arabic-West). Post Doom People in non-modern, modern, post-modern, and meta-modern worlds value different understandings of nature and human development. Non-modern worlds value the spiritual “I-I” journey from my self to the Self of all selves, Divine Qualities, Love, Beauty, Goodness, Truth, and the Wholeness of Nature. Modern worlds, informed by Cartesian bifurcation – as mathematician-metaphysician Wolfgang Smith confirms in his books, Physics, The Vertical Ascent et al. – value things that can be measured, primarily measurements of res extensae [entities in Cartesian space-time, in physical and life sciences] and secondarily reductive measurements of res cogitantes [things of the mind, such as psychometrics-sociometrics in psychologicalsocial sciences], without true regard for Qualities, and the Wholeness of Nature. Consequently, in modern economics, reductive measurements, such as GDP, ESG, and UN SDGs, tend to ignore the Quality of various Qualities (Colours, Music, Love [Agape-Eros-Agency-Communion], Compassion, Wisdom, Beauty, Goodness, and Truth) within the Seer, Seeing, and the Seen in the Wholeness and Unity (Pneuma/NousSpiritus/Intellectus-Rūḥ/‘Aql-Heart, psyche-anima-nafs-soul, soma-corpus-jism-body) of Human Wellbeing. Post-modern worlds tend to 1) critique modern lifeless mechanics with selected living systems designs, often in terms of flat non-hierarchical relations, and 2) critique various myopic authoritarian knowledge claims. Meta-modern worlds attempt to include modern and postmodern values in developmental or evolutionary from less to more complex understandings, with some meta-modern commentators working with models of adult development (See Institute of Applied Metatheory, Beyond Meta-Modernism: Human Development from the Perspective of Complex, Evolving, Living Systems | by Dr Robin Lincoln Wood | Feb, 2023 | Medium, the models of human development presented in Ken Wilber’s Integral Psychology [pp. 197-217], models of human development presented in this paper, and Marianne Williamson 2024, who in her presidential campaign is trying to go beyond current habitual left versus right constructs). Integrative Heart-Centred Thriveability involves inter-connecting non-modern, modern, post-modern, and meta-modern values at child “ME”, adult “US”, and evermore inclusive, inter-relating, and integrating, “All of Us, Altogether” stages-levels-layers of personal intentionalbehavioural, inter-personal relational and cultural, and social organisational development within the Wholeness and Unity (Pneuma-SpiritusHeart, Psyche-Anima-Soul, Soma-Corpus-Body in the Greek-Latin-West, and the Tribhuvana [The Triple World] in the Vedic East) of Nature. Gerard Bruitzman, Advocate for Integrative Heart-Centred Thriveability within Everybody with Everybody, Gerard Bruitzman - Academia.edu Have You Seen the Movie Don't Look Up? Changing Our Focus from Science to the Wholeness of Nature I found the popular movie Don’t Look Up – a climate change allegory, featuring a comet crashing into earth – provocative, funny, upsetting, at times, but seriously inadequate. A much deeper understanding of our intensifying ecological-social metacrises, in my view, is available at Post-Doom. Michael Dowd, in Sanity 101, introduces five stages of awakening, using Paul Chefurka’s framework. So, in your view, is our metacrises, no problem, just one problem, many problems, interconnecting many problems, or a significant part of our whole predicament (Michael Dowd's Sanity 101: Living Fully in an Age of Decline (Basic Training))? Now, I ask you to determine which mix of these stages of increasing awareness, from asleep to trying to see the whole shebang, seem to be involved in informing your own understanding of our escalating ecological-climate emergencies. For myself, I struggle to understand, even though I would like to inhabit, a more inclusive stage-5 awareness. If you watch Michael Dowd's Sanity 101, you will see his superb review of a popular way W.E.I.R.D. people tend to evade the full predicament of our escalating ecological-social metacrises – techno-optimism. To its credit, Don’t Look Up provides its own curious critique of techno-optimism, ending with (oh dear Meryl, what one does for the sake of art!) the gory consumption of a naked dim-witted American president by a hungry dinosaur! Now we must go beyond various techno-optimisms, championed by various techno-billionaires. According to Bill Baue, a systems transformation catalyst at r3.0, there are other options: ESG (blah! blah! blah!) or Sustainability: You Choose. Whoops! Sustainability – everybody living well within our local-global ecological matrices-thresholds, and with fair social allocations of limited capacities and capabilities for each body with everybody – is totally ignored in Don’t Look Up! Instead, the movie offers a naïve stage for science, with no awareness of the various ways inquiry-minded sciences turn into closed-minded scientisms, which in stage-5 views is seen as another crucial problem in our shared metacrises. Some philosophers of science, usually ignored by many, continue to warn us about the outcomes of Cartesian bifurcation. John Trevor Berger: Cartesian ‘bifurcation’—a term coined by Alfred North Whitehead, which Wolfgang Smith has put to good use throughout his authorial career—constitutes a dichotomy which divides the world into two substances, namely Thought (res cogitans) and Extension (res extensa). This gives rise to the belief that the ‘objective’ world can be wholly described in quantitative terms. In light of Smith’s ontological distinction, this is tantamount to the reduction of the corporeal to the physical. Therefore, qualitative attributes—such as colour, sound, or taste—are taken, in the Cartesian paradigm, to be mental or subjective. On the other hand, the quantitative attributes—the ‘extended’ (i.e., measurable) aspects—of the world are taken to be the ‘really real’. Quantities are thought to have ontological priority over qualities, insofar as the latter are merely ‘in our heads’ (res cogitantes). What is left in the external world, then, are objects which can be accounted for, without residue, in mathematical terms (res extensae). Philos-Sophia Initiative Foundation » Surveying the Integral Cosmos | Philos-Sophia Initiative. This drastic modern reduction of reality into abstract mathematical terms, engineered by our W.E.I.R.D. Cartesian mindsets, also ignored in Don’t Look Up, ends with many of us waging our current all-consuming war on Nature. Now let us ask here: what must we do to stop waging our stupid, currently escalating, degenerative war on Nature? In other words, how do you and I become truly whole, and thus fully happy, in our lives – which involves each person and each community living well with each other within our local-global ecological matrices-thresholds, and with fair social allocations of limited capacities and limited capabilities for each person and each community – as we learn to secure the precious wellbeing of all forms of life within each generation and across all generations on our beautiful planet? Gail Hochachka – Making meaning of climate change towards greater climate action. Gail Hochachka - The Psychology of Climate Change: Understanding the Causes and Finding Solutions to the Great Challenge of Our Time - Deep Transformation Podcast. W.E.I.R.D. – Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, Democratic UN Secretary-General António Guterres, with ready access to the dedicated work of many UN agencies, understands better than many what is happening on our planet. He keeps on saying, REPEATEDLY, again and again, “Humanity is waging war on nature. This is senseless and suicidal” (UNEP report, Making Peace With Nature). With the release of IPCC Sixth Assessment Report: WG1, he declared a Code Red for Humanity! At COP27 in Egypt, he said, “We are on a Highway to Climate Hell with our Foot on the Accelerator!” So, here we are in CODE RED with an escalating climate crisis, with our current BAU trends already condemning ourselves to 1.5°C degrees of global heating within a few years, and, given that for many of us changing ourselves is much too hard, re-signing ourselves to allowing around 3.0°C degrees of global boiling within a generation or two! Moreover, we are not yet ready to talk about abrupt runaway climate change, prompted by geophysical surprises yet to be considered or measured in IPCC reports, which would turn our current, already very alarming, IPCC projections, in each of five authorised scenarios, into more blah! blah! BLAH!, Arctic News: Crossing 3C (arctic-news.blogspot.com). Indeed, all of us are living in very challenging, unsettling times (Said E. Dawlabani, Paradise Lost | The Sequel – Kosmos Journal; Jeremy Lent, Solving the Climate Crisis Requires the End of Capitalism). In addition to deliberately choosing with BAU to dooming ourselves to inhabiting uninhabitable global boiling in upcoming years-decades, we have • our ongoing challenges with COVID-19 with novel everchanging variants that are likely to continue to emerge to disrupt, upset, and terminate many lives into the foreseeable future. • according to the WWF and Zoological Society of London’s 2022 Living Planet Report, population sizes of mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, and fish declining by 69% on average since 1970, and, with ongoing significant losses of habitat continuing to be orchestrated by BAU, population sizes are likely to decline into the foreseeable future. • Sir David Attenborough presenting, in Breaking Boundaries and A Life on Our Planet, his thoughtful accounts on the devastating environmental consequences of humanity’s rapid economic and population growth in recent decades. He laments the tragic ongoing decline of biodiversity and life on Earth, saying emphatically, “Our planet is headed for disaster. We need to learn how to work with nature; rather than against it.” (UN Biodiversity Conference (COP 15), POST-2020 GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK). • limited supplies and declining resource quality of key resources, compounding within upcoming years-decades, according to Nate Hagens (The Great Simplification) and Harald Sverdrup et al. r3.0 2020 Conference, WORLD7, Global Integrated Assessment Model, that will be needed in any transformations into regenerative economies. • economic systems that deliberately, legally externalise from their accounts, unethically, unsustainably 1) fail to consider the necessity of living within our planet’s limited ecological matrices-thresholds, and 2) fail to provide secure social foundations for everybody with everybody in genuine intragenerational-intergenerational justice. • political systems that 1) fail to go beyond divisive debates between various “us” versus “them” contenders, 2) fail to generate diversity informed “all of us, interconnecting with each other” dialogues, and 3) fail to work to integrate what is true, good, and beautiful in the various contributions of various rightsholders. Now, let us dive from what is happening on our observable measurable surfaces into our metaphysical depths. There is much more of crucial importance to be considered here: • in physics, as A.N. Whitehead, Nick Herbert, Wolfgang Smith, Sabine Hossenfelder, et al. have declared in various ways for decades, physicists have “lost their grip on reality”. • in philosophy, too few understand humanity’s Heart-soul-body metaphysics which can be found within humanity’s diverse languages, from East to West, from South to North. • in religion, noetic-yogic practices of purification, illumination, and unification, in Heart-soul-body, in individuals, communities, and kosmos, that generate METANOIA from exclusive self-centredness and/or exclusive group-centredness into the Universal Heart of All Living Beings too often tend to be ignored in both theoria and praxes. Now, with this barest outline of our global-national-local metacrises in place, let’s ask: what does authentic development and overall regenerative transformation truly mean? • in humanity’s wisdom traditions, development means noetic transformations from self-centredness and/or group-centredness into the Universal Heart of All Living Beings. • in metaphysics, development means awakening ever more inclusive modes of the seer (who is seeing in epistemic views in me-centred body, us-centred community, or heartcentred, all of us, living beings, altogether?), seeing (how is seeing being done with our current methodologies?), and seen (what is being seen in various ontological domains, in individuals, communities, and kosmos?) into ever more inclusive modes of wisdom and compassion in Heart-Centred Service of the Wellbeing of All Living Beings. • in modern science, development means, in ordinary, “instrumentalist”, “positivistic” terms, using limited “sciences of measurement”, advances in technological innovations. • in capacities management, development means putting into place the cyclical renewal of limited living capacities, not our current reckless taking, using, and wasting of resources. • in biodiversity management, development means re-wilding habitats and re-generating biodiversity, not continuing with polluting air, waters, and lands in business-as-usual. • in climate action, development means reducing, stopping, and drawdown-ing emissions of greenhouse gases as much as possible as quickly as possible within our current decade, the 2020s, and working to repair, restore, and regenerate the natural balance of our planet that was present in the Holocene in which all forms of life tended to flourish. • in economics, development involves going beyond our current degenerative BAU exploitations, and various ESG LaLaLands, transforming key initiatives, like Ralph Thurm’s r3.0Presentation-WEALL-NL-February-16-2023 (r3-0.org), and UNRISD’s Sustainable Development Performance Indicators (SDPIs) User Manual, at pathfinding organisations, like r3.0 Conference 2023 | Activating Restorative Norms (r3-0.org), Global Thresholds and Allocations, UNRISD SDPI, Earth4All, DEAL, and WEAll, into a regenerative economics, based on everybody living well with each other in Heart-soul-body within our planet’s ecological matrices-thresholds and with fair social allocations for everybody. • in politics, development means local-national-global co-ordinations in robust, ethical, and Heartful Service of the Wellbeing of Life in All Beings on our Precious Planet. Now, let all of us move out of our current forms of “deadly incrementalism” (BAU, CSR, ESG, UN SDGs et al.) into truly robust, multi-dimensional, regenerative transformations. We repeat here that a tangible way forward must work to coordinate what is happening within who is seeing, and how is seeing being done with our methodologies, both of which are resulting in what is being seen in our various Covid, biodiversity, ecological matrices-thresholds, climate, economic, and political crises, separately, interconnectedly, and altogether. Time for each of us to respond with all of us to overcome our current degenerative ways of living, which have resulted in all of us living in our CODE RED life-threatening world. I wish you, everybody, well, in our challenging, unsettling, hopefully transformative times, in moving out of our heartless ways of living into Heartful Regenerations, Gerard Bruitzman.