Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

2024, "Vacant Houses", Parity

Abstract
sparkles

AI

This paper discusses the issues surrounding vacant houses in remote Northern Territory communities, highlighting the significant proportion of unoccupied dwellings despite the pressing need for affordable housing. It reviews the challenges in the re-tenanting process and the inefficiencies between government departments managing housing stock. The findings indicate that improving communication and processes could enhance the utilization of existing properties, thereby contributing to the goal of reducing overcrowding and meeting national socio-economic targets.

Opinion 2 Liam Grealy Senior Research Fellow, Healthy Homes Monitoring and Evaluation, Homelands Housing and Infrastructure Project Monitoring and Evaluation, Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research extending existing stock. Increasingly, as recommended by Menzies’ evaluation and prior research,2 greater attention is being given to preventive and cyclical maintenance services as the key means to improve the function of housing and prolong the life of the asset. One feature of the remote housing system that is rarely considered, but which is relevant to the goal of reducing the proportion of crowded houses, is the prevalence of vacant or unoccupied stock. Vacant Houses In September 2023, Menzies School of Health Research completed an evaluation of Healthy Homes, the Northern Territory’s (NT) remote housing maintenance program.1 NT Government data in December 2022 showed that, of the 5,498 properties subject to the program, 52.9 per cent were ‘overcrowded’. Well-known to everyone in the NT’s social housing sector, the 19 national socio-economic targets under Closing the Gap include the goal that ‘People can secure appropriate, affordable housing that is aligned with their priorities and need’. Target 9a aims to ‘By 2031, increase the proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living in appropriately sized (not overcrowded) housing to 88 per cent’. Consecutive national agreements between the Federal and NT governments have sought to reduce remote community crowding by increasing much needed housing stock and by refurbishing and 100 In December 2022, 604 of the total 5,498 dwellings were unoccupied. From 2017 to 2022, the proportion of vacant remote housing stock has ranged from eight to 11 per cent.3 There are various legitimate reasons why a house may be vacant, including that it is scheduled for demolition, undergoing upgrade or maintenance works, or pending allocation to a tenant. This is a feature of any housing system. However, the proportion of vacant remote community houses in the NT is relatively high. Housing providers registered under the National Regulatory System for Community Housing (NRSCH) are required to minimise the proportion of vacant properties. The NRSCH performance measure codes properties as green, amber, and red for calendar days vacant at less than 14, 14 to 29, and over 29 days respectively.4 In the Reporting Framework established for the National Partnership for Remote Housing NT (2018–2023) one measurement established to monitor property and tenancy was the ‘Average year to date turnaround time (days) — vacant dwellings’.5 This data does not appear to be publicly reported, but a 2022–23 Budget Paper set a key performance indicator for the ‘Days to occupy vacant urban public housing (average)’ at 70 days.6 In Department of Territory Families, Housing and Communities (TFHC) annual reports, the days to occupy urban public housing has increased from an average of 99 days in 2017–18 to 165 days in 2022–23. As it stands, there are challenges to streamline the process for re-tenanting a property once a householder vacates. In remote communities, Alice Springs town camps, and Tennant Creek community living areas, the TFHC department is responsible for managing tenancies while the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Logistics (DIPL) is responsible for superintending remote housing maintenance services contracts. When a tenant vacates a property, TFHC must alert DIPL, which will inspect the property for necessary vacate works and request upgrade and maintenance works from the contracted provider for remote housing maintenance services. Once works are completed, the property can be re-tenanted by TFHC. Menzies’ Healthy Homes evaluation consulted with service providers that expressed frustration with the delays in this process, which can result in properties sitting vacant for extended periods of time. Improving the mechanisms by which the departments communicate with one another to manage the vacancy, upgrade, and allocation process has the potential to significantly increase the utilisation of existing remote housing stock. New and upgraded housing stock, subject to preventive and cyclical maintenance programs, is much