Academia.eduAcademia.edu

CFP CAA 2025 - STILL DEFINING ROMAN ART

It has now been a decade since Christopher Hallett called upon scholars to "define" Roman Art. ("Defining Roman Art", in A Companion to Roman Art, edited by B. Borg, Malden, MA, 2015). Hallett described how, in order to distinguish new Roman production from the Greek tradition, scholars rely upon carefully selected genres of Roman visual culture, for example, historical relief or veristic portraiture, that are overtly distinct from earlier Greek production. This approach deafeningly excludes from the conventional corpus of Roman Art other categories of Roman visual production, such as those focusing on mythological, heroic, and religious subjects, small scale private items, Roman copies or versions of Greek originals, or objects tied to Early Christian iconography or patronage, among others. This session seeks to reflect on, re-evaluate, and expand upon this challenge to the field of Roman art history, examining ways that scholars now strive both to add new material and to reintroduce neglected objects traditionally placed beyond the disciplinary scope of Roman art history. We will also query the still-undefined relationship between post-Enlightenment (capital-A) "Art", material culture, and design, as well as between artists, craftspeople, designers, architects, and builders in both ancient Roman thought and contemporary scholarship. Our goal is to broaden the scope and discussions of Roman Art and visual culture and to maintain academic interest in innovative methodological approaches to the field of Roman art history.

STILL DEFINING ROMAN ART Session will present: On location It has now been a decade since Christopher Hallett called upon scholars to “define” Roman Art. (“Defining Roman Art”, in A Companion to Roman Art, edited by B. Borg, Malden, MA, 2015). Hallett described how, in order to distinguish new Roman production from the Greek tradition, scholars rely upon carefully selected genres of Roman visual culture, for example, historical relief or veristic portraiture, that are overtly distinct from earlier Greek production. This approach deafeningly excludes from the conventional corpus of Roman Art other categories of Roman visual production, such as those focusing on mythological, heroic, and religious subjects, small scale private items, Roman copies or versions of Greek originals, or objects tied to Early Christian iconography or patronage, among others. This session seeks to reflect on, re-evaluate, and expand upon this challenge to the field of Roman art history, examining ways that scholars now strive both to add new material and to reintroduce neglected objects traditionally placed beyond the disciplinary scope of Roman art history. We will also query the still-undefined relationship between post-Enlightenment (capital-A) “Art”, material culture, and design, as well as between artists, craftspeople, designers, architects, and builders in both ancient Roman thought and contemporary scholarship. Our goal is to broaden the scope and discussions of Roman Art and visual culture and to maintain academic interest in innovative methodological approaches to the field of Roman art history. Keywords: Topics: Ancient Roman Time Period: 500 BCE to Fifth Century Topics: Art History Topics: Methodologies Medium: Sculpture Chairs: Anne Hrychuk Kontokosta, New York University and Peter D De Staebler, Pratt Institute