Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2011
…
13 pages
1 file
The nascent fi eld of Memory Studies emerges from contemporary trends that include a shift from concern with historical knowledge of events to that of memory, from "what we know" to "how we remember it"; changes in generational memory; the rapid advance of technologies of memory; panics over declining powers of memory , which mirror our fascination with the possibilities of memory enhancement; and the development of trauma narratives in reshaping the past. These factors have contributed to an intensifi cation of public discourses on our past over the last 30 years. Technological, political, interpersonal, social and cultural shifts affect what, how and why people and societies remember and forget. This groundbreaking series tackles questions such as: What is "memory" under these conditions? What are its prospects, and also the prospects for its interdisciplinary and systematic study? What are the conceptual, theoretical and methodological tools for its investigation and illumination?
Oxford Handbooks Online, 2014
This chapter considers the definitional and disciplinary politics surrounding the study of memory, exploring the various sites of memory study that have emerged within the field of communication. Specifically, this chapter reviews sites of memory and commemoration, ranging from places such as museums, monuments, and memorials, to textual forms, including journalism and consumer culture. Within each context, this chapter examines the ways in which these sites have interpreted and reinterpreted traumatic pasts bearing great consequence for national identity. It concludes with a discussion of the challenges set forth by new media for scholars engaging in studies of the politics of memory and identifies areas worthy of future research.
The Ethics of Memory in a Digital Age, 2014
The nascent field of Memory Studies emerges from contemporary trends that include a shift from concern with historical knowledge of events to that of memory, from 'what we know' to 'how we remember it'; changes in generational memory; the rapid advance of technologies of memory; panics over declining powers of memory, which mirror our fascination with the possibilities of memory enhancement; and the development of trauma narratives in reshaping the past. These factors have contributed to an intensification of public discourses on our past over the last thirty years. Technological, political, interpersonal, social and cultural shifts affect what, how and why people and societies remember and forget. This groundbreaking series tackles questions such as: What is 'memory' under these conditions? What are its prospects, and also the prospects for its interdiscipli-nary and systematic study? What are the conceptual, theoretical and methodological tools for its investigation and illumination?
Memory Studies 2008
This article presents an account of collective memory which explains its relationship to individual memory on the one hand and to history on the other. It argues that the role of memory, both individual and collective, is not merely cognitive; it is also normative. That is, memory does not simply transmit information from the past to the present; it also transmits responsibilities. Insofar as collective memory has a cognitive aspect, it makes claims about the past. These may be confirmed or disconfirmed by historical research. This does not mean that collective memory is just bad history. It is more like history written in the first person, and its role is to inform the present generation of its responsibilities to the past.
International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 2009
Understanding the processes by which individuals and groups remember or forget the past has been a concern for centuries. However, over the past three decades, the study of memory has become an increasingly popular topic for scholarly inquiry. This surge in memory research has greatly contributed to the way in which we consider a broad range of issues from the most basic biological and cellular encoding and retrieval systems to the ways in which political and cultural systems facilitate the remembering or silencing of historical events. As a result, the concept of “memory” is now studied and taught across a wide range of academic disciplines from the natural and social sciences, the humanities, and the arts. In addition, the past three decades have witnessed an increase in the number of texts, scholarly journals, conferences, students, and practitioners interested in the understanding and function of memory. Of particular interest are burgeoning attempts among memory scholars seeking t ...
Memory Politics and Transitional Justice, 2022
Efforts to recover and preserve the historical memory of past violence and injustice are today increasingly widespread in countries wrestling with, or emerging from, violent conflict. This reflects the rise of memory studies as a distinct field of inquiry as well as the growing recognition of the importance of centrally including the voices of victims in the elaboration of narratives of past suffering and evil. However, as an “essentially contested concept,” historical memory faces numerous challenges that have to be navigated when conducting applied historical memory work in violence-inflected settings. Among the pitfalls, historical memory work faces the unresolved tension between history and memory, which gives substance to claims that forgetting should trump remembering. Furthermore, owing to it being anchored in the subjective domain of memory, applied historical memory work risks deepening prevailing patterns of hatred, enmity and exclusion, in addition to being instrumentalis...
Culture, Theory and Critique, 2012
Memory as an academic field of inquiry as well as a subject matter of popular culture has soared with increased intensity since the 1990s. Interest in memory, both individual and social or collective, is shared across scholarly disciplines with a staggering variety of approaches, theoretical concerns, and methodologies. The sheer number of descriptions of memory: cultural memory, public memory, historical memory, official memory, popular memory, local memory, social memory, transnational memory, cosmopolitan memory, and multidirectional memory makes any attempt at an overview near impossible. Providing broad distinctions, French sociologist Maurice Halbwachs describes three categories of memory: autobiographical memory (personal experience), historical memory (the 'dead' past as found in historical records), and collective memory (the active past that informs our identities) (Olick and Robbins 1998: 111). This collection of essays focuses on collective memory, what Halbwachs defines as 'a social reality, transmitted and sustained through the conscious efforts and institutions of groups' (Halbwachs and Alexandre 1950: 36). In the last six years, scholars have engaged with the effects of globalization on the study of collective memory, emphasizing the de-territorialization, de-nationalization of memory cultures. While being attentive to the global circulation and transformation of collective memories, authors in this issue seek to revisit and critique some assumptions about transnational memory. Definitions of transnational memory as 'cosmopolitan' or 'multidirectional' have generally been framed in opposition to the nation as the sole and natural container for collective memories. If national memory is made uniform via forgetting (Renan) and is said to be stable, linear, and fixed to a territory (Nora 1996-1998; Halbwachs and Alexandre 1950), descriptions of transnational memory are, in contrast, mobile, non-linear, shifting, and heterogeneous. While authors of this special issue acknowledge how globalization has transformed our study of memory to reflect the transnational and global complexities of our worlds, many of these same authors take issue with the strict dichotomy between the national and the global, as well as the dominant views that transnational memories are necessarily forces of progress, that they weaken nationalist memories, and render place less relevant to memory cultures. Transnational memory, they argue, can in fact lead to the acceleration of nationalist memory and ideology. The French nation state, for example, reacts to its decreasing control over the representation of its past by creating
2020
Is memory an example of successful adaptation among homo sapiens? – this hypothesis permeates the 40 chapters of the Routledge International Handbook of Memory Studies. This volume edited by Anna Lisa Tota and Trever Hagen approaches the field of memory studies from multiple perspectives, from sociology and philosophy to psychology and biology even. The book is divided into six parts, complemented with index, illustrations, all carefully edited. Part One presents a number of theories and perspectives. Here, main concepts of memory studies are discussed with the hindsight of several decades that have passed since they first stormed social sciences. Collective, communicative and cultural memory as well as their relation to history all receive attention there. Patrick H. Hutton's thorough analysis of Pierre Nora's 'sites of memory thirty years after' deserves special praise for its careful reconstruction of the process in which this concept arose, as well as for a succi...
Damnatio in Memoria: Deformation und Gegenkonstruktionen in der Geschichte, Sebastian Scholz, Gerald Schwedler, and Kai-Michael Sprenger, eds. (Vienna/Cologne/Weimer: Böhlau, 2014), pp. 25–34., 2014
The Guardians of Memory and the Return of the Xenophobic Right, 2021
THE GUARDIANS OF MEMORY AND THE RETURN OF THE XENOPHOBIC RIGHT Translated by Alastair McEwen Copyright © Bompiani, 2019 USA Edition copyright © 2020 CPL EDITIONS All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-941046-32-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface For a Memory Culture Beyond Victims and Perpetrators. By Michael Rothberg. 9 Introduction What Went Wrong? 19 By Valentina Pisanty Chapter I, The Duty of Memory. 31 Chapter II, The Discourse of History 75 Chapter III, Collective Memories 109 Chapter IV, New Cinema of the Shoah 153 Chapter V, The Spectacle of Evil 201 Chapter VI, Denial and Punishment 229 Appendix 263 End notes 285 Bibliography 307 Filmography 329 Index 335
Memory Studies, 2008
The multidisciplinary field of memory studies combines intellectual strands from many domains, including (but not limited to) anthropology, education, literature, history, philosophy, psychology and sociology. Our article has four parts. We first consider definitions of memory and note that the single term itself is not particularly useful. Rather, scholars must specify the type or variety of memory under investigation. Second, we consider the breadth of memory studies and briefly survey disciplines in addition to those listed above that may prove interested parties to the new field. Third, we argue that the field of memory studies is just emerging, and that its proper development will require creation of a systematic set of methodological tools (qualitative and quantitative) that may be borrowed from various social sciences and adapted to new purposes. Finally, we describe two undergraduate programs in memory studies that have been developed at Washington University in St. Louis, U...
Programme égalité des chances, 2012
Lösungsschlüssel Deutsch für Ingenieure, 2017
Motivos porque a Companhia das Índias Ocidentais deve tentar tirar ao rei da Espanha a terra do Brasil, e isto quanto antes & Lista de tudo que o Brasil pode produzir anualmente. 1624
Jurnal Renaissance, 2021
TEMAS de la Academia. Memorias, apropiaciones y referencias, 2015
Información, cultura y bibliotecas, 2024
Energies, 2021
International Journal of Sexual Health, 2019
PROCEEDINGS OF UNIVERSITIES APPLIED CHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019
American Heart Journal, 2008
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2022
University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1995
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2019
Revista Chilena De Derecho Privado, 2019