|
TYPE Editorial
PUBLISHED 21 December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnume.2023.1342672
Editorial: Insights in PET and
SPECT: 2023
EDITED AND REVIEWED BY
Adriaan Anthonius Lammertsma,
University Medical Center Groningen,
Netherlands
*CORRESPONDENCE
Mario Petretta
mariopetretta2009@yahoo.it
RECEIVED
22 November 2023
ACCEPTED 11 December 2023
PUBLISHED 21 December 2023
Mario Petretta1*, Carmela Nappi2 and Alberto Cuocolo2
1
Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS SYNLAB SDN, Naples, Italy, 2Department of Advanced
Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
KEYWORDS
nuclear medicine, SPECT, PET, metabolic imaging, molecular imaging
CITATION
Petretta M, Nappi C and Cuocolo A (2023)
Editorial: Insights in PET and SPECT: 2023.
Front. Nucl. Med. 3:1342672.
doi: 10.3389/fnume.2023.1342672
Editorial on the Research Topic
Insights in PET and SPECT: 2023
COPYRIGHT
© 2023 Petretta, Nappi and Cuocolo. This is an
open-access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License (CC BY). The use, distribution or
reproduction in other forums is permitted,
provided the original author(s) and the
copyright owner(s) are credited and that the
original publication in this journal is cited, in
accordance with accepted academic practice.
No use, distribution or reproduction is
permitted which does not comply with these
terms.
It is a pleasure and an honor for us to introduce the Research Topic Insights in PET and
SPECT: 2023, published in the PET and SPECT section of Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine.
The development of tomographic technologies such as single photon emission computed
tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) began in the 1970s. Since
then, PET and SPECT have established themselves as extremely useful methods in the
clinical field thanks to their high sensitivity, deep penetration capacity and an
increasingly wider range of radiopharmaceuticals (1, 2). Both techniques are currently
used in many diseases, including Alzheimer’s, Parkinsons, and other nervous system
diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic inflammatory disorders. In oncology,
anatomical imaging techniques may detect tumors with a diameter of one centimeter or
more, which already contain more than a billion cells, while functional imaging PET
and SPECT can detect small tumors up to one millimeter (3). This Research Topic
includes five Original Contributions, one Systematic Review, and two Case Reports,
covering several aspects of a spectrum of disease.
Phantom study to assess stability of PET radiomic
features
Radiomics aims to enhance the potential of medical imaging through mathematical
extraction and analysis of the spatial distribution of signal intensities and pixel
interrelationships. Radiomic features quantify textural information as promising metrics
for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of several diseases, including cancer. However,
variability in hardware, software, respiration, and other variables may impact the
stability of PET images radiomic features and their utility (4). Alsyed et al. present data
from a phantom study evaluating the ability of radiomics features to distinguish PET
image regions with different uptake patterns based on different image reconstructions
settings. The study identified 15 features stable to reconstruction parameters and
showing statistically significant differences in the presence of different levels of
phantom designed spatial heterogeneity. The findings encourage the design of further
studies involving clinical data using a similar approach to evaluate the potential of
translational application of the observed results.
Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine
01
frontiersin.org
Petretta et al.
10.3389/fnume.2023.1342672
suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) (8). The
introduction of dedicated gamma cameras with CZT
semiconductor detectors has enabled significant progress in the
clinical evaluation of heart disease due to increased photon
sensitivity and spatial resolution compared to the conventional
SPECT system (9, 10). In particular, CZT cameras allow
noninvasive quantification of an important physiologic measure,
such as myocardial flow reserve (MFR). Lima et al. aimed to
compare myocardial perfusion SPECT with or without MFR
evaluation for the detection of obstructive CAD. The authors
found that the addition of MFR data to perfusion data
improved the detection of CAD over perfusion abnormalities by
CZT-SPECT imaging alone, especially in patients with
multivessel CAD. A regional MFR of 2.0 provided the best
trade-off between sensitivity and specificity for identifying
obstructive CAD.
Whole-body CZT camera in a PET-like
utilization
Quantification of bone SPECT images is useful for the
differential diagnosis of several diseases, such as osteomyelitis,
osteonecrosis, degenerative bone lesions and primary and
metastatic cancers (5). Moreover, quantitative SPECT images
allow to track longitudinal spontaneous (e.g., due to progression
of disease) and treatment induced changes. Previous quantitative
bone SPECT studies have been performed using conventional
Anger cameras; however, this approach can’t get timely pictures
showing images that display whole-body recordings using a
standardized uptake value (SUV) scale. To overcome these
limitations, Bahloul et al. aimed to determine whether such PETlike images may be obtained with a high-speed cadmium-zinctelluride (CZT)-SPECT/CT system, with a further application for
the longitudinal monitoring of vertebral fractures, using a new
high-speed whole-body CZT camera. This camera not only
enhances images quality but also reduces SPECT recording times
to <20 min, as currently required for PET imaging (6). With this
CZT-SPECT/CT system, the authors were able to obtain fast 3D
acquisitions and high-quality images of vertebral fractures
displayed on a reliable SUV scale, similarly to what is achieved
and recommended for PET imaging.
Disparities of PET/CT use in
gastro-esophageal cancer
Esophagus or gastroesophageal junction cancers have a high
global incidence and mortality rates (11). Imaging techniques, in
particular 18F-FDG-PET/CT, have significantly enhanced the
accuracy of clinical staging. In general, while staging of
locoregional disease is usually best done with a combination of
CT and endoscopic ultrasound, any metastases are better
recognized with 18F-FDG-PET/CT (12). Currently, PET/CT is
recommended in multiple guidelines for staging these types of
cancer; however, in clinical settings the use of this imaging
technique is highly variable. Therefore, health disparities exist
due to multiple and complex reasons (13). Gupta et al. report
the results of an analysis performed on data obtained from the
Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumors of
Ontario and Ontario Health. Notably, women underwent less
PET/CT than men, and patients with esophagus cancer were
referred more than patients with gastroesophageal junction
cancer. Other differences in demographic and clinical variables in
receipt of PET/CT were found.
Prognostic value of PET parameters in
patients with head and neck squamous
cell carcinoma undergoing immune
checkpoint inhibitor therapy
In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have proven to
be a valid therapeutic strategy in patients with recurrent and/or
metastatic head and neck cancer (HNSCC). However, further
research is needed for the definition of optimal treatment
schemes and above all to identify prognostic biomarkers useful
for the appropriate selection of patients (7). Kwon et al.
evaluated the prognostic value of basal metabolic features of
18
F-FDG PET/CT in patients with HNSCC treated with immune
checkpoint inhibitors. The authors also assessed the correlations
between these features and immunohistochemical biomarkers.
The authors found a negative correlation between programmed
cell death-ligand 1 expression and metabolic tumor volume.
Moreover, the progression-free survival was inversely related to
metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis. These data
support the prognostic potential of 18F-FDG PET/CT in HNSCC
patients treated by immunotherapy.
Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG
PET/Ct vs. PET/MRI for the diagnosis of
colorectal liver metastasis
Detection of liver metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC)
patients is complicated and still represents a major clinical
challenge (13). In CRC patients, the liver is a frequent site of
metastatic disease. Often, at the time of detection metastases are
limited to the liver, and available treatment options, such as
complete resection of lesions, can be curative and beneficial to
survival (14). These considerations underline the importance of
correct staging at baseline and during follow-up of patients with
CRC, in order to be able to choose a personalized therapeutic
approach. Different diagnostic imaging techniques are available
for CRC staging or restaging. Further progress has been made
Regional coronary blood flow by CZT
cameras for evaluation of coronary
artery disease
Stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging is an established
technique for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in patients with
Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine
02
frontiersin.org
Petretta et al.
10.3389/fnume.2023.1342672
splenosis, highlighting the high potential of nuclear medicine in
such trivial cases.
with the introduction of integrated imaging techniques, such as
hybrid PET/CT and hybrid PET/magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI). However few studies quantitatively compared the relative
clinical performance of these two approaches. Miao et al.
performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic,
searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for
eligible articles until November 2022. Finally, a total of 21
articles evaluating the diagnostic performance for colorectal liver
metastasis, 16 for PET/CT and 5 for PET/MRI, were included.
18
F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MRI show similar
performance in detecting colorectal liver metastasis. However, as
noted by the authors, pathological results were not available for
all patients in the included studies and PET/MRI results were
derived from studies with small sample sizes. Therefore, further
larger prospective studies on this topic are welcome.
Author contributions
MP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis,
Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. CN: Data
curation, Writing – original draft. AC: Supervision, Validation,
Writing – original draft.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the
absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could
be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors declared that they were an editorial board member
of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the
peer review process and the final decision.
Case reports
This Research Topic includes two Case Reports. Cortés
Mancera et al. describe a 67-year-old male patient diagnosed
with prostate adenocarcinoma with a clinical picture of muscle
weakness in the lower limbs and other neurological symptoms
and signs. In this patient, 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging was able to
demonstrate that amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, prostate cancer
and progressive supranuclear palsy may coexist in the same
patient. Finally, Nearchou et al. describe the first case utilizing
18
F-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT and
99mTc-sulphur colloid SPECT to detect intraabdominal
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the
authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated
organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the
reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or
claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed
or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Nappi C, Panico M, Falzarano M, Vallone C, Ponsiglione A, Cutillo P, et al.
Tracers for cardiac imaging: targeting the future of viable myocardium.
Pharmaceutics. (2023) 15(5):1532. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15051532
9. Cantoni V, Green R, Acampa W, Zampella E, Assante R, Nappi C, et al.
Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging with conventional and
CZT single-photon emission computed tomography in detecting coronary artery
disease: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. (2021) 28(2):698–715. doi: 10.1007/s12350019-01747-3
2. Nerella SG, Singh P, Sanam T, Digwal CS. PET Molecular imaging in drug
development: the imaging and chemistry perspective. Front Med (Lausanne). (2022)
9:812270. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.812270
10. Assante R, Zampella E, Cantoni V, Green R, D’Antonio A, Mannarino T,
et al. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging by cadmium zinc
telluride single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with
suspected or known coronary artery disease: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2023) 50(12):3647–58. doi: 10.1007/
s00259-023-06344-8
3. Nguyen AT, Kim HK. Recent developments in PET and SPECT radiotracers as
radiopharmaceuticals for hypoxia tumors. Pharmaceutics. (2023) 15(7):1840. doi: 10.
3390/pharmaceutics15071840
4. Cuocolo R, Caruso M, Perillo T, Ugga L, Petretta M. Machine learning in
oncology: a clinical appraisal. Cancer Lett. (2020) 481:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.
2020.03.032
11. Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, Cooke D, Corvera C, Das P, et al.
Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 2.2023, NCCN clinical
practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. (2023) 21(4):393–422.
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0019
5. Tabotta F, Jreige M, Schaefer N, Becce F, Prior JO, Nicod Lalonde M. Quantitative
bone SPECT/CT: high specificity for identification of prostate cancer bone metastases.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2019) 20(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3001-6
12. Choi J, Kim SG, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS. Comparison of endoscopic
ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed
tomography (CT) in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal
cancer. Surg Endosc. (2010) 24(6):1380–6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0783-x
6. Melki S, Chawki MB, Marie PY, Imbert L, Verger A. Augmented planar bone
scintigraphy obtained from a whole-body SPECT recording of less than 20 min
with a high-sensitivity 360° CZT camera. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2020) 47
(5):1329–31. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04525-y
13. Mirshahvalad SA, Kohan A, Metser U, Hinzpeter R, Ortega C, Farag A, et al.
Diagnostic performance of whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MR in cancer M staging: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. (2023). doi: 10.1007/s00330-02310009-3. [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 37535156.
7. Nenclares P, Rullan A, Tam K, Dunn LA, St John M, Harrington KJ. Introducing
checkpoint inhibitors into the curative setting of head and neck cancers: lessons
learned, future considerations. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. (2022) 42:1–16.
doi: 10.1200/EDBK_351336
14. Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Adam R, Köhne CH, Pozzo C, Poston G, et al.,
European Colorectal Metastases Treatment Group. Towards a pan-European
consensus on the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Eur
J Cancer. (2006) 42(14):2212–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.012
8. Cuocolo A, Petretta M, Acampa W, De Falco T. Gated SPECT myocardial
perfusion imaging: the further improvements of an excellent tool. Q J Nucl Med
Mol Imaging. (2010) 54(2):129–44. PMID: 20588210.
Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine
03
frontiersin.org