Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Traditional Approach and New Configuration for Digital IF

With the objective to develop low-power-consumption technology for Digital Down Converter (DDC) and Digital Up Converter (DUC) necessary for implementation of Digital IF, we tried to acquire the low-power-consumption technology by focusing on the problems on general DDC/DUC configuration, extracting the underlying issues and solving them. As a result, a unique DDC/DUC configuration deriving special characteristics that cannot be feasible with the general configuration has been obtained. It is important for the design of DDC/DUC utilizing this proposal to understand how we approached to the development of DDC/DUC in the development process.

Traditional Approach and New Configuration for Digital IF Takahiko Kishi, Atsuya Yokoi, Woo-Shik Kang, Gi-Beom Kim         Outline Background Issues Complex vs. Real Next step Fine step vs. Coarse step DDC/DUC Minimum Size NCO Response of 2-step DDC Conclusions Background  Power Consumption of SDR Mobile Terminals using Digital IF Power consumption[W]  ADC, DAC, and digital IF have big wait  Low-power-consumption technology is key for SDR terminals 4.5 Moor's Law on RX power consumption of SDR terminals using digital IF 4.0 RF/IF Ana. 3.5 Revolution on Digital IF 3.0 ADC/DAC IF Dig. BB 2.5 Revolution on ADC/DAC? 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Revolution on low-power-consumption technology of ADC/DAC/Digital IF Advanced SDR MS 2009 2010 2011 Year General SDR MS Issues  Low-power-consumption technology of DDC and DUC  Configurations:  Technologies of each part: have not changed for years various proposals  Two questions for general DDC and DUC Frequency Converter Fs Converter DIF Mixer Channel Filter Shaping Filter ↓M ↑M CIC CIC cos cos flo sin Frequency Converter Mixer Fs Converter MOD Zero IF DMOD ↓M ↑M CIC CIC - General DDC configuration - flo Zero IF sin General DUC configuration  Why complex processing?  Why single conversion? DIF Complex vs. Real  General super-heterodyne receiver has real signals front-end  1st freq. converter’s input and output are real with variable OSC  2nd freq. converter’s input is real and output is complex of baseband freq. with fixed OSC Real processing power is half as against complex processing  We reduce the Front-end Power by half!!  Selection of configuration for DDC and DUC  This configuration has an image issue at freq. converter 1, also superheterodyne receiver Frequency Converter1 Frequency/ Fs Converter2 Fs Converter Channel Filter I ↓M/2 0 DIF1 Zero IF -1 DIF2 Demodulator 3 Q ↓M/2 Flo1 -1 Next Step Real processing on the digital front-end halves front-end power, but is insufficient for revolution on DDC and DUC. We have focused on local signal generator of DDC and DUC, and solved issues by the double super-heterodyne technique as the next solution. Fine step vs. Coarse step  NCO Spurious How to reduce phase spurious without increasing the power?  Phase  j=k  ep = 0 : no spurious  jk  ep  0 : phase spurious Answer j = k 1. Increase ROM size  poor 2. Reduce frequency step fairy good  Amplitude  Not big issue ep  j Phase Register j  Old analog radio ea k Phase to Amplitude m (ROM) Super-heterodyne But frequency resolution insufficient! = phase increment data j = number of phase register bits k = number of ROM address bits m = number of ROM data bits Fine step local is difficult to implement Double super-heterodyne 1st local is coarse, 2nd local is fine step or analog VCO easy to implement 2-step DDC  Our proposal: 2-step DDC Sampling conversion 1 Roofing filter Frequency Converter1 DIF1 Mixer1 Fs Converter1 ↓M1 DIF2=Near Zero IF dif1 = lo1 - lo2 lo1 = (s1Δ1 )/2j1 >channel step lo2 = -(s2Δ2 )/2j2 «channel step Frequency conversion parameters Sampling conversion 2 Frequency Converter2 Fs Converter2 Sampling conversion factors Channel Filter M = M1×M2 s2 = s1/M1 s3 = (s1/M1)/M2 Mixer2 CIC ↓M2 cos cos flo2 flo1 sin DMOD Power consumption Zero IF sin ↓M1 - CIC ↓M2 Pmix, Pnco: Conventional DDC Pfconv1 = Pmix +0.8kd1Pnco Pfconv2 = 2Pmix+0.8kd2Pnco/M1 Coarse step conversion Fine step conversion Shaping filter >channel step No phase spurious Small ROM «channel step Allow NCO spurious Low processing activity Just shaping Low taps Response of 2-step DDC Local1 j = 8 k = 8 m = 15 Amplitude [dB] Amplitude [dB] DDC input 0 UnDesired -20 -40 -100 0.00 Loca1 -20 -40 Desired -60 -80 0 -60 -80  lo1 9.83 -100 19.66 29.49 39.32 49.15 Frequency [MHz] 58.98 68.81 78.64 -78.64 -58.98 0 unDesired -20 Desired Fs Conv.1 FIR 128 16 -60 -80  lo2 -100 Amplitude [dB] 58.98 78.64 0 3.69 4.92 Loca2 -58.98 -39.32 -19.66 0.00 19.66 Frequency [MHz] 39.32 58.98 78.64 -20 Ch. Filter FIR 32 -40 -60 -80 -100 -2.46 -1.23 0.00 1.23 Frequency [MHz] -60 -80 -4.92 0 -3.69 -40 -100 DDC out -4.92 39.32 -20 -40 -78.64 -19.66 0.00 19.66 Frequency [MHz] Local2 j = 32 k = 6 m = 6 Amplitude [dB] Amplitude [dB] Frequency Converter1 out -39.32 2.46 3.69 4.92 -3.69 -2.46 -1.23 0.00 1.23 Frequency [MHz] 2.46 Desired = DSB f= 15.02MHz Undesired = IS95 Forward channel f=27.0912MHz + 29.5192MHz IF frequency DIF1=15.02MHz DIF2=1MHz+error of NCO1 = 1.5032MHz Sampling Frequency Fs1=157.2864MHz Fs2= 9.8304MHz Conclusions  We have developed a low-power configuration of DDC and DUC  Spurious response improved, power reduced  Specific power consumption will be estimated on the test bed  “To understand the new, learn from the old”  Radio design has long history with tremendous knowledge.  In the digital generation, digital designers must not ignore such knowledge.  Also, We have achieved the old requirement of band limitation as near as an antenna terminal in the digital domain. Will introduce it next time!