Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Feminist Theoretical Models: Questions from the Indian Context

In common parlance, a theory is mostly an idea or thought, a set of concepts or principles clarifying how some aspect of human behavior or performance is organized. When we talk of feminist theories, we understand it to be an extension of feminism into theoretical or philosophical discourse. The label ‗Indian' when used for feminist theories implies a political and cultural specificity. Indian feminism is clearly a response to issues concerning Indian women and the debates that have centered on the status of women. To explore how this debate has taken shape over the years this paper will explore the inevitable association with western feminism, the position of women in colonial and post -colonial India, and the challenges posed by globalization and the right wing ideology, the writings of prominent Indian academics and activists as they discuss feminism in the context of Indian culture, society and politics and explore its theoretical foundations in India. Feminism in India can be seen as a set of movements, legal reforms, social and cultural changes that have taken place over a period of time aimed at establishing and defending equal political, economic, social rights and equal opportunities for women in India. Apart from issues like right to work for equal wages, right to equal access to health and education and equal political rights feminism has also found culture specific issues within Indian patriarchal society. It has grappled in the past with issues such as the inheritance law, practice of widow immolation, child marriage, Dowry deaths and of late problems of domestic violence, sexual harassment at workplace, rape, honor killings, abortion and pro-life pro-choice debates, LGBT issues, the definition of family and the questions of family values, sexuality and religion, discriminatory practices against women in the unorganized sectors, isolation of the tribal and dalit women from the so called mainstream feminist agendas among other such issues.

4

For her, feminism is intellectual, elitist, metropolitan and it designs a kind of regimentation, which according to her does not address grassroots issues. And such intellectual ossification encourages biased opinions and is a western offshoot of individualism.

Four texts have now been flouted as feminist texts to affirm that feminism in India was not a western creation and that it had its endogenous roots in third world. In one fell swoop, women, modernity and nation become essential and inseparable elements in the discourse of civilization (Sen 2000,10). For the colonialist rulers the atrocities practiced against women became a confirmation of the rulers modernity and moral ground of their civilizing mission could be carried out, it was a ‗mask of conquest' (Vishwanathan 1990) they paraded as protectors of Indian women against the prevalent practices of sati, child marriage, ascetic widowhood, kulin polygamy, female infanticide and women's education. It was the colonialist discourse that by 5 assuming hegemony of brahmanical texts, believed in the total submission of all Hindus to the dictates of the text and that the texts were the necessary basis of all such practices as sati which received the sanction of texts.

First Phase of Women's Question: The Nationalist Answer

The nationalist's concern to defend their culture against western invasion led them to endorse the subordination of women with some of the most regressive customs. This is well documented in recent scholarship; some of the most important The Indian constitution then granted equality and freedom from discrimination based on gender, class, caste or religion. The constitution of India contains various provisions, which provide for equal rights and opportunities for both men and women.

The salient features are:

• Article 14 guarantees that the State shall not deny equality before the law and equal protection of the laws;

• Article 15 prohibits discrimination against any citizen on the ground of sex;

• Article 15(3) empowers the State to make positive discrimination in favour of women and children;

• Article 16 provides for Equality of Opportunity in matters of public employment;

• Article 23 prohibits trafficking in human beings and forced labour; 7 • Article 39 (A) and (d) enjoins the State to provide equal means of livelihood and equal pay for equal work;

• Article 42 enjoins upon the State to make provisions for securing just and humane conditions of work, and for maternity relief;

• Article 51A (e) imposes a Fundamental Duty on every citizen to renounce the practices derogatory to the dignity of women;

• Article 243(d) ( 3)provides that not less than 1/3rd of the total number of seats to be filled by direct election in every Panchayat to be reserved for women, and such seats to be allotted by rotation to different constituencies in a Panchayat;

• article 243 (T) (3) provides that not less than 1/3rd of the total number of seats to be filled by direct election in every Municipality shall be reserved for women and such it now became a repository of India's spirituality, the good woman, the chaste wife and mother empowered by spiritual strength was seen as an iconic symbol of the nation. Partha Chatterjee aptly summed it up as women were spoken for and that the new woman was a construct (1989,251). New woman was subjected to new patriarchies; she was to be a bhadramahila (a respectable woman) without becoming a memsahib (English woman), without jeopardizing her home (John 1996,9). Her education was meant to inculcate the values of discipline or orderliness, thrift, cleanliness and personal responsibility. Resolution of the women's question was considered to be complete; it disappeared for a period of over twenty years.

Second Phase of the Women's Question

Third Phase of the Women's Question:

One of the most significant contributions of feminist theorizing in the last two decades in India has been an unrelenting critique of essentialist notions of both

Backlash and Multiple Feminisms

Positioning the issue of feminism in the context of the print media, films, Television soaps we find two popular types of feminism that it sustains, a feminism of choice and a traditional feminism. At the same time, they express hostility, both covert and not so covert, to organized women's movements. This simultaneous cooptation and backlash is seemingly a sign of a consensus over some of feminism's demands, such as equality, while it also perverts the agenda of feminism itself-in the interests of a newly liberalised economy and a resurgent majoritarian religious political party movement.

India is a heterogeneous land and also there are multiple patriarchies and this call for multiple feminisms. Therefore feminism in India is not a singular theoretical orientation; it has changed over time in relation to historical and cultural realities, levels of perception, understandings and actions of individual men and women and men and women as a group. The widely used definition of feminism is "An awareness of women's oppression and exploitation in society, at work and within the family, and conscious action by women and men to change this situation" (Bhasin and Khan 1986, 1). Acknowledging sexism in daily life and attempting to challenge and eliminate it through deconstructing mutually exclusive notions of femininity and masculinity as biologically determined categories opens the way towards an equitable society for both men and women.

Indian Feminism must also be at once attentive to the micro politics of context, subjectivity and struggle as well as to the macro politics of global economic and political systems and processes (Mohanty 2002, 501). Mohanty (1991) discusses Maria Mies study of the lace makers of Narsapur as a demonstration of how to do this kind of multilayered, contextual analysis to reveal how the particular is often universally significantwithout using the universal to erase the particular or positing an unbridgeable gulf between the two terms. We need to deconstruct the objectification of ‗third world' feminisms and reconstruct a plural, contradictory,

complex notion of what feminist paradigms mean in India. And further show that the heterogeneity of Indian experience and the ever-changing gender relations has necessitated the articulation of multiple feminism and multiple theoretical frameworks