TEACHING/LEARNING MATTERS
ASA’S NEWSLETTER FOR THE
Volume 44, Number 1
Section Chair’s Corner
Kate Linnenberg
Beloit College
Spring 2015
employ their sociological imagina?ons as they navigate the
world so that they can understand the structures of a new
place and what that means for their posi?on within it.
These three brief stories capture ways in which my
students have begun to do Sociology in thought‐provoking
and exci?ng ways.
Kate Atkinson, a senior who double majors in Sociology
and Russian, presented her research on disabled children
and their ins?tu?onaliza?on in orphanages in Russia. This
project began during her semester abroad in Moscow
when Kate volunteered at a children’s art center that
works with orphaned children, many of whom have
disabili?es. She tackles the intersec?on of history and
biography by looking at how the construc?on of disability
in pre‐ and post‐Soviet Russia affects the integra?on, and
lack thereof, of children with disabili?es into larger
society, framing this as a human rights issue.
Last Thursday was Student Symposium Day at Beloit
College, and that is always one of my favorite days
of the semester. Classes are cancelled, and the day
is filled with student presenta?ons. Students
demonstrate how they’ve put the “liberal arts into
prac?ce” as we say at Beloit. There were
fascina?ng and polished presenta?ons, many of
which you would have been thrilled to stumble
upon at ASA. The day got me thinking about how
we teach students to “do” Sociology. We ask them
to conduct empirical research and write up or
present their results, sure, but mirroring the
research process of academia isn’t all I have in mind
when I think of “doing” Sociology. I think of
community‐based learning, internships, and other
experiences that give our students the opportunity
to connect text to context. We teach students to
Nate Brault is a senior who double majors in Sociology and
Educa?on & Youth Studies. In the fall, he spent the
semester in a Wri?ng for Social Jus?ce Program in
Minneapolis. As a part of that curriculum, he interned
with a high school theatre program that incorporated hip‐
hop pedagogy into the classroom. He spoke of having
students deconstruct the language of popular lyrics to
have conversa?ons about concepts such as race and social
class. As part of this “culturally relevant pedagogy,”
students also wrote and performed pieces that addressed
issues of poverty, feminism, and date rape.
Students don’t have to leave Beloit in order to “do”
Sociology. Each semester, my colleague Carol
Wickersham, offers a course called the Duffy Community
Partnerships. This class meets for two hours each week
and students spend 90 hours throughout the semester at
1
their community site. These range from a food
pantry to an organic farm to a local Fortune 500
company. The ques?on that drives the course is,
“What makes a good ociety?” For the past year,
Carol and two students—Maggie Cress and Karen
Jones—have conducted research on the program
that inves?gates the content of learning in this
community‐based experience. One ofs their findings
is that many students experience “pivot points,”
occurrences where learning isn’t gradual, but rather
takes a big jump forward. One way this happens is
that a student will make a connec?on between what
is happening in their par?cular site and what
happens in society more broadly. Students begin to
get a firmer grasp on the concept of social structure,
and this happens because they are embedded in a
community site that is accompanied by academic
grounding.
As a dedicated teacher, I am always looking for ways
to deepen student learning through innova?ve
pedagogy. That is a large part of my aZrac?on to
this sec?on—it is filled with educators who care
about teaching and learning and who are happy to
share their ideas. I’m already looking forward to all
that I will learn from you all at ASA in Chicago this
summer, but more on annual mee?ng programming
in my next column.
Editor’s Introduction
Daina Cheyenne Harvey
College of the Holy Cross
Table of Contents
Welcome to Spring! Worcester was the snowiest city in the
US this year and I didn’t really think we would ever see a
change of seasons (despite what The Byrds—or The
Limeliters claimed). Much like Kate and Beloit College, here
at Holy Cross we wrap up our semester with our annual
academic conference. Our undergraduates present their
research projects and theses. It is a wonderful chance to see
how young scholars are learning how to “do” sociology. At
?mes it also makes me realize I have a lot more to learn
about the doing of sociology.
This edi?on of our newsleZer is choked full of ideas about
doing sociology from fellow members.
Ader asking members for columns on connec?ng to the
community, we received almost half a dozen. In this edi?on
we include three. Jerry Krase uses visual sociology to
document blight and gentrifica?on in his teaching and
ac?vism. In a similar vein Jennifer Sullivan uses photography
to get her students interested in the local community.
Finally, Janet Lorenzen writes about transi?oning as a new
faculty member and how daun?ng making connec?ons to
the local community can be. She gives several examples and
some sugges?ons on how to make the transi?on.
We also have several ideas for the classroom in this edi?on.
Benjamin Drury writes about the flipped classroom. In his
piece he writes about assigning films, readings, and
2
recordings to students outside of the classroom and
having them come to class ready to discuss the
material. Kevin Dougherty writes about Learning
Celebra?ons. Rather than give exams or quizzes,
Kevin treats students to a party while they do
mul?ple choice ques?ons. In this way he changes
the connota?on of what evalua?on means and has
fun doing it. Qu'ils mangent de la brioche! Dee Hill
Zuganelli writes about strategies for dealing with
plagiarism and explains that by and large what we
currently do simply avoids the problem. Orit Hirsch
writes about a project she uses in her classes that
includes infographics to help students develop their
sociological imagina?on. Finally, we include a piece
by Deborah Abowitz on keeping it real. She shows
how designing unique wri?ng assignments keeps
students engaged and allows them to use
knowledge they have learned in class.
Kathleen Fitzgerald and Salvatore Babones both
write about their new books.
We have also included brief blurbs on our
candidates for the upcoming elec?on.
I’d also like to put in a personal plug. An edi?on of
Humanity & Society I co‐edited with Corey Dolgon
and James Pennell on teaching humanist sociology
just hit the shelves. I hope many of our readers find
it useful.
Finally, be on the lookout for two calls for papers
from Teaching Sociology!
As always, feel free to send ideas and pieces for the
next edi?on of the newsleZer.
August 2014 To August 2015
STLS Officers / Council Members
OFFICERS
Kate Linnenberg, Chair
Kathy Rowell, Past-Chair
Maxine Atkinson, Chair-Elect
Melinda Messineo, Secretary/Treasurer
Jamie Oslawski-Lopez, Student Representative
NEWSLETTER EDITORS
Daina Cheyenne Harvey
Francisco Vivoni
Shelley White
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Two-Year College Representatives
Michaela Nowell
Rebecca Hatch
Barbara Walters
Four-Year College Representatives
Jan Thomas
Marybeth Stalp
Carla Corroto
University Representatives
Mary Neil Trautner
Patricia Hoffman
Michael Schwartz
SECTION COMMITTEES
Awards Chair: Michael Schwartz
Cooperative Initiatives: Jeff Chin
Membership Chair: Liz Grauerholz
Program Chair: Maxine Atkinson
Publications Chair: Andrea Miller
Nominations Chair: Kathy Rowell
Contingent Faculty: Suzanne Mauer and Maria Paino
Graduate Student Concerns: Jamie Oslawski-Lopez
Sage Awards: Keith Roberts
Pre-Conference Program Planning: Melinda Messineo
Social Media: David Purcell and Marni Brown
3
Special issue of Teaching Sociology: Sociology Instruc6on in
the Community College Context.
3. Section Officers
Community colleges present unique opportuni8es for
teaching sociology, as well as challenges. While not
restricted to instruc8on in community college contexts,
especially salient concerns include:
4. Call For Papers
•
5. Connecting the Classroom to the Community
•
Strategies of assuring instruc8onal quality with
reliance con8ngent faculty
1. Section Chair’s Corner
2. Editor’s Introduction
10. Ideas for the Classroom
16. Meet the Candidates
14. Technologies and Teaching Resources
16. Announcements
Call For Papers
Teaching Sociology
Have you tested the effec?veness of an innova?ve
teaching approach? Do you have perspec?ves on
the state of teaching and learning in sociology that
you wish to share? Consider publishing your
insights in Teaching Sociology, a peer reviewed
journal of the American Sociological Associa?on.
In addi?on to reviews, the journal publishes three
types of manuscripts. Ar?cle submissions are
research‐based are approximately 25 pages
double spaced. Notes submissions summarize the
applica?on of specific teaching strategies or
approaches, and do so in a more restricted
manner than research ar?cles. They are
approximately 15 pages double spaced.
Conversa?on submissions are wriZen to s?mulate
lively, thoughkul and informed discussion of issues
that are subject to debate and controversy.
Conversa?on submissions can be as long as 25
pages double spaced but unlike ar?cle submissions
they do not necessarily need to include analysis of
data or assessment. If you have ques?ons about a
prospec?ve submission, contact the editor
Stephen Sweet at teachingsociology@ithaca.edu.
The journal is currently seeking all types of
submissions, as well as submissions for two special
issues.
Effec8ve engagement of part 8me faculty
•
Promo8on of professional disciplinary involvement
within the discipline
•
Curriculum design and decision making processes
•
Experien8al learning within limited exposure to
sociology courses
•
Effec8ve responses to teaching demands and resource
constraints
Teaching Sociology seeks ar8cles and notes that address
issues rela8ng to effec8ve engagement of sociology within
community college seFngs, including concerns that directly
relate to instruc8on, management, and disciplinary
engagement. Submission deadline is February 1, 2016.
Instruc8ons for submission can be found at hNp://
www.sagepub.com/journals/Journal201974. Ques8ons
concerning poten8al submissions can be addressed to the
editor, Stephen Sweet at teachingsociology@ithaca.edu.
Special Issue of Teaching Sociology: Incorpora6ng
Globaliza6on in the Sociology Curriculum
Teaching Sociology seeks ar8cles and notes that address
issues that focus on innova8ve approaches that incorporate
globaliza8on and transna8onal concerns in the curriculum.
Among the topics of interest are:
•
Effec8ve strategies that make global and
transna8onal concerns evident to students
•
Exercises or assignments that engage students in the
study of global and transna8onal concerns
•
Strategies of orchestra8ng transna8onal learning
experiences, such as class trips abroad
•
Cri8cal reviews of ways that global and transna8onal
content are presented in the curriculum
Submission deadline is February 1, 2017. Instruc8ons for
submission can be found at hNp://www.sagepub.com/
journals/Journal201974. Submissions concerning classroom
applica8ons should include assessment data. Ques8ons
concerning poten8al submissions can be addressed to the
co‐editors of this dedicated issue: PaF Giuffre at
pg07@txstate.edu or Stephen Sweet at
teachingsociology@ithaca.edu.
4
Connecting the Classroom to the
Community
"Fighting from Urban Blight to Gentrification and
Displacement in Brooklyn"
Jerry Krase
Brooklyn College of CUNY, Sociology
Image 1. Local Community Leaders
Sociologists can connect to the community in many
different ways. As a visually‐oriented sociologist I do
it with images. For example, in the 1970s my
students went out into the field to help a racially
changing neighborhood, Prospect‐Lefferts‐Gardens,
correct nega?ve, essen?ally racist, defini?ons of
this and other central city areas into which African
Americans and Afro‐Caribbeans were moving. Due
to the biases of various public and private
authori?es, the residents and businesses in these
communi?es suffered from such things as poor city
services as well as mortgage and insurance red‐
lining. Below are two images represen?ng
neighborhood residents, homes as well as student
research and documentary ac?vi?es.
This Brooklyn College student is audio taping an
interview of Mr. and Mrs. Norman McField, who are
Prospect‐Lefferts‐Gardens community leaders.
Image 2. Residen?al Block in Prospect‐Lefferts‐
Gardens
5
This is a common example of Prospect‐Lefferts‐
Gardens streetscape that in the 1970s was
considered by outsiders a “bad” neighborhood.
As technology advanced my students used new ways
to learn about and assist community residents. The
following is an excerpt from one such a class project
that was available on line:
We are a group of CUNY Honors students at
Brooklyn College. Walking the streets of our
borough, we constantly observe the history,
culture and everyday life of Brooklyn and
Brooklynites. People from all over the world
seZle onto the streets that weave
themselves into each other, mingling their
cultures, languages, religions and ethnici?es,
thus crea?ng diverse communi?es unseen in
most other ci?es in the world. One such
community that fascinated us with its
unique history, neighborhood spirit and
individuality was Prospect Lefferts Gardens.
Calm, shadowed streets lined with turreted
houses and beau?ful trees are nestled
between the bustle of Flatbush and the calm
serenity of Brooklyn Botanic Gardens.
History seeps from the pavement as one
walks around, looking up at the houses and
talking with the local residents. One of the
most preserved communi?es of Brooklyn,
Prospect Lefferts Gardens is worthy of study
and perhaps a trip on the Q train.
Our Mission
Our Mission is to Protect the moderate to low
income people from being displaced from the
Flatbush Ave, Lefferts Garden area, due to
gentrifica?on. We are determined to help true
affordable housing, that is based upon the current
popula?on income and to provide assistance and
support to maintain the current affordable housing
stock.
We are also engage with City Planning and behind
the scenes developers who want to turn Empire
Blvd. into a tourist aZrac?on and make tons of
money off the community. We are being played in a
bait and switch with community benefits. Told by
City Planning that if we don't Up zone Empire Blvd.,
we won't get assistance from the City to help with
our affordable housing. We know that if they get
those high risers on Empire, we won't be here, to
get any community benefits, so we are not going to
fight for a community that won't exist in five years!
These last two images were taken by me during a walking
tour to show an urban planner what the problem looks like.
MTOPP has engaged the planner to respond to the rezoning
study that threatens the affordability of the area with high‐
rise high‐density luxury development.
We invite you to come with us into Prospect
Lefferts Gardens!" (hZp://
macaulay.cuny.edu/student‐projects/2006/
neighborhoods/9/home.html)
From these kinds of experiences some of my
students became community ac?vists, got involved
in local poli?cs; one even became a board member
of the local Community Planning District.
Ironically, that same neighborhood is today suffering
from a reversal of misfortune in the form
Gentrifica?on and Displacement. Although no longer
teaching full‐?me I have become involved with The
Movement To Protect the People (hZp://
www.mtopp.org/) whose mission is stated below:
Image 3. If the rezoning is approved this corner could be the
site for High‐Rise, High‐Density Commercial and /or
Residen?al Development.
6
Image 4. These buildings once offered local Prospect‐
Lefferts‐Gardens residents affordable rents and in
an?cipa?on of the rezoning has is already become a
residen?al development site.
Connecting the Classroom to the
Community
Connec&ng to the Community through
Sustainability in Prac&ce
Janet A. Lorenzen
Willame<e University
As a new faculty member, living in an unfamiliar
city, how do you get to know a community and
develop a place‐based curriculum? This was the
challenge I faced this year at WillameZe University
in Salem, Oregon. My goal was to assess the
connec?ons already in place and open up a variety
of opportuni?es which I could pursue in more depth
in the future.
While developing a new course (“Sustainability,
Jus?ce & Society”) I encountered a course design I
wanted to emulate. Alvarez and Rogers (2006) took
their students on seven fieldtrips to help them
understand “sustainability in prac?ce.” These
fieldtrips (in Australia) included local government
offices, a winery, an orchard, a berry farm, and an
environmental non‐profit organiza?on. Students
then wrestled with sustainability in the real world
including the conflic?ng priori?es of stakeholders
and their divergent perspec?ves on how to define
sustainability. I wanted to recreate this course in
the agriculturally rich WillameZe Valley but seven
fieldtrips seemed like a daun?ng task. I decided to
begin by bringing the community to the class, rather than
the class to the community. My course on “Sustainability,
Jus?ce & Society” highlights the disconnect between
sustainability (oden of the built environment) and social
jus?ce (focused on labor and health) and the differences
between defini?ons of sustainability in textbooks and the
empirical reality of sustainability‐in‐ac?on that we find on
campus and in our local communi?es (Lorenzen
forthcoming). I organized the course so it touched on global
connec?ons, local communi?es, and the campus itself. We
began, as many environmental sociology classes do, with a
supply chain assignment. We read selec?ons from
Confessions of an Eco‐Sinner: Tracking down the Sources of
My Stuff and watched clips from the film Mardi Gras: Made
in China.
In searching for a template for my supply chain assignment I
reached out to my social networks and Norah MacKendrick
at Rutgers University recommended Belasco (2008, 62‐63) –
who lays out a detailed assignment on food supply chains. I
adapted his assignment to include both food and other
products. [Although I did not use it for my course, Belasco
(2008) also discusses another assignment: “The New
Product Development Game” where students can design
and market a new product, then deal with the ethical
implica?ons of the product (68‐69).] The supply chain
assignment had both academic and entertainment value.
On the entertainment side, we learned that honey nut
cheerios do not have any nuts in them and other odd facts.
On the academic side, I asked students to interrogate the
“informa?on deficit model” by assessing the likelihood that
the “average consumer” could make “beZer decisions” by
seeking out informa?on on resource extrac?on, farming and
labor prac?ces, etc.
In order to compliment the food chain assignment I brought
in a guest speaker who was comple?ng a local food
assessment (hZp://oregonfoodbank.org/) and who worked
with a local food share that the University had a long‐
standing rela?onship with. The food assessment involved
interviewing local farmers (What do they grow? Are
processing loca?ons accessible?) and organizing town hall
mee?ngs to discuss food access. This visit gave students
insight into local food webs and their rela?onship to food
insecurity. It also opened up a dialogue between myself and
the local food share about future service learning
opportuni?es tailored to sustainability and social jus?ce.
7
In addi?on to capitalizing on the pre‐exis?ng
rela?onships with non‐profits, I also piggy‐backed
course content onto campus events. For example,
when Liz Carlisle (author) and David Oien (Founder of
Timeless Natural Food) came to campus to give a talk
about the book Len8l Underground and went with
my students to watch the documentary film Food
Chains which was followed by an excellent panel on
fair labor prac?ces. The class followed up by prin?ng
leZers in support of the Fair Food program from the
film’s website and bringing them to the local Safeway
(hZp://www.foodchainsfilm.com/). Accommoda?ng
these events required some flexibility in my syllabus,
but was worth the effort.
I also coordinated a campus greening project for the
course similar to one I had heard about at an AASHE
panel (The Associa?on for the Advancement of
Sustainability in Higher Educa?on) (Johnson and Long
2013). I invited the head of the sustainability
ins?tute, food services, facili?es and grounds
keeping to the class (2 different class periods) to talk
about what they have done in the past to green
campus and what they hope to do in the future.
Students followed up with them and designed a
proposal for a campus greening project. In the last
third of the class students have the op?on of carrying
out their project. For example, one student group is
mapping the edible gardens on campus (there are
about 5) and making a webpage about them
available to students, staff, faculty and the local
community including a nearby homeless shelter. For
their final project students also have the op?on of
researching a local organiza?on that is working on
both sustainability and social jus?ce issues. This
allows me to get to know local groups and gives
students the opportunity to explore mechanisms of
social change.
students. My advice for new faculty is threefold: work with
exis?ng rela?onships, embed community outreach into the
curriculum, and seek out connec?ons that fit with both your
curriculum and research interests.
Works Cited
Alvarez, Amaya and Judy Rogers. 2006. “Going ‘Out There’:
Learning about Sustainability in Place.” Interna8onal Journal
of Sustainability in Higher Educa8on. 7(2): 176‐188.
Belasco, Warren. 2008. Food: The Key Concepts. Oxford, UK:
Berg.
Carlisle, Liz. 2015. Len8l Underground: Renegade Farmers
and the Future of Food in America. New York: Gotham.
Johnson, Richard and Elizabeth Long. 2013. “A Decade of
Lessons from Connec?ng Campus Greening with the
Classroom at Rice University” in Teaching Sustainability:
Perspec8ves from the Humani8es and Social Sciences.
Wendy Peterson‐Boring and William Forbes (Eds.)
Nacogdoches, TX: SFA Press. Pp. 199‐211.
Lorenzen, Janet A. Forthcoming. “Teaching & Learning
Guide for: Green Consump?on and Social Change: Debates
over Responsibility, Private Ac?on, and Access.” Sociology
Compass.
Pearce, Fred. 2008. Confessions of an Eco‐Sinner: Tracking
Down the Sources of My Stuff. Boston: Beacon Press.
I am also building up my own community networks.
Ader aZending several environmental lobbying days
at the state capital for research purposes, I invited a
local pastor to the class to speak about eco‐feminism
and religious environmentalism. And organized a
panel of residents from a nearby eco‐village to come
to class and discuss their defini?on of sustainability
and trials and tribula?ons that they have faced
because of the housing market collapse. I am
currently working with the eco‐village to find more
ways to make connec?ons between it and University
8
Connecting the Classroom to
the Community
Seeing History Through the Lens of a
Camera
Jennifer Sullivan
Mitchell College
Visual Sociology: Photography is an elec?ve
sociology course which combines my two passions,
sociology and photography, and is taught in a small
group se•ng of 11 students. The course explores
documentary photography by examining the
photography cri?cism of Susan Sontag’s, On
Photography, and photographers such as Jacob
Riis, Walker Evans, Diane Arbus, Dorothea Lange
and Lewis Hine. The course is flexible enough to
allow for discussions of modern photography
cri?cism and debate (such as morality of photos
taken of Abu Gharib) as well as historical mysteries
(Roger Fenton’s the “Valley of Death”
photographs). Although not a photography skills
course, students are required to complete eight
weekly photo assignments which challenge them to
explore their world through the lens of a camera;
digital cameras and cell phone cameras are
permiZed.
The course incorporates discussion, cri?cal
analysis, and hands‐on photography elements.
However, the most effec?ve teaching tool I have
u?lized in the course so far is bringing my students
to the archive room of the New London Public
Library in New London, CT.
New London, CT is a small, waterfront town along
the Thames River rich with mari?me history. In a
leZer wriZen in 1864, Henry White of New Haven
stated, “I have met no town history, which, in my
judgment, is quite equal to it.” The New London
Library itself is an important historical building and also
contains archives of leZers, books and photographs which
span 300 years of history in New London County.
The library staff were quite helpful and accommoda?ng in
allowing my students and I to carefully sort through the
historical documents and pictures of New London and the
surrounding towns. During our visit, the students were
amazed at the old photographs of a tree lined State Street
with horse drawn carriages, and pictures of numerous
submarines being built across the river in Groton, CT at
Electric Boat. The students were amazed that they were able
to hold documents in their hands that were over 100 years
old. One student was fascinated by the front page of our
local newspaper, The Day, which had ar?cles repor?ng on
World War II. Another student found newspaper clippings
from the 1950’s about the history of our ins?tu?on, Mitchell
College, and the fluctua?ng enrollment of 97 students to an
influx of veterans returning home from World War II. One
young woman in the course found a picture of the inside of
a submarine control room. She told me that her boyfriend is
also in the Navy and talks about spending ?me in a similar
control room. Because of the photograph, she was able to
understand where he worked and she used her cell phone to
take a picture of the archived document to share with him.
Watching the students pore through the files and
photographs reminded me that they were learning more by
being outside of the classroom and in the community than in
any powerpoint lesson I could present. Working
independently yet alongside their peers allowed all students
in the class to be witnesses to others’ discoveries and
allowed me to be curious and amazed as I searched the
photographs with them.
An interes?ng contradic?on to the students’ explora?on of
older documents was their use of modern technology via
their cell phones. While in the library archives, students
were tasked with finding three photographs that interested
them, surprised them or affected them in some way. All of
the students used their cell phones as a camera, but some
also found another use for their smart phones – as a
research tool. Many students found terms and events
men?oned in the files which were unfamiliar to them and
used the internet as a reference. A photography field trip
into the community evolved into students’ individual
research projects; an unexpected outcome.
9
Bringing my sociology students into the community
proved to be an invaluable teaching tool and
connected Mitchell College students with an
important building in our town’s history, the New
London Public Library.
Ideas For the Classroom
The Flipped Classroom
Benjamin Drury
Morton College
One thing that plagues me towards the beginning of
every semester is where to draw the line between
what content to show, display, discuss, or otherwise
present in the classroom and what material students
are responsible for consuming outside of class. The
overall goal is to s?mulate discussion and
par?cipa?on with the lecture. And when trying to
select movies of interest to students, or even audio
recordings or ar?cles readings, I have to limit them
by their length if I want to show them in class.
However, last semester I caught wind of a new
movement in educa?on that gives teachers the
opportunity to release low‐stakes assignments
related to these longer viewings, or other form of
media, and ?e them to discussion ques?ons for class
?me.
I took this ques?on to an on‐campus Teaching and
Learning Center event last semester en?tled “The
Flipped Classroom” to inves?gate this teaching style
that requires students to take ?me out of class to
review certain materials – in most cases it is a longer
film – and complete review ques?ons for class
discussion. In the presenta?on, our campus digital
expert walked us through the process of designing
materials to be used in the “Flipped Classroom” that
can help students and teachers alike.
powerful in opening student minds to the power of using
alterna?ve perspec?ves to inves?gate social issues. Second,
the instructor needs to link the media to some form of
review ques?ons. For me, I designed fairly broad‐strokes
ques?ons aimed at engaging students with the material. Of
course, one can’t make the ques?ons too specific, but, for
example, asking how gender, race, or social class influence
the outcomes of certain situa?ons can open student minds
to the power of social drivers in our life. Third, and perhaps
most important, the class discussion. Simply crea?ng these
responses is beneficial in and of itself. But when you allow
students the opportunity to share their responses, engage
with other students who may or may not share their
viewpoint, and then have them work together to seZle on a
shared perspec?ve on the issue is hugely significant.
Naturally, ader hearing this presenta?on I was sold and
desired the opportunity to test this pedagogy on my own
students.
This semester I designed and released a “Flipped Classroom”
worksheet – I call them “Chapter Handouts” – for each
chapter to give students exposure to a variety of films, audio
recordings, and alterna?ve ar?cles. They complete a set of
ques?ons related to their viewing and we then discuss them
in class. Interes?ngly, as my fear was that students would
feel overwhelmed by this strategy, many students felt this
ac?vity brought them to a closer understanding of the
material. Overall, I see an increase in student discussions
and exam grades, so it appears that the “Flipped Classroom”
strategy is working. However, I do need to complete a more
focused assessment of student a•tudes toward the
assignment before fully integra?ng this method into all of
my classes.
The first step in designing a “Flipped Classroom” is
deciding what media is important for students to
review and connect to the course material. For
sociologists, the field is rela?vely open in terms of
media that can be related to course material.
However, there were some specific films – PBS
documentaries especially – that are lengthy (about 2
hours in run?me) that I believe are immensely
10
Ideas For the Classroom
Reframing Test Day
Kevin D. Dougherty
Baylor University
our teaching team, myself and two graduate teaching
assistants, gently remind them that no such ac?vi?es occur
in our course. We ins?tute a different vocabulary and a
different set of norms to alter the way students perceive of
and experience assessment.
Assessment is for Learning
It is test day in my Introduc?on to Sociology class.
Students wait nervously outside the classroom
door. They talk in muted tones as they compare
notes and lament that this is the second or third
test of the week for them. The mood is somber.
Then the doors to the classroom open.
Signs on the doors read, “It’s ?me to celebrate!”
Balloons and streamers surround a table of treats at
the front of the room. Kool and the Gang’s song
“Celebra?on” plays in the background. Members of
the teaching staff receive entering students as party
guests. The furrowed brows of students quickly
change to broad smiles. The muted tones and
shuffling of notes are replaced by happy banter and
rhythmic nodding of heads to the music. At the
appointed ?me, the music fades. The professor
takes the stage, greets students as “community
members,” and thanks them for coming to the
Learning Celebra?on. Welcome to test day in Soc
1305!
More than a seman?c gimmick, I have been ac?vely
working to reframe test day for the past two years.
Drawing on social construc?onism, my goal is to
create an ambience for assessment that enhances
learning and joy. I tell students that our course is
far too fun for quizzes and exams. Instead, we have
Learning Checks and Learning Celebra?ons.
Students are skep?cal at first and oden slip into the
familiar language of quizzes and tests. Members of
Learning Celebra?ons shid the emphasis of assessment
from grading to learning. Assessment is an important part
of learning. Tests, in par?cular, are useful tools for learning.
Teaching advocates Marilla Svinicki and Wilbert McKeachie
(2014) instruct: “Tes?ng and other assessments should be
learning experiences as well as evalua?on devices” (p. 83).
Students tend to think of tests solely in terms of evalua?on.
They bristle at quizzes and tests as external requirements
imposed upon them. By changing the language, I aZempt to
change the connota?on of assessment. The course syllabus
describes Learning Celebra?ons as occasions “to consider
and celebrate what we’ve learned.” The choice of a plural
pronoun is inten?onal. We celebrate holidays, birthdays,
and other rites of passage with others. In similar fashion,
Learning Celebra?ons are shared events that contribute to a
larger goal of transforming a crowd of 200+ strangers into a
community.
Assessment Can Be Fun
Learning Celebra?ons reinforce another lesson for students:
Assessment can be fun. Learning Celebra?ons in Soc 1305
are fun. In addi?on to the music and décor of the
classroom, the content of Learning Celebra?ons is amusing.
Thirty to forty mul?ple choice ques?ons comprise each
Learning Celebra?on. Students are in many ques?ons.
Rebecca adopts a ferret and gets evicted from her campus
residence hall in Learning Celebra?on 1 (formal sanc?on).
Michael marries two female classmates in Learning
Celebra?on 3 (polygamy). Students smile and chuckle as
they read about themselves in the ques?ons. This affec?ve
response is valuable. Learning has both cogni?ve and
affec?ve dimensions. When students care about a subject
and care about classmates, the poten?al for deep, las?ng
learning increases (Fink 2013). I want students to care
about sociology. It is one of my course objec?ves. By
making Learning Celebra?ons fes?ve occasions, I aim to
raise students’ interest in sociology and their intrinsic
mo?va?on for studying sociology.
11
Outcomes
I enjoyed the Learningg Celebra?ons
Celebra?
in Soc
1305
Strongly Disagree
1%
vote consistently favors four celebra?ons. Thus, the
frequency of Learning Celebra?ons may par?ally account for
higher average scores. Nevertheless, taking student opinion
and student performance together provides support for
Learning Celebra?ons as a benefit to learning.
Disagree
3%
Slightly Disagree
7%
Conclusion
Slightly Agree
22%
Agree
26%
Strongly Agree
41%
Total
100%
(N=537)
Assessment is too important for students to dread. As
teachers, we can influence how students perceive of and
experience assessment. Make test day something special in
your courses. Bring balloons and treats. Students may do
beZer as a result. This is worth celebra?ng.
Response to the Learning Celebra?ons has been very
posi?ve. When I made the change from tests to
celebra?ons in Fall 2013, I added a ques?on about
the Learning Celebra?ons to the course evalua?on.
Over three semesters (Fall 2013, Spring 2014, and
Fall 2014), nine out of ten students agreed that “I
enjoyed the Learning Celebra?ons in Soc 1305.”
Remarkably, 41% strongly agreed. I can’t remember
another ?me in my teaching when students were so
enthusias?c about mul?ple‐choice ques?ons to
assess their learning. Unfortunately, I have no way
of tes?ng whether level of enjoyment has changed
with the introduc?on of Learning Celebra?ons in my
Soc 1305 course. It never occurred to me to ask
whether students enjoyed the exams. I do have
compara?ve data on student performance.
Comparing three semesters of exam scores (Fall
2011, Spring 2012, Fall 2012) to three semesters of
Learning Celebra?on scores (Fall 2013, Spring 2014,
and Fall 2014), telling differences emerge. I convert
raw scores to percentages for comparison purposes,
since the number of ques?ons on exams/
celebra?ons were not uniform across semesters.
The mean percentage on exams was 84.65. The
mean percentage on Learning Celebra?ons was
86.48. Hence, students taking Learning Celebra?ons
scored nearly two percentage points higher than did
students taking exams in previous semesters. And
they did so consistently. The standard devia?on for
exam percentages was 9.89 in contrast to a standard
devia?on of 7.34 on Learning Celebra?ons. These
differences are sta?s?cally significant (t = ‐3.73, p < .
001). A necessary qualifica?on is in order however.
I used to give three exams. Students now vote on
the number of Learning Celebra?ons. The majority
References
Fink, L. Dee. 2013. Crea?ng Significant Learning Experiences.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass.
Svinicki, Marilla D. and Wilbert J. McKeachie. 2014.
McKeachie’s Teaching Tips, 14th ed. Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth.
Ideas For the Classroom
Disdain and Honesty as Contributors
to Teachable Moments in Plagiarism
Dee Hill Zuganelli
University of Arizona
Plagiarism represents one of the most troubling
developments for academic integrity in the present ?mes
of higher educa?on. It is troubling for two reasons.
First, plagiarism has not only increased in prevalence over
?me, but it also now serves as the predominant challenge
in academic integrity (Yardley, Rodriguez, Bates, and
Nelson 2009). Second, effec?ve solu?ons for tackling
plagiarism prove elusive. Instructors and professors can
resort to puni?ve measures ranging from loss of course
credit to dismissal from class to program suspension and
expulsion. However, they fail to address the broader
context in which chea?ng occurs: percep?ons of high‐
stakes academic performance, ?me management skill
deficiencies failures to strategize and priori?ze workloads,
and ever‐present tempta?ons of Internet and digital
resources.
12
Heckler and Forde (2015) proposed that cultural
values such as freedom, individualism, and fault‐
finding inform jus?fica?ons and deterrents for
plagiarism. Universi?es can work to create stronger
cultures of learning and social norms and values
campaigns to ins?ll the importance of integrity. But
how do we translate Heckler and Forde’s university‐
level recommenda?ons directly into our work in the
classroom?
The majority of my teaching experience with
plagiarism has dealt with crea?ng and enforcing
sanc?ons. This means crea?ng clear language in
course syllabi that defines plagiarism and iden?fies
consequences, ensuring students know the risk, and
enforcing sanc?ons when students get caught. So
long as I had wriZen statements to refer to, my
responsibility to stop plagiarism ended there. If
anything, the cultural argument had more to do with
students’ internal moral compasses than any
responsibility on my part to change their behavior.
And to the extent this sen?ment is shared among
faculty, it becomes easier and easier to react with
disdain. Here’s why.
Plagiarism is a topic that can easily make students’
eyes glaze over. To prevent this, I incorporate
stories of former chea?ng incidents. I keep the
required talk fairly minimal – what the term means,
copying from the web versus recycling old
homework, how I use Turn‐It‐In, how surprisingly
effec?ve it is, etc. Ader that, we spend more ?me
discussing how rela?vely innocent behaviors – like
working together on homework, sharing copies of
assignments, or distribu?ng class notes – present
different levels of risk.
The accompanying Powerpoint lesson shows a color‐
coded thermometer. The topic (e.g., students
working together) is the slide ?tle. The
thermometer appears next to a series of acceptable
and risky varia?ons. Thus, ge•ng together to study
is a “safe” behavior whereas exchanging and copying
each other’s content is a clear viola?on. More
importantly, intermediary behaviors – such as asking
a class mate to see how they word a short essay
response in their homework – generate the real
responses. “Why is that risky?” a student asks. And
then I tell students about the ?me Friend A asks B
for her homework, B voluntarily gives it, only for A
to copy her en?re assignment and submit it for a grade.
Disdain sets in because of the ?me wasted in crea?ng as
lively a discussion for chea?ng as possible, only for it to do
not one hint of good. It gets worse when instructors
confront cheaters who have already aZended plagiarism
workshops and early sanc?ons. And in full disclosure, my
disdain translated into policy change. If I couldn’t beat
students down with a sanc?on (loss of course credit, loss of
leZer grade), then I reached for a larger hammer (failing the
course). While serving on a college‐level taskforce for
plagiarism and academic integrity issues, we reflected
openly and honestly about these sen?ments.
If readers are compelled by Heckler and Forde’s cultural
arguments for chea?ng, then we need to consider our own
values that frame how we address plagiarism.
Authoritarianism and accountability might appeal to the
hammer‐wielders out there. But if we want to see student
honesty between the chea?ng and the conference, perhaps
we can turn these logics into a more forgiving measure.
I couple my (now, disdain‐infused) zero‐tolerance policy for
chea?ng with a catch. It’s delighkully simple on their part.
If a student voluntarily discloses that they have cheated on
an assignment prior to my discovery of it, then he or she is
eligible for a lighter sanc?on. Honesty becomes an effec?ve
bargaining chip.
The act becomes a way to regain accountability even in the
face of prior wrongdoings. Although discre?onary
enforcement claims to work in the same way, the self‐
incrimina?on clause avoids reintroducing the risk of
chea?ng (due to no punishment). It is sufficiently technical
and legalis?c for the sake of campus rule enforcement while
giving students a clear behavioral alterna?ve, especially
ader wrongdoing occurs. Moreover, this instructor‐side
interven?on may relieve the disdain that inadvertently
bubbles up in applying sanc?ons. It’s easier to approach
students who show a capacity for accountability through
confession and to treat them with forgiveness in return.
In conclusion, plagiarism and academic integrity issues are
unlikely to result in fewer headaches on our collec?ve
teaching behalf in the near future. The Internet and the
subsequence ease of accessing and sharing materials,
copywriZen and otherwise, will not shrink any ?me soon.
Policies promote reflec?on and allow us to take stock of
an?‐plagiarism messages we repeat and promote as
13
instruc?ve devices. For me, it’s less “You fail the
course” and more “Be honest so that I won’t fail
you.”
References
Heckler, Nina C. and David R. Forde. 2015. “The Role
of Cultural Values in Plagiarism in Higher Educa?on.”
Journal of Academic Ethics, 13, 61‐75.
Yardley, Jennifer, Melanie Domenech Rodríguez,
ScoZ C. Bates, and Johnathan Nelson. 2009. “True
Confessions? Alumni’s Retrospec?ve Reports on
Undergraduate Chea?ng Behaviors.” Ethics and
Behavior, 19(1), 1‐14.
Ideas For the Classroom
Linking Technology, Sociology and the
Real World in One Independent
Project
Orit Hirsh
Kingsborough Community College
How do we engage the students beyond simply learning the
terminology for a test? How can we make the sociological
theories not to sound encyclopedic, but relevant? How can
we demonstrate to our students that the theories they are
studying have been developed based on interac?ons found
in everyday life and can be studied on any street corner,
shopping mall, and classroom?
Ader five semesters of tes?ng out various ideas, I have
developed a project which successfully engages all of the
students in ac?vely learning the material, enriches their
understanding of fundamental sociological theories, and
causes them to reflect on how they are affected by their
social backgrounds in society. The project asks students to
examine social problems from a sociological perspec?ve
and asks them to suggest policies for modifying the nega?ve
aspects of these social problems. Students then create an
infographic or a video that leverages their technological
skills and present these theories and relevant topics to the
class. I have found this project and the technological twist
engages almost all of the students. They are invested in
applying their sociological knowledge to understanding
their social environment.
At the beginning of the semester, I introduce the two‐part
and provide a list of general and specific topics as examples.
The students have the op?on to select one of the topics and
relate it to their own lives or to choose a sociological topic
of their own. The topics might be connected to their
hobbies, college major, or ideas that were covered
throughout the semester. In the past, students have
wriZen about diverse topics such as: objec?fica?on of
women in the media; how social media affects teens; the
percep?on of black hair; racism in soccer; the cultural
differences between speakers of Cantonese verses
Mandarin; college enrollment for minori?es in a 4‐year
college verses a 2 year college; and addic?on to mobile
phones.
The first part of the project includes researching the topic of
interest by selec?ng two ar?cles from the popular press
(web, magazines, and newspapers) and two ar?cles from a
social science journal, which enables students to examine
both the popular and social science perspec?ves on this
topic. Their research results in a 4‐page essay, which is
outlined below:
14
•
•
Start with an introductory paragraph that
outlines and describes your social topic,
such as why it is important.
Select one of the sociological perspec?ves:
func?onalism, conflict theory, symbolic
interac?onism.
•
Interpret the social problem from the
selected sociological perspec?ve.
Furthermore, be specific in your
explana?on: what you learned from each
reading and which sociological perspec?ve
you are using.
•
Suggest a social policy to improve the social
problem
Ideas For the Classroom
Students Wri8ng Advice to the Lovelorn:
Engaging Students and “Keeping it Real”
Deborah A. Abowitz
Bucknell University
For the second part of the ar?cle, the students have
to create a video or an infographic incorpora?ng
their research.
For each part of the assignment, I meet with the
students to discuss the topic they have selected,
help them outline the project and make it
manageable, and discuss the best way to showcase
their research (an infographic or a video). You can
choose to have the students work individually or in
groups.
This project brings the theories to life and
challenges students to view their everyday
interac?ons from a sociological lens. Adding these
technological tools somehow made the project
seem more fun and crea?ve to students and their
engagement overall increased. I no?ced that
par?cipa?on during the lectures drama?cally
increased. Even the students from my 8 a.m. class
were more engaged; they asked more ques?ons and
volunteered their ideas to the discussions more
frequently. As a result, their grades improved as
well. As a core class, Introduc?on to Sociology
draws students from diverse educa?onal
backgrounds. This assignment allows students to
develop a beZer understanding of sociological
aspects by researching ideas that maZer to them,
while also challenging them to present their findings
in a crea?ve way.
I was cha•ng about student engagement recently with a
colleague in Economics. He popped by my office, quite
excited ader having just taught one of those classes where
things “clicked.” He told me about the student‐centered
examples he uses to make abstract macro‐economic models
maZer to his students. Between us, we have almost six
decades of teaching experience; while I spent most of my
career at our current ins?tu?on, he is new to our faculty.
Despite our different genders, disciplines and teaching
backgrounds, we both ended up in the same pedagogical
“place” as teachers: trying to engage students by “keeping it
real.” We both accept that teaching today puts the burden
on us not to be “boring,” and that most students do not see
intrinsic value in what and how we used to teach.
When my students say a course is “boring,” this is code for
either material that is too “academic” or an instructor whose
style is just “not engaging” to them. When pressed, they
confess that “too academic” means course material seems
unrelated to or divorced from the “real world,” while “not
engaging” mostly refers to old‐school low‐tech pedagogy
(like, gasp!, live lectures). In all, they use “boring” to
characterize courses that are not inherently entertaining in
form or func?on (at least, not by their social media‐driven
standards). Although I actually do use a range of instruc?onal
technologies in various courses, I do not rely on high‐tech
15
digital razzle‐dazzle to engage my students in class.
Instead, like my colleague, I focus on “keeping it
real” to help my students connect to sociology
while I try to avoid the s?gma of being “boring.”
Keeping it real means two things to me. First,
whenever possible, I select some required readings
that directly connect social theory and data to their
lives. I look for studies that have some personal or
prac?cal relevance to students (for example, journal
ar?cles that use undergraduate samples). Some
might perceive this as pandering to their
genera?onal narcissism, but it increases the
likelihood that they do the readings while providing
fodder for some meaningful in‐class discussions.
Second, and more to the point here, I try to design
unique wri?ng assignments requiring crea?ve
integra?on and applica?on of course material to
real world situa?ons. Students not only enjoy doing
these assignments (something frequently
men?oned in end‐of‐term student evalua?ons), but
these kind of assignments are not easily plagiarized,
so I spend less ?me policing academic dishonesty.
Whether teaching introductory sociology, research
methods, or upper‐level seminars, I have long since
put away the long essay assignments and tradi?onal
research or “term” papers that were the staples of
my own undergraduate and graduate courses. I do
not ques?on their pedagogical value, in a perfect
world, just their efficacy with my students here and
now.
One of the most enjoyable and effec?ve examples
of this kind of assignment (this is from my senior
seminar on courtship and marriage in the US), has
students wri?ng “advice to the lovelorn.” In the role
of advice columnists (“Dear Cupid”), they write
formal responses to “leZers” solici?ng advice on
personal dilemmas. I crad each “Dear Cupid” leZer
to reflect topics covered in our course that relate to
“real” problems facing 20‐somethings. On the rare
occasion that there is an older or non‐tradi?onal
student in the class, the same assignment also
draws well from their broader life experience. Some
topics come from anonymous ques?ons students
submit during the first week of class when I ask
what they want to learn from the course. As a
result, Dear Cupid leZers may include ques?ons
about hooking up or about transi?oning from
hooking up to rela?onships, but they are just as frequently
about cohabita?on, work‐family balance, and other topics
gradua?ng seniors have on their minds.
I grade student response leZers on both content and style
(this is a wri?ng‐intensive course). In terms of content, as
Cupid, they need to integrate what they learned from course
readings and class discussion into their advice on the leZer’s
topic.
I look at whether their answers: a) reflect a comprehensive
and accurate understanding of the issues; b) appropriately
apply the material; and c) whether or not they provide
balanced perspec?ve on controversial issues. They get
bonus points for leZers that are wiZy, not just “smart.” I
give students some choice in this assignment, so they can
respond to leZers with more personal appeal. I post four
“Dear Cupid” leZers from which they must choose two. Here
is a sample leZer:
Dear Cupid,
My boyfriend and I have been together for 3 years now. We
used to hook up in college but aher gradua8on, we ended up
in the same city and finally began da8ng. We got exclusive
last year. Now he says we should move in together since we
spend all our 8me at my place or his and are was8ng rent.
He thinks this way we’ll be able to tell if we’d make it if we
got married. He says he loves me but my mom told me,
“nobody buys a head of leNuce or a cabbage that somebody
else already squeezed.” She doesn’t think I should live with
him un8l there’s a ring on my finger. So, Cupid, what should I
do? I love my boyfriend, but is living together really good
prac8ce for marriage, or, it is just an easy way for him to
squeeze the leaves?
Signed, Confused Cabbage
Many students fully embrace the assignment, submi•ng
responses to extra leZers just for fun. In most semesters,
students ask for class ?me to read their completed leZers
aloud and share them with the group. The fact that the
assignment focuses on “real” courtship and marriage
dilemmas maZers to them, even though the wri?ng task is
much more challenging than first appears. It turns out not to
be so easy to integrate and apply almost an en?re semester
of material on each topic in an accessible (and hopefully
amusing) form, but they do not seem to mind struggling
with this task.
This assignment works best toward the end of the semester,
when students have the breadth of course material and
class discussion to draw on. I have not constructed it to
serve as a final or culmina?ng class assignment, but with
16
some revision, it could serve well in that capacity.
What this assignment gives me is an indicator of how
well they have mastered (learned, integrated, and
can apply) the sociology we read and what they took
away from class discussions.
Meet the Candidates
Nominees for Chair‐Elect
Michelle A. Smith
Present Professional Posi:on
Professor of Sociology, Lakeland Community
College, Kirtland, OH, 2002‐present
Amy Traver
Present Professional Posi:on
Assistant Professor of Sociology, Queensborough
Community College, City University of New York (CUNY),
Queens, NY, 2008‐present
Posi:ons Held in ASA
Member, ASA Sec?on on Teaching and Learning Pre‐
Conference Planning CommiZee, 2012‐2015
Member, ASA Sec?on on Teaching and Learning
Nomina?ons CommiZee, 2011‐2013
Two‐year representa?ve, ASA Sec?on on Teaching and
Learning Council, 2010‐2013
Posi:ons Held in ASA
ASA Task Force on Community Colleges 2012‐
present
Member, ASA Sec?on on Teaching and Learning Program
CommiZee, 2010‐2012
SoTL Nomina?ons CommiZee 2013‐14
Member, ASA Sec?on on Teaching and Learning SAGE
Award Selec?on CommiZee, 2010‐2011
SoTL Membership CommiZee 2005‐06
SoTL Coopera?ve Ini?a?ves CommiZee 2004‐2005
Personal Statement:
As a sociologist, my primary passion is passing the
core of the discipline on to undergraduate students.
I believe that public sociology occurs every day
within the classroom, thus understanding the
dynamics of teaching and learning is cri?cal for our
discipline. The sec?on on Teaching and Learning has
been instrumental in raising awareness about the
importance of SoTL, this sec?on is cri?cal to our
discipline and all those who convey our discipline to
the general public. In many respects my ‘home’
within the ASA is within the SoTL sec?on. My
primary professional work occurs within the
classroom and thus a main connec?on to the
discipline of sociology is with sociologists who teach
and who study the art and science of teaching –
these connec?ons are made through this sec?on.
Personal Statement:
The ASA Sec?on on Teaching and Learning does a fantas?c
job of clearing a space for community college faculty at the
Annual Mee?ngs and in the organiza?on, more generally. It
also recognizes community college faculty as sociologists
with insights of value to the Sec?on and organiza?on. I
believe that I have the experience to serve as Chair‐elect of
the Sec?on. For example, I have represented community
colleges on NEH‐funded pedagogy projects and an AACU
research project. I have also sought out and received CUNY
pedagogical research awards and a number of teaching and
research fellowships and grants, including the Sec?on’s
2009 SAGE Teaching Innova?ons & Professional
Development Award. In addi?on, and consistent with the
focus of the Sec?on, I have published on various pedagogies
in community‐college contexts. Finally, I have experience as
the two‐year representa?ve on the Sec?on’s council and as
caucus Co‐Chair of another na?onal research/teaching
organiza?on.
17
Nominees for Secretary/Treasurer
Carla Corroto
Present Professional Posi:on
Associate Professor of Sociology, Radford
University, Radford, VA
Posi:ons Held in ASA
Council, 4‐year representa?ve
Personal Statement:
I have found the Sec?on on Teaching and Learning
in Sociology to be a place of support, collegiality,
and scholarly challenge. The members of this
Sec?on are commiZed to sharing the sociological
perspec?ve in the classroom, and beyond. Their
passion is contagious! I am seeking office to serve
the group that mentored me as a new faculty
member. From the Carla B. Howery Teaching
Enhancement Grants Program to the Scholarship of
Teaching and Learning sessions and workshops at
ASA, this Sec?on is fundamental to the scholarship
of teaching and learning in sociology. I have served
as chair of the membership commiZee and am
currently on the social media commiZee for the
Sec?on. My goal is to further the shared mission of
teaching excellence that I believe is vital to the
discipline. Thank you.
Student Forum Advisory Board, Chair 2006‐2007
Personal Statement:
I would be honored to serve the Sec?on on Teaching and
Learning as the Secretary/Treasurer. I have been a member
of the sec?on for close to ten years. Ever since aZending
the pre‐conference as a graduate student I have felt that it
is my home within ASA. I currently serve as co‐editor of our
newsleZer and am on the publica?ons commiZee. I have
also served on the nomina?ons commiZee. Within ASA I
have also been chair of the Student Forum Advisory Board
(where I served on the travel grant, research grant, and
outreach commiZees) and was the graduate student
representa?ve to the Culture sec?on. I have also presided
over eight sessions, been a discussant at three sessions,
and organized two sessions at various ASA conferences. I
appreciate your considera?on for this important posi?on.
Nominees for Council Members (2‐year school)
Alison BeHer
Present Professional Posi:on
Assistant Professor, Kingsborough Community College,
CUNY, Brooklyn, NY, 2011‐Present
Posi:ons Held in ASA
ASA Task Force on Community College Faculty, Appointed
Member, 2012‐2015
ASA TRAILS Area Editor, Sexuali?es, 2014‐Present
Daina Harvey
Present Professional Posi:on
Assistant Professor, College of the Holy Cross,
Worcester, MA 2013‐present
Posi:ons Held in ASA
NewsleZer Editor, Sec?on on Teaching and
Learning, 2013‐present
Publica?ons CommiZee, Sec?on on Teaching and
Learning, 2013‐present
Student Representa?ve, Sec?on on Culture 2010
Nomina?ons CommiZee, Sec?on on Teaching and
Learning, 2010
ASA Teaching and Learning Sec?on, Program CommiZee,
2014‐2015
ASA Body and Embodiment Sec?on, Council Member,
2010‐2012
Personal Statement:
I would like to serve the ASA Sec?on on Teaching and
Learning as a Council Member represen?ng two year
colleges. In this posi?on, I would be a voice for others at two
year colleges and other marginalized scholars. I currently sit
on the ASA Task Force for Community College Faculty
working to amplify the voices of community college faculty
in sociology and in our professional organiza?ons. I have
been ac?vely involved in ASA in a variety of ways, including
18
serving as an Area Editor for TRAILS, a Council
Member for the Body and Embodiment Sec?on, and
an Organizer for a Professional Development
Workshop on teaching. In this posi?on, I would like
to con?nue to serve the organiza?on and help
others focused on innova?ve, crea?ve, high‐quality
teaching in sociology as well as enhance the visibility
of sociologists at community colleges.
Debra Swanson
Deidre Tyler
Task Force on Sociology and General Educa?on, 2007
Present Professional Posi:on
Professor of Sociology and Social Work, Hope College,
Holland, MI, 1989 ‐ present
Posi:ons Held in ASA
Task Force on Teaching Sociology in the High School, 2012 ‐
2014
Personal Statement:
Nominees for Council Members (4‐year school)
Stephanie Medley‐Rath
Present Professional Posi:on
Assistant Professor of Sociology, Indiana University
Kokomo, 2014‐present
Posi:ons Held in ASA
Editorial Board, Teaching Sociology, 2014‐2017
Personal Statement:
I have taught at a range of ins?tu?ons and se•ngs,
including both two‐year and four‐year, online and
face‐to‐face, and private and public colleges. These
diverse teaching experiences have made me the
teacher that I am and give me insight into the
challenges faced by faculty in each se•ng. I have
taught as an instructor, an assistant professor, and
as an adjunct. Honestly, I am not sure my teaching
history is all that unique, but I would like to be a
voice for those of us who have eclec?c teaching
histories. I want to serve as 4‐year school
representa?ve because it is ?me for me to increase
my contribu?ons to the sec?on. My involvement
thus far has been peripheral. I have published in
TRAILS and serve as an editorial board member for
Teaching Sociology. My ASA home is this sec?on
and I would like to serve it in a greater capacity.
I would be honored to serve on the Council of the Teaching
and Learning Sec?on of ASA as the 4 year college
representa?ve. I have spent more than 25 years teaching at
a small liberal arts college. I have been very involved with
the North Central Sociological Associa?on, par?cularly
around issues of teaching, and was awarded the John F.
Schnabel award for Dis?nguished Contribu?ons to Teaching
in 2008. In 2009, I received Hope College's Ruth and John
Reed Faculty Achievement Award for my role as director of
Hope's Teaching Enhancement Workshop. And more
recently (2014) I received the Michigan Campus Compact
award for including service‐learning in my classes. I love
being in the classroom and look forward to the opportunity
of being more involved in ASA and the Teaching and
Learning Sec?on.
Nominees for Council Members (University)
Jacqueline Bergdahl
Present Professional Posi:on
Associate Professor, Wright State University, Dayton, OH,
2005‐present
Personal Statement:
I would be honored to serve as University Representa?ve
for the ASA sec?on on Teaching and Learning. I would enjoy
the opportunity to pay forward the benefits I have received
as a member of the sec?on. I also believe my experience in
the Teaching and Learning sec?on of the North Central
Sociological Associa?on gives me a good founda?on for
useful service in the same sec?on in ASA. I hope you will
offer me the opportunity to do so.
19
Lissa Yogan
New Book
Present Professional Posi:on
Associate Professor of Sociology and Criminology,
Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, IN 2007 ‐ present
Taking Account of Race, Racism, and Privilege
Kathleen J. Fitzgerald
University of New Orleans
Posi:ons Held in ASA
ASA High School Sociology Advisory Panel, 2011 ‐
2015
Member of Wri?ng Team for
Member, Sec?on on Teaching and Learning,
2008‐2015
Member, Sec?on on Race, Class, Gender, 2008‐2015
Member, Sec?on on Altruism, Morality, and Social
Solidarity 2012‐2015
Personal Statement:
I have taught sociology for almost 20 years and have
witnessed the impact of sociology on both general
educa?on students and sociology majors. For many,
the sociological imagina?on allows them to see the
world and themselves in new ways. The work of this
sec?on is vital to society. Many of our students will
not become PhD students in sociology but they will
all go out into the world and interact and lead
various social ins?tu?ons. Their understanding of
sociology and how it can shape their future ac?ons is
dependent on excellent teaching that promotes
deep learning. The work of teaching can be trans‐
forma?ve and I would like to further this sec?on's
efforts at honoring excellent teachers, developing
the content which informs the prac?ce of teaching,
and building rela?onships among the many excellent
teachers who emphasize varied content areas within
sociology. It would be a pleasure to serve alongside
the many excellent faculty members who belong to
the Sec?on on Teaching and Learning.
Announcements
If you are looking for a new sociology of race/ethnic
rela?ons textbook, look no further. Check out my new
textbook Recognizing Race and Ethnicity: Power, Privilege,
and Inequality (Westview Press 2014). This text
encourages students to take account of race, racism, and
the “other side of racism,” white privilege. To take
account of race is to bring it out into the open – to
emphasize how membership in par?cular racial groups
works for some while hindering others. It exposes how
race is s?ll alive and well as a social divide in our culture
and, further, is embedded in our social ins?tu?ons, cultural
ideologies, and iden??es. The phrase “take account of
race” reflects the language used by Supreme Court Jus?ce
Harry Blackmun in his opinion in the affirma?ve ac?on
case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)
where he notes:
A race‐conscious remedy is necessary to achieve a fully
integrated society, one in which color of a person’s skin
will not determine the opportuni?es available to him or
her...In order to get beyond racism, we must first take
account of race. There is no other way...In order to treat
persons equally, we must treat them differently.
In this opinion, Blackmun emphasizes a key paradox in
American society: that we must recognize race to get
beyond it. Simply claiming we live in a color‐blind society is
not enough as it fails to challenge white privilege or
acknowledge ongoing racism.
My objec?ve with this textbook is to offer professors and
students an approach to the sociology of race rela?ons
that differs rather drama?cally from the leading texts on
the market. Our goal should be to engage students with an
emphasis on self‐reflexivity as well as coverage of topics
that are more meaningful to their lives: sports, popular
culture, interracial rela?onships, and biracial/mul?racial
iden??es. This text reflects the most current research in
the sociology of race, including a discussion of the social
construc?on of race, white privilege, and cri?cal race
theory.
20
I have taught race rela?ons courses since 1995, yet
have failed to find one textbook that addresses
everything I think needs to be addressed in a
sociology course on race/ethnicity. For instance, no
textbook currently on the market addresses white
privilege to the extent that it should (for instance,
having an en?re chapter devoted to the concept).
Yet, this is where the inves?ga?ve lens has shided in
our discipline: to the study of those privileged by
societal status hierarchies. It is not enough to study
the sociology of racial inequality, how and why some
groups are disadvantaged by current societal
arrangements. We also have to study race privilege,
the other side of racism. If certain groups are
oppressed and discriminated against, we have to
recognize that some other group benefits from the
exis?ng social arrangement. Thus, we must clearly
inves?gate where whites historically and currently
benefit from the racial hierarchy, not only where
people of color have been disadvantaged. We need
to bring white people “to the table,” so to speak,
instead of allowing them (us) that comfortable
distance while racial/ethnic “others” are being
discussed. For too long not only our culture but the
discipline of sociology, has treated racial/ethnic
minori?es as “the problem,” yet excluded ourselves
(those of us who are white) from the discussion.
The only way to truly alter race rela?ons is to make
this invisible aspect of the racial hierarchy visible, to
acknowledge that race shapes all people’s lives, for
beZer or for worse.
Announcements
New Book
Sixteen for '16 ‐‐ A Discussion Book for the 2016 Elec:ons
Salvatore Babones
University of Sydney
It's only spring 2015 but the 2016 elec?on season has
already begun. The non‐candidate candidates have
established their "exploratory commiZees," the inevitable
scandals have started to emerge, and the best‐known
advisors have been snapped up by the best‐financed
campaigns. For the candidates of the two major par?es the
top advisors include publicists, economists, and
interna?onal rela?ons experts, but not a lot of sociologists.
Sociology has important insights to offer about how best to
run a country, but unfortunately our insights are rarely
(never?) welcome at the table. Most of the signature
policies adopted by major party candidates would fail a
first‐year sociology final take‐home exam. America is ruled
by poli?cal expediency, not by sociological insight.
My new book Sixteen for '16: A Progressive Agenda for a
BeZer America (2015 Policy Press) is one American
sociologist's aZempt to inject some sociological reality into
America's poli?cal debate. The book tackles sixteen issues
ranging from classic social policy topics (educa?on and
healthcare) to controversial areas of debate (abor?on and
immigra?on) to areas that sociologists too oden cede to
others (foreign policy, global warming). Each of the 16
short chapters makes an argument for reasonable, realis?c,
sociologically‐informed policies. I have made every effort
to be fair but the book is in no way even‐handed. For
example, Chapter 1 kicks off with reams of data to show
that America needs more and beZer jobs, especially for
young people just entering the labor force, and argues that
government must play an ac?ve role in crea?ng them.
More state budget cuts simply will not create more jobs.
Sixteen for '16 may not be even‐handed but it is
empha?cally non‐par?san. No poli?cal party is endorsed
or cri?cized and no likely 2016 Presiden?al candidates are
named. My royal?es from the book have been pledged to
support inves?ga?ve repor?ng by Truthout.org, which is
21
also scrupulously non‐par?san. The publisher,
Policy Press is a non‐profit press whose credo is
"publishing with a purpose." No corporate or
poli?cal interests are involved in the publishing of
this book.
I teach Introduc?on to Sociology and I have wriZen
Sixteen for '16 with the needs of teachers foremost
in my mind. Each chapter is almost exactly 2000
words long, appropriate for reading in prepara?on
for a class discussion. The 270 endnotes document
every figure cited in the book, poin?ng mainly to
online sources that are easily accessible to students.
Perhaps most importantly, the book is cheap: with a
list price of $16.00, the paperback is available for
just $12.98 online (the e‐book will be even less).
The argumenta?on in every chapter is independent
of the other fideen and the chapters can be read in
any order. The book uses no advanced sta?s?cs and
no theore?cal jargon. I have worked very hard to
ensure that the book accessible for beginning
undergraduate students in the sincere hope is that
sociology teachers will use individual chapters as
discussion prompts throughout the semester. A
teaching resources website will go online in June.
Elec?on repor?ng these days focuses mainly on
which side is leading in the polls, not on what they
will do once in office. Everyone loves the 538 blog
as a fun bit of sport. But our students should be
discussing the issues, not the personali?es and their
prospects for winning. On the issues we have too
long focused on cri?cism, le•ng economists dictate
actual social policy. Our students should learn that
prac?cal sociology offers a much beZer guide to
what will work in the real world than highly abstract
economic theories. I won't make any money from
Sixteen for '16 and I certainly won't get any credit
from the sociological research community. This
book is wriZen by a teacher for use by teachers.
With apologies for making such an explicit plug, I do
hope that you will use it ‐‐ and enjoy it.
22