Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Are gardens good for mining bees

Abstract

The Naturalist 141:39-40

Are gardens good for mining bees? Michael Archer Email: marcher756@btinternet.com Solitary bees are common in gardens. 30 species were found in a large garden in York (Archer, 2004), 45 species in a suburban garden in Leicester (Archer, 2013) and 145 species (range 14-118) from a study of 12 gardens (Archer, 2014). 183 of the c.228 solitary bees recorded nationally (c.80%) are mining bees or cleptoparasites dependent on nesting bees (Edwards et al., 2005). A typical life cycle of soil-nesting solitary bees can be illustrated with the early spring bee Andrena clarkella, which nests in sandy, thinly vegetated soils on the level in sunny situations. The female mines a single vertical burrow with branches in which the cells are built. Each cell is provisioned with a pollen-nectar ball on which an egg is laid. After hatching, the larva quickly eats the provisions and matures into a resting stage until the following spring when it pupates and emerges as an adult. The sexes mate and the females mine the burrows. A nomad bee may dig into the burrow and lay an egg in a cell. On hatching, the nomad kills the host’s egg and eats the provisions, hence it is called a cleptoparasite. Whether mining bees are well represented in gardens can be investigated with the use of two indices. The Aerial Nester Frequency (AF) is the proportion of solitary bee species that nest above the ground and the national value for AF is 17.9%. From the York garden the AF has a relatively high value of 40.0%, indicating a relative lack of mining bees. From the Leicester garden for the bees only recorded in 1-7 years (infrequent visitors) the AF was 21.4%, near the national value. For those recorded in 8-27 years (frequent visitors) the AF was a high of 45.0%. From the 12 garden study those found only in 1-4 gardens (infrequent visitors) the AF was 15.4%, similar to the national value, but for the bees found in 5-11 gardens (frequent visitors) a high value of 36.4%. The relative lack of mining solitary bees presumably is due to the frequent disturbance of the soil and the lack of bare or sparsely vegetated soil in sunny situations. Some mining bees are found in gardens, e.g. the Tawny Mining Bee Andrena fulva. The infrequent visitors are usually called tourist species, perhaps being found in gardens by chance or those in dispersal searching for favourable nesting sites or maybe just rare bees. Another index called the Parasitic Load (PL) measures the percentage of solitary bees that are cleptoparasites. The national average for PL varies between 25 and 40% for semi-natural sites. From the York garden the PL was 16.7%, indicating a relative lack of cleptoparasites. From the Leicester garden the PL for the infrequent visitors was 33.3%, which is within the national values, but only 16.7% for the frequent visitors. From the 12 year study the PL for the infrequent visitors was 33.6% and 13.2% for the frequent visitors. The relative lack of cleptoparasites can be related to their behaviour of tending to occur around the nesting sites of their hosts. Since there is a relative lack on mining bee species in gardens there will be a relative lack of cleptoparasitic species. The Naturalist 141 (2016) 39 The relative lack on mining and cleptoparasitic bees has also been found in garden studies from Liège (Belgium) (Jacob-Remacle, 1984) and New York (U.S.A.) (Matteson et al., 2008). These results show that gardens are relatively not so good for mining bees and their cleptoparasites. In the wider urban area surrounding gardens, the Parasitic Load increases and Aerial Nester Frequency decreases in York (Archer, 2012) and Sheffield (Archer, 2009), due to the greater occurrences of subterranean nesting sites, e.g. river banks, closely mown lawns and paths. A third index attempts to measure species quality or conservation interest by dividing the solitary wasps and bees into six groups. The three low quality groups (with species scores Universal (1), Widespread (2) and Restricted (4)) are found in more than 70 hectad squares with varying distributions in England, Wales and Scotland. The three high quality groups (with species scores Scarce (8), Rare (16) and Very Rare (32)) depend on the number of hectad squares (1-70) in which each is found. The species scores for each site are added together to give a Quality Score (QS) and when the QS is divided by the number of species found at a site it generates a Species Quality Score (SQS). It has been found that the QS tends to increase with the area of a site while the SQS is relatively independent of site area, so it can be used to compare sites of different areas (Archer, 1999). The SQS for the York garden (1.5) and for the urban areas (York, Sheffield, 2.2) are lower than semi-natural sites (2.4-2.8) in Yorkshire. Similarly, the SQS of the Leicester garden (2.2) is lower than Midland semi-natural sites (2.6-3.4) and the frequent visitors of the 12 garden study (1.6) fall within the lower part of the range for English semi-natural sites (1.2-5.5). The lower SQS values for gardens are due to the relative lack of high quality or rare species. However, gardens are still important refuges for the low quality or common ones. To encourage solitary mining bees in gardens it is necessary to expose dry friable soils by removing the plants so that the sun can heat the soil. Part of a lawn could be bulldozed to expose the soil with the bulldozed part formed into a bank. In contrast, most bumblebees need a densely vegetated area to attract small mammals whose burrows provide nesting sites. Others nest at ground surface level when a good leaf litter layer and dense grass or herb growth is needed. References Archer, M.E. (1999) The aculeate wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) of the Ainsdale- Formby sand dunes on the Lancashire coast compared with other northern sites. British Journal of Entomology and Natural History 12: 1-10. Archer, M.E. (2004) The wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) of York’s Victorian Cemetery in Watsonian Yorkshire. The Naturalist 129: 145-153. Archer, M.E. (2009) The solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) of the ‘Green Spaces’ of urban Sheffield. Entomologist’s monthly Magazine 145: 11-25. Archer, M.E. (2012) The wasps, ants and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) of the ‘Green Spaces’ of urban York. Entomologist’s monthly Magazine 148: 173-183. Archer, M.E. (2013) The solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) of a suburban garden in Leicester, England, over 27 years. Entomologist’s monthly Magazine 149: 93-121. 40 The Naturalist 141 (2016) Archer, M.E. (2014) The solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) 0f Urban and Suburban gardens. Entomologist’s monthly Magazine 150: 169-179. Edwards, M., Williams, R., Orledge, G., Burn, J. & Archer, M.E. (2005) Adult active months and notes, in, Archer, M.E. (Ed.) BWARS Bees, Wasps and Ants Recording Society Members’ Handbook: 133-155. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. Jacob-Remacle, A. (1984) Etude écologique du peuplement d’Hyménoptères Aculéates survivant dans la zone la plus urbanisèe de la ville de Liège. Bulletin et Annales de la Sociétè royale belge d’Entomologie 120: 241-262. Matteson, K.C., Ascher, J.S. & Langellotto, G.A. (2008) Bee richness and abundance in New York city urban gardens. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 101: 140-150. The Naturalist 141 (2016) 41

References (9)

  1. Archer, M.E. (1999) The aculeate wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) of the Ainsdale- Formby sand dunes on the Lancashire coast compared with other northern sites. British Journal of Entomology and Natural History 12: 1-10.
  2. Archer, M.E. (2004) The wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) of York's Victorian Cemetery in Watsonian Yorkshire. The Naturalist 129: 145-153.
  3. Archer, M.E. (2009) The solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) of the 'Green Spaces' of urban Sheffield. Entomologist's monthly Magazine 145: 11-25.
  4. Archer, M.E. (2012) The wasps, ants and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) of the 'Green Spaces' of urban York. Entomologist's monthly Magazine 148: 173-183.
  5. Archer, M.E. (2013) The solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) of a suburban garden in Leicester, England, over 27 years. Entomologist's monthly Magazine 149: 93-121.
  6. Archer, M.E. (2014) The solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) 0f Urban and Suburban gardens. Entomologist's monthly Magazine 150: 169-179.
  7. Edwards, M., Williams, R., Orledge, G., Burn, J. & Archer, M.E. (2005) Adult active months and notes, in, Archer, M.E. (Ed.) BWARS Bees, Wasps and Ants Recording Society Members' Handbook: 133-155. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.
  8. Jacob-Remacle, A. (1984) Etude écologique du peuplement d'Hyménoptères Aculéates survivant dans la zone la plus urbanisèe de la ville de Liège. Bulletin et Annales de la Sociétè royale belge d'Entomologie 120: 241-262.
  9. Matteson, K.C., Ascher, J.S. & Langellotto, G.A. (2008) Bee richness and abundance in New York city urban gardens. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 101: 140-150.