Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Humans are sentient beings. This means that we are aware of ourselves, our sensations, our subjective thoughts and perceptions, and our emotions. Not only are we aware, but we are aware of our awareness. This is sentience. This short article describes Jung's four levels of consciousness, enlightenment, and individuation.
Why can’t we interpret our own dreams? It’s not merely a matter of training in dreamwork, symbolism, mythology, archetypal imagery, or experience with interpreting others’ dreams, etc. There is something more at stake here. And that “something” has to do with a possible new world of appearances emerging from the unknown future…. My title suggests that this possible future has to do with Jung and with his unique living concept and experience of consciousness—yes it is a living concept, little understood and almost impossible to find one’s way to it! Jung appears to have been born with it and as such, he may be thought of as inaugurating a new world through his very embodiment of this unique style of consciousness.
Consciousness is awareness. To expand consciousness means to bring into awareness of a wider variety of stimuli, both internal and external. This includes incorporating unconscious material into personal consciousness. It also involves becoming aware of things of a higher spiritual dimension. Here one begins to sense the subtleties of the spiritual dimension, to hear the still small voice within and feel the gentle prompting of the angels. This article seeks to further illustrate this process.
Based on the Arka's theory of the six main levels of consciousness, this study predicted that people would show a trend towards a more Feeling-Mind heart-based consciousness after being trained to go below their thinking mind. In order to test this, a scale was constructed under the name of the Feeling Consciousness Scale (FCS). The scale items were based on Arka´s work and information derived from interviews with people who had practiced the Intuitive Meditation (IM) method for more than 7 months. Using a repeated measures design, the FCS was filled in by 8 male and 23 female participants comprising of five different groups, before and after attending five Intuitive Meditation training sessions spread over 6 weeks (a total of 13.5 hours). A significant difference at the .001 level was found between both scores. Due to the small sample size and that the scale is a project in development, these results are tentative. This research supports the third level of Arka´s theory and suggests that we have a level of consciousness associated with the heart which is characterized by certain traits such as intuition, unity, peace, positivity, awareness of emotions, and connection to one's inner Self, sometimes expressed as soul, inner being, or atman. The drawings by one participant after each intuitive meditation session indicate that the inner journey of Self-discovery is a process. In suggesting other levels of consciousness including a feeling based experiencing consciousness associated with the heart, Arka's theory might also offer a solution to what Chalmers calls the hard problem of consciousness. The other levels of Arka's theory still need to be researched.
Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 2021
As artificial intelligence (AI) develops, it is expected that humans and AI will become more closely related than now. At the same time, however, the more closely humans and AI are related to each other, the more clearly they will face a moral dilemma, i.e., artificial intelligence will face a moral dilemma. To solve the moral dilemma problem, AI should understand and take into account human values and ethics. From this point of view. we designed a consciousness model based on Jungian post-psychological notes. As a result, we found that in order to implement the model of consciousness on a computer, it is necessary to design it with a structure similar to that of human beings, referring to human structures in various fields.
Jung spent much of his long life working to develop an integrated model of the psyche and the dynamics of various regions of human consciousness operational in the cosmos. In his mature writing, instead of beginning by focusing on the word consciousness, he chose to use the word psyche, an ancient Greek word that translates as “soul” or “butterfly.” In his essay, “On the Nature of the Psyche,” Jung elaborates his psychological model of the structure of the psyche. He expressed a growing interest in aligning his observations with the latest models from physics and mathematics, especially his view of what he had originally termed “synchronicity” that he had observed during a period in which he worked intensely with the I Ching oracle. Jung had first used the term synchronicity in 1930, two years before meeting Pauli, to explain the Chinese approach to seemingly non-causal yet what seemed to be clearly interrelated, connected events. In his essays on the psyche, Jung recurrently expresses his longing for some “mathematical basis” to the psyche: “The tragic thing is that psychology has no self-consistent mathematics at its disposal.” However even without the mathematics he longed for, Jung proceeded to develop a mathematical metphor for elements of the psyche along an axis analogous to the visible light region of the electromagnetic spectrum.
The notion of a level of consciousness is a key construct in the science of consciousness. Not only is the term employed to describe the global states of consciousness that are associated with post-comatose disorders, epileptic absence seizures, anaesthesia, and sleep, it plays an increasingly influential role in theoretical and methodological contexts. However, it is far from clear what precisely a level of consciousness is supposed to be. This paper argues that the levels-based framework for conceptualizing global states of consciousness is untenable and develops in its place a multidimensional account of global states. Two Aspects of Consciousness Consciousness is typically taken to have two aspects: local states (see Glossary) and global states. Local states of consciousness include perceptual experiences of various kinds, imagery experiences, bodily sensations, affective experiences, and occurrent thoughts. In the science of consciousness local states are usually referred to as 'conscious contents', for they are typically distinguished from each other on the basis of the objects and features that they represent. By contrast, global states of consciousness are not typically distinguished from each other on the basis of the objects or features that are represented in experience. Instead, they are typically distinguished from each other on cognitive, behavioural, and physiological grounds. For example, the global state associated with alert wakefulness is distinguished from the global states that are associated with post-comatose conditions such as the vegetative state (VS) and the minimally conscious state (MCS), and these states are themselves distinguished from the states that are associated with light-to-moderate degrees of sedation, dreaming, hypnosis, and epileptic absence seizures. Compared with the amount of attention that has been devoted to the contents of consciousness , global states of consciousness have been relatively neglected (although see [1–6]). This neglect might be justified if the notion played only a marginal role in the science of consciousness , but it is puzzling given the increasing prominence of global states in consciousness studies. The neglect of global states might also be justified if their nature was self-evident, but that is not the case either. Indeed, the standard conception of global states equates them with 'levels of consciousness', but it is far from clear what a level of consciousness is supposed to be. This paper argues that the levels-based conceptions of global states of consciousness is untenable, and offers in its place a multidimensional analysis of global states.
The paper starts from a Searlean dilemma – we are bound to view consciousness as ultimately explicable by scientific means, yet science appears to give us no means for explaining the specificity of consciousness – and presents what I see as a plausible though speculative story for avoiding the brunt of the dilemma. The basic idea is (a) that consciousness, or anticipations of it, should be seen as pervasive throughout the biosphere; (b) that the biosphere, following Gerald Edel-man, can be seen as the sphere of meta-systems irreducible to purely physical particles and forces; and (c) that it is plausible to view " full waking consciousness " as occurring at a very high level of meta-syste-maticity; with the conclusion (d) that full waking consciousness is both an expectable outcome of the biogenic forces and, in virtue of how it combines them, a very singular case.
Introduction to Logophilosophy, 2022
Chapter 5 of a published e-book 'Introduction to Logophilosophy' (Niiles-Mäki, A. & Sadeaho, M) 2022, Institute for Purpose-centered Philosophy Finland, https://logoterapeutti.fi/