Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
5 pages
1 file
AI-generated Abstract
The article discusses the challenges of bullying, particularly against LGBTQ students, within the context of the American educational system. It highlights the plight of students like Cedeno, who embodies the intersection of urban public school issues and systemic failures in addressing bullying and providing adequate support for marginalized groups. The need for effective anti-bullying policies and a culturally competent educational environment is emphasized, along with the pressure on schools to adapt to evolving social norms and protect all students' rights.
The Queering Education Research Institute© is an independent think--tank, qualitative research and training center founded in 2006 and housed in the Syracuse University School of Education. The purpose of the Queering Education Research Institute (QuERI) is to bridge the gap between research and practice in the teaching of LGBTQ students and the creation of LGBTQ youth--affirming schools. QuERI strives to foster change for LGBTQ youth and families through:
Please note that, in addition to meeting with you during office hours, I am available to communicate with you either by phone or email. Regarding emails and phone calls: During the weekdays, I normally will respond within 24 hours, on weekends within 48 hours).
2019
In this Dialogues we are highlighting educators, community members, and researchers whose work focuses on advocacy for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning (LGBTQ+) students in educational institutions. Despite greater visibility, more legal protections, and seemingly greater support for LGBTQ+ individuals, LGBTQ+ students in K-12 schools still face hostile school environments with little to no representation in school curricula. The Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network’s most recent school climate report found that over half the LGBTQ+, or queer, students surveyed reported facing regular bullying and harassment. Additionally, trans and gender nonconforming students, and transgender people in the United States at large, face threats to their rights under the Trump presidency.
Dominant understanding of LGBTQ students' school experiences has been shaped by discourses that reduce "the problem" to bullies who express homophobic attitudes by targeting LGBTQ peers. In turn, interventions typically focus on eliminating bullying behaviors and providing protection for victims. Within this framework, cultural privileging of heterosexuality and gender normativity goes unquestioned, LGBTQ marginalization is reproduced and re-entrenched in new ways, and schools avoid responsibility for complicity in LGBTQ harassment. This paper explores educators' stories of LGBTQ harassment and how dominant bullying discourses are shaping educators' understandings of the needs of LGBTQ students. We propose a new definition of bullying to create a more useful framework for understanding the social nature of peer-to-peer aggression and designing interventions to address the cultural roots of this aggression. Finally, we take the position that a majority of peer-to-peer aggression in U.S. public schools is some form of gender policing, and we believe bullying must be redefined to account for relationships between peer targeting and structural inequalities.
Journal of homosexuality, 2014
The purpose of this paper is to provide insight to the multiple ways that school leaders resist, avoid, or block LGBTQ professional development for their staff and thus resist the conversations around school responsibility to these students and families. School leaders who resisted LGBTQ professional development claimed that such training was not relevant to their school contexts, that the training would attract community backlash, that the school board would not approve the training, or that school personnel would not be interested in learning about LGBTQ students. Implications: Increasing LGBTQ content in educational leadership training is a necessary step for convincing school leadership that LGBTQ-competence is necessary for creating a positive school climate for all. Significant legal and cultural changes are putting pressure on administrators to rethink the work of creating inclusive schools. Same-sex marriage is now legal in all states, and many states' anti-bullying laws specifically protect LGBTQ students. However, conversations about sexual and gender identity remain highly contested terrain in K-12 settings (DePalma & Atkinson, 2006). Reasons for this are multiple, but often it is " because of [educators'] own fear and concerns and because of a prevailing belief that sexual orientation…is not an appropriate focus for education " (p.333). Expanding inclusion efforts to gender and sexual minority students and families necessitates " integrating or embedding diversity into the ordinary work or daily routines of an organization " (Ahmed, 2012, p.23). The work of recognizing and including sexual and gender diversity in K-12 schools requires identifying the normative assumptions about student, family, and teacher identity embedded in all facets of schools—from bathrooms to curriculum to student records to extracurricular activities to dress codes. It requires pursuing opportunities to expand the institutional imagination about who is occupying school spaces and who has always occupied them. Objectives or purposes Educational practices that account for diversity and pursue social justice are critical for improving school life for LGBTQ youth. Broadly, social justice education aims to create conditions of equitable recognition and access to resources and opportunities (North, 2008). Achieving such conditions requires identifying how institutions privilege dominant identities and
QED: A Journal in GLBTQ World-Making, Inaugural Issue, 2013
Recent attention to youth suicides and violence framed as “bullying” has triggered a range of responses by schools and the state. In this article we locate and analyze the “gay wins” most noted in education, including the recent moves to establish gay-inclusive anti-bullying laws and policies, within a larger social justice framework to map contradictions. In particular, we question the efficacy of anti-bullying laws and ask how this initiative can mask the sources of punishing heteronormativity in schools and communities and potentially distract educators and others from identifying and addressing structural conditions that foster interpersonal forms of violence. We close by suggesting how and why a “queer” vision pushes those invested in LGBT lives to move beyond “equality” (or assimilation) as a goal for social justice struggles.
Journal of Language Intelligence and Culture, 2020
Rivista di Scienze Preistoriche, 2020
مجلة البحوث الإدارية
Contemporary Politics, 2013
Δήμος Περάματος, η πόλη της ναυτοσύνης, 2023
DergiPark (Istanbul University), 2021
Літературні обрії. Праці молодих учених. К.: Ін-т літератури ім. Т.Г. Шевченка НАН України, 2009. , 2009
Anais do 21º Encontro Nacional de Pesquisadores em Jornalismo, 2023
Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials, 2020
European Scientific Journal, 2016
Journal of Criminal Psychology, 2020
Patient Education and Counseling, 2012
Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 2016
Фармация, 2023
Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2019