Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
This short piece argues that men should support feminism, but not call themselves feminists. In a nutshell: men publicly identifying as feminists risks eroding one of the few areas of social discourse where women’s voices are emphasised and valued in their own right. It also risks masking the diversity of feminist perspectives, including the complex and fraught intersections of race, class, sexuality, disability, religion and gender. I call this view ‘radical pro-feminism’, because it preserves the radical potential of feminism to pose a genuine challenge to male-dominated power structures. It also challenges traditional gender roles, because it requires men to play a supporting and enabling role, rather than taking the lead and setting the agenda. Men can do many things to support feminism. One of the most important is to help create spaces for women to speak on their own behalf and have their voices heard.
This article explores the relationship of men to feminism, asking how men can support the feminist movement without compromising its gynocentric nature. It begins by discussing two key challenges men face in engaging with feminism, before suggesting some attitudes and practices men might adopt to advance the feminist project.
In the last decades we have witnessed many debates around new masculinities. However, reflections about masculinities and hegemonic masculinity seem to leave the trouble between men and feminism unsolved. Therefore, both academia and social movements demand tools to develop a critical view on this issue. This article deals with these questions based on two points of departure: in one hand, a series of academic and activist presentations in feminist and LGBT environments. In the other hand, an inquiry, conducted between 2012 and 2013 on the discourses around masculinities emerged from anti-sexist men's groups that appeared in Basque Country in the previous years. Privilege, oppression, identity, subjectivity and collective action are some of the matters that amalgam in the reflections this article brings together.
The question of whether men can be feminists raises a variety of broader issues. Some of these relate to whether men can have the kinds of understanding, solidarity and political commitment necessary to qualify as feminists. Others concern the role that men can and should play within the feminist movement. This talk begins by exploring some of the psychological and social barriers men face in understanding and supporting feminism. It then concludes with some practical suggestions as to how men might seek to engage constructively with feminist ideas and objectives.
This research project examines the personal and political experiences of five men engaged in pro-feminist organizing. Their experiences are explored in the context of the emergence of antifeminist groups, and an increasingly volatile funding environment whereby women’s rights organizations are seeing their financial resources threatened. Using a critical and sociological approach to masculinities, significant challenges at the personal level for these pro-feminist men are examined and are shown to compound engagement with women feminists, and the potential of cross gender partnerships. A people-oriented qualitative approach is employed to capture men’s personal journeys and how they self- identify with the feminist movement. This research adds to the prevalent “Man Question”, contesting men’s engagement in the feminist movement. Ultimately, however, the thesis concludes that men’s engagement in the feminist movement needs to be clearly positioned as a political project with an explicit commitment to building alliances with women’s rights networks.
2012
This research project examines the personal and political experiences of five men engaged in pro-feminist organizing. Their experiences are explored in the context of the emergence of antifeminist groups, and an increasingly volatile funding environment whereby women’s rights organizations are seeing their financial resources threatened. Using a critical and sociological approach to masculinities, significant challenges at the personal level for these pro-feminist men are examined and are shown to compound engagement with women feminists, and the potential of cross gender partnerships. A people-oriented qualitative approach is employed to capture men’s personal journeys and how they selfidentify with the feminist movement. This research adds to the prevalent “Man Question”, contesting men’s engagement in the feminist movement. Ultimately, however, the thesis concludes that men’s engagement in the feminist movement needs to be clearly positioned as a political project with an explici...
Feminism & Psychology, 2001
The May 16 (Vol. 1,No. 20) 2015 ‘Review of Women’s Studies’ Issue of the EPW refreshingly regulates that -men can be feminists and they can contribute to feminist knowledge when they make ‘care’ an intellectual virtue and ‘care epistemology’ their choicest mode. This affirmation is broached through an autobiographical mapping of each of the author’s ‘towards feminism’ journey. In this review-essay, the articles seem, and is shown to have violated the same ‘care-epistemic’ principles they had set for themselves. The present discussion raises questions as to why care epistemology lacks a fit with the agenda in question -and autobiography, ethnography and care could never accompany each other well. Finally, if a man emulates to be a feminist and do feminism, the political uncertainty that is unleashed drags us into a pure, political terrain much beyond a simple epistemological or an ethical one. This review concludes that -- the articles distinctly fail to offer an alternative, new politics.
Millars: Espai i Història, 2017
Bol. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Hum.,, 2024
Veterinary World, 2024
Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 2020
Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2007
Geosciences, 2019
Cardiologia Croatica, 2021
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010
Materials
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2005
Astroparticle Physics, 2019