Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Should Men Call Themselves Feminists? The Case for Radical Pro-Feminism

This short piece argues that men should support feminism, but not call themselves feminists. In a nutshell: men publicly identifying as feminists risks eroding one of the few areas of social discourse where women’s voices are emphasised and valued in their own right. It also risks masking the diversity of feminist perspectives, including the complex and fraught intersections of race, class, sexuality, disability, religion and gender. I call this view ‘radical pro-feminism’, because it preserves the radical potential of feminism to pose a genuine challenge to male-dominated power structures. It also challenges traditional gender roles, because it requires men to play a supporting and enabling role, rather than taking the lead and setting the agenda. Men can do many things to support feminism. One of the most important is to help create spaces for women to speak on their own behalf and have their voices heard.

Should Men Call Themselves Feminists? The Case for Radical Pro-Feminism JONATHAN CROWE∗ It is becoming increasingly common—and socially acceptable—for men to describe themselves as feminists. Barack Obama, Justin Trudeau, Malcolm Turnbull and Bill Shorten are among the political leaders to publicly adopt the label. This level of high profile male support for feminism would have been unthinkable 10 or 20 years ago. It shows the growing acceptance of feminism as a mainstream social justice movement. This is surely a positive development. The mainstreaming of feminism, however, arguably comes at a cost to its radical potential. One traditional goal of feminism is to ensure that women’s voices and perspectives are heard and taken seriously in their own right. Feminism, on this view, works to create a space where women can speak authentically about their interests, concerns and lived experiences, which are too often silenced or forgotten in maledominated social discourse. Does the publicity surrounding high profile male feminists help or hinder this goal? At best, it could help draw wider attention to feminist issues and create more opportunities for women’s concerns to be heard and addressed. The risk, however, is that public discussions of feminism come to be unduly influenced by male voices—and thereby come to reflect a version of feminism that is less threatening from the dominant male point of view. Promoting a version of feminism deemed acceptable by powerful male interests also risks masking the diversity of feminist per∗ Professor of Law, Bond University. This essay originally appeared on the BroadAgenda blog on 31 January 2018. Thanks to Cicely Bonnin, Catherine Carol, Rachael Field, Danielle Ireland-Piper, Madeline Price, Lisa Toohey and Kylie Weston-Scheuber for their valuable comments. Should Men Call Themselves Feminists? 2 spectives. It is unlikely to expose the complex and fraught intersections of race, class, sexuality, disability, religion and gender (see Crenshaw 1991). It is for these reasons that I have previously argued that men should be hesitant to call themselves feminists (Crowe 2011; 2013). Rather, they should consciously adopt a subsidiary, supportive and listening role in relation to the feminist movement. I call this approach radical pro-feminism. It is radical in two ways. First, it preserves the potential of feminism to pose a genuine challenge to male-dominated power structures, avoiding the temptation to make it more socially palatable. Second, it requires men to play a supporting and enabling role, as opposed to taking the lead and setting the agenda. This, in itself, is a radical move, because it challenges social expectations about male and female behaviour. Pro-feminist men should be willing to recognise that they are not where women are; feminism is not about them; and they are there to learn. This involves resisting cultural norms that construct men as leaders and women as followers. There are many practical ways for men to advance feminist goals. They can do a greater share of the housework, mentor and promote women in the workplace, speak out against sexual harassment, and challenge sexist language and attitudes. They can create space for female voices, by deferring to women in meetings and discussions, listening actively and believing what they have to say (see Fricker 2007), not interrupting them or taking credit for their ideas, and avoiding the temptation to mansplain (see Solnit 2014). They can also undertake political advocacy, research and activism on feminist issues such as domestic violence, sexual assault and reproductive rights, without seeking to take over the agenda or dominate discussions. Kathleen Hanna (of Bikini Kill and Le Tigre) has said that ’fem- Should Men Call Themselves Feminists? 3 inism isn’t something that you are, it’s something that you do’ (Singer 2013). Pro-feminist men should take this to heart. Talk is cheap, but concrete action is what is really needed. My advice to men who are asked if they’re feminists, then, is to say, ’No, I’m a radical pro-feminist.’ And then explain why it’s important for men to support women to speak on their own behalf and have their voices heard. References Kimberle Crenshaw, ’Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color’ (1991) 43 Stanford Law Review 1241 Jonathan Crowe, ’Men and Feminism: Some Challenges and a Partial Response’ (2011) 30(1) Social Alternatives 49 Jonathan Crowe, ’Can Men Be Feminists?’, Keynote Address, Annual General Meeting, Women’s Legal Service Queensland, 17 October 2013 Miranda Fricker, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing (Oxford University Press, 2007) Lena Singer, ’This Is My Thing: An Interview With Kathleen Hanna’, Rookie Magazine (16 September 2013) Rebecca Solnit, ’Men Explain Things to Me’ in Men Explain Things to Me and Other Essays (Granta, 2014)