Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
22 pages
1 file
2019 School festival special talk manual The function of magic as remedial practice through the act of generating intentional synchronicity making use of synesthesia is argued.
The Wire Science, 2020
This article is part of the 'More Fun Than Fun' column by Prof Raghavendra Gadagkar. He will explore interesting research papers or books and, while placing them in context, make them accessible to a wide readership. I recently had great fun reading a fascinating book, called Experiencing the Impossible: The Science of Magic (2019), by Gustav Kuhn. I might not have read the book but for the remarkable fact that Gustav Kuhn is both a professional scientist and a professional magician. He is a reader in psychology at Goldsmiths, a constituent college of the University of London, and has publishedin addition to this bookover 60 scholarly articles on the psychology and neurobiology of magic. He and his collaborators were the first to put volunteers into an fMRI machine while they were enjoying magic. They discovered that areas in the brains of their subjects involved in monitoring and managing conflict lit up preferentially. And of course, magic, as Kuhn explains in his book, involves a conflict between what we think is possible and what we think we have seen. In other studies, he has used eye-tracking technology to observe volunteers 'succumbing' to magic. His credentials as a magician are equally impressive: he is the president of the Science of Magic Association, a member of the Experimental Psychology Society and the Magic Circle. A young Gustav was hooked onto magic at 13 years, when his school-friend performed the trick of making an egg appear from behind his ear, and hasn't looked back. All science should be fun, but Kuhn and his students seem to have more than their fair share. This happens when you combine your hobby with your profession. His students learn to perform magic and show off their skills before children, fellow students and the public, all the while gathering data for their scientific papers and theses. I read the following excerpt (trimmed for length) from one of their recent papers with envy: "Sixty participants recruited on Goldsmiths University campus took
Frontiers in Psychology, 2015
Over the centuries, magicians have developed extensive knowledge about the manipulation of the human mind—knowledge that has been largely ignored by psychology. It has recently been argued that this knowledge could help improve our understanding of human cognition and consciousness. But how might this be done? And how much could it ultimately contribute to the exploration of the human mind? We propose here a framework outlining how knowledge about magic can be used to help us understand the human mind. Various approaches—both old and new—are surveyed, in terms of four different levels. The first focuses on the methods in magic, using these to suggest new approaches to existing issues in psychology. The second focuses on the effects that magic can produce, such as the sense of wonder induced by seeing an apparently impossible event. Third is the consideration of magic tricks—methods and effects together—as phenomena of scientific interest in their own right. Finally, there is the organization of knowledge about magic into an informative whole, including the possibility of a science centered around the experience of wonder.
Zētēsis: International Journal in Fine Art, Philosophy and the Wild Sciences, Vol 2, no. 3:, 2014
Twice Upon A Time: Magic, Alchemy and the Transubstantiation of the Senses In this, the third volume of Zetesis, a neatly packaged Molotov was launched into the ‘out-there’ of art, of science and of life in the disguised form of an international call for papers. We were curious if there might be a different way to re-think/re-make the links between and amongst speculation, materiality, performativity, the senses and sensualities, with bodies both real and imagined, without having to resort to the somewhat staid methodologies of “dialectical materialism” or “objected oriented ontologies” or the seemingly overrated metrics of “scientistic deduction.” Recognising, at the same time, that we were riding the wave of a massive, revolutionary paradigm shift brought on by advances in complexity, radical materiality and the quanta, quarks and feedback loops, robotics, artificial intelligences, transsexualities and ecological verisimilitude our task could not have been more urgent. The Call went out. But rather than ask for a direct or literal response to this ‘re-think/re-make’, the collective chose instead to journey onto a slightly more dangerous, curious path, one not usually linked with formal research, but instead cast often as frivolous or whimsical, illusionary, religious or just plain wrong. We chose to partner with the wild side and take a stronger look-see at the forerunners to all contemporary art, philosophy and science; to wit: magic, alchemy and the transubstantiation of the senses. Under the illusive cloak of magic, the curiosity of alchemists introduced a means for experimentation into the innate properties of materials. The transformation of raw matter into precious metals, the combination of hot sulphur and wet, cold mercury to birth the philosopher’s stone; to bring the inanimate to life, to vanish miraculously and conjure the body, as well as providing a foundation for the laws of substance based on sensory interaction and its potentiality. The scientific practices of today echo this inherent desire for material vitally ‘alive’ transformations, yet Western tradition remains cautious of unreasoned sensorial data, often treating it with trepidation. While this paradigm has proven an efficient methodology, it has installed a discriminatory partition between that which can be rationalised or mathematized and that which is supposedly ‘only’ sensory. These energised and sensate transformations mark the beginning of a new challenge against tradition, returning to curiosity, experimentation and the intensity of the senses away from conventional modes of thought. The Centre for Fine Art Research (CFAR) and the Research Centre for Creative Making (S.T.U.F.F.) based at the Faculty of Arts, Design and Media (ADM) joined forces at Birmingham School of Art – BCU to welcome papers/ performances/exhibition installations that responded to magic/alchemic practices in all their forms, including but not limited to the origins of alchemy and its contemporary relevance in science, magic performance, illusion, automata, the sensory in artificial intelligence and radical thinking in relation to concepts of time. We invited artists, scientists and philosophers to explore again the threshold between these paradigms, dwelling on curiosity and the tradition of scientific questioning. This bold and viscerally complex conference, laid the groundwork for this volume 3 of Zetesis: Twice Upon a Time: Magic, Alchemy and the Transubstantiation of the senses. The exhibitions, artwork, papers and prose contained in this volume include some of the best international practice-led and theoretically emboldened research on this topic today. By foregrounding the alchemist’s vision, we now present here in Zetesis our initial findings: a profane renegotiation of the very boundaries that seemed heretofore always insistent upon separating into binaric unities the so-called texture-realities of representation vs thought, sensation vs logic, image vs text. In challenging those easy divisions, we celebrate the (re-)turn to a ‘twice upon a time’ when transubstantiation, metamorphosis and morphogenesis gives succour to this energy we so nonchalantly call art. Johnny Golding
2015
The past few years have seen a resurgence of interest in the scientific study of magic. Despite being only a few years old, this "new wave" has already resulted in a host of interesting studies, often using methods that are both powerful and original. These developments have largely borne out our earlier hopes (Kuhn, Amlani, & Rensink, 2008) that new opportunities were available for scientific studies based on the use of magic. And it would seem that much more can still be done along these lines. But in addition to this, we also suggested that it might be time to consider developing an outright science of magic—a distinct area of study concerned with the experience of wonder that results from encountering an apparently impossible event . To this end, we proposed a framework as to how this might be achieved (Rensink & Kuhn, 2015). A science can be viewed as a systematic method of investigation involving three sets of issues: (i) the entities considered relevant, (ii) the kinds of questions that can be asked about them, and (iii) the kinds of answers that are legitimate (T Kuhn, 1970). In the case of magic, we suggested that this could be done at three different levels, each focusing on a distinct set of issues concerned with the nature of magic itself: (i) the nature of magical experience, (ii) how individual magic tricks create this experience, and (iii) organizing knowledge of the set of known tricks in a more comprehensive way (Rensink & Kuhn, 2015). Our framework also included a base level focused on how the methods of magic could be used as tools to investigate issues in existing fields of study. Lamont & colleagues (Lamont, 2010; Lamont, Henderson, & Smith, 2010) raised a number of concerns about the possibility of such a science, which we have addressed (Rensink & Kuhn, 2015). More recently, Lamont (2015) raised a new objection, arguing that although base-level work (i.e., applications of magic methods) might be useful, there is too little structure in magic tricks for them to be studied in a systematic way at the other levels, ruling out a science of magic. However, we argue here that although this concern raises some interesting challenges for this science, it does not negate the possibility that it could exist, and could contribute to the study of the mind.
This paper originally formed part of a correspondence course offered by the short-lived Sacred Science movement within modern Western esoteric practice. It was designed as an aid for students in training rather than academic study (hence the paucity of quoted sources) and sought to lay a rational foundation for magical practice in the Western Tradition. The paper is offered ‘as is’ — or rather ‘as was’ — with no attempt to update the scientific sections in the light of more modern theories and/or discoveries. (I’m afraid the pentagram and tattva diagrams that accompanied this paper failed to upload for reasons that are far beyond my computer competence. Anyone desperate to have them might like to email me at herbie@eircom.net and I’ll send them the relevant graphics.)
It is argued here that cognitive science currently neglects an important source of insight into the human mind: the effects created by magicians. Over the centuries, magicians have learned how to perform acts that are perceived as defying the laws of nature, and that induce a strong sense of wonder. This article argues that the time has come to examine the scientific bases behind such phenomena, and to create a science of magic linked to relevant areas of cognitive science. Concrete examples are taken from three areas of magic: the ability to control attention, to distort perception, and to influence choice. It is shown how such knowledge can help develop new tools and indicate new avenues of research into human perception and cognition.
Scholars have long debated the chronology of the passion week of Jesus. It is almost impossible not to be confused if one reads an account like the one in Wikipedia. 1 It is not possible to review all the many suggestions within a fairly short paper, so I am trying here to focus on the arguments that I find most relevant.
El alimento es la vida de todos los seres, y todo el mundo lo busca. La piel, la claridad, la buena voz, la larga vida, el entendimiento, la felicidad, la satisfacción, el crecimiento, la fuerza y la inteligencia, todo se fundamenta en el alimento. De todo lo que es beneficioso para la felicidad mundana y de toda acción que conduzca a la salvación espiritual, se dice que se fundamenta en el alimento.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2011
Annales de Limnologie - International Journal of Limnology, 2020
Contemporary Voice of Dalit, 2011
Tese de Doutorado , 2024
Electrochimica Acta, 2010
Przedsiębiorczość - Edukacja, 2021
Рятівні дослідження на території м. Острог (вул. Г. Острозької, 2б), 2022
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Development, 2014
Міжнародний науковий журнал «Інтернаука». Серія: Економічні науки, 2024
Nature Genetics, 1995
Perspectives of Biophysical Ecology, 1975
Management and Quality – Zarządzanie i Jakość, 2024
international journal of advanced design and manufacturing technology, 2012
Acta Scientific Gastrointestinal Disorders