Academia.eduAcademia.edu

The Birthing Brain: A Lacuna in Neuroscience

2021, The Birthing Brain: A Lacuna in Neuroscience

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105722

During pregnancy, maternal brain neuroplasticity indicates vast neurofunctional and neuroanatomical changes. Recent findings documented a similarly massive readjustment after pregnancy. Currently, these brain changes are interpreted as preparation for and adjustment of the maternal brain to motherhood. Yet, this perspective leaves many questions unsolved. Neuroscientific studies have not yet been conducted to determine the brain areas that function during natural childbirth even though physiological birth is the natural process of women who have reproduced successfully throughout two million years of evolution of the genus Homo. It is rational to believe that the female brain is an active and crucial actor during birth and that birth, itself, is a process that requires brain neuroplasticity. Lack of studies of the birthing brain and brain preparation for birth is a significant lacuna in neuroscience research. I demonstrate theoretically that a new hypothesis for complementary interpretation of maternal brain neuroplasticity is reasonable: Certain maternal brain changes during pregnancy can be interpreted as brain preparation for birth and certain maternal brain changes after birth can be interpreted as brain recovery after the tremendous event of birth. This essay can be a starting point for new directions in neuroscience studies.

Remedying the lacuna: positive systemic implications

Remedying the lacuna in research of the birthing brain can lead to significant economic and health benefits. The cost of medicalization of the birth process in the industrial world is high (Tracy & Tracy, 2003). There are also serious physical and mental health costs to women in postpartum resulting from instrumental deliveries and unplanned c-sections (Thiel & Dekel, 2020), and the negative implications for the baby of unnecessarily medicated birth go far beyond the perinatal period (Peters et al., 2018). Therefore, reducing the unscheduled cesarean rate and unnecessary interventional birth is a public health priority (World Health Organization, 2018). Both the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recently updated their CPGs surrounding labor management, advocating for practices in accordance with physiologic birth unaltered by medical interventions, including epidural (Dufour et al., 2018). Neuroscience studies comparing the brain mechanism of the natural birthing process versus highly medicated interventional birth, emergency c-section, and planned c-section may explain why, despite many efforts, rates of highly medicated births and c-sections are still rising (Zwier, 2020).

"Birth is unpredictable" is a well-known idiom, and its implication that women should remain open-minded with realistic expectations regarding their birth preferences is widely accepted (McKenzie-McHarg et al., 2015). However, the unpredictability of the birth process and its potential for sudden complication and emergency intervention should not give sway to determinism. This is not the way science usually works; science typically seeks to increase understanding and thus minimize unpredictability. Greater understanding of the brain mechanism of the natural birth process can lead to decreasing its disruption and maximizing its efficiency. Many can gain from such information: science in general, childbirth educators, midwifery experts, obstetrics professionals, and birthing women and their familieswhich accounts for nearly every single human being on earth.

Conclusion

Cognitive and phenomenological empirical research teaches that something extremely significant occurs to the birthing woman during physiological birth. Moreover, births involving obstetrical intervention have tremendous and long-lasting mental and physiological consequences on mothers and their babies. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that delivery is also a function of brain process, and not merely a mechanical process reliant upon size and shape of the maternal pelvis and fetal head. It is also reasonable, from an evolutionary point of view, to state that the brain is a significant participant in the complex event of birthwhich is a go-no-go point for the success of reproduction. Throughout most of human evolution, all efforts invested in finding the right pairing, mating, and undergoing a full and healthy pregnancy would have been for naught if the woman was unable to birth. Believing that the braincrucial to preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum processesdoes not prepare a woman for the extremely dangerous and complicated occasion of birth itself does not stand to reason.

I have offered a new hypothesis: to interpret the empirical findings concerning maternal brain morphological plasticity before and after birth as preparation of the brain for birth, not only for motherhood. This perspective is new because it connects existing data to the state of consciousness of the birthing woman, predicting the birthing brain mechanism that correlates with these phenomenological and cognitive features. This innovative hypothesis currently cannot be empirically validated because there is a lacuna in neuroscience: No direct research has been conducted, to date, on the specific neurophysiological states of women during natural and undisturbed birth, nor any other kind of birth. Remedying this lacuna can have far-reaching positive implications for the entire midwifery field, as well as for the physiological and mental health of women and their families.