Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2011
…
7 pages
1 file
(This paper was read at the conference, “Nicosia: The Last Divided Capital in Europe”, organized by the London Metropolitan University on 20th June 2011)
This publication draws largely from an interdisciplinary conference entitled “Nicosia -- Divided City”, held at New York University (NYU), on April 23-25, 1998. The conference was devised and organized by Vangelis Calotychos (New York University) and Yiannis Papadakis (Uinversity of Cyprus). This resulting volume was edited by the same two authors along with Peter Hocknell (University of Durham). The organizers conceived the conference so as to coincide with ongoing discussions on the theme of divided cities held by the Project on Cities and Urban Knowledges, at the International Center for Advanced Studies (ICAS), at New York University.
Cyprus Mail, 2015
The oldest and the most valuable part of the last divided capital city of Europe with thousands of monuments is now under three different legal and administrative authorities. With Nicosia the first divided settlement on the island, yet also the subject of Cyprus’ first bi-communal project as developed by the municipalities of this city, could it now play a special role in the re-unification of the island by hosting the first re-unified initiative?
Space and Culture, 2018
Nicosia, the capital of the island of Cyprus, has accommodated diverse political changes, and the city itself has transformed in the process. In the recent past, as an outcome of the 1963-1964 ethnic conflicts, the city’s most radical transformation has been its division into a Turkish and a Greek part. This article argues that this division has not only affected the daily lives of people living in the northern part of Nicosia but has also caused changing socioeconomic dynamics. The article explores these shifting boundaries through an analysis of the border area and maps these changing spatialities through in-depth interviews with certain social actors. Thus, this study offers a broader understanding of the Cyprus issue, as well as highlights certain intangible aspects of urban boundaries as they affect the spatial configuration of divided cities in general.
This chapter seeks to investigate the relationship between social structures rooted in conflicting identities and the urban environment in the contested context of Nicosia - the last divided city in Europe and capital of Cyprus. The urban actors consisting of the two communities that inhabit the divided island are characterised by differences in language, religion and origin. Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots have been initially separated in 1963 and have been living in a completely divided island since 1974. The opening of the Lockmaci/Ledra Street checkpoint in the old section of Nicosia in 2003 resulted in subtle manifestations of temporal activities and interventions within the urban fabric. Appreciating the alienation between the two communities and the development of separate identities involves understanding two urban impediments. First, the failure of the city as a political institution to ensure that the diversity will still continue upon a solution of the Cyprus conflict and second, the mismanagement of ethnic diversity as a large socio-spatial concern. This chapter investigates the political, social and cultural parameters in the urban context as manifested through symbols and artefacts that enhance this obsession with preserving the national self. By performing a thorough investigation of Nicosia’s multi-faceted environment, this chapter attempts to understand the current cultural structure between the two communities as the result of conflict. The quotidian reality of the inhabitants suggests that the enforcing, manipulation, moulding and alteration of cognitive memories shape the perception of ‘the other’. The chapter will consequently explain the role of the urban environment as a vessel for structuring the identities of Turkish-Cypriots and Greek-Cypriots in the future as we speculate a reunification scenario.
GEOGRAPHY, 2007
ABSTRACT: Nicosia, the capital of Cyprus for the last ten centuries, is currently Europe's last divided city, with the northern (Turkish) and southern (Greek) sections separated by a UN buffer zone. This continuing division is central to the city's ongoing problems, restricting development and creating complex problems for future planning.
2015
Nicosia is a city designed to be divided across many false lines. The rich history of the city reveals the remnants of foreign intervention that imprinted a multicultural background on Nicosia, which – at the same time – erected some artificial lines of segregation. Britain’s colonial rule was crucial in fostering the most contemporary lines of division. A given constitution in 1960 made these lines look inevitable, and by 1964 Nicosia (like many other towns in Cyprus) was already divided on the ground. Turkey’s military invasion in 1974 imposed an even deeper line of division across Nicosia (and Cyprus) that engendered some novel problems which are visible up until today. EU accession stimulated some hope for overcoming division, which is relatively elusive.
This thesis hopes to serve as a dual experiment to approach the “Cyprus Problem” from a spatial perspective, while elaborating on the production of social space through the lens of confict, in the case of the divided old city of Nicosia, Cyprus. In this framework, Nicosia is actually the “socio-spatial lab” that offers the opportunity to “dig” under the visible urban mosaic, towards a city made out of memory, oblivion, trauma, senses, smells, collective actions, aspirations, stereotypes, thrills, ghosts and dreams. A city, where the everyday actors produce a space through narrations, mappings and actions, while inviting us to a new “geography”, where reality meets imagination and the communities’ secrets and expectations become our guide in space. From this perspective, this thesis is actually an alternative map of the divided Nicosia. While the offcial map of the city shows the physical scar of the Green Line and the Buffer Zone, creating the Turkish Cypriot North and the Greek Cypriot South, I suggest that there are multiple divisions and contacts produced by everyday dynamics that are worth to be mapped. In this context, I hope to offer a mapping process that reveals invisible borders being crossed or avoided, and which will probably remain even after the demolishment of the visible ones. Within the broader debate on the production of space, I collect, evaluate, manage and narrate feldwork data that serve both as an input to the mapping process and as an output for the creation of the city’s image. In particular, I suggest two axes: frstly, space in the mind as presented by oral history and mental mapping processes involving local everyday actors; and, secondly, the common space of demand as produced by grassroots activism and the broader civil space. The goal is to shed light on different aspects of the division. In this sense, I elaborate on the mental representations of confict, the emerging quest for wholeness and the confrontation of different dynamics that claim hegemony over common space. As a result, I come up with a new reading of Nicosia and a further understanding of the production of the social space of confict.
Shared Spaces and their Dissolution: Practices of Coexistence in Cyprus and Elsewhere, 2011
Reconciliation efforts in Cyprus often refer to a period of "coexistence" before the island's division as proof that the various communities of the island have lived together in the past and can live together again. However, "coexistence" is a term of broad scope that can refer to practices of living together separately or antagonistic tolerance, as well as to forms of closer interaction or entanglement with the lives of members of another community. In its root, the word already implies a separation brought together through spatial practices. In recent years, social science studies of conflict have increasingly turned to analysis of the everyday practices of coexistence in order to ask where such practices may succeed, and where they may fail or be caused to fail. In particular, many studies of ongoing conflicts or post-conflict societies have asked what mechanisms enable communities to repair ruptures in the social fabric and to re-engage in coexistence, and what circumstances or factors may disrupt the capacity for repair. This conference aims to interrogate "coexistence" in Cyprus and other related cases and to ask what practices enabled centuries of cooperation and sharing, as well as how and when such sharing was disrupted. "Shared spaces" may be religious sites with meaning for more than one confessional group; the market, mine, or other site of economic activity; or the common space of the mixed village. Shared spaces may be characterized by political, economic, or social cooperation or antagonism. The everyday cooperative practices that enable the sharing of space may entail friendship or simple pragmatic accommodation. Moreover, the sharing of space may be altered by nationalist practices such as the renaming of sites, or it may continue unaltered even through episodes of violence. More importantly, daily interaction may be shaped by state policy, including more recent policies that encourage an understanding of coexistence as "social harmony." The conference will use analyses of particular sites, practices, or events to address the following and similar issues: * Theorizing the texture of everyday intercommunal relations pre-74 * The "nationalization" of place and its effects on daily relations * Identifying dynamics of cooperation and conflict * Local histories of violence and its effect on the sharing of space * The effects of state policy on quotidian cooperation, including resistance to such policies * The way that a discourse of "coexistence" has become implicated in the conflict context * The effects of closed and/or open checkpoints on understandings of past coexistence Although our immediate focus is on historical and ethnographic studies of coexistence in Cyprus, the conference will also include comparative case studies with relevance for the island.
Akpinar, İ.Y., Dinçyürek, Ö., “Spatialisation of Immigration In Nicosia: Tradition Interrogated”, IASTE conference, Oxford Brookes, UK, 12-15.12.2008; Center for Environmental Design Research, International Association of Traditional Environments, Traditional Dwellings and Settlements, University of California, Berkeley - working paper series, www.arch.berkeley.edu/research/iaste In the last 30 years, with the aim of pursuing a better life, immigrants from Turkey come to Northern Cyprus, and are especially settled in traditional neighborhoods in the walled city of Nicosia - while the Greek part welcomed certain number of immigrants from the countries in the periphery. On one hand, migration from Turkey to Northern Cyprus has caused noticeable change of population and the emergence of an invisible spatial border between the migrants and locals effecting urban daily life: the leisure, the work and residential spaces of the locals and immigrants have been segregated. On the other hand, the change of social structure has been directly reflected into the architectural structure. The re-use of a one-family mansion by immigrant families has transformed spatial organization and the traditional identity by ad-hoc sub-divisions. In other words, a large number of immigrants have re-shaped traditional architecture as well as urban identity in the traditional built environment. In 2004, in the a simultaneous vote in the reunification of the divided island by the Annan Plan, a United Nations (UN) proposal, whilst the proposal was approved by Turkish majority, the Greeks rejected. Despite their rejection, the urban dynamics of the Turkish part have been changed, and Nicosia has become more globalized. In this context, Northern Nicosia accommodates a series of regeneration projects financially supported by the UN, spatializing emerging tensions between the ones who can be part of globalization (locals) and who can not be (immigrants) - divided by invisible borders. What makes the Nicosia case worth to study is its uniqueness as a political and social layers as well as re-emergence of unification with the outside world. In this context, our study aims at investigating the radical change in traditional houses inhabited by immigrants as well as urban transformation that arises as a result of the encounter between immigrants and globalizing locals. Focusing on the spatialization of immigrants and locals, our study conducts interviews in a traditional neighborhood located in old city where UN projects have been constructed. Interviews with immigrants and locals underline different life styles, expectations, new consumption patterns and stereotypes against each other.
BOMBAS DE INYECCIÓN DIÉSEL. ESPAÑA. EDICIONES CEAC. S. A., 1984
REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación
Rethinking Marxism, 2008
BRILL eBooks, 2014
Il populismo contemporaneo, le sue attinenze con la filosofia politica tra dogmatismo e scetticismo ed i suoi limiti teleologici di azione , 2024
International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), Vol. 22, No. 3, June 2024, 2024
Revista Latino-americana De Enfermagem, 2008
Education Sciences , 2024
arXiv (Cornell University), 2024
Iqbal Darul Fauzi dan Muhammad Ditto Cantona, 2023
Journal of Computational Science, 2011
Proceedings, 2018
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), 2022
Molecular Brain, 2013
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2021