J. Mol.
Rd.
(1982) 162, 335-343
Replication
Origin
of Bacteriophage
fl
Two Signals Required for its Function
(Received
17 June 1982)
1’1~sstrand synthesis in bacteriophage fl initiates in a region of dyad symmetry at
a specific site (plus origin) recognized and nicked by the viral gene TI protein. In
this paper we describe several small deletions on the 5’ side of the fl plus origin
which disrupt the region of dyad svmmetry and extend up to only four nucleotides
from the gene II protein nicking site. These deletions do not impair the ability of
gene II protein in vitro to nick this site. However, they do inhibit in z~no plus
strand synthesis. We conclude that the nucleotide sequence at the fl plus origin
contains at least two specific signals that are required for efficient plus strand
synthesis.
1. Introduction
DNA replication
of the single-stranded
DNA phages fl, M13, or fd, requires t,wo
mechanisms, one for the synthesis of the viral (plus) strand and one for that of the
complementary
(minus) strand (Horiuchi
& Zinder, 1976: Eisenberg et al., 1976).
The origins of plus and minus strand synthesis (plus and minus origin) map in the
intergenic region and are separated from each other by 24 nucleotides.
The minus
origin is biochemically
defined as the first nucleotide on the plus strand transcribed
by the host RNA polymerase to prime the synthesis of the minus strand (Geider et
nl.. 1978). Upon completion
of one round of minus strand synthesis, a doublestranded, circular, superhelical
molecule (RFI) is formed (Horiuchi
et al., 1978a).
The origin of plus strand synthesis (plus origin) is biochemically
defined as the
specific site on the plus strand of the RF1 molecule at which a nick is introduced
by
the action of the viral gene II protein (Meyer et al.. 1979). Elongation
of the 3’ end
of the nick is accompanied
by displacement
of the viral strand via a rolling circle
mechanism
(Gilbert
& Dressler, 1968). The nick introduced
in vitro by purified
gene II protein has been located at position 5780 (Meyer et al., 1979) in a nucleotidc
sequence with S-fold symmetry
(Schaller, 1978) (Fig. 1) that was thought likely to
interact specifically
with the gene II protein.
This paper is concerned with the elucidation
of the sequence around the plus
origin that is required for efficient plus strand synthesis as well as the sequence
necessary for gene II protein recognition.
For these studies, we used a chimerich
plasmid containing
the fl “functional
origin”
of DNA replication
(Dotto et al..
335
Oo22-2836/R2/34o335-09
$03.00/O
‘4” l!J82 Ac:d~rnic~
l’wss
1IIC. (I~r~ntiorr)
I,ttl.
C:. 1’. 1)OTTO
E?’ AL.
6000
IGenelI
C
:
,
\
\
\
\
TT GT;’
FII:. 1. Map of the intergenir
region (IG) of bacteriophage fl (Horiuchi ~1 al., 19786). The numbers
indicate the nucleotidt~ lxx&ion (Heck B Zink. I!181 ). (+ ) and (- ) IPtbpresent the origins of plus and
minus strand synthGs. resp~ctivc~lv. -+~ lndic,atis thr sitta in R283 whrrc~ a I’st linker has heen ins&cd.
Y. Indicates the HidI cleavage s&s. The nucleotidr sequence (Schallrr. 197X: Beck & Zink. 1981)
around the plus origin is shown in detail as a region with P-fold symmetry. 0.
Site of gene II protein
nicking. In this and subsequent Figures hyphens have heen omitted from the sequence for clarity.
19Xla). Several deletions on the 5’ side of the fl plus origin were introduced
which
disrupted
the region of dyad symmet,ry and extended up to only four nucleotides
from the gene II protein nicking site (Fig. 1). The effects of these changes on the
synthesis of plus strand were established
irr /*i/lo by measuring the production
of
virion-like
particles containing
chimeric plasmid single-st’randed
DNA. The effects
of the deletions on gene II protein recognition
were investigated
in N&O hy treating
their DNAs with purified gene II protein and determining
the efficiency of nicking.
2. Materials
and Methods
The bacterial strain used was Eschvrichin coli lC3H (Lyons K: Zirrdcr. 1972). fl phap was
from our laboratory
stock. R283 is an fl variant, lvith a I’st linker (octamer)
inserted at
position 5766 of the fl map (Horiucahi. unpublished
results).
pI)8
has beell
described
(Dotto
cut ol.,
1981n).
pl)I I was constructed
by insrrting
the
HpaII-H fragment of R283 at the BumHI site of pACYC184 (Chang & Cohen, 19X4), using
RamHI linkers (Collaborative Research). pD12 was obtained by recloning the R283 HFII-H
fragment from pDll into the RumHl site of pD17, a pBR322 (Bolivar et al., 1977)
derivative harboring the fl HaeIII-F fragment at the EcoRI site (Dotto et al., 1981a).
Similarly,
the fl fragments
of the deletion
mutants
(see below)
site of pD17. In all cases, the clones used had the fl HpaII-H
same orientation
as they
are in fl wild
type
(Fig.
1).
were recloned
and HaeIII-F
at the BumHI
fragments in the
REYLICATIOS
(I))
ORIGIX
OF fl
33;
IklPtiO?l vnutallts
The deletions WWP obtained by digesting pDl1 DNA with I’d. The linearized DNA was
t,reated with exonuclease Bn131 (BRI,) (Grav et nl.. 1975): 01 unit ofenzyme/pmol
of DN.4.
at a concentration of @l pg/,.d at 12°C for i min. The reaction was stopped by addition of
E(:TA. 160 mM final concentration. After circularization with Td DNA ligase. the 1)X,\ was
E. coli K38 cells ( I)otjto
again treated with PstI and then used to transform calciumtreated
it rrl.. 19810). (“hloramphenicol-resistant
colonies were isolated a,nd the plasmid DN;\
charactrrized (Davis ut 01.. 1980; Boeke ut al., 1979). Th e nucleotide sequence of the drletiotrs
was determined as follows. ilfter BnnrHI cleavage. the fl HpaII-H fragments from the
various mut.ants U.ere purified and digested with =IwI : the 3’ ends were labeled 1)~ addit,iotl
of Klcno\c fragmcant and [ ~-321’jdGTP (Maxam & (Gilbert. 1980). The DNA \vas subsequc~ntl?.
clravc~l with Hiufl and the fragments of interest were grl-purified. The nurleotide s~~clurnc~t~
was dt,trrmined 1)~ the method of Maxam CCGilbert (1980).
Phage yields were obtained as follows: @3 ml of E. coli K38 cells containing the various
plssmids and grown to stationary phase were infected with fl wild-type (10’ plaque-forming
units) and plated. After overnight incubation at 37°C’. phagr stocks were prepared 1)~ plat,e
scraping and were titrated for plaqutl-forming units. I’hage stocks were used as previousI>
described (Dotto rt rrl.. 1981a) to infect exponentially
growing K38 cells that \verc
subseclur~rrtly plated on either chloramphenicol (1 mg/plate) or ampicillin (1 mglplate). Thea
number of transdurtants (chloramphenicol- or ampic~illir~-resistant colonies) was takrn as a
me~asurf~of thcx atltibiotic rrsistancae transducing particles produced.
(d) Gr~e I/ protritr puv-ijcotion rrrld in vitro trssay
Gene II protein was purified from E’. coli K 38 (pD2) ~11s that contain a plasmid into
which grnc II has been cloned, and produce large amounts of gene II protein (Dotto rt (I/..
1981h). The assav for the purification was based on the ability of gene II protein to linearizcl
specifically fl RF1 DNA in the presence of Mn’+ (Dotto et al.. 19816). The gene II protein was
purified approximately
:iOOO-fold 1)~ using minor modifications of the method of Meyer &
Geider (1979~). One unit of enzyme is measured l,g the complete conversion of 05 tug of fl
RF1 DXA into RF11 and RFIV in 20 ~1 of 20 mM-Tris . HC’I (pH 8,0), 5 m&l-MgCl, and 5 mMdithiothreitol. The reactions were performed at 30°C for 30 min and were stopped with 2 ~1 of
2Oqb (w/v) sucrose, O+$, (w/v) sodium dodeeyl sulfate. 200 mM-EDTA and Ol0/0 (w/v)
bromphenol blue.
3. Results
(a) Isolation
qf deletion
mutavb
at the
.fl
@rigin
The phage “functional
origin” of replication
is defined as the minimal fl sequence
t,hat, when present in a plasmid, confers on it the ability to interfere with fl T)NA
replication
and to yield, in the presence of helper phage, virion-like
particles that
transduce
resistance to antibiotics
(antibiotic
resistance transducing
particles:
Dotto et al.. 198la). Such a sequence includes the fl plus origin and it extends for
more than 100 nucleotides on its 3’ side (Dotto et al., 1981a: Cleary & Ray, 1980).
(The fl minus origin is dispensable. since other sequences elsewhere in the plasmid
DNA can serve for minus strand initiation
(Cleary B Ray, 1981).) The functions
and the precise boundaries of the stretch of nucleotides
on the 3’ side of the plus
origin required for efficient replication
remain to be determined.
In the present study, we set out to establish the 6’ boundary of the “functional
plus origin”.
For this purpose, we cloned the functional
origin (H;oaIT-H fragment,,
Fig. 1) of R283, an fl variant with a Pst linker (ortamer) inserted at position 5766,
338
G. I’. DOTTO
K:T ill,.
57fo
5’170
CGCCCTTTGACGTTGGAGT~~~AGTCCACGTTCTTTAATAGTGG
5’l*o
fourteen nucleotides upstream from the plus origin (Fig. 1), into pA C YC’184 ((Thang
& Cohen, 1978), which does not contain any I’st sites. The replication
of R283 is not
affected significantly
by the presence of the octamer. The DNA of the resulting
chimeriu plasmid (pD11) was linearized
with Pst. keated with exonuclease
&z/31
(Gray et al., 1975) under very limiting
conditions,
and religated
to transform
calcium-treated
E. coli cells (Dotto et al... 1981a). The ability of a chimeric plasmid
to yield transducing
particles, following infection with fi. was used as an indication
of the functionality
of its fl origin (Dotto et al.. 1981a). pDl1 was used as a
standard.
Several clones with absent, reduced, or nearly normal ability
to yield
transducing
particles
were chosen and the nucleotide
sequences of their fl
fragments were determined.
As shown in Figure 2. a detailed deletion map on the 5’
side of the plus origin was obtained.
(b) 1’1~~ strand synthesis
in viva
is &wqly
ajyected by the deletiorls
In order to quantify
more accurately
the residual i71 Co activity
of the various
deletions, all the fl fragments
were recloned in pD17, a pBR322 (Bolivar
et al..
1977) derivative
that already contains the fl NaeIII-F
fragment (Fig. 1). We have
shown previously
(Dot.to e.f al.. 198la) that this fragment
contains
a signal
important
for virion morphogenesis
and in its presence the yield of transducing
particles of chimeras that already cont,ain the fl functional
origin of replication
is
enhanced by approximately
20-fold. pD12 was obtained by recloning into pD17 the
R283 HpaII-H
fragment.
pD8 is the same as pD12, except that it contains the fl
wild-type
HpaII-H
fragment
(without
the Pst linker). The biological
activities
of
pD8 and pD12, measured either hg their ability to yield transducing
particles or to
interfere with fl replication,
are very high and practically
identical
(Table 1).
When the irr Avo data for deletion 468 (extending
from inside the Pst linker to
two nucleotides
out of it. toward t,he plus origin: Fig. 2) are compared with those
REPLICATION
ORIGIN
339
OF fl
for pD8 and pD12 (Table l), it is clear that 468 has suffered no loss of biological
activity
from the deletion. The deletion of two additional
nucleotides
(470) in the
direction of the plus origin causes a fivefold drop in activity.
However, because of
the new nucleotide sequence created by the deletion, A70 differs from A68 by only
one of the two deleted
nucleotides
(see Fig. 3). In 070. the nucleotides
corresponding
to positions 5769, 5770, 5771 in wild-type
fl are TGC rather than
TC’C’ : i.e. the (’ + G change at position 5770 caused a fivefold drop in activity.
The
loss of one more nucleotide (471) causes an additional
30-fold drop in activity.
The
nucleotides
corresponding
to positions
5769. 5770, 5771 are now TTG. Quite
Biological activity of the deletion mutants
Transductants:
p.f.n.:
I’lanmids
.SOW
pm
pI)l%
A68
AiO
Ail
Ail
A72I)
Ail
Ai(i
A X3
3x
3x
2x
3x
2x
2x
Ix
Ix
3x
2x
5x
1(P2
l(VO
1o’O
IO’O
IO”
lo’*
lo’*
Io’2
1O’2
lOI
1o’2
< oaooo5
2
24
1.x
04
0.014
007
0.047
0405
OGon
< oaooo.5
Relative biological
artivitv$ * (96)
loo
100
!)O ( 100)
20 (10)
07 (1 )
3.5 (2)
2.3 (2)
0.35 (1 )
045 (1)
p.f.u.. plaque-forming units.
t Phage yields were obtained as described in Matrrials and Methods.
$ Thr number of transdnctants (ampicillin-resistant
colonies) is taken as a mrasure of the ampicillin
resist,anw transducing particles produced. It was determined as described in Materials and Methods.
5 The relative biological activity of the plus origin is defined in each case as the ratio between the yield
of transducing particles obtained with a certain deletion and that obtained with pD8. the biological
activity of which is arbitrarily svt at lOOo,b.In parentheses are the values that would be obtained if the
biological activity were defined as the inverse ratio between the yield of phage obtained with the
dtBlet,ions and that ohtainrd with pD8 (a mrasure of interference wit,h fl phage replication).
unexpectedly,
when one more nucleotide
is removed (A72 and A72b), there is a
fivefold increase in relative activity.
Examination
of the sequence created in A72
(Fig. 3) shows that the three nucleotides
corresponding
to positions 5769, 5770.
5771 are TQC, the same found in 470. However, A72 does have sixfold less activity
than 470. The A -+ T change at position 5772 might be the cause. A72b has the
same sequence as 472, with the addition
of one extra nucleotide:
its biological
similar to
activity
is approximately
half that of 472. A residual biological activity,
that observed for A71 (- 05%), remains even with deletions extending
up to four
nucleotides from the plus origin (A74 and 476). AX3 is not active, as expected, since
the plus origin has been deleted (Fig. 2). These results directly
demonstrate
the
requirement
for I2 nucleotides on the 5’ side of the plus origin for full activity
of the
origin in k/?o.
310
c:.
5767
pDl2
1’.
I)C)T’I’O
FT
1
.-I I.1
60 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 70 79 00 81
II III II III Ill II
AGTCCACGTTCTTTA
II
III Ill
II
III
l
II
II
Btol. octiv.
$
100%
Ill
’
II
II
90%
The effects observed with the various deletions could result from the disruption
of the gene II protjein recognition
sequence around the plus origin. In particular.
the persistence of some activity
( - OS%,) even with deletions up to position 5776,
four nucleotides
from the gene II protein nicking site, could be explained
by a
diminished
but not, completely
abolished
affinity
of t,he enzyme
for these
we usetl DNAs from the various deletion
sub&rates.
To test such a possibility,
mutants as substrat)es for purified gene 11 protein. This protein, in addition to its
nicking function. possesses a closing activny so t,hat, in /-itro. in the presence of Mg.
it, converts fl RF1 molecules into RF11 (relaxed. nicked circles) and RFI\’ (relaxed,
closed circles) in approximately
equimolar
amounts (Meyer & Geider. 19796). We
used this reaction to determine the efficiency with which the gene II protein can acat’
on the various delet,ion mutant,s.
pD8 and pD12 RF1 were converted int,o RF11 and RFIV as efficiently
as fl, and
were used as controls (Fig. 4). 483 is not, nicked by gene TI protein, as expected.
because the gene II protein nicking site has been deleted. Quite unexpectedly.
when the RFI of all the other deletion
mutants
were incubated
with gene I1
identical to
protein, the efficiency of conversion to RF11 and RFIV was practically
that of pD8 and pD12 (Fig. 4). A titration
of t,he amount of purified gene II protein
required to convert, completely
a given amount of RF1 to RFII and RFIV showed
that all of the deletion mutants
(except 483) are as efticient as substrates
for
REI’I~I(‘ATlON
pD8 pD12 A68
+-+-t-t-t-t-
A70 A71 A72
C)RI(:IS
34 I
OF fl
A72bA74 A76 A83
+-t-+-+-t-+-
fl
pBR322
-fl
z--f1
‘II-
‘FIm-
gene II protein as fl RF1 (data not shown). Moreover. the relative amounts of
KFII and RN\’
formed were the same as in the control (Fig. 1).
From these results. we can conclude that the 5’ end of t,he recognition
sequence
for gene II protein lies wit’hin four nucleotides from its nicking site. The possibilit?
that the region of dyad symmetry
around the plus origin is required for grrw II
protein recaognition is ruled out>.
4. Conclusions
M’e have direc%ly demonstrated
the requirement
for 12 nucleotides on the 5’ side
of the plus origin for the full a&ivity
of t.he origin in P&J. Our results are c:onsistzent
with the fact that in M13, deletions of various lengths extending up to position 5767
do not ttlock phagr replication
(Kim rt nl.. 1981). The 5’ boundary of the irr &Y)
“functional
plus origin” can be mapped to the sequence 5’.T-C-C’-A-(‘-3’,
starting at
position 5769. The first eight nueleot,idea. 5769 to 5778. involve a region of dpad
symmetry that can be drawn as a hairpin with the gene I1 protein nicking site in its
loop (Fig. 1). The structure
of such a region was assumed to be important
for
gene II protein recognition,
since this protein reacts specifically
only with closed
superhelical fl l)pl’A. We have shown. however, that this is not the case and that
contains all that is required on the 5’ side of the pll~s
the sequence 5’-(‘-T-T-T’A-3’
origin for the gene II protein nicking (and closing) a&v&v.
The region of d+vad
RFII
RF1
342
Q. P. DOTTO
ET AL.
symmetry may be required in some later steps in plus strand synthesis. e.g.
formation of the replication fork or termination
of replication. It should be
mentioned that the nicking (and closing) activity we measured in vitro using RF1
molecules as substrates to form RF11 (and RFIV) is necessary for initiation of plus
strand synthesis, but it is only a reflection of the gene II protein activity required to
cleave and seal the single-stranded tail after one round of plus strand synthesis to
form single-stranded circles.
In +X174, the plus origin is not located in the middle of a palindromic sequence
as is that of fl (van Mansfield et al., 1980; Sanger et al., 1977). Also, unlike the fl
gene II protein, the +X gene A protein remains covalently attached to the .5’ end of
the nick it produces (Eisenberg & Koruberg, 1979). Both proteins are thought to be
involved in the termination as well as the initiation of plus strand synthesis. It
might be that for efficient termination to occur, either a covalent linkage of the
initiator protein to the nick or a palindromic sequence around the nick is required.
The 3’ boundary of the gene II protein recognition sequence has yet to be
established but must extend at least four nucleotides beyond the gene II protein
nicking site to form a recognition sequence of a minimum of eight nucleotides. This
can be deduced by the fact that the same stretch of seven nucleotides at the plus
origin (5’.C-T-T-TLA-T-T-3’)
is found in two other locations in fl DNA (position
2211 and 5406 of the fl map) (Beck & Zink, 1981) and once in pBR322 (position 32
of the pBR322 map) (Sutcliffe, I978), and none of these sequences is nicked by
gene II protein.
The fl plus origin has been shown t,o behave as a specific signal not only for the
initiation but, also for the termination of plus strand synthesis (Horiuchi. 1980;
Dotto & Horiuchi. 1981: Meyer at al., 1981). Here we have shown that the sequence
at the fl plus origin
contains
additional
specific
information
besides that
required
for gene 11 protein nicking (and closing) activity. The detailed nature of this
information
as required for the initiation
and/or termination
of plus strand
synthesis remains to be determined.
We gratefully acknowledge the skilful technical assistance of Judy Schurko, and we thank
Peter Model for ma,ny helpful suggestions and critica,l rt,ading of the manuscri@. We also
thank Klaus Ceidrr for helpful suggestions regarding the gene I I protrin purification. This
work was supported in part hy grants from thr, National Science Foundation and ttw
National Institutes of Health.
REFF,RE:N(:ES
Krck. E. & Zink. B. (1981). ~GPILP,
16. 3+5X.
Boeke, J. I).. Vovis. G. F. & Zinder. h’. II. (1979). I ‘TOP. Sat. Acnd. Sci.. 1CS.d. 76, 26QQ2702.
Bolivar. F.. Rodriguez. R. I,.. (+reen. 1’. ,J.. Hetlach. 31. C”.. Hepneker. H. I,. & Koyer. H. W.
(1977). Oenr. 2. 95-113.
Chang. A. C. Y. & Cohen, S. N. (1978). ,/. Unctrriol. 134. 1 l-21.-1156.
Cleary. J. M. & Ray. D. S. (1980). I ‘rot. Sat. Adcud. Ski., C,‘.S.A 77. 4638-4642.
Cleary. J. M. &r Ray. D. S. (1981). .J. C’irol. 40. l!)T-203.
Davis. R. W.. Thomas. M.. Cameron. J.. St. John. T. I’.. Scherer. 8. di Padgett. R. A. (1980).
In Mfthods in Enzymology (Grossman. L. & Moldave. K.. eds), vol. 65, pp. 404-411.
Academic Press. New York.
REPLICATION
ORIGIN
OF fl
313
Dot,to, (:. P. & Horiuchi. K. (1981). J. Mol. Biol. 153. 16%176.
Dotto, (:. P.. Enea, V. & Zinder. N. D. (1981~). T’irology. 114, 463-473.
Dotto, (:. P.. Enea, V. & Zinder, S. D. (198lb). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., C.S.;I. 78. 5421-5424.
Eisenberg. S. & Kornberg, A. (1979). J. Riol. Chrm. 254. 532%5332.
Eisenberg. S.. Scott. J. F. & Kornberg. A. (1976). Proc. Sot. .A&. Sci.. (‘S..4. 73. 3151-m
3 155.
(ieider, K.. Beck. E. B Schaller. H. (1978). l’roc. Sat. 4cad. Sci.. I ‘.S.,3. 75. 645-649.
(Gilbert. W. B Dressier, I). (1968). Cold Spring Hrrrhor Symp. Quaint. Biol. 33. 473-485.
(iray. H. B., Ostrander. D. A.. Hodnett. ,J. L.. Legerski. R. .J. Kr Robberson. T). 1,. (1975).
Sucl. Acids Rra. 2. 1459-1492.
Horiuchi. K. (1980). Proc. Snt. Acad. Sci.. /IS.=l. 77. 522G.5229.
Horiuchi. K. 8r Zinder, N. I>. (1976). Z’roc. ,I’at. Acud. Sci.. C’.A’.il. 73. 2341m-2345.
Horiuchi. Ii.. Ravetch. J. V. 8 Zinder. N. I). (197%). (“old Spring Hnrhor Xymp. Q~~rrt. Rio/.
43. 389-399.
Horiuchi. K.. lTovis. G. F. & Model, 1’. (1978). In The Singlr-A’tmrrdrd DIVA J’hagrs
(1)cnhardt. I). T.. Dressler. I). & Ray. 1). S.. eds). pp. 113-137. Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory, Nrw York.
Kim. >I. H.. Hines, J. (‘. & Ray. D. S. (1981). Proc. Snt. .-lcmd. Sci.. I:.S.A. 78, 6784-678X.
Lyons, I,. B. & Zinder, N. D. (1972). Virology, 49, 45-60.
Maxam. A. M. & (:iIbert. W. (1980). In Methods in Enzymology ((:rossma,n. 1,. & Moldave. K..
~1s). vol. 65. pp. 49%560. Academic Press. New York.
~Te~er. 7’. F. bi (ieider, K. J. (1979n). J. Biol. Phem. 254, 12636-12641.
Meyer. T. F. & (ieider, K. .J. (1!)79h). J. Rio/. Chem. 254, 32642-12646.
Meyer. T. F., (Gler. K.. Kurz. (‘. 8r Srhaller. H. (1979). Snturr (London), 278. 365-367.
Meyer. T. F.. Blumel, 1.. (ieider. K. & Redinger. P. (1981). .J. Biol. Chem. 256. 581~5813.
Sanger. F.. Air. (:. 31.. Rarrell. B. G.. Brown. N. L., (‘oulson, A. R.. Fiddes, J. C.. Hutchison.
(‘. ,t.. III. Slocombe, 1’. M. Rr Smith. $1. (1977). ,V’nfuw (London). 265. 687495.
Schallrr. H. (1978). (‘old Spri,rg Hnrhor %ymp. Quatrt. Biol. 43. 401-408.
Sutcliffe. .J. (:. (I!)78). (‘old Spring Hnrhor ~Symp. @tnnt. Bio/. (1978). 43. 77-90.
van Mansfeld. A. I). M.. Langeveld, S. A.. Baas. 1’. I).. ~Jansz. H. S., van der Marel. (:. A..
\-wnrman. (:. H. & van Boom. ,J. H. (1980). Sntltrv (Lortdotr). 288. 561-566.
Edited by S. Rrenner