Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2018, Procurement Finance
…
8 pages
1 file
This book explores the concept of procurement finance in the context of the digital transformation impacting procurement organizations and financial institutions. It advocates for an integrated approach encompassing trade finance, supply chain finance, and payments management, emphasizing the need for organizations, particularly SMEs, to adapt to global complexities while innovating and managing risks. The focus is on optimizing value network processes to enhance long-term cash flow and operational management.
Manufacturing System, 2012
Mit Sloan Management Review, 2008
ver the past 25 years, the role of procurement within companies has changed dramatically from that of simply buying goods and services to overseeing an integrated set of management functions. Procurement has crept into every aspect of management, from category management to managing supplier relationships, contracts and payments, and strategy. As companies look beyond short-term costs and the scope of procurement-related issues has grown, procurement professionals are paying more attention not just to what they spend on goods and services but to the broader costs of operating, maintaining and replacing the items and resources they purchase over time. Despite procurement's increased level of importance, it has yet to achieve the high-level recognition it deserves. There are two main reasons for this. First, it is often difficult to document procurement's specific contributions: Were the cost savings the result of skillful negotiations with vendors or a fortuitous shift in the market? The financial benefits of a favorable procurement deal often extend beyond the initial purchase price to other aspects of performance (for example, improved working capital or reduced financing costs), so there is more than one bottom line to consider. Second, the line between the responsibilities of procurement and those of other stakeholders can be ambiguous. The result: Procurement often shares whatever successes it achieves with other groups; in failure, however, it typically gets all the blame. The need to place procurement in a broader strategic context has become all the more pressing in the current era of increasing globalization. Global sourcing links procurement decisions to strategic decisions. "Make or buy" decisions-for example, whether to move production offshore to your own subsidiaries or outsource it to outside producers and subcontractorsare typically made at the senior executive levels. However, other important decisions (such as where to buy, from whom and under what conditions) are usually handled by procurement professionals. The reality is that these decisions are no longer based entirely on an understanding of direct purchase costs or on easily observable transaction costs, such as transport expenses and import duties, but on many other types of transaction costs as well, including those related to cultural, institutional and political differences. In this article, we will explore the role of these other transaction costs in sourcing decisions and offer a new framework for evaluating costs associated with sourcing and procurement in an increasingly globalized market.
Journal of Business Research, 2005
Increasingly, industrial selling and purchasing is embedded in supplier networks extending national borders. The internationalisation of supply activities adds considerable complexity to the coordination tasks performed by suppliers. Traditionally, supply chain management was upstream-oriented, focusing on the leading contractor's supply chain management. However, the increased demand for flexibility echoes down in supply network, decentralising the coordination task. We focus on subcontractors as connective nodes in supply networks and outline how coordinative roles are linked to the diversity of exchange nodes. We develop a typology for the coordinating roles taken on by subcontractors and use case studies to ground our explorative efforts empirically.
Over the past decades, outsourcing has been an important mechanism not only to reduce costs but also to organise both production and non-core activities of the company, in order to remain competitive and efficient on the market. The globalisation of the markets has radically changed competition rules. Companies must adapt their traditional strategies and policies to an ever changing and highly instable context characterised by a broad and complex environment. The solution adopted by big corporations is the creation of global business networks where companies work and interact with partners and stakeholders to enhance strengths and exploit opportunities. In this context, competitive outsourcing emerges as a new configuration of strategic alliance based on the network structure aimed at gaining shared advantages.
Transforming Buyer-Supplier Relations risk of market failure, and the availability of technologies which permit enhanced task and communication integration between constituent parts of industrial organization (Castells, 1988; Dunning, 1986). In tum, it is argued that these trends relate to the development of cooperative, non-market, relations, characterized by the global diffusion of dynamic networks and industry synergy (Amin and Robbins, 1990). An illustration of this is strategic alliances between large corporations, based on the principle of mutual complementarity between specialists, relations characterized by collaborative marketing and distribution, shared R&D, and co-production (Cooke, 1988; Gordon, 1988). As Amin and Robbins (1990) note, these organizational innovations indicate a significant deepening of oligopolistic behaviour and control, illustrative of more effective corporate integration across vertical, horizontal, and territorial boundaries (1990, p. 12). In this sense, the emergence of new interfirm relationships is partly linked to a 'network' logic dictated by the need to reduce market uncertainty, to control development trajectories, and to share information, communication systems and related production costs. However, this is not to suggest that the increasing fragmentation of productive systems is the same as a fragmentation of capital and control. As Harrison (1989) notes, the development of new interfirm relationships corresponds to the revitalization of the centralization and concentration of capital. In this way, the tendency is not indicative of cartel formation, but rather a redefinition of competitive market relations (that is, towards heightened forms of competitive pressures). As Amin and Robbins (1990) conclude, these have been elevated to the level of rivalries between global galaxies of firms, or what Gordon (1988) terms 'transnational alliance formations'. In particular, these trends are underpinned by corporations slimming down for reasons of cost and competitiveness, with vertical disintegration to satellite and subcontract firms (Shutt and Whittington, 1984; Scott, 1988). This takes a number of forms, including the contraction of core activities, from the manufacture of parts and sub-assemblies to maintenance and cleaning and, in some instances, the putting-out of design a'i well as research and development. As Amin and Robbins (1990) note, these processes of externalization are more complex than a simple choice between 'make' or 'buy', in so far that the development of new interfirm relations involves a distinct quasi-market or quasi-integration formation, characterized by close collaboration and long-term contractual practices. This is particularly the case with the development of new supplier networks by buyer companies, with a turnaround in past practices based on archaic methods of production control, poor quality and development, and Buyer-Supplier Relations and Changes in Industrial Organization 3 * Gross fixed investment excluding leased assets at 1988 prices.
International journal of multidisciplinary and current research, 2016
Outsourcing has become very sophisticated and technology intensive. This is attributed to the demand for enhanced productivity and the maintenance of standards. It cannot be emphasised enough that skilled personnel is a key requirement when conducting outsourcing. This article investigates The Dynamics and Complexity of Outsourcing through the use of secondary method of data collection. The key findings suggest that the increase in outsourcing of core and non-core activities creates business opportunities. The successful management of outsourcing relationships, the adoption of Total Quality Management (TQM) and the skillful compilation of outsourcing contracts are considered to be of paramount importance in attaining successful outsourcing outcomes. Outsourcing creates jobs with minimal remuneration for vendor companies to attain higher profits and job loss of permanent personnel which is a complex issue to address. Union leaders globally have viewed outsourcing as unfavourable for their members. The challenge however lies in identifying suitable formulae to compensate retrenched workers and the compilation of favourable remuneration packages for outsourcing personnel. In conclusion, supply chains open markets globally allowing free trade to take place which consequently results in increased economic growth and development.
Journal of International Management, 2005
The bNetworked EconomyQ describes alliances of firms that manage globally distributed supply networks. In the best of all worlds, this interactive flow of information among member firms will result in efficient and effective balance of supply and demand. Unfortunately, supply networks suffer from poor and inexact information, and, in the worst case, information is unavailable where and when it is needed. Such entropy creates errors and limits responsiveness of processes leading to situations where there is too much or too little inventory at a given stage in a supply network. These complications are exacerbated across transnational supply chain networks. This paper offers theoretical perspectives, a case study, and outline of a research proposal to help address these challenges and develop insights into the best practices of transnational digital supply networks. High level questions include: What are the defining characteristics of high performing digital supply networks? How does information sharing impact the error and responsiveness of supply network processes and, consequently, supply network performance? How do international outsourcing practices affect network outcomes? These questions are theoretically examined and used to formulate specific hypotheses. An initial investigation of this theoretical formulation is conducted using a case study approach of a global plastics supply network.