Review Symposium
Global Gender Inequality and the
Empowerment of Women
A Discussion of Half the Sky: Turning
Oppression into Opportunity for Women
Worldwide
Half the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity for Women Worldwide. By Nicholas D. Kristof and Sheryl
WuDunn. New York: Knopf, 2009. 320p. $27.95
Half the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity forWomenWorldwide is a powerful journalistic account of the oppression of women
worldwide, and of the ways that some women and men have struggle against this oppression and discovered new forms of economic
empowerment. The book—in its eleventh printing in less than a year, and with testimonials from the likes of Angelina Jolie and
George Clooney—is also a publishing sensation. Half the Sky brings much attention to an important and timely topic, and it creatively combines narrative, analysis, and policy prescriptions, and so we invited three prominent scholars of gender inequality and
development to reflect on the book’s strengths and weaknesses: Ayelet Shachar, Uma Narayan, and Valentine M. Moghadam.
Ayelet Shachar
doi:10.1017/S153759270999291X
alf the Sky is a powerful and unsettling book. It is
unsettling for at least three reasons. First, the book
documents through individualized stories some of
the most gruesome human rights abuses that girls and
women still face worldwide: gang rape, forced prostitution, sex trafficking, to mention but a few examples. Anyone who believes that feminism is passé, with little left to
offer by way of making the world a more egalitarian and
just place, might wish to reconsider their position in light
of the evidence of gender-based violence presented in this
book.
Second, the style of argumentation involves a mixture
of outstanding journalist reportage with a moral call for
action: “We hope to recruit you to join an incipient movement to emancipate women and fight global poverty by
unlocking women’s power as economic catalysts” (p. xxii).
This mission of recruitment is pursued by a twofold
method: bearing witness to the dark side of humankind’s
treatment of women, including almost graphic descriptions of sexualized violence and maternal childbirth injuries; and more uplifting quasi-epic narratives, which testify
to women’s survival, perseverance, and civil action—
H
Ayelet Shachar is Professor of Law and Political Science at
the University of Toronto, where she holds the Canada
Research Chair in Citizenship and Multiculturalism.
overcoming their pain and suffering, helping themselves
and others, turning horror and despair into redemptive
and empowering experiences. This particular stylistic choice
by the authors leads them to represent women in binary
terms: victims turned heroes; young girls rescued from the
hell of sexualized objectification in cheap brothels only to
find hostage in the secure, but no less gendered, life of
traditional marriages. The narrative continues with stories
of unprotected intercourse leading girls as young as fourteen or fifteen to a living-dead pariah existence, suffering
from severe injuries and complications during childbirth.
The lethal combination of women as sexualized objects
contrasted with maternal injury and suffering relies on a
familiar iconography—the whore and saint, virgin and
mother. These archetypes are plentiful in the book.
Third, the authors are upfront about their aspiration to
turn this book into a social manifesto for a “new emancipation movement to empower women and girls around
the world” (p. 244). To that end, they wish to enlist you,
the reader, as an effective supporter who will not only
donate money but also volunteer on the front lines. This
focus on individualized, bottom-up social action, as
opposed to large-scale “treetop” governmental reform
projects, is most evident in the book’s closing chapter.
Here, a concluding subsection directly preaches “Four Steps
You Can Take in the Next Ten Minutes” (pp. 251–52).
This particular method of recruitment can best be described
as feminist-evangelical—oxymoron notwithstanding—
offering the movement’s participants a stake in “a story of
transformation. It is change that is already taking place,
March 2010 | Vol. 8/No. 1 279
Review Symposium
|
Global Gender Inequality and the Empowerment of Women
and change that can accelerate if you’ll just open your
heart and join in” (p. xxii). This blend of conviction and
advocacy also helps explain the authors’ urgent appeal to
overcome the “God Gulf” that plays out particularly harshly
in debates about American foreign policy as they relate to
population and family planning (pp. 131–45). This strange
mixture of unflagging zeal and progressive pragmatism
also informs the authors’ call to establish cooperation across
the “bickering lines” of left- and right-wing politics, different branches of feminism, and secular and religious
activists, in “combating what everyone believes is abhorrent” (p. 26, emphasis in original).
The book is most powerful when its first-rate journalism speaks truth to power and promotes unorthodox solutions to difficult problems. The weaker sections are found
when authors move beyond documentation and venture
into the world of explanatory factors and causal relationships. Especially for those accustomed to the nuance of
academic debate, the questions posed in some of the chapters (e.g., “Is Islam Misogynistic?”) and the answers offered
(“no, but . . .”) appear both overloaded and oversimplified, as well as implicitly steeped in a “west and the rest”
dichotomy. For example, consider even the following pragmatic assessment: if modern Muslim nations wish to enjoy
the fruits of economic development, greater freedoms must
eventually be afforded to women. This bears a subtext that
is no less revealing than the stated conclusion. As Kristof
and WuDunn explain, “[t]his [the status and role of
women] is the greatest handicap of Muslim Middle Eastern societies today, the flaw that bars them from modernity” (p. 160).
It is here that we encounter a crude set of either/or
choices: equality versus culture, tradition versus modernity. These are important—and admittedly complex—
topics that have rightly been given much academic and
public attention in recent years. But in this book, the
presumed incompatibility of culture and gender is mostly
taken as a given rather than viewed as a relationship in
need of critical exploration and evaluation. This stance is
indicative of what I above describe as the book’s feministevangelical conviction. It is perhaps most explicitly stated
in the context of a discussion of China’s emergence as “a
model on gender issues for developing countries: It evolved
from repressing women to emancipating them, underscoring that cultural barriers can be overcome relatively swiftly
where is the political will to do so” (p. 206). Here, the
authors assert, “If we believe firmly in certain values, such
as the equality of all human beings regardless of color and
gender, then we should not be afraid to stand up for them:
it would be feckless to defer to slavery, torture, footbinding, honor killing, or genital cutting just because we
believe in respecting other faiths and cultures” (p. 207).
Powerful words, but are they fully convincing? Perhaps, if
we take extreme examples like these and further assume
that culture and religion only breed repression and injus280 Perspectives on Politics
tice. But that is a partial picture at best, even for women;
for religion can also serve as a basis for resistance, a path
for empowerment, a tool for justifying political action
against the status quo, precisely the things that the evangelical side of Kristof and WuDunn’s branch of feminism
seeks to accomplish. So in the spirit of overcoming the
God Gulf, the book, or a supplement to it, would be more
complete if the same commitment to objective and inquisitive reportage that informs the bulk of the book were also
applied to exploring whether, and under what conditions,
women have found strength and power to change their
world through reforming religion from within—rather than
in opposition to it. In fact, a careful reading of some of the
more moving stories in the book reveals that this process
of change is already more prevalent on the ground than
what is described at the rhetorical level by the authors.
Beyond its shock-and-awe effect, the book’s most intriguing and innovative sections involve a discussion of possible “out of the box” solutions to empower women through
bottom-up grassroots activism that have proved fruitful
where other efforts have failed. Here, the authors astutely
utilize an array of real-life examples: the establishment of
a flourishing local school by a gang-rape survivor in Pakistan; a successful UN official with a high-flying international career, who returned to Somaliland, building—
against all odds—a maternity hospital that delivers quality
maternal care and trains a loyal staff of care providers; the
local development of empowerment programs written with
the input of villagers to demonstrate that collective action
and democratic deliberation can make a real difference,
leading the participants themselves to find new ways to
change long-established marriage traditions that once
imposed penalizing gender-based harms on young women.
The book praises these grassroots efforts just as fiercely as
it articulates a disdain for top-down aid programs that
aim to do good but end up being wasteful, culturally insensitive, and unable to reach far enough into the countryside where they are needed most. Criticizing the spending
of precious money on large international conferences and
fleets of SUVs for foreign-aid workers, the authors convincingly plead in favor of local efforts that generate communal support. The book also promotes the theme of
self-aid through extensive discussion of microcredit loan
programs and social entrepreneurialism. This is fully in
line with the book’s general emphasis on individualized
salvation and bottom-up remedy, the same spirit of
feminist-evangelism that saves one soul at a time.
This focus on grassroots efforts is part of a larger motto
that runs throughout the book, which can easily be summarized as the preference for “changing reality, not changing laws” (p. 32). This approach certainly has its charms,
prime among which is the possibility of motivating individuals to make their own contributions (volunteering time,
donating money, and so on). But turning the campaign of
achieving justice and dignity to every woman, everywhere
on the face of the earth, into primarily a “grassroots war”
also risks mammoth shortfalls. Surely some degree of
governmental, international, and transnational cooperation is required. Furthermore, actual policies, laws, and
budgets need to be defined and resources allocated in order
to ensure women are granted their due share, namely “half
the sky.”
The authors clearly understand this point. Indeed, the
pragmatic side of their analysis is adroit. For instance,
early in the book, they offer what amounts to an economic pricing-theory logic: if we want to see a drop in
sex trafficking, make it more costly through measures
such as heavier regulatory controls and law-and-orderstyle enforcement. Similarly, the book’s final chapter spells
out specific initiatives for the new movement to press,
initially in the United States and, ultimately, throughout
the world. These initiatives include a $10 billion effort
over five years to educate girls around the world and
reduce the gender gap in education, a global drive to
iodize salt in poor countries (a measure designed to prevent impaired brain development in fetuses when the
mother’s body lacks enough iodine during pregnancy),
and a $1.6 billion project to eradicate obstetric fistula as
a first step toward addressing the larger problem of maternal mortality (the latter takes a staggering toll of one life
a minute) (pp. 246–249). But these goals require more
than just individualized, bottom-up action. To fulfill them,
the power of states, multilateral organizations, and international (governmental and non-governmental) players
must be recruited as well.
The best evidence for the significance of legal and institutional factors is found in the book itself: during World
War I, more American women died in childbirth than
American men died in war (p. 116). This pattern of maternal mortality changed, and radically so, once women gained
the right to vote. With their newly acquired political voice,
“their lives also became a higher priority” (p. 198); patterns of legislation shifted accordingly, leading to a sharp
rise in public health spending that in turn rapidly reduced
maternal mortality rates in America. This is a political
story that involves coordinated policy and implementation decisions that go well beyond the self-aid approach.
Similarly, the authors are right to point out that we can
anticipate improved conditions and opportunities for
women once societies make the calculated decision that
their lives are “worth” investing in—through a more just
distribution of food, shelter, education, access to employment, healthcare, legal protection, and so on. And that
decision is easier to make today, more so than ever before,
because “[t]he economic advantages of empowering women
are so vast as to persuade nations to move in this direction” (p. 250). This is the happy end toward which the
book steers. Whether this is achieved through individual
action, political pressure, or sheer economic calculation
ultimately becomes secondary. The authors’ primary goal
is to elicit support for a major social transformation that,
in their black-and-white vernacular, “is turning women
from beasts of burden and sexual playthings into fullfledged human beings” (p. 250).
Although I have expressed reservations about the choices
made by the authors in their representation of women
(namely, the focus on documenting the brutality and vulnerability they still face while ignoring almost all other
aspects of women’s lives, the pervasive binary images that
the book unwittingly reproduces, and the amalgamated
feminist-evangelical position), Half the Sky successfully discharges its core mission. It persuades that now is the time
to register the struggle for gender equality in the developing world as a major moral challenge of the twenty-first
century. Precisely because of the unforgiving accumulation of widespread injustice and suffering the book evidences, Half the Sky unsettles to the point of making
indifference evaporate. And that’s a significant achievement worth celebrating. And there is no better place to
begin than flipping back to the page describing those “four
steps you can take in the next ten minutes.”
March 2010 | Vol. 8/No. 1 281