ENGLISH EDUCATION
English Journal for Teaching and Learning
Vol. 09 No. 01June 2021 pages 77 – 86
http://jurnal.iainpadangsidimpuan.ac.id/index.php/EEJ
Students’ Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text
Walidah Sofyan Siregar1, Eka Sustri Harida,2
Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Padangsidimpuan1,2
e-mail: *1walidahsofyan98@gmail.com, 2esha_stainpasid@yahoo.com
Abstract This research is discussing about the students‟ reading comprehension of the
second year MTs.Muhammadiyah 22 Padangsidimpuan. This research employed
descriptive quantitative research. Based on the result of the research, researcher
got the description of the data was found that mean score was 56.76. It means
that the students‟ reading comprehension of the second year
MTs.Muhammadiyah 22 Padangsidimpuan was categorized into enough ability.
Then, from the result of the hypothesis testing, the researcher found that Zcount =3.57<Ztable 0.3264. It means the hypothesis was rejected. Thus, the result of mean
scores the students‟ ability in enough ability and actually it should be accepted
hypothesis, but based on the result of that score it is rejected. So, maybe there is a
mistake in instrument or in calculation.
Keywords: Reading Comprehension; DescriptiveText; Students‟ Ability; Generic
Structures; Language Features.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini membahas tentang pemahaman membaca siswa tahun ke-2
MTs.Muhammadiyah 22 Padangsidimpuan. Penelitian ini dikerjakan
menggunakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian,
peneliti memperoleh nilai rata-rata 56.76. Dari hasil tersebut dapat disimpulkan
bahwa pemahaman membaca siswa tahun ke-2 MTs.Muhammadiyah 22
Padangsidimpuan dikategorikan ke dalam kategori cukup. Kemudian, dari hasil
tes hipotesis, peneliti memperoleh Zcount =-3.57<Ztable 0.3264. Dari hasil tersebut
dapat disimpulkan bahwa hipotesis ditolak. Dengan demikian, hasil dari nilai
rata-rata kemampuan siswa dikategori cukup dan itu seharusnya hipotesis
diterima, tapi berdasarkan dari hasil tes hipotesis ditolak. Jadi, mungkin ada
kesalahan dalam instrument perhitangan.
Kata Kunci: Pemahaman Membaca, Teks Deskriptif; Kemampuan Siswa; Struktur
Teks; Ciri Bahasa.
E-ISSN :2579-4043
Corresponding Author
P-ISSN: 2338-8781
Students’ Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text
INTRODUCTION
Reading is one of skills that very important in teaching and learning English. It is one
of skills that students should learn and care of. Reading is more beneficial to them during
their study because it enables them to acquire many things about the knowledge of language
and to understand different subject areas.
Reading is the way to get information from something that was written, to obtain
information and to improve the science and knowledge. By reading, it will be easier for
students to interpret language, and make students able to find every message of the text.
Then, “reading is bringing meaning to and getting meaning from printed or written
material”(Nurhamidah, et. al., 2018). So, reading is a process to understand a text because
there is a transaction between the text and the reader.
The reason of the students‟ reading in the classroom is to get the information.
According to Beatrice and Jeffries (1996), that reading is an important way to improve
language skill, help the students to learn to think in English, can enlarge English vocabulary,
can improve students‟ writing, and is a good way to find out about new ideas, facts, and
experiences. It means that reading is very important to improve students‟ language skill in
English. Through reading, the students are able to read English text effectively and
efficiently.
In addition, reading can improve the science or knowledge and also give pleasure. It is
undeniably that reading is necessary for everybody in variety of purpose and needs.
Reading is not just saying the words but reading also the process of getting meaning from
the text. According to Whorter (1992) “reading is a complex process; it involves much more
than adding word meanings together. Reading involves not only understanding ideas, but
also recognizing the relationship and structures among ideas”. t means that reading is not
only saying the word but also understanding the meaning, recognizing the relationship and
structures of ideas.
Also, reading is an activity of getting meaning from the text. Besides, the readers must
be able to combine their own background knowledge and information from the text build
meaning and readers also must understand ideas, recognize the relationship and structures
of ideas. Because the goal of reading is comprehension, so the readers must be able to
remember and understand about the text.
Reading involves two skills, receptive and active skill. First, receptive skil refers to the
fact that readers have to infer meaning, using their knowledge. Receptive means that the
reader receivers input from a writer. The readers rarely have opportunity to question the
Walidah & Eka/ EEJ/ Vol.09 No.01 June 2021
Page 78
Students’ Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text
author about what he/she really had in mind when writing a text. Second, reading as active
skill, which a reader finds a reading pessage interesting. His/her mind is fully engaged in
trying to understand the reading material.
From both of the reading skill, it is needed to be able to comprehend in understanding
the text. To comprehend, the reader must have a wide range of capacities and abilities. The
students also must be able to read and catch some paragraph message or information from
the text. One of the way to measure the students‟ comprehension from the text is by asking
them some question about the paragraph from the text given. If the students can answer the
question well, it can conclude that they can catch the message from the text. If the students
can‟t answer the question , it can conclude that they can‟t catch the message from the text.
Ability is a quality or state being able, power to perform, whatever to perform,
whatever physical moral intellectual, conventional or legal capacity, skill or competence in
doing, sufficiency of strength, skill, resource. Ability is a natural tendency to do something
successful or well. The ability is a quality or being able, especially in physical, mental or
legal power to perform. The ability means the quality or capacity of being able to do
something well. As said by Hornby (2000), the definition of ability such as, “ability is: 1)
Capacity or power to do something physical and mental, 2) Cleverness, intelligence, 3)
Special natural power to do something well that talent. Based on explanation above, the
ability is a quality that makes the students be able to do something, easy to understand what
they do, and have intelligence well.
Reading comprehension is a good way to develop and understand English. In reading
comprehension, the students are not only understanding ideas, but also recognizing the
relationships and structures among ideas. So, the students get the information and message
from the written text that they have read. In reading comprehension, the students should
have the particular purpose of their mind before they interact with the text. The students
should have attention, memory, and motivation in reading text. So, the teacher should help
them not only to read the text but also help them how to find the meaning or the content of
text (Siregar 2018). It means the students need to learn and have the background knowledge
about the text that they will read.
According to Manser in oxford learner‟s pocket dictionary (2008), comprehension is
ability to understand. It is the ability to understand a language to get a message and
information from the text. Then, reading comprehension is the process of constructing
meaning from the text. Reading comprehension is a skill that can balance and coordinate
many abilities that seem easy and enjoyable to fluent readers (Grabe and Stoller, 2002).
Walidah & Eka/ EEJ/ Vol.09 No.01 June 2021
Page 79
Students’ Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text
When writer‟s messages are successfully understood, reading can be a wonderfully
inspiring, enjoyable and transforming experience. It means that reading comprehension is
the process of getting the meaning from the text and it is enjoyable activities for fluent
readers and for transforming experience if the writer messages are successfully understood.
Moreover, according to Snow (2002), reading comprehension is the process of
extracting and constructing meaning involving the written language. It means that the
readers construct meaning from a text being read connected to the background knowledge
that they have. From the explanation above, it‟s concluded that reading comprehension is
interaction of thought and analysis for understanding information presented in written
form, transforming experience and it is enjoyable for fluent readers. Furthermore, reading
comprehension is conceptualized as an interactive process requiring the dynamic
combination or readers‟ background knowledge with the information decoded from text.
Descriptive text is a text that gives information about particular person place, or thing.
Gerot states that “descriptive text is a kind of text with a purpose to give
information”(Wardani, et. al., 2014) & (Siregar and Dongoran 2020). The context of this kind
of text is description of thing, animal, person and others. Mukarto et. al. as citied in Etfita
(2014) states that a descriptive text is used to describe something, someone, or place. In other
word, descriptive text is the text with function to describe particular person, things or place
with the aim to give information to the reader. Descriptive text is a kind of text that can
occur as „stand alone‟ text. It is often part of a longer text, such as the description of a
character or setting in a story or biography (Adam, 2017). It means that descriptive text is to
describe the character or setting from the text.
So, the researcher concludes that descriptive text is a kind of text in genre that gives
description about things. Descriptive text describes much information about an object,
where the information is about the parts, qualities, characteristics of object, or setting that is
described. Descriptive text consists of generic structures that can be elaborated as follows: 1)
Identification means that to identify the phenomenon that to be describe from text, 2)
Description describes parts, activities and characteristic of thing, person, animal and place
(Etfita, 2014).
Based on explanation above the generic structures of descriptive text are identification
and description person, thing, animal and place. There are three language features of
descriptive text they are: 1) Using simple present tense, 2) Using attributive and identifying
process, 3) Using adjective and classifiers in nominal group (Kartawijaya, 2017). The
researcher can conclude that the language features of descriptive text are using simple
Walidah & Eka/ EEJ/ Vol.09 No.01 June 2021
Page 80
Students’ Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text
present tense, using adjective, certain noun, thinking verb, action verb, and figurative
language.
Today, almost all students only read but did not comprehend the content of the text.
Based on interview between researcher and the students in MTs.Muhammadiyah 22
Padangsidimpuan, it was known that there are some problems that made students‟ reading
comprehension was not perfect. There were 60% students can not reading well when
students were asked to do reading activity.
The First, the students were seldom to do reading activity in the school moreover in
the house and made them still confused to determine the main idea from the text. Whereas,
to make students comprehend in reading, the students should have many times to do
reading activity. When the students tried to catch the content of the text in learning process,
the students were difficult to do it. It caused the students were seldom to do reading
activity.
The Second, they were seldom to repeat the material at home. It is not meaningful if
the students not repeat it anymore. So, the students still have low ability in reading
comprehension and everything that had been learned by them will be lose and not develop.
Based on the problems above, the researcher was interestedon how the reading
comprehension of students when reading descriptive text. So, the researcher decided to
analyze the students‟ reading comprehension in Descriptive Text.
METHOD
The researcher used the quantitative research with descriptive method. This researcher
observed one variable. Descriptive method is determiners and describes the way things are.
The researcher used multiple choice test to take the data that consist of 20 items. The
researcher analyzed the data with mean score. The population is the whole the students at
grade VIII of MTs. Muhammadiyah 22 Padangsidimpuan. The researcher use total sampling
to take the sample that was 30 students. The researcher used themultiple choice test as the
instrument in collecting the data.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The researcher collected the data and gave the test about reading comprehension in
descriptive text. The researcher gave a test to the students, then collected the students‟
answer sheet and the last researcher checked the students‟ answer sheet and gave the score.
The researcher used the formulation of Z-test to test the.
Walidah & Eka/ EEJ/ Vol.09 No.01 June 2021
Page 81
Students’ Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text
The total scores of the second year MTs.Muhammadiyah 22 Padangsidimpuan in
reading comprehension test was 1703. It can also see that there were three students got 95 as
the highest score, two students got 90, one student got 85, one student got 80, four students
got 75, one student got 70, one student got 65, two students got 50, six students got 40, five
students got 35, two students got 30, one student got 25, and one student got 20 score as the
lowest score.
To know the quality score each of the students in reading comprehension can be seen
as below:
Table 1
Quality Score of The Students’ Reading Comprehension Test
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Students’ Initial name
AGM
AFH
AV
AG
AR
DMH
FHSD
FPRS
FMH
KF
LAR
LN
MFP
MHAH
MIR
MYP
NFD
NFL
NVAH
NZ
RA
ROB
SSS
SRS
SKH
UHH
URMH
WMH
YA
YAL
Total
Walidah & Eka/ EEJ/ Vol.09 No.01 June 2021
Total score
40
90
40
35
35
80
95
40
50
40
35
95
50
75
75
40
25
85
70
75
30
65
40
35
90
75
20
35
95
30
1703
Quality score
Low
Very High
Low
Low
Low
High
Very High
Low
Enough
Low
Low
Very High
Enough
High
High
Low
Low
Very High
High
High
Low
High
Low
Low
Very High
High
Very Low
Low
Very High
Low
Page 82
Students’ Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text
Based on table 1, the quality of the students‟ scores in reading descriptive text were
different. There were 1 student or 3.33% who has very low score, 14 students or 46.67% who
have low score, 2 students or 6.67% who have enough, 7 students or 23.33% who have high
score, and 6 students or 20% who have very high quality of score. It means that the ability at
grade VIII students MTs.Muhammadiyah 22 Padangsidimpuan of the second year in
reading descriptive text test was various.
The test score become the data that were needed for testing hypothesis is the data are
tabulated as follow:
Table 2
Resume of Score in Reading Comprehension Test
No
1
2
3
4
5
Statistic
High score
Low score
Mean score
Median
Mode
Variable
95
20
56.76
19.5
38.18
From table above, it was known that the high score for variable in reading descriptive
text test had been searched from 30 students, and based on the total of sample research the
highest score is 95 and low score is 20, mean score 56.76, median is 19.5 and mode is 38.18.
Based on the calculation mean score were 56.76. So, application of reading
comprehension was enough. To know revelation of data done to group the variable scores in
reading descriptive text which interval 13.
Table 3
Frequency Distribution in Reading Comprehension Test
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
Interval Class
Frequency Absolute
20 – 32
33 – 45
46 – 58
59 – 71
72 – 84
85 – 97
i = 13
4
11
2
2
5
6
30
Walidah & Eka/ EEJ/ Vol.09 No.01 June 2021
Frequency
Relative
13%
37%
6.75%
6.75 %
16.5%
20%
100 %
Page 83
Students’ Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text
Frequency
Based on table 3, it can be drawn at histogram as below:
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
20-32 33-45 46-58 59-71 72-84 85-97
Interval Class
Figure 1: Histogram of Students’ Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text
Based on table 3, it was known that the variable revelation of students‟ reading
comprehension in descriptive text shown that the respondent at 20 – 32 were 4 students
(13%), interval 33 – 45 were 11 students (37%), interval 46 – 58 were 2 students (6.75%),
interval 59 – 71 were 2 student (6.75%), interval 72 – 84 were 5 students (16.5%), interval 85 –
97 were 6 students (20%). So, the meaning of interval in this research is showing the count of
sample that got score in percentage.
The researcher found that the students‟ reading comprehension in descriptive text is
enough ability. It can be seen from the value of mean score was 56.76 . The researcher found
that the the result of Z score is lower than Z table. It can be proved fromZcount=3.57<Ztable=0.3264
The researcher discussed the result of this research and compared with related
findings. The first is Poso Harahap. He concluded that in comprehending a text were
enough categories (Harahap, 2015). The second is Sari. She concluded the students were
good in comprehending English text for literal and creative level, but they are low in
comprehending English text for interpretive and critical level (Sari, 2017). The third is
Sekarni. She concluded that the perception of students about Narrative text, which 13.3% is
easy, 86.7% is difficult (Sekarni,2017). The fourth is Nona Tari Pulungan. She concluded that
students‟ reading comprehension can be categorized into enough categories (Pulungan,
2018). The fifth is Kartawijaya. He concluded that the students‟ ability in comprehending
descriptive text was low (Kartawijaya, 2017). The last is Eka Sustri Harida. She conluded
that students‟ reading comprehension are still low (Harida, 2014).
From the result of the research that is previously stated. It was proved that the ability
of students‟ reading comprehension was enough ability. In summary, the researcher found
all the related findings support this research.
Walidah & Eka/ EEJ/ Vol.09 No.01 June 2021
Page 84
Students’ Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text
CONCLUSION
Based on the result of the research and calculations of the data, the researcher got the
conclusion that students‟ ability in reading comprehension in descriptive textat grade VIII of
MTs. Muhammadiyah 22 Padangsidimpuan was categorized into enough ability. It can be
seen from the value of the precentage from mean score gotten by students, that is 56.76
mean score. Then, the hypothesis is “students‟ reading comprehension in descriptive text at
grade VIII MTs. Muhammadiyah 22 Padangsidimpuan is enough ability”. Then from the
result of the hypothesis testing, the researcher found that the hypothesis is rejected. It can be
proved fromZcount=- 3.57<Ztable=0.3264.Thus, the result of mean score the students‟ ability in
enough ability and actually it should be accepted hypothesis, but based on the result of that
score it is rejected. So, maybe there is a mistake in instrument or in calculation.
REFERENCES
Adam. 2017. “Improving Students ‟ Reading Comprehension of Descriptive Texts through
Cognitive Strategy at Grade VII-2 of SMPN I Indra Praja Tembilahan.” Anglo-Saxon 8
(2): 166–77. https://doi.org/P-ISSN 2301-5292; E-ISSN 2598-9995.
Etfita, Fauzul. 2014. “Improving Students‟ Reading Comprehension of Descriptive Texts
Through Cognitive Strategy at Grade VII-2 of SMPN 1 Indra Praja Tembilahan.” Lingua
Dadikta 7 (2): 75–86. https://doi.org/P-ISSN 1979-0457; E-ISSN 2541-0075.
Harahap, Poso. 2015. “The Analysis On Students‟ Reading Comprehension at Grade IX SMP
N 2 Satu Atap Batang Onang.” IAIN Padangsidimpuan.
Harida, Eka Sustri. 2014. “Students‟ Ability and Difficulties in Understanding English Text
(A Study at English Program IAIN Padangsidimpuan).” Al-Ta’lim Journal 21 (3).
Kartawijaya, Sukarta. 2017. “Analysis of The Students‟ Reading Comprehension in
Comprehending Descriptive Text.” Jurnal Curricula 2 (3): 80–87.
L, william Grabe and Stoller. 2002. “Teaching and Researching Reading” 14 (2): 3.
Nurhamidah, Siti, Syahid Muammar Pulungan, and Eka Sustri Harida. 2018. “The Analysis
of Teachers‟ Strategy in Teaching Reading Comprehension at SMAN 2 Padangbolak at
State Institu for Islamic Studies.” Tazkir 04 (2): 299–312.
Pulungan, Nona Tari. 2018. “An Analysis of Students‟ Reading Comprehension in
Explanation Text at Grade XI SMA Negeri 3 Padangsidimpuan.” IAIN
Padangsidimpuan.
Sari, Dian Permata. 2017. “An Analysis of Students‟ Reading Comprehension Based on The
Four Levels Comprehension Skills (A Study at The Second Year Students of SMA N 10
Bengkulu Academic Year 2014/2015).” Jurnal IAIN Bengkulu.
Walidah & Eka/ EEJ/ Vol.09 No.01 June 2021
Page 85
Students’ Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text
Sekarni, Anindya. 2017. “An Analysis of Students‟ Reading Comprehension Constraints.”
Jurnal Unila.
Siregar, Sri Rahmadhani. 2018. “The Effect of Venn Diagram Strategy to Students‟ Reading
Comprehension Ability at Eight Grade of SMP Swasta Nurul Ilmi Padangsidimpuan.”
English Education: English Journal for Teaching and Learning 06 (1): 39–51.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&cluster=6908265404613858988&btnI=1&h
l=id.
Siregar, Sri Rahmadhani, and Nursahara Dongoran. 2020. “Students ‟ Ability in Writing
Descriptive Text.” English Education: English Journal for Teaching and Learning 08 (01): 88–
90.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&cluster=17461154325444838052&btnI=1&
hl=id.
Snow, C. E. 2002. Reading for Understanding :: Toward an R & D Program in Reading
Comprehension. Edited by Barbara Angell Caslon. Hardvard University: Rand
Education, 2002. http://www.rand.org.
Wardani, Imelda, Hasan Basri, and Abdul Waris. 2014. “Improving The Ability in Writing
Descriptive Text Through Guided-Questions Technique.” E-Journal of English Language
Teachng Society 9ELTS) 2 (1): 1–13.
Wardani, I., Basri, H., and Waris, A. 2014. “Improving The Ability in Writing Descriptive
Text Through Guided-Questions Technique.” E-Journal of English Language Teachng
Society 9ELTS) 2, no. 1 (2014): 1–13. http://jurnal.untad.ac.id
Whorter, K. T. Mc., 1992. Efficient Flexible Reading, Third Edition, United State of America:
Harper Collins.
Walidah & Eka/ EEJ/ Vol.09 No.01 June 2021
Page 86