Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2005, Religious Studies Review
…
4 pages
1 file
Palgrave Communications
This paper reads the future of the Philosophy of Religion via a critical engagement with the thought of Paul Tillich and diversions into other thinkers to support the main thrust of the argument. It takes as a starting point Tillich's discussion of the relationship between religion and culture in On the Boundary (1967), in particular his statement "As religion is the substance of culture, culture is the form of religion" (69-70). With (unlikely) diversions via TS Eliot and Karl Barth, the argument is developed through a re-reading of Tillich's work on a theology of culture and in particular the statement from Systematic Theology III (1964b) that "…religion cannot express itself even in a meaningful silence without culture, from which it takes all forms of meaningful expression. And we must restate that culture loses its depth and inexhaustibility without the ultimacy of the ultimate" (264). Central to the rethinking of this paper is then the reworking of Tillich's statement in On the Boundary that "My philosophy of religion …consciously remains on the boundary between theology and philosophy, taking care not to lose the one in the other. It attempts to express the experience of the abyss in philosophical concepts and the idea of justification as the limitation of philosophy" (52). While this can be seen as expressing the basis of continental philosophy and its creative tension between theology and philosophy, this paper inserts culture as the meeting point that holds theology and philosophy in tension and not opposition. That is, a theology of culture also engages with a philosophy of culture; just as a philosophy of religion must engage with a philosophy of culture; for it is culture that gives rise to both theology and philosophy, being the place where they both meet and distinguish themselves. The final part of this paper articulates a rethought Philosophy of Culture as the boundary space from which the future of the Philosophy of Religion can be thought, in creative tension with a Tillich-derived radical theology.
2011
Theology has always been done interculturally; how could it be otherwise? In its origins, Christianity was thoroughly Jewish and indigenous to Palestine, though very soon, impelled by the missionary vision of St Paul, it moved out into the Mediterranean world with Greek as its medium, and eventually it appropriatedindeed, became assimilated tothe terminology and concepts of Greek philosophy. Wherever it has taken root, Christian faith has been embodied in the languages and customs of a wide variety of cultures, while always remaining itself and exercising a critical function vis-à-vis what was alien to itself. No religion of transcendence, what Aloysius Pieris calls 'metacosmic' religion, can exist in a pure form, detached from the myriad ways in which human beings think, feel, speak and act; despite its claims to uniqueness and universality, such religion remains always and without exception in a kind of symbiosis with the 'cosmic' religion whose points of reference are the natural world and communities living in harmony with nature. 1 Transcendent religion exists in a constant tension between the languages and cultural idioms of its own origins, which always bear the marks of particular times and places, and the new cultural forms in which it is continually called to re-express itself. Theology, then, can only be done interculturally; it is a process of continual translation between humanly constructed cultural worlds. It is only relatively recently, however, that the full implications of this fact have been realised. While the cultural and linguistic osmosis that has given shape to Christian faith in ever new ways in a variety of contextsincluding those of Western Europe! 2can be documented again and again from mission history, another constant theme is that of 'meliorism', as it has been well called: 3 the assertion that Christian revelation is indubitably true, which entails its superiority over every conceivable form of religion. It is surely not accidental that this conviction of superiority went hand in hand with the civilisational achievements which made missionary expansion possible. A logical deduction from this was the imperative of conversion: only by accepting Christ and rejecting their Visioning Ecumenics 2 own beliefs and practices could people who were 'other' than Western or Eastern European Christians be saved. Now we have reached a situation of 'inter-culturation': 4 the process of encounter and mutual transformation has become at least two-way and is often many-sided. We Christiansto take us as the paradigmatic examplecan now see our faith cast in their linguistic, liturgical and legal forms, our theology transposed into their symbols and conceptsand some of us can welcome the resulting enrichment of our faith. Not only that: in principle, and increasingly in practice, Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims and also adherents of 'primal' or indigenous traditions such as those of Aboriginal Australia or the Pacific Islands are learning to recognise and accept the reappropriation of their religious and cultural heritages by Christians and others. Some Buddhist scholars are beginning to talk about Buddhist theology in the sense of a 'Buddhology' modelled on its Christian counterparts as critical reflection on the pluriformity of Buddhist traditions as they encounter one another 'ecumenically' in
Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology
Throughout his theological career Paul Tillich was fundamentally concerned with the question of the religious meaning of culture. The answers that he gave -initially in the revolutionary ferment of 1920s-1930s Germany and then again in the brave new world of post-World War II America -were profound and far-reaching in their importance for twentieth-century theology. This article will explore the development of Tillich's interpretations of the religious meaning of culture and apply his analyses to our contemporary religious and cultural situation by suggesting a trinitarian enlargement of Tillich's concept of theonomous metaphysics towards a multidimensional theology of culture.
Cultural Encounters, 2012
in what follows i will place "theology" and "culture" together around a set of core social relations, defining and configuring these relations within a trinitarian and incarnational theological framework drawn largely from the thought of scottish reformed theologian t. F. torrance. i will then suggest that this particular theological vision, and the configuration of social relationships it suggests, not only accounts for the emergence of human culture and cultural activity but is open to insights from work being done in other anthropological disciplines. 1 convergence between these other disciplines and the theological vision developed here will be demonstrated through brief considerations of the work of cultural anthropologist Ernest Becker and the sociologists christian smith and Peter Berger.
At one level, of course, a thesis is the unavoidable culmination of however many years one has spent in the pursuit of one's degree and evidence of one's familiarity with and dexiterity in the chosen field.
Estados Unidos y sistema mundial. ¿Declive de influencia global?, 2018
Sprawozdania Archeologiczne
مجلة مشكلات الحضارة . Volume 8, Numéro 2, Pages 70-78 , 2019
INRAE productions animales, 2024
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Mesin …, 2009
Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research, 2023
Progress In Electromagnetics Research, 2010
Minia Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research MJTHR
Многоязычие в образовательном пространстве, 2024
Value in Health, 2016