Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
8 pages
1 file
AI-generated Abstract
The paper discusses the framework of business law in Malaysia, focusing on the Federal and State Constitutions, federal law, and legal principles such as specific performance and delegated legislation. It illustrates the interaction between laws and practical scenarios in business operations, emphasizing the importance of understanding legal rights and protections for individuals and businesses alike. The conclusion underscores the necessity of legal knowledge to navigate societal challenges and safeguard against unethical behavior.
Current Law Journal , 2002
The jurisdiction of the syariah courts to hear matters involving wakaf is provided in List II to the 9th Schedule of the Federal Constitution ('FC') and the provisions in the respective states' enactment on the administration of Islamic affair enactments (hereinafter referred to as 'the said provisions'). Alas, this has otherwise been decided and negated by the civil court. Based on the case's decided, even though the jurisdiction to hear wakaf exclusively is under the jurisdiction of the syariah court, yet the civil court vehemently decided otherwise, viz, it is under their domain. This clearly negates the importance of article 121 (1A) of the FC. This paper intends to study the decided cases involving wakaf since the inclusion of sub clause 1A to article 121 of the FC, which has bestowed on the syariah courts, exclusive and unfettered jurisdiction and power to adjudicate and determine their own matters as provided the said provisions and to identify the real legal and jurisprudential issues, causes and stumbling blocks which had hitherto barred the syariah courts from having the freedom and ability to decide on wakaf and further to give suggestion and solution in the problem of conflict of jurisdiction of between these courts, civil and syariah, in matters pertaining to the same. It is hoped that through the illumination of this paper on wakaf and its conflict of jurisdiction between both courts in Malaysia, will give us some insights as to how issues on wakaf and its disputes were and are currently determined.
Eschewing theoretical discussion of both “secularism” and the “Islamic state,” this article instead examines situated understandings of these ideas as they emerge in contests about the place of religion in Malaysian law, politics and society, paying particular attention to the views of Malaysian legal professionals. It examines the official positions taken by the peak professional legal organisation (the Malaysian Bar Council) speaking on behalf of its professional constituents and to a wider constituency of Malaysia citizens in order to examine how the organised Bar has used its prestige and expertise to explain and clarify the legal aspects of these issues to the general public and how it has attempted to use its privileged status to foster informed discussion about law reform.
This article appears at Middle East Law and Governance 4 (2012) 356–385. This journal is not readily available in this part of the world, so I am uploading it here. The article is part of a special issue on Islamic law. Here is the Abstract: Malaysia has a classically plural society with a Malay/ Muslim majority and a legal system which, for historical reasons, is bifurcated between the common law and Islamic law. It also has a colonial-era federal constitution under which Islam is a state issue. Disputes concerning religion are both many and divisive. They are dealt with mainly in constitutional terms, especially in debates about the notion of an Islamic state, in light of Article 3 and the enshrinement of an official religion and in litigation. The latter is rendered complex by the separation of Islamic from common law jurisdiction in 1988, a fact that has given rise to highly sensitive and troubling litigation involving, especially, religious conversion in Lina Joy (2007). This article traces historical developments relating to religion and the law, and finds cause for some optimism that religious divides can be bridged by constitutional means, in light of recent judicial responses and evolving debates about the constitutional position of Islam.
The Major Trends of Islam in Contemporary Malaysia and their Influence on the Form of Islamic Family and Penal Law, 2012
The aim of this article is to present selected major trends in Islam in contemporary Malaysia – its political representation (the dominant political parties: UMNO, PAS and PKR) and intellectual non-governmental groups (especially the NGO Sisters of Islam). The paper defines their positions, their general ideas and, essentially, their attitudes concerning Islamic law and their influence on the development and application of Islamic family law and Islamic penal law. The article further describes the basic provisions and main problematic issues in Malaysian Islamic family law: marriage, polygamy conditions, kinds of divorce - talaq, khul‘, ta‘liq, li’an and fasakh, financial settlements during marriage and divorce, and custody. The article also provides information about the principal provisions of the Malaysian Islamic penal code. Islamic law has evolved into a real battlefield in relation to these groupings because it transfers theoretical intellectual work into its practical form and due to this it has a wide scale impact on the entire Muslim population of Malaysia. Currently, a specific form of Islamic penal law, especially its implementation, has become one of the key issues in Malaysian politics. The uncompromising enforcement of Islamic penal law constitutes a clear strategy by the opposition Islamic parties but simultaneously presents the main contradiction within the whole political opposition coalition.
Most Muslim-majority countries have legal systems that enshrine both Islam and liberal rights. While not necessarily at odds, these dual commitments nonetheless provide legal and symbolic resources for activists to advance contending visions for their states and societies. Using the case study of Malaysia, Constituting Religion examines how these legal arrangements enable litigation and feed the construction of a 'rights-versus-rites binary' in law, politics, and the popular imagination. By drawing on extensive primary source material and tracing controversial cases from the court of law to the court of public opinion, this study theorizes the 'judicialization of religion' and the radiating effects of courts on popular legal and religious consciousness. The book documents how legal institutions catalyze ideological struggles, which stand to redefine the nation and its politics. Probing the links between legal pluralism, social movements, secularism, and political Islamism, Constituting Religion sheds new light on the confluence of law, religion, politics, and society.
The best approach to the study of African customary law is to treat as a system. It is one of the existing customary laws in the world that has several contrasts with rules and principles of human rights law. It has more than eyes can meet in so far as legal values are concerned. The book is rich in legal insights and critical legal thinking. Its focus makes several critical analysis not only into the history of legal thinking in Africa but also attempting to question the negligence of the argument by modern legal minds. The book seeks to open a new window into the question of authenticity, validity, expediency and compatibility of the African customary law system with modern practice.
Malaysia ranks sixth out of 175 countries worldwide in the degree of state regulation of religion. The Malaysian state enforces myriad rules and regulations in the name of Islam and claims a monopoly on the interpretation of Islamic law. However, this should not be understood as the implementation of an ‘Islamic’ system of governance or the realization of an ‘Islamic state’. Rather, the Malaysian case provides a textbook example of how government efforts to monopolize Islamic law necessarily subvert core epistemological principles in the Islamic legal tradition. As such, Malaysia provides an important opportunity to rethink the relationship between the state, secularism and the politics of Islamic law.
This academic research intends to identify the issue of apostasy in Malaysia from legal perspective. The basics of Islam and the sources of Islamic Law is from the Quran, Hadiths, Sunnah and ulama. However, there are differences of opinion between the ulama or Islamic scholars on the punishment for apostasy. Some scholars categorize apostasy as a crime punishable under hudud while some scholars categorize it as a crime punishable under ta’zir. Malaysia deals with apostasy cases by referring to the available law in each state as Islamic matter is under the jurisdiction of the state as provided by the Federal Constitution. Landmark cases of apostasy are revisited to identify the issues or problems that had happened. Finally, this paper shall identify the preventive measures that could be taken and enlighten the reader on the procedures and administration of apostasy cases. Opinion from experts on the direction of Islamic Law especially on apostasy cases will also be presented in this writing.
Musical Bodies, Musical Minds: Enactive Cognitive Science and the Meaning of Human Musicality, 2022
International Sephardic Journal, 2005
Un enfoque multidimensional en la psicoterapia psicoanalítica, 2023
Generaciones en movimiento y movimientos generacionales. Escribanías he-chas a varias manos, varios pasos y co-razones. Colectivos, movimientos y comunidades en resistencias tejidos desde el camino del pensamiento auto-nómico Afrodiaspórico-Abya Yala-Urbano-popular y disidente en Latinoamérica. , 2019
Zoo Biology, 2009
Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia, 2019
Časopis pro pěstování matematiky, 1973
American Journal of Computing and Engineering, 2021
Revista Universidad de La Salle, 2019
South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 2014
Linguistic Inquiry, 1998
Agricultural Water Management, 2010
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 1996
ANAIS DO XXXI CONGRESSO NACIONAL DO CONPEDI BRASÍLIA -DF: BIODIREITO E DIREITOS DOS ANIMAIS, 2024
Climatic Change, 2010
Progressa: Journal of Islamic Religious Instruction, 2019