BRIEF COMMUNICATION
A Visit To The Office of Vivian Bucay, MD
D OW S TOUGH , MD
Clinical Assistant Professor of Dermatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Hot Springs, Arkansas
THE ATTENTION to style was evident upon entering
the well-lit, brightly colored waiting room. Modern
artwork adorned the walls in an elegant, but not overdone fashion. As I walked to the reception area, a Picasso-style logo that characterizes Dr Bucay’s practice
immediately caught my eye. I was aware of the anxiety
that accompanied my request to intrude upon Dr
Bucay’s busy practice and observe her well-recognized
expertise with hyaluronic acid fillers. I wanted to glean
additional knowledge about its use by observing a true
master.
I had made this visitation request as a complete
stranger; one whose only common bond was the practice of dermatology. ‘‘Welcome. We’ve been expecting
you,’’ said the smiling, sharply dressed receptionist.
She led me into the modern clinic adorned with light
hardwood floors, soothing bright walls and soft blue
exam rooms with matching tables. Here I found more
artwork, style, and attention to detail. This was a reflection of the clinic’s leader, and the ambiance calmed
my initial anxiety over being ‘‘an intruder.’’ No doubt
Dr Bucay’s first-time patients apprehensive about cosmetic dermatology would be put at ease by these serene surroundings.
Bouncing up the hall with a smile that seemed capable of handling any of life’s problems was Dr Vivian
Bucay (boo-ki). She welcomed me with an infectious
enthusiasm. ‘‘I’m glad you’re here,’’ she said. ‘‘I hope
we will be able to show you some new techniques. We
have quite a few cases lined up.’’ Dr Bucay’s background and adventures in life are as interesting as her
medical practice. A native of San Antonio, Texas, Dr
Bucay is married to cardiologist, Dr Moises Bucay. I
had the opportunity to meet their three beautiful children, who like their mother are bilingual. Her devotion to career and community is quite evident. She
completed her premedical studies at John Hopkins
University and obtained her medical degree from Baylor College of Medicine. Her experience with fillers
began during her dermatology training at the University of Miami. After her residency, she practiced for 8
years in Mexico City. It was during this time she honed
her experience with hyaluronic acid. Her practice is
now located in San Antonio, Texas.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Dow Stough, MD,
3633 Central Avenue, Suite N, Hot Springs, AR 71913, or e-mail:
dowstoughmd@cablelynx.com.
Hyaluronic acid fillers are becoming popular worldwide. These are natural hyaluronic acid derivatives
that can be stabilized with chemical modifications.
Nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA) is
characteristically injected into the dermis and does not
disrupt normal tissue function.1 The NASHA gel undergoes gradual isovolumic degradation. The tissue
augmentation that is initially achieved can be maintained despite loss of the NASHA polymer. This is due
to the fact that as the concentration of the NASHA
decreases, the water binding sites increase, resulting
in maintenance of the original volume for over 6
months.2,3 These fillers are currently not FDA approved in the United States, but it is anticipated that
they receive approval in late 2003 or 2004.
There are three forms of NASHA gel based on the
gel particle size. All forms are crystal clear biodegradable nonanimal stabilized by hyaluronic acid gels. The
largest gel particle is Perlane for injection into the deep
dermis. Restylane is composed of an intermediate gel
particle size and Restylane Fine Lines is composed of
the smallest gel particle size. Each version should be
injected at different levels: Perlane into the deep dermis
and superficial subcutaneous tissue, Restylane in the
middermal plane, and Restylane Fine Lines into the
upper dermis.
Restylane was launched in 1996 and has proven to
be associated with minimal problems. The advantages
of this compound include decreased allergic reactions,
increased longevity, and advantages in combining therapy with botulinum toxin (Carruthers A, ‘‘New Evidence of Hyaluronic Acid (NASHA) as a Dermal
Filler,’’ 11th Congress of the EADV, Prague, Czech
Republic, October 2002). The treatment-related adverse events include prolonged swelling, erythema,
edema, and small nodules at the injection sites.
Hyaluronic acid derivatives are said to confer less risk
of an allergic reaction than collagen. Because NASHA
is derived from nonanimal sources, transmission of
potentially harmful viruses and bacterial agents is
greatly reduced. The material is provided in a disposable 1.0-mL syringe with a sterilized 30-gauge needle
designed for intradermal injection. In an article by
Narins et al.4 it was concluded that NASHA provides a
more durable aesthetic improvement than bovine collagen and is well tolerated.
When approaching patients, Dr Bucay carefully
studies facial characteristics, ascertaining the causes
r 2004 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
ISSN: 1076-0512/04/$15.00/0 Dermatol Surg 2004;30:1038–1040
Dermatol Surg
30:7:July 2004
Figure 1. Dr Vivian Bucay administering Restylane to a patient in her
office in San Antonio, Texas.
of rhytids, i.e., dynamic versus static, while carefully
listening to her patients’ concerns. She never fails to
compliment patients on their unique facial features
before suggesting areas for improvement. She also
strives to keep her patients comfortable, performing
nerve blocks when needed and applying soothing, cool
ice wands—a mainstay of her practice.
After performing intraoral nerve blocks on a patient
who was about to undergo lip augmentation, we exited the room to view previous cases on a computer
screen. She explained in great detail the rationale for
her current technique. ‘‘I really like to cross-hatch with
Restylane across the nasolabial groove in more of a
perpendicular plane and then layer in a horizontal
plane over that. It’s very important to also augment
this area,’’ she said as she pointed to the junction of the
alar groove and the most superior portion of the nasolabial fold. ‘‘I really prefer to use Perlane in a deeper
plane and sometimes I will layer Restylane superficially over the top. I do not find as much of a need for
Restylane Fine Lines.’’ The seven exam rooms filled up
quickly. I chuckled silently in admiration of the immediate strong rapport Dr Bucay is able to build with
her patients. ‘‘Well, this is coming from a woman, and
you know how picky we are,’’ she banters with a
woman with small, thin lips. The woman also displayed minor dynamic wrinkles over the lower mentum. ‘‘I think we can make a positive change in this
area and one in which you would be pleased with.’’
Taking every opportunity to educate, she looks up at
me and quickly states, ‘‘Don’t forget a few units of
botulinum in the lower mentum to boost the effects of
fillers in the lips. Be careful not to place the botulinum
too high in this area.’’ She stated as she pointed to the
area immediately below the lower lip. The teacher was
in her element while carefully explaining her rationale
STOUGH: THE OFFICE OF VIVIAN BUCAY
1039
and approach. It is clear that Dr Bucay becomes intrigued by difficult and challenging cases. I realized
how inadequate my own fund of knowledge was despite achieving good results on the cases I had
attempted. This is an office of a practitioner who
loves her work and exudes knowledge and enthusiasm to a degree seldom seen in my visits to other
practitioners.
As she studies a woman with purse string lips, deep
nasolabial folds, deep glabelar creases, and a history of
poor results from techniques performed by other physicians, she explains, ‘‘You cannot use botulinum alone
here for these deep glabelar creases. You must layer
underneath with Perlane, then add Restylane on top
and utilize Botulinum injections also to the same area.
I found the two work very well together in select cases.’’ Her comments reflect preliminary findings from a
study by Carruthers that indicates ‘‘that combination
treatment with Restylane and Botox is more effective
than either modality individually in correcting glabelar
rhytids’’ (Carruthers A, ‘‘New Evidence of Hyaluronic
acid (NASHA) as a Dermal Filler,’’ 11th Congress of
the EADV, Prague, Czech Republic, October 2002) At
the time of my visit to Dr Bucay’s office (August 2003),
I had recently attended a meeting where soft tissue
filler techniques were presented by some of our experts
in the field today. It is clear that techniques vary widely
from one practitioner to the next and that the use of
NASHA filler substances is evolving and is an area to
be explored.
As we worked through the day, no two cases seemed
alike; patients all varied in their requests and solutions.
A pleasant lady appeared upset over her past experience with being injected with a ‘‘Botox-like substance’’
by a physician impostor who quickly left town. Dr
Bucay was sympathetic to this patient, who was visiting her clinic for the first time. ‘‘I’m very sorry you
had a bad experience, but I think you will enjoy the
results from injecting these lines around your eyes,’’
she said pointing to the crows feet area. ‘‘Now, let’s not
spend money on this area. Your forehead already looks
great,’’ she said to the woman, whose bangs covered
her very minor forehead imperfections.
A complete stranger had arrived in her office, was
placed at ease instantly, gleaned tremendous insights,
and learned from a true master. Dr Bucay’s experience
in cosmetic dermatology, pharmacology, and use of
botulinum and fillers places her firmly among the
masters of this field of cosmetic dermatology. There
are many things you simply cannot learn from attending a routine medical meeting. The time, effort, and
opportunity of visiting another practice will pay tremendous dividends in our own practices and, ultimately, continue to establish the dermatologist’s
essential role in the field of cosmetic surgery.
1040
STOUGH: THE OFFICE OF VIVIAN BUCAY
References
1. Fitton A. NASHA promising in facial soft-tissue augmentation. Inpharma 2002;1363:11–2.
2. Olenius M. The first clinical study using a new biodegradable implant for the treatment of lips, wrinkles, and folds. Aesthetic Plast
Surg 1998;22:97–101.
Dermatol Surg 30:7:July 2004
3. Duranti F, Salti G, Bovani B, Calandra M, Rosati ML. Injectable
hyaluronic acid gel for soft tissue augmentation: a clinical and histologic study. Dermatol Surg 1998;24:1317–25.
4. Narins R, Brandt F, Leyden J, et al. A randomized, double-blind,
multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of restylane
versus zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg
2003;29:588–95.