Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1994, Leonardo (ISSN 0024-094X)
…
3 pages
1 file
“Sidelights on visual texture”. Leonardo (Journal of the International Society for the Arts Sciences and Technology, publicada por el MIT Press, ISSN 0024-094X) vol. 27 N° 2, 1994, págs. 123-124.
Semiotica, 1990
What place does the study of visual texture occupy in the field of design? Considered in its different modalities (architectural, graphic, industrial), design is a discipline which involves various semiotic systems. On one hand, it includes systems of representation, such as perspective (in its variants: conic or axonometric) and Monge's system of descriptive geometry. On the other hand, it comprehends systems of prefiguration of pure design. 1 If we are able to draw a quadrangular room in a plan (a representation), it is because we have previously had the form 'square' (a pure form) as a possibility. These systems of pure design refer to the formal structures which are behind a visual representation. We recognize, according to Jannello (1988), four systems which allow us to analyze any representation or visual perception. They are the theories of Spatial Delimitation (or Form), Color, Texture, and Cesia. Therefore, Visual Texture is one of these systems, standing at the same theoretical level. Can visual texture be considered a semiotic system? The affirmative answer will imply primarily that in referring to it, we are dealing with signs. As Peirce states, a sign 'is something which stands to somebody, for something, in some respect or capacity' (CP 2.228). 2 With this simple definition Peirce constructs the three aspects of the sign. He also argues that all our knowledge and thought is necessarily in signs (CP 5.251). This affirmation is enough to assume that visual textures are signs. But how do they fulfill the three requisites? Paraphrasing Peirce: when an observer sees a texture, it produces equivalent signs or interpretants in his mind (signs of other characteristics-e.g., tactile concepts such as rough, smooth, etc.). The texture stands for an object (perhaps for the physical composition of a material). It has such internal relations that we can recognize it as belonging to the same kind of texture, even if it appears at different times or on different materials (it has a specific form) (CP 2.228).
2016
Everything is made of a material size is around us, that we can see with the eye or felt by touch . Viewing or touch we can see if the surfaces are smooth, coarse, pleasant , unpleasant, soft, hard, wet or dry. When we play with the interior surfaces using a design fantasy that will unite or split the surfaces depending on the objective and rezultetot call plays on surfaces with different textures. All items have these textures can be created by nature and man. Therefore the use of textures can be a different density and size of application or the choice to combine with what gets iluzija smooth and hoarse.
Annual Review of Vision Science, 2017
Visual textures are a class of stimuli with properties that make them well suited for addressing general questions about visual function at the levels of behavior and neural mechanism. They have structure across multiple spatial scales, they put the focus on the inferential nature of visual processing, and they help bridge the gap between stimuli that are analytically convenient and the complex, naturalistic stimuli that have the greatest biological relevance. Key questions that are well suited for analysis via visual textures include the nature and structure of perceptual spaces, modulation of early visual processing by task, and the transformation of sensory stimuli into patterns of population activity that are relevant to perception.
Perception & Psychophysics, 2005
EMS : Electroacoustic Music Studies Network Conference – Beijing 2006.
This paper examines the use of terminology that springs from parts of the theory of light, applied to electroacoustic music, highlighting the intimate connections between the visual and the auditory, and suggesting that music is not solely an auditory experience. Furthermore, the extra-musical nature of various sonic parameters cannot be addressed solely with reference to musical language, but should include possible relationships and analogies with other forms of art and, in general, with aspects of life. Hence, the concept of Textural Value is introduced as a unifying feature that relates sonic parameters and attributes with light, contributing to a meaningful understanding of music. The terms of Frequency and Amplitude, Hue, Saturation, and the Brightness of a sound are presented as coordinates that unify aspects of sound and light.
[Abstract] Texture or textuality, a key notion in the field of discourse analysis, does not catch enough attention since its first mention by Halliday & Hasan (1976) in their cohesion theory. The concept of texture, albeit having been touched on by many scholars, is not fully elucidated. This paper firstly gives a review of the definition of texture. Then, it discusses the resources for creating texture. And most importantly, the paper talks about the theoretical positioning of texture and draws such a Conclusion that texture per se is an abstract and composite notion, an overall psychological atmosphere created by the interaction of multiple textual features or texturing resources. Intangible as texture is, we can concretely study and understand this notion via its manifestations such as cohesion, coherence, situationality and so on and so forth.
Visual Communication, 2011
The term ‘texture’ is often applied beyond the tactile, to describe visual and aural qualities. While tactile, visual and aural texture have been studied separately in various fields, the relationships between them remain largely unexplored. To address this gap, this article proposes parameters for describing tactile surface texture and visual texture, and compares their meaning-making potential. The authors argue that, as new technologies increasingly limit the role of tactile experience and expand the importance of the visual, there is a growing need to study the influence of ubiquitous technologies on our use and understanding of the semiotic potential of resources such as texture. They hypothesize about this influence by reviewing the presentation of texture as a fill option for shapes and backgrounds in Microsoft PowerPoint for Windows from 1992 to 2007.
2001
posed a visualization problem she and I have been interested in for several years. The problem is that of visually representing a 2D field of data that has multiple data values at each point. For example, 2D fluid flow has a vector value at each location and derived values are often available at each location. Interrante suggests using natural textures to attack this problem, because the textures can potentially encode lots of information. She provides some intriguing examples and proposes a psychology-based approach for developing an understanding of how we perceive natural textures, like those Brodach photographed. 2 Understanding this helps us build better visualizations. Based on Interrante's suggestions, I would like to posit and explore what is, perhaps, a less well-defined approach. Through evolution, the human visual system has developed the ability to process natural textures. However, in addition to natural textures, humans also visually process man-made textures—some ...
Bab 5 Manajemen dan Bisnis2024, 2024
The Mount The Dome and The Gaze: Temple Mount in Israeli Visual Culture, 2017
Journal of China and International Relations, 2018
Revista Digital Universitaria
Prity Oktaviani, 2024
Science China-life Sciences, 2009
Azulejo para el aula de Español, 2023
Penerbit BRIN eBooks, 2023
Publication of the Afro-Latin/American Research Association, 2018
Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 2018
Journal of dairy science, 2018
Applied Economics, 2013
International Journal of Pavement Engineering
The European Proceedings of Multidisciplinary Sciences