Academia.eduAcademia.edu
paper cover icon
Invasive IPMN and MCN: Same Organ, Sifferent Outcomes

Invasive IPMN and MCN: Same Organ, Sifferent Outcomes

Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2011
Abstract
Background The efficacy of surgery for invasive mucinous neoplasms is unclear. We examined the natural history of invasive mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) and invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) in patients who underwent pancreatic resection. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1996–2006) was queried for cases of resected invasive MCN and IPMN. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and overall survival were examined using log-rank analysis and multivariate Cox regression model. Results Of 185 MCN cases and 641 IPMN cases, 73% and 48%, respectively, were women (P P P P = 0.0005), and it was better for patients with node-negative MCN vs. node-negative IPMN (P = 0.0061). There was no significant difference in survival of patients with stage IIA MCN vs. stage IIA IPMN (P = 0.5964), stage IIB MCN vs. stage IIB IPMN (P = 0.2262), or node-positive MCN vs. node-positive IPMN (P = 0.2263). Age older than 65 years (hazards ratio (HR) 1.71, P = 0.0046), high tumor grade (HR 2.68, P P P = 0.0040) predicted worse outcome in node-negative patients. Conclusions Our findings suggest that survival is better after resection of invasive MCN versus invasive IPMN when disease is localized within the pancreas, but this difference disappears in the presence of nodal metastasis or extrapancreatic extension.

vu vu hasn't uploaded this paper.

Let vu know you want this paper to be uploaded.

Ask for this paper to be uploaded.