D-Day 1944 (2): Utah Beach & the US Airborne Landings
By Steven J Zaloga and Howard Gerrard
4/5
()
About this ebook
On their western flank, the Allied landings on D-Day combined a parachute drop by the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions with an amphibious assault on “Utah” Beach by the US 4th Infantry Division. The landings came ashore in the wrong place but met weaker German resistance as a result. The heaviest fighting took place inland where the badly scattered paratroopers gradually gathered in small groups and made for their objectives.
This book traces the story of D-Day on Utah beach, revealing how the infantry pushed inland and linked up with the Airborne troops in a beachhead five miles deep. Now the battle to break out and seize the key port of Cherbourg could begin.
Steven J Zaloga
Steven J. Zaloga is a senior analyst for Teal Group Corp., an aerospace consulting firm, where he covers missile and drone technology as well as international arms transfers for clients in the aerospace industry and the government. He served for more than two decades as an adjunct staff member with the Strategy, Forces, and Resources division of the Institute for Defense Analyses, a federal think-tank, retiring in 2021. He is the author of numerous books on military technology and history, including NVG 294 Allied Tanks in Normandy 1944 and NVG 283 American Guided Missiles of World War II. He currently lives in Maryland, USA.
Read more from Steven J Zaloga
British Battle Tanks: American-made World War II Tanks Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Companion to the Red Army 1939-45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Smashing Hitler's Panzers: The Defeat of the Hitler Youth Panzer Division in the Battle of the Bulge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5US Airborne Divisions in the ETO 1944–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Smashing Hitler's Guns: The Rangers at Pointe-du-Hoc, D-Day 1944 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Kremlin's Nuclear Sword: The Rise and Fall of Russia's Strategic Nuclear Forces 1945-2000 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to D-Day 1944 (2)
Titles in the series (100)
Gallipoli 1915: Frontal Assault on Turkey Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Leipzig 1813: The Battle of the Nations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vicksburg 1863: Grant clears the Mississippi Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Gettysburg 1863: High tide of the Confederacy Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Balaclava 1854: The Charge of the Light Brigade Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKhartoum 1885: General Gordon's last stand Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vimeiro 1808: Wellesley’s first victory in the Peninsular Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Chickamauga 1863: The river of death Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Tarawa 1943: The turning of the tide Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Gravelotte-St-Privat 1870: End of the Second Empire Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5First Bull Run 1861: The South's first victory Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5San Juan Hill 1898: America's Emergence as a World Power Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tet Offensive 1968: Turning point in Vietnam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuilford Courthouse 1781: Lord Cornwallis's Ruinous Victory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAlexander 334–323 BC: Conquest of the Persian Empire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mons 1914: The BEF's Tactical Triumph Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Waterloo 1815: The Birth of Modern Europe Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Chancellorsville 1863: Jackson's Lightning Strike Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5First Ypres 1914: The graveyard of the Old Contemptibles Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Salamanca 1812: Wellington Crushes Marmont Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nagashino 1575: Slaughter at the barricades Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bussaco 1810: Wellington defeats Napoleon's Marshals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pearl Harbor 1941: The day of infamy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Peking 1900: The Boxer Rebellion Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lorraine 1944: Patton versus Manteuffel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Operation Compass 1940: Wavell's whirlwind offensive Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5D-Day 1944 (4): Gold & Juno Beaches Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Badajoz 1812: Wellington's bloodiest siege Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Louisbourg 1758: Wolfe’s first siege Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sekigahara 1600: The final struggle for power Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related ebooks
Operation Dragoon 1944: France’s other D-Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5D-Day 1944 (4): Gold & Juno Beaches Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5D-Day 1944 (1): Omaha Beach Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5D-Day 1944 (3): Sword Beach & the British Airborne Landings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzkrieg France 1940 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBattle of the Bulge 1944 (1): St Vith and the Northern Shoulder Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rhine Crossings 1945 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Dieppe Raid: The Combined Operations Assault on Hitler's European Fortress, August 1942 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Operation Neptune 1944: D-Day’s Seaborne Armada Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5German Airborne Divisions: Mediterranean Theatre 1942–45 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5British Paratrooper vs Fallschirmjäger: Mediterranean 1942–43 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cherbourg 1944: The first Allied victory in Normandy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ardennes 1944: The Battle of the Bulge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDieppe 1942: Reconnaissance In Force With Strategic Overtones Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Arnhem 1944 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Building for Battle: Hitler's D-Day Defences Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Metz 1944: Patton’s fortified nemesis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Falaise: The Flawed Victory–The Destruction of Panzergruppe West, August 1944 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Caen 1944: Montgomery’s break-out attempt Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5St Nazaire 1942: The Great Commando Raid Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Operation Market-Garden 1944 (1): The American Airborne Missions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Desert Raiders: Axis and Allied Special Forces 1940–43 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gebirgsjaeger: Germany's Mountain Troops Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUS Tank and Tank Destroyer Battalions in the ETO 1944–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anzio: Italy 1944 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Gold Juno Sword Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPanzer IV vs Sherman: France 1944 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Chindit vs Japanese Infantryman: 1943–44 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Panzer III vs Somua S 35: Belgium 1940 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Wars & Military For You
The Wager Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What We Owe The Future: The Sunday Times Bestseller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Radium Girls: They paid with their lives. Their final fight was for justice. Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5World War II in Simple French: Learn French the Fun Way with Topics that Matter: Topics that Matter: French Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Crusades Through Arab Eyes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSaigon Calling: London 1963-75 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flight: 100 Greatest Aircraft Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ruin of Kasch Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Destined For War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides's Trap? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Precipice: ‘A book that seems made for the present moment’ New Yorker Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Krabat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Germany's War and the Holocaust: Disputed Histories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jean Paul Marat: Tribune of the French Revolution Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A War Transformed: WWI on the Doggerland Front: A Wargame Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Danish Navy 1850-1943: Through The Lens Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar and Revolution: Rethinking the Twentieth Century Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the Problems of Peace, 1812-22 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wolf Tamers: How They Made the Strong Weak Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Alexander the Great, a Battle for Truth & Fiction: The Ancient Sources And Why They Can't Be Trusted Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIt’s Not Over: Learning From the Socialist Experiment Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5There Is No Unhappy Revolution: The Communism of Destitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRise of the Machines: the lost history of cybernetics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Englanders and Huns: The Culture-Clash which Led to the First World War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Fight a War Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5History of Japan in Manga: Samurai, Shoguns and World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for D-Day 1944 (2)
2 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
D-Day 1944 (2) - Steven J Zaloga
(NARA)
INTRODUCTION
The plans for the US Army at Utah Beach were a bold attempt to use airborne units to overcome the difficult terrain behind the beachhead. In the largest combat airdrop of the war so far, two airborne divisions were delivered at night behind enemy lines with the aim of securing the key bridges and access points. Due to the inherent risks of such a night operation, the paratroopers were very scattered and unable to carry out many of their specific missions. Yet in spite of these problems, the gamble paid off. The landings at Utah Beach were never in doubt, and within a day the US Army had a firm foothold in Normandy. The earlier book in this D-Day series on Omaha Beach ¹ provides a more detailed account of the planning and preparation for US Army operations on D-Day. This book is intended to complement it by providing a more detailed look at US Army operations subsequent to D-Day. With the capture of Cherbourg and the Cotentin peninsula, the Wehrmacht lost any hope that the Allies could be dislodged from France.
THE STRATEGIC BACKGROUND
Allied planning for Operation Overlord recognized the need for extensive port facilities to supply the armies for later operations in France. The German army presumed that the Allies would conduct their invasion in the Pas de Calais where there were many excellent ports. Consequently, the main German defensive effort was concentrated in this area, making it far less attractive to Allied planners, who turned instead to Brittany and Normandy. Brittany had several excellent ports such as Brest, but the Breton peninsula was more distant from English ports than either the Pas de Calais or Normandy. In addition, had the Allies landed in Brittany, German forces might have contained their advance by sealing off the relatively narrow exit from the Breton peninsula. As a result, Brittany was dropped from consideration. The Normandy coast had few large port facilities except for Cherbourg on the Cotentin peninsula. Nevertheless, Normandy was attractive for many other reasons including its proximity to the English Channel ports, and the relatively weak German defenses in the region, especially in mid-1943 when Allied planning started in earnest. A two-step solution was found to the problem of port facilities. In the short term, the Allies would rely on the creation of a pair of artificial harbors that would be located at the landing beaches. The next objective would be to seize suitable port facilities. This was a task assigned to the US Army: first, the seizure of Cherbourg and then the Breton ports. Utah Beach was selected with this objective in mind. It was the westernmost of the five D-Day landing beaches, at the base of the Cotentin peninsula, offering the best access toward Cherbourg.
This propaganda photo of the Atlantic Wall was released by Germany in December 1943. The Cotentin peninsula, especially around Cherbourg, was one of the few portions of the Normandy coast with a substantial number of heavy coastal defense guns like these. (USAOM)
German defense of the Cotentin peninsula was based on the mistaken assessment that the main Allied effort would be against the Pas de Calais. As a result, German defensive efforts in 1943 concentrated on creating the Atlantic Wall
along this stretch of coastline. The Allied landings in Italy in 1943–44, particularly the Anzio landing in January 1944, convinced senior German commanders that the Allies would land in more than one location, using smaller landings to draw off German reserves and weaken the main defenses. As a result, the German strategy was to deploy second-rate units behind mediocre beach defenses on other areas of the French coast such as Normandy and Brittany as an economy-of-force approach. These forces would prevent an uncontested Allied landing and would be reinforced in early 1944 as resources permitted.
1 Campaign 100: D-Day 1944 (1) Omaha Beach
CHRONOLOGY
1943
July First draft of Overlord plan completed
3 November Führer Directive 51 directs priority to reinforcing Western Front
6 November Rommel appointed to lead Army Group for Special Employment
1944
1 February Operation Neptune plan adds Utah Beach to the Overlord operation
28 May Landing zone for 82nd Airborne Div. shifted from St Sauveur to Merderet River
3 June OSS teams drop into Normandy to set up beacons for pathfinders
4 June Luftwaffe meteorologist forecasts rough seas and gale-force winds through mid-June
5 June Eisenhower decides that break in weather will permit execution of Neptune on 6 June 1944
D-Day, Tuesday, 6 June, 1944
00.15 Pathfinders begin landing in Normandy to set up beacons for air drops
01.30 Albany mission begins and 101st Airborne paratroopers start landing in Normandy
02.30 Boston mission begins and 82nd Airborne paratroopers start landing in Normandy
02.30 Task Force U arrives off Utah Beach, anchors in transport area
03.10 Gen Marcks begins to move Kampfgruppe Meyer to counter paratroop drops
04.00 Chicago mission begins and 101st Airborne gliders start landing
04.07 Detroit mission begins and 82nd Airborne gliders start landing
04.30 Cavalry detachment lands on St Marcouf island off Utah Beach, finds it deserted
05.05 German coastal batteries begin engaging Allied warships
05.50 Preliminary naval bombardment of Utah Beach begins
06.05 Bomber attacks on Utah Beach begin
06.30 Assault waves begin landing on Utah Beach
09.00 Combat Team 8 (CT8) begins moving off Utah Beach via Exit 2
21.00 Elmira mission delivers glider reinforcements to LZ W; Keokuk to LZ E
POST-D-DAY
7 June Galveston mission delivers gliders to LZ W at 07.00; Hackensack at 09.00
7 June German counterattack on Ste Mère-Église repulsed with tank support
8 June Rommel receives set of captured VII Corps orders, decides to reinforce Cotentin peninsula
9 June La Fière causeway finally captured by 82nd Airborne Division
10 June 101st Airborne seizes causeway leading to Carentan
10 June 90th Division begins attempt to cut off Cotentin peninsula
11 June Fallshirmjäger Regiment 6 (FJR 6) retreats from Carentan
12 June 101st Airborne occupies Carentan in effort to link up with V Corps at Omaha Beach
13 June Counterattack on Carentan by 17th SS-Panzergrenadier Division fails with heavy losses
15 June Failure of 90th Division leads to substitution of 9th Division and 82nd Airborne Div. in westward attack
16 June Hitler meets Rommel and Rundstedt in France, insists on last-ditch defense of Cherbourg
17 June 60th Infantry, 9th Division reaches the sea at Barneville, cutting off Cotentin peninsula
19 June Final drive on Cherbourg begins as a three-division assault
21 June VII Corps reaches outer ring of defenses of Fortress Cherbourg
25 June US infantry begin entering outskirts of Cherbourg
26 June Senior Wehrmacht commanders in Cherbourg forced to surrender
28 June Final outlying German positions in Cherbourg harbor surrender
30 June Last pocket on Cap de la Hague surrender to 9th Division
1 July 9th Division reports that all organized German resistance on Cotentin peninsula has ended
OPPOSING COMMANDERS
GERMAN COMMANDERS
The Wehrmacht had developed a hard-won reputation for tactical excellence during World War II, due in large measure to a style of war epitomized by "aufsträgtaktik": senior commanders briefed their subordinate commanders on the goals of the mission, and then permitted them to carry out the assignment as they saw fit, allowing them considerable tactical flexibility. This flexibility was eroded as the conflict dragged on, particularly in the final year of the war. By 1944, the Wehrmacht’s capabilities in the field were degraded by an increasingly Byzantine command structure. At the strategic level, Hitler had gradually usurped more and more command authority due to his growing distrust of the professional army officers. He made all major strategic decisions, but interfered at the tactical level as well. Given the sheer complexity of modern industrial war, management of combat operations was beyond the capabilities of a single great commander as might have been possible in centuries before. Hitler’s interference was inevitably erratic and episodic. He would allow the usual chains of command to exercise control over most operations, but would become involved in some operations at his whim. Hitler’s leadership style was more feudal than modern, encouraging the dispersion of power away from professional organizations like the general staff and into the hands of enthusiastic amateurs like himself, cronies such as the Luftwaffe head Hermann Göring and the SS chief, Heinrich Himmler.
Commander of Army Group B was Field Marshal Erwin Rommel. It was Rommel’s initiative in the autumn of 1943 that set in motion the fortification of the Normandy beaches. (MHI)
Field command was in the hands of the professionals, but with inefficient constraints on their freedom of action. Generalfeldmarschal Gerd von Rundstedt was the nominal supreme commander of western forces (OB West). In reality the Luftwaffe and Navy units in the West were outside his jurisdiction, and some occupation units were under the control of regional governors. Rundstedt’s control was further confused by Hitler’s decision in the autumn of 1943 to dispatch one of his favorites, Generalfeldmarschal Erwin Rommel, to command the amorphous invasion front
. Rommel and Rundstedt attempted to cooperate under difficult circumstances. Rommel took it upon himself to reinvigorate the construction of beach defenses along the Channel coast. This had the greatest impact in Normandy, which had previously been neglected. Rommel was less certain than many senior commanders about the inevitability of landings on the Pas de Calais, and felt that even if the main attack did fall there, there still might be