Jesus Was a Trinitarian
()
About this ebook
One of the most used Unitarian proof-texts is Mark 12:28-34, wherein the Lord Jesus affirms the Shema of Deuteronomy 6:4-5, and further identifies his interlocutor's reaffirmation of the Shema as being a wise answer. Because Christ affirms this monotheistic creed and, more than this, reaffirms the creed as articulated by a Jewish interlocutor, and does not correct the scribe for his strict monotheism (the unitarian assumes), then it follows that Jesus was also a unitarian monotheist. The argument has a prima facie punch, but once the underlying assumptions made by the unitarian are revealed, and once the text of Scripture is read closely on its own terms, it quickly becomes apparent that the unitarian's argument is logically incoherent and biblically unjustifiable. Jesus was, is, and will forever be a Trinitarian.
Read more from Hiram R. Diaz Iii
Soul Sleep: An Unbiblical Doctrine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAthanasius, Ontology, & the Work of Christ Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Jesus Was a Trinitarian
Related ebooks
In Search of the One True Christ: Resolving Adventism's Gordian Knot Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJesus, the New Adam: Humanity’s Steadfast Hope Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeven Questions on the Two Natures in Christ Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat's So Different in Millard Erickson's Teaching About Jesus Deity, Humanity, and Return? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Hexagon of Heresy: A Historical and Theological Study of Definitional Divine Simplicity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Beauty of the Faith: Using Aesthetics for Christian Apologetics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWomen Preachers Forbidden or Not? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMutual Hierarchy: A New Approach to Social Trinitarianism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsI Pledge Allegiance: A Believer's Guide to Kingdom Citizenship in Twenty-First-Century America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Confessing the Triune God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProfound: Twelve Questions That Will Grab Your Heart and Not Let Go Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Collected Writings of James Leo Garrett Jr., 1950–2015: Volume Two: Baptists, Part II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe One God: A Critically Developed Evangelical Doctrine of Trinitarian Unity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Perfection of Our Faithful Wills: Paul’s Apocalyptic Vision of Entire Sanctification Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKnowing Who You Are: Eight Surprising Images of Christian Identity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJesus and the Father: Modern Evangelicals Reinvent the Doctrine of the Trinity Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Jesus in Trinitarian Perspective Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Christ and the New Creation: A Canonical Approach to the Theology of the New Testament Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5THE UNIQUE CHRIST FOR SALVATION THE CHALLENGE OF THE NON-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS AND CULTURES: Revised Edition 2019 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInterdisciplinary Perspectives on the Authority of Scripture: Historical, Biblical, and Theoretical Perspectives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPerichoretic Salvation: The Believer’s Union with Christ as a Third Type of Perichoresis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAlways Being Reformed: Challenges and Prospects for the Future of Reformed Theology Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Matthew 24–25 as Prophetic-Apocalyptic: Structure, Function, and Eschatology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpiritual Being & Becoming: Western Christian and Modern Scientific Views of Human Nature for Spiritual Formation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPredestination:The Pharaoh Account of Grace Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsINTRODUCTION TO BIBLE DOCTRINE: Ten Foundational Truths behind Christianity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Goldilocks Zone: Collected Writings Of Michael J. Ovey Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Should Women Be Pastors and Leaders in Church?: My Journey to Discover What the Bible Says About Gender Roles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPersons, Powers, and Pluralities: Toward a Trinitarian Theology of Culture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Christianity For You
Getting Started in French for Kids | A Children's Learn French Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWise Thoughts for Every Day: On God, Love, the Human Spirit, and Living a Good Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beginning French for Kids: A Guide | A Children's Learn French Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeginning French Lessons for Curious Kids | A Children's Learn French Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Speak French for Kids | A Children's Learn French Books Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5René Girard and the Nonviolent God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBody Becoming: A Path to Our Liberation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On the Genealogy of Morals Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Book of All Books Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5French is Fun, Friendly and Fantastic! | A Children's Learn French Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTill We Have Faces Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Love in the Void: Where God Finds Us Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Learn French Now! For Every Kid | A Children's Learn French Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreek Passion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Porn Trap: The Essential Guide to Overcoming Problems Caused by Pornography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Being Christian: Baptism, Bible, Eucharist, Prayer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Living His Story: Revealing the extraordinary love of God in ordinary ways Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Between Heaven and Mirth: Why Joy, Humor, and Laughter Are at the Heart of the Spiritual Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5God: An Anatomy - As heard on Radio 4 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Comments on Father Reniero Cantalamessa’s (2016) Fourth Advent Sermon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLanguage Learning in Ministry: Preparing for Cross-Cultural Language Acquisition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Is Everyone Happier Than Me?: An Honest Guide to the Questions That Keep You Up at Night Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings101 Questions You Need to Ask in Your Twenties: (And Let's Be Honest, Your Thirties Too) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tu as un talent: Aides Pratiques pour les Vainqueurs, #14 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Hour That Matters Most: The Surprising Power of the Family Meal Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries Updated and Expanded Edition: When to Say Yes, How to Say No To Take Control of Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bruised and Wounded: Struggling to Understand Suicide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Jesus Was a Trinitarian
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Jesus Was a Trinitarian - Hiram R. Diaz III
Hiram R. Diaz III
Jesus Was a Trinitarian
First published by Scripturalist Publications 2019
Copyright © 2019 by Hiram R. Diaz III
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise without written permission from the publisher. It is illegal to copy this book, post it to a website, or distribute it by any other means without permission.
First edition
This book was professionally typeset on Reedsy
Find out more at reedsy.com
Publisher LogoContents
Introduction
Being & Person in Logic & Scripture
An Examination of Mark 12:28-34
Conclusion
About the Author
Introduction
A precursory familiarity with unitarian¹ arguments against the deity of Christ will no doubt acquaint one with the following syllogism.
All Jews were strict monotheists.
Jesus was a Jew.
Therefore, Jesus was a strict monotheist.
This argument correctly identifies the Jews as monotheists, Jesus as a Jew, and, therefore, Jesus as a monotheist. Insofar as it does these things, it is not problematic. However, the argument uses the undefined modifier strict
when describing monotheism, indicating that the kind of monotheism it is referring to is distinct from other forms of monotheism, especially trinitarian monotheism. Thus, it follows that strict monotheism, as the unitarian is using the phrase, is taken to mean unipersonal monotheism (hereafter, Umt)². This presuppositional commitment to Umt is what we have called the axiom of unipersonality,³ the belief that If x is an individual personal being, then x is necessarily unipersonal.
With the axiom in place, the unitarian argues that since monotheism is Umt, and Jesus was a monotheist, then it follows that he was a Umt. A better reformulation of the above argument, then, would be the following —
All Jews were Umt.
Jesus was a Jew.
Therefore, Jesus was a Umt.
This effectively draws a line between Umt and whatever is ¬(Umt), even those forms of ¬(Umt) that are, in fact, monotheistic - such as trinitarianism. This is a deceptive move made by unitarians which attempts to force trinitarians to either identify Christ as a unitarian or a polytheist. And the deceptive nature of this argumentation is only heightened when an appeal is made to Scripture by the unitarian, for by emphasizing the Scripture’s repeated stress on the ontological singularity of God (i.e. monotheism), he circularly argues that these are all proof of Umt.
Perhaps the most used proof-text in this regard is Mark 12:28-34, wherein the Lord Jesus affirms the Shema of Deuteronomy 6:4-5, and further identifies his interlocutor’s reaffirmation of the Shema as being a wise answer. Because Christ affirms this monotheistic creed and, more than this, reaffirms the creed as articulated by a Jewish interlocutor, and does not correct the scribe for his strict monotheism (the unitarian assumes), then it follows that Jesus was also a Umt. The argument has a prima facie punch, but once the underlying assumptions made by the unitarian are revealed, and once the text of Scripture is read closely on its own terms, it quickly becomes apparent that the unitarian’s argument is logically incoherent and biblically unjustifiable.
This book will make two broad argumentative moves. Firstly, it will refute the unitarian belief that being-person numerical identity is a necessary assumption, arguing that this is neither a necessity of logic nor of ontology. This will be further augmented by reference to the