Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only €10,99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    The Laws Of War, Affecting Commerce And Shipping
    The Laws Of War, Affecting Commerce And Shipping
    The Laws Of War, Affecting Commerce And Shipping
    Ebook161 pages2 hours

    The Laws Of War, Affecting Commerce And Shipping

    By H. Byerley Thomson

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    As can be guessed from the title, this book examines the effects of war on commercial enterprises, with a specific focus on informing the readers on whether there are new regulations that one must abide by during times of strife. The laws discussed in this book were British ones, and the war conditions described are that of World War I.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherGood Press
    Release dateDec 5, 2019
    ISBN4057664570567
    The Laws Of War, Affecting Commerce And Shipping

    Related to The Laws Of War, Affecting Commerce And Shipping

    Related ebooks

    Law For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      For Decency’s Sake, Let’s Quit Strasbourg

      Jan 27, 2022

      HIBBOLETHS THESE DAYS come in all shapes and sizes. Since the UK signed the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in 1950, few have dared question the need to maintain our allegiance to it. It is nevertheless time that we left it. There is scope

      5 min read

    • Article

      The Most Conservative Branch

      Aug 30, 2024

      The Most Conservative Branch
      13 min read

    • Article

      Tobacco Judgment Troubling

      Dec 20, 2020

      THE recent tobacco judgment in the British American Tobacco case in the Western Cape High Court, penned by judges Ndita, Steyn and Slingers, makes for troubling jurisprudence. The optics look terrible. At its core, the court bends its jurisprudence f

      3 min read

    • Article

      Tobacco Judgment Troubling

      Dec 20, 2020

      Tobacco Judgment Troubling
      3 min read

    • Article

      Originalism, Divided

      May 25, 2021

      Originalism, Divided
      9 min read

    • Article

      A Matter Of Principles

      Oct 7, 2024

      A Matter Of Principles
      2 min read

    • Article

      The Divergent Classmates

      Feb 3, 2017

      The Divergent Classmates
      5 min read

    • Article

      Back To Black

      Jan 15, 2024

      An article in the Post before Christmas suggested that the new government may institute a shift in judicial appointments. It reported that Act and NZ First are keen to be much more active in appointing rigorous, black-letter law judges as and when ab

      2 min read

    • Article

      International Law: The Basics

      Nov 30, 2023

      INTERNATIONAL LAW TENDS to be poorly understood, even among lawyers. But it retains an aura among laymen which frequently leads to its invocation as a form of higher law, though often in a severely mangled form. Recent events such as the wars in Ukra

      3 min read

    • Article

      When the World Outlawed War

      Oct 19, 2017

      When the World Outlawed War
      7 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for The Laws Of War, Affecting Commerce And Shipping

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      The Laws Of War, Affecting Commerce And Shipping - H. Byerley Thomson

      H. Byerley Thomson

      The Laws Of War, Affecting Commerce And Shipping

      Published by Good Press, 2022

      goodpress@okpublishing.info

      EAN 4057664570567

      Table of Contents

      INTRODUCTION TO PART I.

      THE LAWS OF WAR.

      PART I.

      THE LAWS OF WAR AFFECTING COMMERCE AND SHIPPING.

      CHAPTER I. COMMENCEMENT OF WAR.

      SECTION I.

      SECTION II.

      CHAPTER II.

      SECTION I.

      SECTION II.

      SECTION III.

      SECTION IV.

      CHAPTER III.

      SECTION I.

      SECTION II.

      SECTION III.

      SECTION IV.

      APPENDIX TO PART I.

      DECLARATION.

      THE FOURTH DECLARATION.

      INDEX.

      POSTSCRIPT.

      INTRODUCTION

      CHAPTER I.

      COMMENCEMENT OF WAR.

      SECTION I. The Immediate Effects of War

      SECTION II. On Enemies and Hostile Property

      CHAPTER II.

      SECTION I. Actual War. Its Effects

      SECTION II. Prizes and Privateers

      SECTION III. Licences

      SECTION IV. Ransom, Recaptures, and Salvage

      CHAPTER III.

      SECTION I. Neutrality

      SECTION II. Contraband of War

      SECTION III. Blockades. Right of Search. Convoys

      SECTION IV. Armed Neutralities

      APPENDIX TO PART I.

      NOTE A. The Law of Reprisals

      NOTE B. War Bill Act

      NOTE C. Rule of 1756

      NOTE D. Articles that have been declared Contraband at various times

      NOTE E. The Late Declarations

      INTRODUCTION TO PART I.

      Table of Contents

      It would be superfluous to trouble my readers, in a concise practical treatise, with any theoretical discussion on the origin of the Law of Nations, had not questions of late been often asked, respecting the means of accommodating rules decided nearly half-a-century ago, to those larger views of international duty and universal humanity, that have been the natural result of a long Peace, and general progress.

      To commence with the question, Who is the international legislator? it must be observed, that there is no general body that can legislate on this subject; no parliament of nations that can discuss and alter the law already defined. The Maritime Tribunals of maritime states always have been, and still are, almost the sole interpreters and mouthpieces of the International Law. Attempts that have been made by our own parliaments, by individual sovereigns, and even by congressional assemblies of the ministers of European powers, to create new universal laws, have been declared by these courts to be invalid, and of no authority. And though it is distinctly laid down, that the Law of Nations forms a part of the Common Law of England, yet it is not subject to change by Act of Parliament, as other portions of the Common Law are; except so far as Parliament can change the form, constitution, and persons of the courts that declare the law.

      Lord Stowell says

      No British Act of Parliament, nor any commission founded upon it, can affect the rights or interests of foreigners, unless they are founded upon principles, and impose regulations, that are consistent with the Law of Nations.

      And in another place—

      Much stress has been laid upon the solemn declaration of the eminent persons (the ministers of the European powers), assembled in Congress (at Vienna). Great as the reverence due to such authorities may be, they cannot, I think, be admitted to have the force of over-ruling the established course of the general Law of Nations.

      It is to the Maritime Courts, then, of this and other countries, that the hopes of civilization must look for improvement and advance in the canons of international intercourse during the unhappy time of war. The manner, and the feeling in which they are to pronounce those canons cannot be more finely enunciated than in the words of Lord Stowell himself.

      "I consider myself as stationed here, not to deliver occasional and shifting opinions to serve present purposes of particular national interest, but to administer with indifference that justice which the Law of Nations holds out, without distinction, to independent states, some happening to be neutral, and some belligerent.

      "The seat of judicial authority is indeed locally here in the belligerent country, according to the known law and practice of nations; but the law itself has no locality. It is the duty of the person who sits here to determine this question exactly as he would determine the same question, if sitting at Stockholm; to assert no pretensions on the part of Great Britain, which he would not allow to Sweden in the same circumstances; and to impose no duties on Sweden, as a neutral country, which he would not admit to belong to Great Britain, in the same character. If, therefore, I mistake the law in this matter, I mistake that which I consider, and which I mean should be considered, as UNIVERSAL LAW upon the question."

      When an Admiralty Judge investigates the law in this impartial spirit, he occupies the grand position of being in some respects the director of the deeds of nations; but with equal certainty does the taint of an unjust bias poison all his authority; his judgments are powerful then only for evil; they bind no one beyond the country in which he sits, and may become the motive and origin of reprisal and attack upon his native land.

      As the authority of the international judge depends on his integrity, so also does the universal law arise from, and remain supported by, the true principles of right and justice; in other words, by the fundamental distinction between right and wrong. A statute, a despotic prerogative, and an established principle of common law, rest upon different sanctions. They may be the causes of the greatest injustice, may sow the seeds of national ruin, and yet may even require revolutions for their reformation; but any one of the laws of nations preserves its vitality, only with the essential truth of its principles; a change in the feeling of mankind on the great question of real justice, destroys it, and it simply remains an historical record of departed opinion, or a point from which to date an advance or retreat in the career of the human mind.

      It is for this reason that International Law has been so differently defined by writers at various periods.

      The Law of Nations is founded, I have said, on the general principles of right and justice, on the broad fundamental distinctions between right and wrong, or as Montesquieu defines it, on the principle that nations ought in time of peace to do each as much good, and in time of war as little harm as possible. These are the principles from which any rule must be shown to spring, before it can be said to be a rule for international guidance. But what are the principles of right and wrong? These are not left to the individual reason of the interpreter of the law for the time being, but are to be decided by the public opinion of the civilized world, as it stands at the time when the case arises.

      It may immediately be asked—How is that public opinion to be ascertained? The answer is—By ascertaining the differences in opinion between the present and the past. For this purpose it must be observed, that the views of a past age are easily ascertainable, in matters of law, from theoretical writings, history, and judicial decisions; and these views may be reduced to definition. Modern universal intelligence will either agree or disagree in these views. In the mass of instances it will agree, as progress on such points is at all times slow; and not only will the points of disagreement be few, but they will be salient, striking, and generally of popular notoriety. Present, universal, or international opinion, has therefore two portions. 1. That in which it accords with the views of a past generation, that has become historical. 2. That in which it differs from, or contradicts those views.

      In the first instance, then, we are to ascertain what were the principles of right and justice, from any materials handed down to us; and if those principles agree with, or support the practical rules recorded by the same, or similar sources of information, such are to be accepted as belonging to the code of the Laws of Nations, as far as those principles are uncontradicted by modern opinion.

      In the second instance, those differences which may either overrule, add to, or complete the public opinion of a past age, are to be ascertained, (by those in whose hands such decisions rest,) by looking to the wish of nations on these points; and this wish may be exhibited in various ways; either by a universal abandonment of a given law, in its non-execution by any nation whatever, for a length of time; by numerous treaties, to obtain by convention an improvement not yet declared by international tribunals; or by extending to the relations and duties of nations, the improvements in the general principles of right and justice, that are at the time being applied to the concerns of private individuals.

      The judges of such matters are not to ignore what is going on around them; all necessary knowledge is to be brought into court to discover what is the universal feeling of nations in respect of right and wrong, at the time they decide, and if they see a departure from the past sense of right and wrong, to make the modern, and not the ancient, the fountain of modern law; thence deducing the modern rules.

      Because a precept cannot be found to be settled by the consent or practice of nations at one time, it is not to be concluded that it cannot be incorporated into the public code of nations, at some subsequent period. Nor is it to be admitted, that no precept belongs to the law of nations which is not universally recognised as such, by all civilized communities, or even by those constituting what may be called the Christian states of Europe. Some doctrines, which we, as well as the United States, admit to belong to the Law of Nations, are comparatively of recent origin and application, and even at this period have received no public or general sanction in other nations; and yet, inasmuch as they are founded on a just view of the duties and rights of nations, according to a modern universal sense of what is just, they are enforced here as ascertained laws.[1]

      By a similar train of reasoning, not only may the international tribunals of England enunciate new rules of law, as universal law, if founded and fairly deduced from ascertained modern, public, and international opinion; but they may refuse to alter settled rules, however much opposed by other nations, provided those rules are still deducible from that origin.

      Generally, every doctrine fairly deduced, by correct reasoning, from the rights and duties of nations, and the nature of moral obligation, may be said to exist in the Law of Nations. Those rights, duties, and that moral obligation, are to be ascertained from the enunciation of them in past times, unless they have

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1