The Law of All Things

Author H.Y.Kim (Ho Young Kim)

History

• Department of Business Administration at Seoul National University Graduation

• Korea Institute of Science and Technology,(KIST) Work

E-mail

• delugenr@naver.com

Shaking the foundations of modern scientific theory.

The advent of a new theory

The laws of space and life.

The Law of All Things

Uncover errors in Quantum physics

Solve the millennium prize problems 'Poincare Conjecture' and 'Fermat's Last Theorem'.

Identify the principles of space generation before and after the Big Bang.

Identify the existence of Dark energy and Dark matter.

Reveal the essence of light and sound.

Complete Einstein's long-cherished "Unified Field Theory’.

Identify the principles of superconductors.

Uncover the secrets of The Great Pyramids.

Darwin's theory of evolution and Mendel's laws of genetics are newly interpreted as laws of physics.

Interpret the essence of life, Soul, as physical laws

Develop mathematical algorithms for non-hacking encryption information and communication.

It offers optimal solutions to fight viruses in computers and living things.

Prologue

In the early 1st century A.D., Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor of the Jewish region, asked Jesus, What is the truth? This was a counterargument to Jesus' claim to him that 'I came to the world to prove the truth'. Having absorbed Greek philosophy, he would have asked questions not because he did not know the concept of truth that was prevalent in Roman aristocracy at that time, but because he wanted to know Jesus' thoughts on truth.

Like Pilate, we also have some knowledge of the concept of truth, but there may be some differences in our minds about what the truth is and the desire to know the essential part of what it means.

Truth can be defined in many ways by each person, but I will summarize the definition of truth simply and call it 'the reason of things'.

The purpose of this book is to scientifically explain the common 'law of things' that governs the world, including ourselves in the universe.

I wrote a paper titled Reassessment of Einstein's 'EPR Paradox' to point out the fallacy of quantum physics, which is the trend in modern physics. The important part of the paper is also closely related to the contents of this book, so I will include only the conclusion part of the paper below.

Conclusion of the paper

Three physicists, including Einstein, attempted to highlight the imperfections of quantum physics in 1935, known as the EPR Paradox, in a paper titled Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Consumed Complete, but today's quantum physics community also supports the position of that time. The author fully appreciates the contribution of quantum physics to modern science and technology, but the quantum physics community at this point has many problems, and the theoretical development of physics has been stagnant since Einstein.

This author supports the claims made by three physicists in 1935, and demonstrated this point by applying the Three Body Number Theory and interpreting the double-slit experiment, which was at the center of controversy at the time, as a way to meet Einstein's proposed conditions.

The Three Body Number Theory assumes that all physical systems in the universe reflect the fundamental properties of numbers, based on the Three Body Problem demonstrated by Poincare, and identifies the fundamental properties of integers through the Three Body Number Game.

Just as Mendeleev's periodic table of elements led to the revolutionary development of modern science, I am sure that the above number periodic table (particle periodic table) will greatly contribute to the theoretical development of modern physics. In addition, the particle equation using the 'particle periodic table' could maximize the efficiency of the particle accelerator, which currently costs a great deal of operation.

The 'Three Body Number Theory' solves many of the problems facing Quantum physics.

Identify the reality of light and sound that modern physics does not understand.

Identify the true nature of Dark energy and Dark matter.

Identify the particle-anti_particle symmetry relationship that quantum physics has yet to grasp.

Solve the contradiction of quark theory in the mystery of infinite quarks.

Solve the problem of Unification Theory that Einstein had longed for.

As a Chaos theory, it also applies to many fields of study other than physics.

In the field of encryption of information, which is rapidly increasing in demand in modern industries, the problem of the RSA cryptographic algorithm can be perfectly solved by the Three Body Number cryptographic algorithm.

Thus, 'Three Body Number Theory' will fully serve as a tool to take the development of various academic fields, including physics, to the next level. --Conclusion of this paper—

And in relation to the two issues in the Seven Challenges of Millennium in the mathematical world,

Proving 'Poincare Conjecture' and 'Fermat's Last Theorem' to fit the intentions of the examiner and re-verifying its validity in a physical sense, I wrote. As above, I will only post the purpose of this article below.

Purpose of this article

The Poincare conjecture and Fermat's last theorem are among the seven Millennium challenges, with a large prize at stake along with the Fields Prize called the Nobel Prize in Mathematics. At this point, Russian mathematician Grigory Perelman is credited with proving the former, and British mathematician.

Andrew Wiles is credited with proving the latter. 

However, in both of the above cases, the certification process was so difficult that a number of judges were selected by the Award Committee and their agreement over a long period of examination recognized that the evidence was correct and awarded. However, in Perelman's case, he has so far refused the award. Perhaps it's because he made a conscientious judgment that his method of proof was not enough to win the award. 

Poincare and Fermat were both famous mathematicians and physicists of the time. They put a lot of interest and effort into physics and contributed a lot to the development of modern physics. 

There is no data left on what purpose they set out the above questions and how they proved them.

However, inferring from some of the remaining data, their methods of proof are not complicated, and in their main interest, the problems may be related to physical phenomena. The physical truth is inherently simple, so I don't think the proof should be complicated either. 

However, I don't think the method of proof of the above two winners, which is currently determined by the Fields Prize winning committee, is a method of proof that meets the intentions of the questioners (Poincare and Fermat). 

I have never read the above two persons’ (Perelman and Wiles) ways of proving the problem, nor do I intend to judge the right or wrong of their methods of proving it, nor do I denigrate their achievements. However, for the above reasons, the above two questions must be proved in a way that suits the intentions of the examiner, which will contribute to the development of modern physics. 

And I think that when the two examiners made questions they would have wished the future generations to do so. 

In that sense, I am writing this article because I proved the above two questions in a way that is consistent with the intentions of the examiner, and by verifying them with physical facts revealed in modern physics, I also proved that the method is correct.

--the purpose of this article--

Then, I wrote the title Why Superconductivity Occurs (The First Complete Theory)?. As above, I will only post the purpose of this article below.

Purpose of this article

Superconductivity is a phenomenon in which the electrical resistance of a material becomes zero in a cryogenic situation. After discovering this phenomenon and synthesizing superconductors, several physicists have already won the Nobel Prize, and its application technology has already been commercialized and used in many sectors of the modern industry.

However, no theory has been established to fully explain the phenomenon.

I am writing this article because I have established a theory that can explain the above phenomenon consistently without any contradictions.

To explain the above phenomenon, we first need to modify what we understand in modern physics regarding the nature of electrons.

In doing so, much of the other problems that modern physics is facing that cannot be explained at this point in time will naturally be solved.

Therefore, let's first describe the nature of the electron, then explain the justification for such modification, and finally consider the principle of superconductivity. –The purpose of this article—

The reason why I write and research is to know the logic of things (Truth) as I said in the beginning. And it's because I want to get closer to the truth by telling others the reason I learned and listening to their opinions.

Once upon a time, I sought religious truth. However, I realized that I could not verify the truth through religion. I think faith without verification of the truth is bound to be blind. I don't think we can know everything about God, the Supreme Being. However, if God exists, man should use the power of thought (or reason) given by God (who has nothing to do with the god of any particular religion) to find out the truth about him to the fullest extent possible, and that is what he would welcome. In that sense, we find that all current religious groups are more of an obstacle to the truth than to explore it.

So I'm determined to take a mathematical and physical approach as a means of verifying the truth, corroborating all the truths I've learned, studying, writing, publishing them through books, and interacting with many people to learn more about the truth.

Ancient physicists were fluent in mathematics, philosophy, and so on, as well as physics. This is because physics is closely related to the study of other fields. This book will also cover not only physics but also various fields of study.

I agree with Einstein's idea that no matter how difficult physics theory is, there is an error if it is not explained in language.

In order to make it easier to understand even if you are not a physics major, I will explain it in a language that ordinary people can understand rather than in a difficult formula except when necessary, and if I am forced to use jargon, I will explain it sufficiently. Even so, this book is by no means low, and I am confident that any level of mainstream physicist or physicist has enough groundbreaking content to solve their immediate problems to the extent that they are astonished.

At first, I decided to publish a book titled ‘What is science?’ in this book?, and to publish ‘What is Life?’ in the next book However, for the reasons explained in The Tail, I decided to deal with the two contents together and change the title of the book, so I ask for your understanding.

Originally, the motivation to study physics was to do scientific exploration of the soul, the essence of life.

Therefore, in this book, I am very pleased with the decision, as I have been able to clarify what I have been vaguely thinking about, in combination with two disparate contents.

There were many difficulties, but despite the difficulties of life, I thank my wife Lee Choon-hee for helping me to complete this book.

Especially, when I was stuck in thought, I sometimes asked her to answer me about my strange questions, but she didn't show any displeasure, and gave me simple and clever answer, so I'm deeply grateful for helping me carry on my thoughts.

Also, I would like to thank Shin Sung-ki, a childhood friend, and Kim Gi-tae, a junior at the same university, and Kim Joo-won, a high school classmate, for helping both physically and spiritually.

And I also thank my cousin Kim Ho-myung and my cousin Lim Jae-sun.

Lastly, I would like to sincerely thank the readers for subscribing to this book.

Month of 2021

Kim Ho-young

Table of Contents

Prologue

Part I What is Science?

Chapter I Is Quantum Physics a science?

1. Quantum Physics is not science but religion.

2. Scientific Thinking

3. Popularization of Scientific Thinking

4. Three Body Number Theory

5. Error in Quantum Physics

Chapter II What is universe?

I. Space

1. Before the Big Bang

2. After the Big Bang

II. Atomic

III. Dark energy and Dark matter

1. Dark Energy

2. Dark Matter

3. The role of dark energy and dark matter

Chapter III What is light?

1. Definition of Light

2. Light_Element

3. Dark Matter

4. The Role of Dark Energy and Dark Matter

5. Black Body Radiation

6. Photoelectric effect

7. Wave and particles

8. Uncertainty Principle

9. Secrets of the Great Pyramid of Giza

10. Genesis

Chapter IV What is the sound?

1. Definition of Sound

2. Generation of Sound

3. Differences between Light and Sound

4. 3 Elements of Light and Sound

5. X-ray and gamma-ray

6. Thunder and lightning

7. The role of Dark energy and Dark matter in space

Chapter V Error in Quantum Physics

1. Standard Model

2. Beta decay

3. Magic Number

4. Fusion (/fission) and generation of elements

5. Symmetry of particles

6. Power

7. Magnet

8. Unified Field

9. Double Slit Experiment

10.Polarization

Part II What is Life?

Chapter I Origin of Life

1. Why did life emerge?

2. Origin of Life

3. Differentiation of Gender

Chapter II The origin of species

1. Genes

2. Nature of numbers

3. Genetic

4. Origin of Species

Chapter III What is soul?

1. Material and Non-Materials

2. Great Pyramid

3. Left and right brains

4. Who am I?

5. What is a Dimension?

Chapter IV Information Communication

1. Cryptographic Information and Communication

2. Virus and Vaccine

3. Information and Communication of Life

4. Life Virus and Vaccine

Epilogue

Part I What is Science? 

Chapter I Is Quantum Physics a science?

Science can be defined as the study of the reason of things, just as truth is defined in the header as The reason of things.

In that sense, quantum physics is of course a science.

Nevertheless, it may seem ridiculous for me, an outsider in mainstream science, to dare question the fact that quantum physics, the mainstream of modern physics, is science, but I will not back down because of the following reasons.

1. Quantum Physics is not science but religion.

Feynman, a Nobel laureate in modern quantum physics, said, No one understands quantum physics, and no quantum physicist argues against it.

Let me give another example in this regard.

During a physics course at a university, the professor asks each student the following questions before starting a lecture on the famous Double Slit Experiment.

Can one electron pass through two holes at the same time without being separated?

About 20 students who were asked the above questions answered No in a row, so the professor stopped asking questions about each person.

He answered the question himself, saying, Your answers are all wrong. And then he goes, I don't know why, and God knows why. This is Quantum Physics." All the students immediately calmed down, and no one asked any more questions.

The two examples above are a direct and accurate description of what kind of study Quantum Physics is.

Then, quantum physicists teach their students what they don't understand.

This is similar to a religious leader at the top proclaiming the doctrine of faith and faithfully teaching the congregation with faith as a shield.

Therefore, I think this is not science, but a study that falls under the category of faith.

From the moment science, the study of the reason of things, gives up its efforts to understand it and tries to solve it through the means of faith, the study has already been moved from the realm of science to the realm of faith.

So as long as Quantum Physics holds that view, I will continue to hold on to my argument that Quantum Physics is religion, not science.

2. Scientific thinking

Scientific thinking, such as Copernican theory in the dark ages of the Middle Ages in the West, was persecuted by the ruling class at that time. At that time, the ruling class tried to make it their own property to explore the logic of things, and used the shield of faith to prohibit or suppress scientific thinking of ordinary people. For the ruling class, maintaining the status quo is preferable to transforming the world.

What is the reality of today's scientific community?

Since the emergence of relativity and quantum theory about 100 years ago, all modern