Petrine Theology

Petrine Theology

Douglas W. Kennard

Petrine Theology

Copyright ©

2022

Douglas W. Kennard. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in critical publications or reviews, no part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without prior written permission from the publisher. Write: Permissions, Wipf and Stock Publishers,

199

W.

8

th Ave., Suite

3

, Eugene, OR

97401

.

Wipf & Stock

An Imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers

199

W.

8

th Ave., Suite

3

Eugene, OR

97401

www.wipfandstock.com

paperback isbn: 978-1-7252-7116-6

hardcover isbn: 978-1-7252-7117-3

ebook isbn: 978-1-7252-7118-0

06/06/22

Table of Contents

Title Page

Abbreviations

Chapter 1: Lost Boy or Foundation for Christian Theology

Chapter 2: God

Chapter 3: Christology

Chapter 4: Peter’s Letter Form Presents Intentional Missional Trinity

Chapter 5: The Holy Spirit

Chapter 6: God’s Word

Chapter 7: Humanity

Chapter 8: Christ’s Vicarious New Covenant Atonement, Sanctification, Purification, and Redemption

Chapter 9: Peter’s Gospel

Chapter 10: Exodus Following Jesus to Kingdom Virtues

Chapter 11: The Household of God

Chapter 12: Suffering

Chapter 13: Standing Against Satan and Exorcizing Demons

Chapter 14: False Teachers

Chapter 15: The Coming of the Lord

Select Bibliography

This book is dedicated to

Edwin Blum

For whom an earlier version a part of

this manuscript was prepared decades ago.

Abbreviations

‘Abod. Zar. Rabbinic ‘Abodah Zarah

Abr. On the Life of Abraham

Adv. Gent. Adversus nationes

Adv. Haer. Against Heresies

Advice Advice about Keeping Well

Adv. Jud. Adversus Judaeos

Aem. Aemilius Paullus

Aen. Aeneid

Aet. On the Eternity of the World

AfO Archiv für Orientforschung

AfOB Archiv für Orientforschung: Beiheft

Ag. Against

Ag. Ap. Josephus, Against Apion

’Ag. Ber. ’Aggadot Berešit

Agr. Agricola

Aj. Ajax

AJT American Journal of Theology

Alex. Alexander

Alex. fort. De Alexander magni fortuna aut virtute

All. Allegoriae

Anab. Anabasis

AnBib Analecta biblica series

Ancor. Ancoratus

ANEP Ancient Near Eastern Pictures Relating to the Old Testament. Edited by James Pritchard.

ANET Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament. Edited by James Pritchard.

Ann. Annales

ANRW Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt: Geschichte und Kultur Rom sim Spiegel der neueren Forschung. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. Berlin.

Ant. Antiquities as in Josephus, Jewish history or Sophicles, history

Ant. rom. Antiquitates romanae

Apoc. Apolalypse

Apoc. El. Apocalypse of Elijah in Hebrew and Coptic

Apocr. Jn. Apocryphon of John

Apol. Apology, as for Plato, Apology of Socrates or Justin Martyr, numbered Apology

Apos. Apostles as in pseudepigrapha Epistle to the Apostles

‘Arak. Rabbinic ‘Arakin

Arist. Aristites

ARN 'Abot de Rabbi Nathan

ARW Archiv für Religionwissenschaft

Ascen. Isa. Ascension of Isaiah

As. Mos. Assumption of Moses

ASTI Annual of the Swedish Theological Institute

ATJ Ashland Theological Journal

Att. Epistular ad Atticum

Aul. Gel. Aulus Gellius

B. or b. Babylonian Talmud

BA The Biblical Archaeologist

BAG Bauer, W., W. E. Arndt, and F. W. Gingrich. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Literature. Chicago, 1957.

Bapt. Baptism

Bar Apocrypha Baruch with number 1 or 2 before

BAR Biblical Archaeology Review

Barn. Barnabas

BASOR Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research

Bat. Rabbinic Baba Batra

BBR Bulletin for Biblical Research

BDB Francis Brown, S. D. Driver, and Charles Briggs, eds. A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament. Oxford: Clarendon, 1907.

BECNT Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament

Bell. Cat. Bellum catalinae

Bell Civ. Civil War

Ben. Is. Jac. De benedictionibus Isaaci et Jacobi

Ber. Rabbinic Berorot

BEvT Beiträge zur evangelischen Theologie

BHT Beiträge zur historischen Theologie

Bib Biblica

BJRL Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester

BMAP The Brooklyn Museum Aramaic Papyri. Edited by E. G. Kraeling.

BN Biblische Notizen

BR Biblical Research

Bride Advice to Bride and Groom

Brut. Brutus or De claris oratoribus

BSac Bibliotheca sacra

BTB Biblical Theology Bulletin

BTZ Berliner Theologische Zeitschrift

BV Biblical Viewpoint

BZ Biblische Zeitschrift

BZAW Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft

C. Ap. Josephus, Contra Apionem

C. Ar. Orations against the Arians

Carn. Chr. The Flesh of Christ

Cat. Catechetical Lecture

CBQ Catholic Biblical Quarterly

CD Damascus Document also found at Qumran

Cels. Against Celsus

Cherubim Philo, On the Cherubim

Chron. Chronicle

CIJ Corpus inscriptionum judaicarum. Edited by J. B. Frey, Rome, 1936–52.

Cim. Cimon

Claud. Claudius

Clem. Clement, 1 or 2 or a pseudo-Clement manuscript

Cod. Codex

Col. In omnes B. Pauli epist. Collection of Commentaries of Pauline Epistles

Comm. Isa. Commentarii in Isaiam

Comm. Jo. Commentarii in evangelium Joannis

Comm. Rom. Commentarii in Romanos

ConB Coniectanea Biblica: New Testament Seires

Conf. On the Confusion of Tongues

Consol. Phil. Consolation of Philosophy

Controv. Seneca the Elder’s Controversiae

CPJ Corpus papyrorum judaicarum. Edited by V. Tcherikover, Cambridge, 1957–64.

CSEL Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum. Edited by Filium.

CTJ Calvin Theological Journal

CTM Concordia Theological Monthly

CTQ Concordia Theological Quarterly

Cult. Fem. The Apparel of Women

CurTM Currents in Theology and Mission

C.W. On the Civil War

Cyr. Cyropaedia

DBS Dictionnaire de la Bible: Supplement. Edited by L. Pirot and A. Robert.

Decl. Declamations

Def. Or. Defense of Oratory

Def. orc. De defectu oraculorum

De lib. arb. De Libertate Arbitrii

Dem. ev. Demonstration of the Gospel

Demon. Ad Demonicum

Deus That God Is Unchangeable

Dial. Dialogue

Dial. D. Dialogue of the Dead

Diatr. Diatribe (Dissertationes)

Did. Didache

Diogn. Diognetus

Doctr. chr. De doctrina christiana

Down. J. Downward Journey

DSD Dead Sea Discoveries

Eb. Ebionites

Ebr. On Drunkeness

‘Ed. Rabbinic ‘Eduyyot

Eleem. Works and Almsgiving

Eloc. Style

En. Enoch with number 1 or 2 or 3 before

Ep. Epistle

Eph. To the Ephesians

Eph. Tale Ephesian Tale by Xenophon of Ephesus

Epid. Epidemics or Irenaeus, Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching

Epigr. Epigrams

Ep. More. Epistulae morales

‘Erub. Rabbinic ‘Erubin

Esar Esarhaddon Treaty

Esd Apocrypha Esadras with number 1 or 2 before

Esth. Esther

Eth. nic. Ethica nicomachea

EvQ Evangelical Quarterly

EvT Evangelische Theologie

ExAud Ex auditu

Exh. Cast. Exhortation to Chastity

Expl. Dan. Explanatio in Danielem

Exp. S. Pauli epist. Ad Rom. Exposition of Saint Paul Epistle of Romans

ExpTim Expository Times

Fac. Dict. Factorum ac dictorum memorabilium libri or Memorable Deeds and Sayings

Fid. Grat. De fide ad Gratianum

Fin. De finibus

Fiod. op. De fide et operibus

Flaccus Against Flaccus

Frag. Fragment

Frat. Amor De fraterno amore

Fug. De fuga et inventione

GELNT Greek English Lexicon of the New Testament

Geogr. Geographica

Giṭ. Giṭṭin

Good Person Philo, That Every Good Person Is Free

Gos. Gospel as in pseudepigrapha Gospel of Peter or others

Hab. Virg. The Dress of Virgins

Haer. Against Heresies

Ḥag. Rabbinic Ḥagigah

Hall The Hall

HAT Handbuch zum Alten Testament

Heb. Hebrews as in Gospel of the Hebrews

Heir Who Is the Heir?

Her. Quis rerum divinarum heres sit

Herm. Mand. Shepherd of Hermas, Mandates

Herm. Sim. Shepherd of Hermas, Similitudes

Herm. Vis. Shepherd of Hermas, Visions

Hist. History

Hist. Consc. How to write History

Hist. eccl. Histora ecclesiastica or Ecclesiastical History

Hist. plant. Historia plantarum

Hom. Homily

HTR Harvard Theological Review

HUCA Hebrew Union College Annual Int Interpretation

Ḥul. Ḥullin

Hypoth. Hypothetica

ICC International Critical Commentary

Inst. Institutes as: Lactantius, The Divine Institutes or Quintilian, Institutio oratorio

Int Interpretation

Inv. De invention rhetorica

Ioh. A work on John

IRT Issues in Religion and Theology

Is. Os. Isis and Osiris

JAAR Journal of the American Academy of Religion

JAC Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum

JAOS Journal of the American Oriental Society

JBL Journal of Biblical Literature

JBTh Jahrbuch für biblische Theologie (Neukirchener)

Jdt Apocrypha Judith

JETS Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society

JJS Journal of Jewish Studies

JLW Journal of Luther’s Works

JNES Journal of Near Eastern Studies

Jos. On the Life of Joseph

Jos. Asen. Joseph and Aseneth

Josh. Joshua

Jov. Adversus Jovinianum libri II

JRT Journal of Religious Thought

JSJ Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Periods

JSNT Journal for the Study of the New Testament

JSNTSup Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series

JSOT Journal for the Study of the Old Testament

JSOTSup Journal for the Study of the Old Testament: Supplement Series

JSP Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha

JTS Journal of Theological Studies

JTSA Journal of Theology for Southern Africa

Jub. Jubilees

Kel. Rabbinic Kelim

Ketab. Rabbinic Ketubbot

Kgdms Kingdoms in LXX (reflects Hebrew of 1–2 Kgs) preceded by 3 or 4

KTU Keilalphabetische Texte aus Ugarit. Edited by Manfried Dietrich et al.

L.A.B. Liber antiquitatum biblicarum Pseudo-Philo

Lac. Respublica Lacedaemoniorum

L.A.E. Life of Adam and Eve

Lam. Lamentations

LCL Loeb Classical Library

Leg. Leges or Laws: Cicero, De legibus or Philo, Allegorical Interpretation

Life Josephus, The Life, or Philstratus, The Life of Apollonius

LQ Lutheran Quarterly

Luc. Luke or Lucan

Lucil. Ad Lucilium

LW Living Word

LXX Septuagint

Lyc. Lycurgus

m. or M. Mishnah

Macc Apocrypha Maccabees with number 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 before

Magn. To the Magnesians

Mak. Rabbinic Makkot

Marc. Against Marcion or Seneca, Ad Marciam de consolatione

Mart. To the Martyrs

Mart. Pal. The Martyrdom of Palestine

Mart. Pol. Martyrdom of Polycarp

Matt. Matthew

Meg. Rabbinic Megillah

Mek. Rabbinic Mekilta

Mem. Memorabilia

Menaḥ. Rabbinic Menaḥot

Mes. Rabbinic Metzi’a

Midr. Rabbinic Midrash

Migr. On the Migration of Abraham

Mil. Pro Milone

MM Moulton, J. H., and G. Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament. London, 1930.

Mor. Moralia

Mort. The Deaths of the Persecutors

Mos. Moses

Moses On the Life of Moses

MSJ The Master’s Seminary Journal

MT Hebrew Masoretic Text, reflected in Biblica Hebraica Stuttgartensia. Edited by Funditus Renovata et al., 1977.

NAC New American Commentary

Names On the Change of Names

Narr. Narration

Nat. Naturalis historia of Pliny the Elder

Nat. d. De natura deorum

Naz. Rabbinic Nazir

NCB New Century Bible

Ned. Rabbinic Nedarim

Neot Neotestamentica

NICNT New International Commentary on the New Testament

Nid. Rabbinic Niddah

NIDNTT The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology. Edited by Colin Brown.

NIDOTTE New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology & Exegesis. Edited by Willem VanGemeren.

NIGTC New International Greek Testament Commentary

Noc. att. Attic Nights

NovT Novum Testamentum

NovTSup Supplements to Novum Testamentum

NT New Testament

NTOA Novum testamentum et orbis antiquus

NTS New Testament Studies

Num. Numa

Od. Odyssey

Odes Sol. Odes of Solomon

Oec. Economics

Oed. frag. Oedipus fragment

Off. De officiis

’Ohal. Rabbinic ’Ohalot

Ol. Olympian Odes

Oneir. Oneirocritica

Op. Works and Days

Or. Prayer

Orat. Orations

OT Old Testament

Paed. Christ the Educator

Pan. Refutation of All Heresies

Part. or Partitiones oratoriae

Pelag. Adversus Pelaganos dialog III

Pesaḥ. Rabbinic Pesaḥim

Pesiq. Rab Kah. Pesiqta de Rab Kahana

Pet. Peter as in Apocalypse of Peter or Acts of Peter

PG Patrologia graeca. Edited by J.-P. Migne. 161 vols.

Phil. Ignatius or Polycarp, To the Philadelphians

Philops. The Lover of Lies

Phoen. Phoenician Maidens

PL Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina. Edited by J.-P. Migne. 221 vols.

Plant. On Planting

P.Lond. Greek Papyri in the British Museum. Edited by F. G. Kenyon et al,. London, 1893.

P.Mich Greek Papyri in University of Michigan.

Pol. Ignatius, To Polycarp or Aristotle and Martial, Politics

Post. On the Posterity of Caini

P.Oxy. The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. London, 1898–2010.

Pr Azar Apocrypha Prayer of Azariah

Praed. The Predestination of the Saints

Praem. De praemiis et poenis

Praep. ev. Preparation for the Gospel

Praescr. Prescription against Heretics

Princ. First Principles

Pr Man Apocrypha Prayer of Manasseh

Prog. Theon’s Progymnasmata in James Butts’ translation and treatises on it

Ps.-Arist. Pseudo-Aristides

Ps.-Jon. Targum Pseudo-Jonathan

Ps.-Phoc. Pseudo-Phocylides

Pss. Sol. Psalms of Solomon

Pun. Punica

Q within Qumran manuscript (e.g., 11Q132.2 is read as cave#Qdocument numbers #chapter.#verse)

QE Quaestiones et solutions in Exodum

Qidd. Rabbinic Qiddušin

Quint. Fratr. Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem

Rab. Rabbah often with a biblical book, such as Leviticus (Lev)

RB Revue biblique

RBL Review of Biblical Literature

Res. Resurrection of the Flesh

Resp. Republic

Rev. On Revelation

RevExp Review and Expositor

RHA Revue Hittite et asianique

RHE Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique

Rhet. Rhetoric

R. N. De rerum natura

rom. Romanae as in Dionysis, Ant. rom.

Roš Haš. Rabbinic Roš Haššanah

RQ Römische Quartalschrift für christliche Altertumskunde und Kirchengeschichte

RTR Reformed Theological Review

Rust. De re rustica

Šabb. Rabbinic document Šabbat

Sacr. De sacrificiis Abelis et Caini

Sanh. Rabbinic document Sanhedrin

SANT Studien zum Alten und Neuen Testaments

Sat. Satirae

SB Sammelbuch griechisher Urkunden aus Aegypten. Edited by F. Preisigke et al.

SBL Society of Biblical Literature

SBLDS Society of Biblical Literature Dissertations Series

SBLMS Society of Biblical Literature Monograph Series

SBLSP Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers

Scap. To Scapula

Scorp. Antidote for the Scorpion’s Sting

SCS Society of Christian Scholars series (Scholars Press)

Šeb. Rabbinic Šebi‘it

Šebu. Rabbinic Šebu‘ot

Sedr. Sedrach

Sem. Rabbinic Semaḥot

Šeqal. Rabbinic Šeqalim

Serm. Sermon

Sib. Or. Sibyline Oracles

Sir Apocrypha Hebrew Sirach/LXX Ecclesiasticus

Smyrn. To the Smyrnaens

SNTSMS Society for New Testament Monograph Series

Sobr. On Sobriety

Sol. Solomon

Somn. On Dreams

Spec. Laws On the Special Laws

Speech Speech in Character

Str-B Strack and Billerbeck, Kommentar zum Neuen Testament

Strom. Miscellanies

StudBib Studia Biblica

Sull. Sulla

SwJT Southwestern Journal of Theology

Symp. Symposium

t. or T. Tosefta

T. 12 Patr. Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs

T. Abr. Testament of Abraham

T. Benj. Testament of Benjamin

T. Dan. Testament of Daniel

T. Hez. Testament of Hezekiah

T. Hos. Testament of Hosea

T. Isaac Testament of Isaac

T. Iss. Testament of Issachar

T. Job Testament of Job

T. Jud. Testament of Judah

T. Levi Testament of Levi

T. Mos. Testament of Moses

T. Naph. Testament of Naphtali

T. Sim. Testament of Simeon

Ṭ. Yom Rabbinic Ṭebul Yom

T. Zeb. Testament of Zebulum

Ta‘an. Rabbinic Ta‘anit

Tan. Rabbinic Tanḥuma

TB Theologische Bücherei: Neudrucke und Berichte aus dem 20. Jahrhundert.

TDNT Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Edited by Gerhard Kittel and Gerhard Friedrich.

TDOT Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament. Edited by G. Johannes Botterweck and Helmer Ringgren.

Test. To Quirinius: Testomonies against the Jews

Tg. Targum

Tg. 1 Chr. Targum of 1 Chronicles

Tg. Isa. Targum Isaiah as an Early Jewish commentary on Isaiah

Tg. Jon. Targum Jonathan

Tg. Neof. Targum Neofiti

Tg. Ps.-J. Targum Pseudo-Jonathan

Ṭhar. Rabbinic Ṭhearot

Them. Themistocles

Theoph. Divine Manifestation

Thom. Thomas as in Gospel of Thomas

Tim. Plato’s Timaeus or Aeschines’ In Timarchum

TNTC Tyndale New Testament Commentaries

Tob Apocrypha Tobit

Top. Topica

TQ Theologische Quartalschrift

Trall. To the Trallians

Tranq. an. De tranquillitate animi

TRev Theologische Revue

Trin. Trinity or in Latin, Trinitate

TrinJ Trinity Journal

TRu Theologische Rundschau

TS Theological Studies

TSK Theologische Studien und Kritiken

TU Texte und Untersuchungen

TWOT Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament. Edited by R. Laird Harris et al.

TynBul Tyndale Bulletin

USQR Union Seminary Quarterly Review

Val. Max. Valerius Maximus

VC Vigilae christianae

Verr. In Verrem

Vesp. Vespasianus

Vir. ill. De viris illustribus

Virt. De virtutibus

Vis. Isa. Ascension of Isaiah

VT Vetus Testamentum

VTE Succession Treaty of Esarhaddon

VTSup Supplements to Vetus Testamentum

War Josephus, Jewish War

WBC Word Biblical Commentary

Wis Apocrypha Wisdom of Solomon

Worse Philo, That the Worse Attacks the Better

WTJ Westminster Theological Journal

WUNT Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament

Y. or y. Jerusalem Talmud

Yad. Rabbinic Yadayim

Yebam. Rabbinic Yebamot

ZA Zeitschrift für Assyriologie

ZAW Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft

ZNW Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der ältern Kirche

ZRGG Zeitschrift für Religions und Geistesgeschichte

ZST Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie

ZTK Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche

1

Lost Boy or Foundation for Christian Theology

The early church considered Peter to be the foundation for apostolic Christian tradition. Stating this, J. N. D. Kelley identified, St. Peter is the starting point of apostolic tradition and the symbol of unity for the church.¹ For example, the Gospels always list Peter as first apostle (Matt 10:2–4 even uses πρῶτος first to refer to Peter; Mark 3:13–19; Luke 6:13–16; Acts 1:13). The Gospels, Acts, and the early church declare Peter to be repeatedly the spokesman for the apostles (Matt 14:28; 15:15; 16:16–19; 18:21; 26:35, 40; Mark 8:29; 9:5; 10:28; John 6:68; Acts 1:15; 2:14; 3:4, 12; 4:8; 5:3, 8; 8:20; 10:9—11:18; 15:7)² and one of three within the core disciple band (Matt 17:1; 26:37; Mark 5:37; 9:2; 13:3: Luke 9:28). Paul and Clement of Rome declared Peter to be one of the pillars of the church, along with Jesus’ brother James and John Zebedee (Gal 2:9).³ On the basis of Jesus’ commission of Peter in Matt 16 and the record of the book of Acts, much of the early church declared Peter to be the foundation for the church.⁴ The Orthodox Church considers Peter as foundation for the church, undergirding apostolic tradition and patriarchy of Syria and Rome.⁵ This is the starting point that later gets spun in the Roman Catholic Church grounding Peter as the first pope, possessing the keys of the kingdom with Jesus Christ as the foundation, but before that doctrine emerges, many in the church considered Peter to be the foundation. Either way, Peter certainly laid the foundation for the church universal as Ignatius claimed.⁶ Didymus declared Peter to be the leader and chief among the apostles.⁷ Philip Schaff summarized this sentiment of Peter being the church’s chief actor to ground the apostolic tradition, Peter was the chief actor in the first stage of apostolic Christianity and fulfilled the prophecy of his name in laying the foundation of the church among the Jews and the Gentiles.⁸ Mature scholarly biographers of Peter, such as Pheme Perkins concur, Peter is the universal ‘foundation’ for all the churches. . . . There is no figure who compasses more of that diversity than Peter.⁹ F. J. Foakes-Jackson concluded, the very fact that Peter was singled out by the unanimous voice of the writers of the N.T. for pre-eminence is sufficient reason why he should demand our serious attention.¹⁰ From this foundational bridge position, Martin Hengel begins to make integrated attempts toward a Petrine theology.¹¹ Martin Hengel and Larry Hurtado conclude that Peter has a particular theological competence to contribute to the field of biblical theology.¹² This book brings together a theological construction to reflect the biblical claims from biblical and early patristic sources expressing Peter’s voice.

In later patristics, the historical Peter became less the focus and traditional appropriation of a Peter of faith moved to the fore to ground Roman Catholic doctrines, such as the papacy retaining Peter’s leadership for the church. With Protestantism taking up Paul as their patron apostle, Peter gets lost behind Roman Catholic tradition. An example is that Martin Luther shifts from loving Peter’s spiritual contributions as the noblest books of the New Testament to that of hating the Roman Catholic use of a tradition of Peter to support the papacy.¹³ To reflect this transition, Gene Green used a metaphor from J. M. Barrie’s novel Peter Pan to declare Peter as one of the lost boys of Christian theology.¹⁴ For example, NT theologies often exclude Petrine theology altogether, namely: Rudolf Bultmann, Udo Schnelle, Adolf Schlatter, and Greg Beale.¹⁵ This neglect of Peter to neverland became a motive for Green to try to put together part of a theology for Peter.

With the rise of later biblical criticism, Petrine theology fragmented, and viewed within those fragments it has become viewed as warmed-over Paulinist, and thus both irretrievable and largely irrelevant. For example, Francis Beare analyzed parallels among Peter and Paul’s contributions and concluded that 1 Pet is strongly marked by the impress of Pauline theological ideas, and in language the dependance on St. Paul is undeniably great. All through the Epistle we have the impression that we are reading the work of a man who is steeped in the Pauline letters.¹⁶ In contrast, Goppelt made a similar analysis and concluded that many of these shared themes actually were from paraenetic sections sharing wisdom that Jesus’ teachings or Jewish wisdom, such that he concluded concerning a relationship between Peter and Paul, there can be no mention of any literary dependence.¹⁷ It is probably better to view Petrine theology as providing a bridge from Jesus' ministry to that of Paul’s.

Peter Davids, making major contributions to Petrine theology, mostly described the separate theologies of 1 Pet and 2 Pet, summarizing that many major Pauline themes are missing from 1 Pet:

Many of the major Pauline themes are missing from

1

Peter. Faith, justification, and works are not an issue for

1

Peter, much less specific works of the law such as circumcision and Jewish festivals, which are so important for Paul. First Peter does not use ekklesia (ἐκκλησία, church), which is also important for Paul. While both Paul and

1

Peter discuss election, the discussion in

1

Pet

2

:

4–10

is much different than that in Rom

11

:

26–29

, nor does Paul ever cite Exod

19

:

6

, which is central to

1

Peter’s discussion. When Paul talks about gifts, he associates them with the Spirit, but Peter makes no mention of the Spirit in his discussion about gifts. Finally, the list of terms and ideas that are important to

1

Peter and not found in Paul or important to Paul and not found in

1

Peter is significant.¹⁸

This provides a warning so that an interpreter should not read Paul onto the text, but rather understand meaning within Peter’s context.

Furthermore, splintering Petrine theology fosters so many biblical theologies discussing Petrine attributed works divided into theologies of 1 Pet and of 2 Pet, separated by different vocabulary and expression. Additionally, often one of these sources is considered to not be from Peter, and thus removed from consideration. Rarely is the broad patristic claim considered for Mark within the Petrine corpus which won this Gospel’s canonicity. Recently Gene Green has made a valiant case for Mark’s inclusion while separating Peter’s theology into: 1 Pet, Mark, and Peter imbedded in Gospels and Acts. Green leaves 2 Pet excluded from Petrine theology, though he acknowledged that Peter likely wrote that epistle that claims him as author, that the majority of the global church considers Peter wrote the epistle, and there is not sufficient warrant to reject Peter as author.¹⁹ Additionally, Ralph Martin indicated that, probably no document in the N.T. is so theological as 1 Peter, if ‘theological’ is taken in the strict sense of teaching about God.²⁰ Joel Green extends this thought with 1 Peter is about God and the ramifications of orienting life wholly around him.²¹ Occasionally, the Petrine statements from the book of Acts and the Gospels are folded in to inform a theology of Peter, but this approach is more common among those exploring the early history of the church than those who explore biblical theology.

Ferdinand C. Baur and the Tübingen school followed G. W. F. Hegel’s concept of evolving religion dividing Christianity into thesis-Peter’s Jewish Christianity in Acts, countered by antithesis-Paul’s gentile Christianity that becomes synthesized in second-century traditional Christianity (including Petrine epistles seen through Pauline interpretations). My previous critique of Hegel presented Hegel’s thesis, antithesis, and synthesis as contradictory and thus unable to be fused into a meaningful synthesis.²² When the Tübingen school followed Baur’s lead to develop that Christianity developed from Judaism before it universalized under Paul, early Christianity ended up not following Hegel into the early church tradition, but returning to its Protestant bias for Pauline theology, and cutting adrift selective aspects of Peter for Roman Catholics to prooftext their claims. Peter and Paul were not oppositional in their ministries as Baur developed from Gal 2:7. Thus, when Protestant scholars read 1 Pet they tend to read it through a warmed-over Paulinist lens, and Jewish forms of Christianity got lost as an echo of Paul. Of course, Peter is far more complex than Jewish Christianity,²³ since he wins the first gentiles to Christ and writes 1 and 2 Pet primarily to gentile Christians.

Lutz Doering documents recovery of Petrine studies from this anti-Pauline restrictive bumbler and from warmed-over Paulism to a bridge figure and symbol of unity.²⁴ For example, James Dunn celebrated, Peter was probably in fact and effect the bridge-man (pontifex maximus!) who did more than any other to hold together the diversity of first-century Christianity.²⁵ Peter serves as the outstanding bridge from the oral apostolic witness to that of the foundational written witness.

The Gospels and Acts were witness expressed through an oral phase, more authoritative than written texts. Perhaps recognizing that the disciples were called to be this oral-witnesses (Luke 24:48; Acts 1:8, μάρτυρες). Such a role of witness is one of memory and testimony from personal experience. As such, the subject matter to which a witness testifies is not likely to be submitted to empirical investigation because the events and statement of views occurred previously as testimony (Matt 8:4; 18:16).²⁶ In a Hebrew trial setting multiple oral witnesses were involved to strengthen credibility (Deut 17:6; 19:15). If the witnesses prove to be contradicted credibly then they were considered a false witness and could suffer the same judgment that they were trying to obtain for the one accused (Deut 5:20; 19:16–18). In the Greco-Roman legal system, a witness needed to be an adult free male Roman citizen with honorable reputation and not operating for personal gain.²⁷ Such a witness would make appropriate comments in court as eyewitness testimony he had actually experienced.²⁸ With legal imagery encouraging the credibility of the role of a witness, Papias found the collective memory of Christian eyewitness testimony to be more valuable than the written texts being produced for as long as available eyewitnesses testified about Jesus’ ministry and the early church.

I shall not hesitate also to put into properly ordered form for you everything I learned carefully in the past from the elders and noted down well, for the truth of which I vouch. For unlike most people I did not enjoy those who have a great deal to say, but those who teach the truth. Nor did I enjoy those who recall someone else’s commandments, but those who remember the commandments given by the Lord to the faith and proceeding from the truth itself. And if by chance anyone who had been in attendance on the elders should come my way, I inquired about the words of the elders—[that is] what [according to the elders] Andrew or Peter said, or Philip, or Thomas or James, or John or Matthew or any other of the Lord’s disciples, and whatever Ariston and the elder John, the Lord’s disciples were saying. For I did not think that information from books would profit me as much as information from a living and surviving voice.²⁹

In the second century both Irenaeus and Papias recount that their early memories of the eyewitness testimony took great prominence and were in full accord with the written texts of Scripture.³⁰ Similar claims for accurate vivid early memories framing later perception were made by Seneca the elder.³¹ When such testimony occurred in Christian contexts a corporate memory of tradition could be specifically identified and the others of the group would provide a resilience to reinforce the accuracy of their corporate memory.³² Such a pattern mirrors the corporate memory of rabbinic Judaism that began to establish written accounts of their oral discussions beginning around AD 200 with the Mishnah and then the two corroborating written accounts of the Talmud later around 450 and AD 600. Such Jewish oral tradition and written oral tradition shows very little shift of account except the addition of more recent rabbinic voices.³³ Also, in Judaism there was liturgical retelling of narrative in rabbah texts composed during the second to fourth centuries, which resiliently re-tell the biblical narratives for liturgical purposes. The resilience and consistency in the agreement of these written accounts of oral Torah or narrative re-telling provide a pattern for how local Jewish-Christian corporate eyewitness memory could be corporately preserved into written texts of Gospels and Acts.

From such eyewitness testimony, Markus Bockmuehl develops The Remembered Peter as arguably the only major player to feature in the ministries of both Jesus and Paul; and on any reckoning he provides a vital personal continuity between them both.³⁴ Bockmuehl encouraged use of techniques of the Jewish affirming side of the third quest for the historical Jesus and that of the dialog around the new perspective concerning Paul. Bockmuehl anticipated that reflection on Peter will provide significant benefit in understanding the transition from Jesus’ exclusive mission to Israel (Matt 10:5–6) to Paul’s mission to the gentiles (Acts 9:15; 22:21; 26:17). As such, Petrine theology becomes another planet between Jesus³⁵ and Pauline³⁶ studies, with lesser moons such as a theology of James,³⁷ Heb,³⁸ and Luke³⁹ circling.

Though Petrine theology has gone through an era of neglect,⁴⁰ Peter has theological expression that both fits his time and makes significant contributions to the field of biblical theology. For example, Martin Hengel declared Peter to be the Underestimated Apostle.⁴¹ It is time for Peter’s voice to be heard.

Most Petrine theology treats the contributing units as independent of each other: a theology of 1 Pet, a theology of 2 Pet, sometimes contributions from Peter in Mark or Acts. However, the field of biblical theology is admitting more honestly to a methodology construct from a point of view.⁴² Rarely have these glimpses of Petrine theology been integrated into a unified construct, as the current work before you will attempt to accomplish. Separating Peter into a theology of his sources fragments his theology and diminishes the integrated depth of theology that Peter contributes. Gene Green grants that Peter’s voice is contained within Mark and allows the Gospel to continue to contribute to a composite of Peter’s theology.⁴³ However, Green’s theology of Peter does not interact with 2 Pet, even though he inclines to accept Petrine authorship, because he considered his engagement to be a large enough task already and the academic disagreement over authorship.⁴⁴ Green concluded his synthesis of Peter by recognizing that his unified construct only skims the surface of the apostle’s thought as it has come down to us in the various Petrine sources.⁴⁵ Larry Helyer extends the synthesis a bit further in recognizing the heart focuses on Peter’s two epistles as the primary content, but interacting with the leading theme of 1 Pet as it appears in the Gospel of Mark and Peter’s speeches in the book of Acts.⁴⁶ Helyer added 2 Pet to his Petrine theology, even though he acknowledged many scholars consider it written by someone other than the author of 1 Pet. In both Green’s and Helyer’s approach the separate epistles, Gospel of Mark, and Peter’s speeches contribute separate gems for their collage of theologies of Peter,⁴⁷ thus creating a theology of Petrine sources. The construct of the present volume attempts to go further by providing a more detailed engagement integrating each source to unify a Petrine theology as well as interacting with depth and complexity rather than merely skimming the sources.

Kennard’s Petrine Theology has the basic integrated chapters to reflect the standard biblical theological discussion of Peter’s theology, with its many contributions: Peter’s Jewish heritage, compatible sovereignty and free will, high Christology, missional Trinity, Hebraic anthropology, Jewish atonement, redemption and new exodus, Gospel as allegiance to Christ, contextual sociological ecclesiology, suffering and spiritual warfare in a narrow virtuous exodus way to kingdom, and nuanced consistent eschatology. However, due to the size of the study, a companion book, Petrine Studies, was also composed to discuss: foundational issues (which sources can be demonstrated to be Petrine, and recipients and form of Peter’s letters), a brief biography of Peter, Peter’s communal revelational testimony and empirical evidentialist epistemology, Markan sociological issues to extend Peter’s concept of the church into relevant life concerns (such as tradition, inclusion of gentiles, divorce and wealth), and Markan historical issues concerning Jesus’ death and resurrection. Narrative theology contributions are especially provided by chapters developing Peter’s biography, the Markan section of Exodus Following Jesus to Kingdom Virtues, and Jesus’ Historical Death and Resurrection. Originally, both books were composed to reflect a fully integrated Petrine theology, supporting and playing off each other. However, for the reader’s ease the work was divided into integrated companion volumes: Petrine Theology and Petrine Studies. The topic of a Petrine theology entails both volumes, though Petrine Theology contains the primary trajectory, with Petrine Studies providing important support material to complete a Petrine theology project.

Green expressed the value of such an integrated Petrine theology. For example, he summarized Peter’s theology as the grounding for the early church.

Peter’s theology is, in the end very much the theology of the early church. At various points we encounter unique contributions to early Christian theologizing, such as the apostle’s discussion of Christian theologizing, such as the apostle’s discussion of Christ’s proclamation to the spirits in prison (

1

Pet

3

:

18–22

) and his affirmation that if Israel repents, times of refreshing will arrive from the presence of the Lord, and then God will send the Messiah appointed for you, that is Jesus (Acts

3

:

19–20

).⁴⁸

Green continues to encourage Petrine theology to be valued in prime place.

Peter stands at the very beginning of Christian theology. May the lost boy of Christian theology find his rightful place at the table once again. But if we look closely, we will see that he has been seated at the head of the table all along.⁴⁹

1

. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines,

205

.

2

. John Chrysostom, Hom.

2

Tim

3

:

1

4

; Cyril of Alexandria, In Ioh.

1

:

42

; De trin. dial.

4

; Theodoret, Quaest In Gen. interp.

110

; In Ps.

2

.

3

. Clement of Rome,

1

Cor

5

.

4

. Cyril of Alexandria, In Ioh.

1

:

42

; In Luc 22

:

32

; Epiphanius, Ancor.

9

; Maximus the Confessor, Vita accert

24

; Cyprian, Ep. Of Cyprian

54

.

7

;

70

.

3

;

72

.

11

;

74

.

16

; Treatise of Cyprian

1

.

2

.

5

. Photius, PG

120

.

800

B; Palamas, Trials

2

.

1

.

38

; Meyendorff et al., Primacy of Peter.

6

. Ign. Magn.

10

:

9

.

7

. Didymus, De trin.

1

.

30

.

8

. Schaff, History of Christian Church,

1

:

96

.

9

. Perkins, Peter,

184

; Hengel, Saint Peter,

79–80