Under the third slab, a person earning over Rs150,000 per month but less than Rs208,333.33 is
liable to pay a fixed amount of Rs7,500 and 15% of the amount exceeding Rs150,000 from the next fiscal year.
'We will hold them also administratively
liable dahil trabaho ng DOE yan, trabaho ng ERC yan, at dapat aksyunan, hindi 'yung puro recommendation at research.
In the dispositive portion of the 186-page decision, however, the court said that the "accused are solidarily and jointly
liable to return" to the National Treasury P124.5 million.
For employers to be
liable for the acts committed by employees, there must be a sufficient connection between those wrongs and the employee's employment that would deem it fair to hold the employer
liable, irrespective of what the employer may or may not have done.
Accordingly, a parent cannot be criminally
liable for an offence committed by her or his child and vice versa.
If convicted with an offence, you shall be
liable to imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than two years and not more than twenty years, and with whipping, and shall also be
liable to a fine.
In a decision on the automatic review of the notice of disallowance issued by audit bodies, the three-man COA Commission Proper stated that PNCC is not a private firm as claimed by those held
liable, but a government corporation which can be subjected to audit by COA.
In all cases, the supplier remains
liable for accounting for the tax and paying it to the FTA.
Also, e-commerce operators, who were
liable to be registered under clause (ix) of Section 24 of the CGST / SGST Act, 2017 will not be
liable to do so until the provision of 'Tax Collection at Source' is enforced.
They can be held personally
liable provided that the injured person can prove that their conduct was either negligent or intentional.
The companies are
liable for a total of $1.2M in civil penalties.
A federal court in Arizona has agreed with a growing number of jurisdictions that a franchisor is vicariously
liable for the actions of its franchisee only if the franchisor exerts control over the very instrumentality that caused the alleged harm.
There is, however, a string of cases starting in the 19th Century in which a person could be
liable without any fault on their part, if he brings an exceptionally dangerous thing on to his property, the use of the property is unusual and the dangerous thing escapes and damages other property.
